tahmin edilen regresyon sonuçlar›, afl›r› yüksek ya da düflük getiri oranlar›n›n yatay
kesit de¤iflkenli¤i azaltmad›¤›, dolay›s›yla do¤rusal modellerin uygulanmas›n›n olas›
sürü etkisinin ortaya ç›karamayabilece¤ini göstermifltir. Bu nedenle bir di¤er yaklafl›-
m›n uygulanmas›yla ‹MKB’de gerek yükselifl yönünde, gerekse düflüfl yönünde piya-
sa yönünde sürü davran›fl›n›n var oldu¤u, ancak getiri oranlar› ile yatay kesit de¤ifl-
kenlik aras›ndaki iliflkinin do¤rusal olmad›¤› sonucuna var›lm›flt›r. ‹MKB’de piyasa yö-
nünde sürü davran›fl›n›n geçerli oldu¤una dair elde edilen bu bulgular inceleme kap-
sam›na al›nan Hizmetler, Mali, S›nai ve Yat›r›m Ortakl›l›klar› sektörleri için de geçer-
lidir.
Çal›flma kapsam›ndaki ikinci analiz ise Hwang ve Salmon (2004)’un metodolojisi-
nin uygulanmas› ile yap›lm›flt›r. Sürü davran›fl›n›n belirlenmesi için getiri oranlar›n›n
yatay kesit de¤iflkenli¤i yerine varl›k fiyatlar›nda de¤iflikli¤e neden olan “temel” ne-
denlerden kaynaklanan birlikte hareket etkisinin d›fllanmas› için beta katsay›lar›n›n
yatay kesit de¤iflkenli¤i incelenmifl ve zaman boyunca sürü davran›fl›n›n de¤iflimi ana-
liz edilmifltir. Elde edilen bulgular Ocak 2000-fiubat 2008 dönemi içinde ‹MKB’de sü-
rü davran›fl›n›n genel bir e¤ilim oldu¤unu, Kas›m 2000 ve fiubat 2001 krizlerinin ya-
fland›¤› dönemde sürü ölçüsünün teori ile uyumlu olarak düflük seviyelerde oldu¤u
ve dolay›s›yla sürü davran›fl›n›n kuvvetli oldu¤unu, ancak Aral›k 2003-Nisan 2004 ve
May›s-Ekim 2006 dönemlerinde piyasa yönünde sürü davran›fl›n›n var oldu¤unun
%95 güven düzeyinde söylenemeyece¤i yönündedir. Sektörel inceleme sonucunda
ise tüm sektörlerde piyasa yönünde sürü davran›fl›n›n güçlü oldu¤unun söylenebile-
ce¤i sonucuna var›lm›flt›r.
Sermaye piyasalar›ndan beklenen faydalar›n elde edilebilmesi için piyasalar›n etkin
ve yat›r›mc›lar›n rasyonel olmas›, fiyatlar›n geçerli bilgiye dayal› olarak yat›r›mc›lar›n de-
¤erlendirmeleri do¤rultusunda oluflarak kaynak da¤›l›m› etkinli¤i vas›tas›yla genel eko-
nomik refaha katk›da bulunmas› gerekmektedir. Oysa sürü davran›fl› fleklinde ortaya
ç›kabilecek etkinsizliklerin varl›¤›, ne tür bir nedenden dolay› ortaya ç›kt›¤›na ba¤l› ola-
rak bir yandan bilgisel d›flsall›¤a neden olurken di¤er yandan da ücret d›flsall›¤›na ne-
den olabilmektedir. Sürü davran›fl›n›n irrasyonel nedenlerden ortaya ç›kmas› da piya-
sa fiyatlar›n›n olmas› gerekenden farkl› gerçekleflmesine neden olmakta ve etkinsizli-
¤e yol açmaktad›r. ‹MKB’de sürü davran›fl›n›n varl›¤›na dair bulgulara ulafl›lmas›,
‹MKB’de ifllem yapan yat›r›mc›lar›n da kiflisel bilgi ve de¤erlendirmelerine dayal› olarak
yat›r›m karar› vermek yerine di¤er yat›r›mc›lar›n yat›r›m kararlar›n› taklit ettikleri, dola-
y›s›yla d›flsall›k ve etkinsizliklere neden olarak piyasan›n olmas› gerekti¤i gibi fiyatlama
ve kaynak da¤›l›m› fonksiyonlar›n› yetine getiremedi¤ini göstermektedir.
