26
T.Khalilova
implications and adherent meanings that establish invisible links
throughout the text and
create a kind of semantic background so that the work is laced with certain kind of
imagery.
Lexical ties relevant to this kind of analysis will include synonymous and
antonymous relations, morphological derivation, relations of inclusion (various types of
hyponymy and entailment), commonsemes in the denotative or connotative meanings of
different words.
If a word manifests semantic links with one or more other words in the text it
shows thematic relevance and several links of this sort may be considered a semantic
field, an illustration of which was offered in the previous example on coupling.
Semantic ties in that example (mostly implicit) are based on
the adherent and symbolic
connotations (Church meals, Club member, live-in servants, Union man, etc) and create
a semantic field specific to the theme and message of this work: the contrast between
wealth and poverty, upper class and working class.
In the next example we observe the semantic field of a less complicated nature
created by more explicit means.
Joe kept saying he did not want a fortieth birthday party. He said he did not like
parties–a palpable untruth–and particularly and especially a
large party in honor of his
reaching forty...
At first there were going to be forty guests but the invitation list grew larger and
the party plans more elaborate, until Arthur said that with so many people they ought to
hire an orchestra, and with an orchestra there would be dancing, and with dancing there
ought to be a good-size orchestra. The original small dinner became a dinner dance at
the Lantenengo Country Club. Invitations were sent
to more than three hundred
persons... (O’Hara)
The thematic word of the passage is party. It recurs four times in these four
sentences. It is obviously related to such words used as its substitutes as dinner and
dinner dance which become contextual synonyms within the frame of the central
stylistic device of this piece–the climax.
Semantic relations of inclusion by entailment and hyponymy are represented by
such words as birthday (party), (party) in honor, (party) plans, invitation (list), guests,
people, persons, orchestra, dancing.
The subtheme of the major theme is the scale of the celebration connected with
the importance of the date–the main character reached the
age of forty considered an
important milestone in a man’s life and career. So there is a semantic field around the
figure forty–its lexical repetition and morphological derivation (forty–forty–fortieth)
and the word large amplified throughout by contextual synonyms, morphological
derivatives and relations of entailment (large–larger–more–many–good-size–more-three
hundred).
Another type of semantic relationship that contributes to the semantic field
analysis is the use of antonyms and contrastive elements associated with the themes in
question: large–small, forty–three hundred, small dinner–dinner dance, orchestra–good-
sized orchestra, did not like–untruth. The magnitude and importance of the event are
further enhanced by the use of synonymous intensifies particularly and especially.
Semi-marked structures
27
T.Khalilova
Semi-marked structures are a variety of defeated expectancy associated with the
deviation from the grammatical and lexical norm. It’s an extreme case of defeated
expectancy much stronger than low expectancy encountered in a paradox or anti-climax,
the unpredictable element is used contrary to the norm so it produces a very strong
emphatic impact.
In the following lines by G. Baker we observe a semi-marked structure on a
grammatical basis:
The stupid heart that will not learn
The everywhere of grief.
The word everywhere is not a noun, but an adverb and cannot be used with an
article
and a preposition, besides grief is an abstract noun that cannot be used as an
object with a noun denoting location. However the lines make sense for the poet and the
readers who interpret them as the feeling of sadness and dejection.
Lexical deviation from the norm usually means breaking the laws of semantic
compatibility and lexical valency.
If you had to predict what elements would combine well with such words and
expressions as to try one’s best to..., to like ... or what epithets you would choose for
words like father or movement you would hardly come up with such incompatible
combinations that we observe in the following sentences:
She ... tried her best to spoil the party. (Erdrich)
Montezuma and Archuleta had recently started a mock-serious separatist
movement, seeking to join New Mexico. (Michener)
Would you believe it, that unnatural father wouldn’t stump up. (Waugh)
He liked the ugly little college... (Waugh)
Such combination of lexical units in our normal everyday speech is rare. However
in spite of their apparent incongruity semi-marked structures
of both types are widely
used in literary texts that are full of sophisticated correlations which help to read sense
into most unpredictable combinations of lexical units.
In azerbaijani language categories of stylistics:
Style
Correlative methods of linguistic expression
Stylistic coloring of language units
Stylistic norm
Style rules
Styles include:
Scientific style
Official-business style
Publicisticstyle
Art style
Speaking style
Scientific style
functional style of speech of the literary language, which has a number of
features: a preliminary consideration statements monological character, strict selection
of language means attraction to the normalized speech.
Theme of scientific work is determined by their
content and objectives of
scientific communication: possible accurately and completely explain the facts, to show