53
Sermaye Piyasas›nda Sürü Davran›fl›:
‹MKB’de Piyasa Yönünde Sürü Davran›fl›n›n Analizi
Elde edilen bulgular, gerek geliflmifl, gerekse geliflmekte olan piyasalarda elde edi-
len bulgularla birlikte de¤erlendirildi¤inde de literatür ile uyumlu sonuçlara ulafl›ld›¤›
söylenebilir. Özellikle Wang ve Canela (2006)’n›n 21 farkl› ülke sermaye piyasas›nda
yapt›¤› çal›flmada ulafl›lan sonuçlar, geliflmekte olan piyasalarda sürü davran›fl›n›n ge-
liflmifl ülkelere göre daha güçlü oldu¤unu göstermektedir. Bir baflka çal›flmada
Hwang ve Salmon (2001a), ABD, ‹ngiltere ve Güney Kore sermaye piyasalar›nda da
sürü davran›fl›n›n geçerli bir olgu oldu¤una dair bulgulara ulaflm›flt›r. Tan
et.al.(2008)’›n yapt›klar› çal›flmada Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti sermaye piyasalar›nda da
sürü davran›fl›n varl›¤›na dair sonuçlara ulafl›lmas›, ‹MKB’de elde edilen bulgular›n bir-
çok sermaye piyasas›nda görülen bir olgunun iflareti oldu¤u sonucunu desteklemek-
tedir.
54
Erdinç Altay
55
Sermaye Piyasas›nda Sürü Davran›fl›:
‹MKB’de Piyasa Yönünde Sürü Davran›fl›n›n Analizi
Kaynakça
1.
Ashiya, M. ve Doi, T. (2001). Herd Behavior of Japanese Economists,
Journal of
Economic Behavior and Organisation,46:343-346.
2.
Banerjee, A. (1992). A Simple Model for Herd Behavior,
Quarterly Journal of
Economics,107: 797-817.
3.
Banerjee, A ve Fudenberg, D. (2004). World-of-Mouth Learning,
Games and
Economic Behavior, 46:1-23.
4.
Beckman, D., Menkoff, L. ve Suto, M. (2008). Does Culture Influence Asset MA-
nagers’ Views and Behavior?,
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,
forthcoming.
5.
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D. ve Welch, I. (1992). A Theory of Fads, Fashion,
Custom and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades,
Journal of Political
Economy, 100: 992-1026.
6.
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D. ve Welch, I. (1996). Information Cascades and
Rational Herding: An Annotated Bibliography. Working Paper: UCLA/Anderson
and Ohio State University and Yale/SOM.
7.
Bikhchandi, S. ve Sharma, S. (2000). Herd Behavior in Financial Markets: A Re-
view,
working paper, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2000/
wp0048.pdf,
IMF Staff Papers, WP/00/48, (Eriflim tarihi: 05.03.2007).
8.
Bikhchandi, S. ve Sharma, S. (2001). Herd Behavior in Financial Markets,
wor-
king paper, http://www.imf.org/External/ Pubs/FT/staffp/2001/01/pdf/bikh-
chan.pdf,
IMF Staff Papers, 47.
9.
Brunnermeier, M.K. (2001).
Asset Pricing under Asymmetric Information: Bubb-
les, Crashes, Technical Analysis and Herding, Oxford University Press Inc., New
York.
10. Buguk, C. ve Brorsen, B. W. (2003). Testing weak-form market efficiency: Evi-
dence from the Istanbul Stock Exchange,
International Review of Financial
Analysis, 12:579-590.
11. Bulow, J., Geankoplos, J. ve Klemperer, P. (1985). Multimarket Oligopoly: Stra-
tegic Substitutes and Complements,
Journal of Political Economy,93 (3):488-
511.
12. Caparrelli, F., D’Arcangelis, A.M. ve Cassuto , A. (2004). Herding in the Italian
Stock Market: A Case of Behavioral Finance,
Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5:
222-230.
13. Chang, E.C., Cheng, J.W. ve Khorana, A. (2000). An Examination of Herd Be-
havior in Equity Markets: An International Perspective,
Journal of Banking and
Finance, 24:1651-1679.
14. Chevalier J.A. ve Ellison, G.. (1999). Career Concerns of Mutual Fund Mana-
gers,
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114:389-432.
15. Choe, H., Kho, B.C. ve Stulz, R.M. (1999). Do Foreign Investors Destabilize
Stock Markets? The Korean Experience in 1997,
Journal of Financial Economics,
54:227-264.
16. Choi J.P. (1997). Herd Behavior, he ‘Penguin Effect’ and the Suppression of In-
formational Diffusion: An Analysis of Informational Externalities and Payoff In-
terdependency,
Rand Journal of Economics, 28:407-425.
17. Chung, R. ve Kryzanowsky, L. (1999). Accuracy of Concensus Expectations for
Top-Down Earnings Per Share Forecasts for Two S&P Indexes,
Applied Financi-
al Economics, 9:233-238.
18. Christie, W.G.. ve Huang, R.D. (1995). Following the Pied Piper: Do Individual Re-
turns Herd Around the Market?,
Financial Analysts Journal, July-August: 31-37.
19. Clement, M.B. ve Senyo, Y.T. (2005). Financial Analyst Characteristics and Her-
ding Behavior in Forecasting,
The Journal of Finance, 60:307-341.
20. Çelen, B. ve Kariv, S. (2001). Distinguishing Informational Cascades from Herd
Behavior in the Laboratory,
working paper, New York University,
http://cess.nyu.edu/0003:2001-10.pdf, (Eriflim tarihi: 06.03.2007).
21. Çelen, B. ve Kariv, S. (2004). Observational Learning under Imperfect Informa-
tion,
Games and Economic Behavior, 47:72-86.
22. Dassiou, X. (1999). The Impact of Signal Dependence and Own a¤abeylity
Awereness on Herding Behaviour: A Tale of Two Managers,
Managerial and
Decision Economics, 20:379-395.
23. Devenow, A. ve Welch, I. (1996). Rational Herding in Financial Markets,
Euro-
pean Economic Review, 40:603-615.
24. Döm, S. (2003).
Yat›r›mc› Psikolojisi, De¤iflim Yay›nlar›, ‹stanbul.
25. Ferson, W.E. ve Schadt, R.W. (1996). Measuring Fund Strategy and Performan-
ce in Changing Economic Conditions,
Joural of Finance, 51: 425-461.
26. Graham, J.R. (1999). Herding among Investment Newsletters: Theory and Evi-
dence,
Journal of Finance, 54: 237-268.
27. Hirshleifer, D. ve Teoh, S.H. (2001). Herd Behavior and Cascading in Capital
Markets: A Review and Synthesis,
MPRA paper no:5186 (http://mpra.ub.uni-
muenchen.de/5186/.
28. Hong, H., Kubik, J.D. ve Solomon, A. (2000). Security Analysts Career Concerns
and Herding of Earnings Forecasts,
RAND Journal of Economics, 31: 121-144.
29. Huang, B.N. (1995). Do Asian Stock Market Prices Follow Random Walks? Evi-
dence from the Variance Ratio Test,
Applied Financial Economics, 5:251-256.
56
Erdinç Altay
30. Hwang, S. ve Salmon, M. (2001a). A New Measure of Herding and Empirical
Evidence,
CUBS Financial Econometrics working Paper No: WP01-3,
http://ssrn.com/abstract=299919, (Eriflim tarihi: 05.03.2007 ).
31. Hwang, S. ve Salmon, M. (2001b). Market Stress and Herding,
Journal of Em-
pirical Finance, 11: 585-616.
32. Kahn, R.N. (2004). What Investors can Learn from a Very Alternative Market,
Financial Analysts Journal, 60: 17-20.
33. Kahneman, D. ve Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision
Under Risk,
Econometrica, 47: 263-291.
34. Kultti, K. ve Miettinen, P. (2006). Herding with Costly Information,
Internatio-
nal Game Theory Review, 8: 21-31.
35. Lakanishok, J., Shleifer, A. ve Vishny R.W. (1992). The Impact of Institutional
Trading on Stock Prices,
Journal of Financial Economics, 32: 23-43.
36. Lamont, O.A. (2002). Macroeconomic Forecasts and Microeconomic Forecas-
ters, 48: 265-280.
37. Tan, Lin, Chiang, T.C., Mason J.R. ve Nelling E. (2008). Herding behavior in Chi-
nese stock markets: An examination of A and B shares,
Pacific-Basin Finance Jo-
urnal, 16:61-77.
38. Löffler, G.. (1998). Biasis in Analysts Forecasts:Cognitive, Strategic or Second
Best?,
International Journal of Forecasting, 14: 261-275.
39. Morris, S. ve Shin, H.S. (1999). Risk Management with Interdepedent Choice,
Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 15 (3): 52-62.
40. Park, A. ve Sabourian, H. (2006). Herd Behavior in Efficient Financial Markets,
working paper, http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~apark/papers/herding.pdf,
(Eriflim tarihi: 05.03.2007 ).
41. Persaud, A. (2000). Sending the Herd off the Cliff Edge: The Disturbing Interac-
tion between Herding and Market-Sensitive Risk Management Practices, in
Jac-
ques de Larosiere Essays on Global Finance, Washington: Institute of Interna-
tional Finance.
42. Pons, J. (2003). Strategic Bias, Herding Behaviour and Economic Forecasts,
Jo-
urnal of Forecasting, 22: 67-77.
43. Prechter, R.R.(2001). Unconcscious Herding Behavior as the Psychological Basis
of Financial Market Trends and Patterns,
The Journal of Psychology and Finan-
cial Markets, 2 (3): 120-125.
44. Prendergast, C. ve Stole, L. (1996). Impetuous Youngters and Jaded Old-Ti-
mers: Acquiring a Reputation for Learning,
Journal of Political Economy, 104
(6): 1105-1134.
57
Sermaye Piyasas›nda Sürü Davran›fl›:
‹MKB’de Piyasa Yönünde Sürü Davran›fl›n›n Analizi
45. Scharfstein, D. ve Stein, J. (1990). Herd Behavior and Investment,
American
Economic Review, 80: 465-479.
46. Shiller, R.J. (1990). Investor Behavior in the October 1987 Stock Market Crash:
Survey Evidence, in
Market Volatility, Cambridge: Massachusetts: MIT Press.
47. Suto, M. ve Toshino, M. (2005). Behavioural Biases of Japanese Institutional In-
vestors: Fund Management and Corporate Governance,
Corporate Governan-
ce, 13: 466-477.
48. Trueman, B. (1994). Analyst Forecast and Herding Behavior,
Review of Financi-
al Studies, 7: 97-124.
49. Urritia, J.L. (1995). Tests of Random-Walk and Market Efficiency for Latin Ame-
rican Emerging Markets,
Journal of Financial Research, 18:299-309.
50. Wang, D. ve Canela, M. (2006). Herd Behavior towards the Market Index: Evi-
dence from 21 Financial Markets,
working paper, http://www.fma.org/Barce-
lona/Papers/ Herding_towards_the_market_index.pdf , (Eriflim tarihi:
05.03.2007).
51. Welch, I. (1992). Sequental Sales, Learning and Cascades,
Journal of Finance,
47: 695-732.
52. Welch, I. (2000). Herding among Security Analysts,
Journal of Financial Econo-
mics, 58: 369-396.
53. Wermers, R. (1995). Herding, Trade Reversals, and Cascading by Institutional
Investors,
working paper: University of Colorado, Boulder.
54. Worthington, A. C. ve Higgs, H. (2003). “Tests of random walks and market ef-
ficiency in Latin American stock markets: An empirical note”, Discussion Paper
No. 157. Technical Report, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland Uni-
versity of Technology.
55. Zweibel, J. (1995). “Corporate Conservatism and Relative Compensation”,
Jour-
nal of Political Economy, 103 (1): 1-25.
58
Erdinç Altay
Dostları ilə paylaş: |