3
Japanese Book News
Number 17
Ironically, few people even knew there was such a thing
as a “special nursing home for the elderly” (tokubetsu
yôgo rôjin hômu) until a recent case of government cor-
ruption at the highest level was uncovered. A top Ministry
of Health and Welfare bureaucrat was arrested on suspi-
cion of receiving favors from a man who skimmed off
huge profits from government subsidies provided for con-
tracts to build nursing homes.
Although the Old-Age Welfare Law was enacted in
1963 and Japan has become a rapidly aging society in the
ensuing 34 years, the whole concept of “special care” is
still very poorly understood among the general popula-
tion. Special nursing homes are institutions designed to
look after elderly persons who need full-time care (the
bedridden and victims of various forms of senile de-
mentia) or attention close to full time, and for whom it is
difficult to provide adequate care at home. Anyone who
falls into these categories is eligible, regardless of the
economic resources of the individual or those responsible
for his/her support. In other words, these institutions ac-
cept any bedridden, seriously disabled, or dementia-
afflicted elderly person (as a rule 65 years and older),
from those in difficulties for lack of income to the top-
tax-bracket wealthy. The burden of the cost of this care is
calibrated in accordance with the income of each indi-
vidual. And all patients in these homes receive the same
level of care, regardless of whether they pay nothing or all
of the roughly ¥270,000–280,000 such care costs per
month.
The special nursing home is more or less equivalent to
a European-style nursing home. This type of home is the
best, most path-breaking development in the laws and
systems set up for the aged so far. The greatest difficulty
in post-retirement life comes when people become
bedridden or develop symptoms of dementia. As long as
the elderly are healthy, they can take care of their per-
sonal needs. They can live by themselves and even when
they live with the families of their children, they are not
much of a burden.
In Japan, there are several types of public (tax-sup-
ported) facilities for the aged in addition to special
nursing homes. Yôgo rôjin hômu, or low-income nursing
homes, provide care for those who are healthy but whose
income is low. These facilities are mainly designed for el-
derly people without kin upon whom they can rely or,
even if they do have close kin, cannot live with them.
Then there are “low-cost” homes (keihi rôjin hômu)
which cater to seniors whose income is comparatively
small but who are capable of paying a fixed monthly
amount in expenses. Residents have a private room
equipped with a sink (toilet facilities are joint use), and
are provided with three meals a day. In some facilities,
they can prepare their own meals.
There are also various levels of commercially run
homes (yûryô rôjin hômu), the most luxurious of them lo-
cated in recreation areas in hot spring spas or suburban
areas. The usually quite wealthy residents make a flat en-
trance downpayment of ¥50–100 million as well as pay a
¥200,000–300,000 monthly fee. But in most cases they
are left without any clear assurance that they will be
looked after to the very end when they become bedridden.
Of all these types of homes for the elderly currently op-
erating in Japan, I believe it is safe to say that the only
ones that are absolutely necessary are the special nursing
homes. The vast majority of people, however, do not
know what the distinctions are between the different cate-
gories of homes until they themselves or a family member
arrive at the point of considering professional care. The
case of the bribery scandal involving the former vice-min-
ister of welfare has certainly made the term special
nursing home more widely known. It may be that the cur-
rent case of corruption in the bureaucracy derived from
the lack of adequate checks on central and prefectural
government subsidies for the construction of homes for
the aged, but it would be unfortunate if people were to
start associating corruption with the special nursing
homes themselves.
Literature of Aging
The first writer after the end of the war to take up the
theme of old age was Niwa Fumio, in a short story enti-
tled Iyagarase no nenrei [1947, tr., The Hateful Age,
1956]. Originally published in a 1947 issue of the journal
Kaizô, it “depicts the bewilderment and struggle of the
granddaughter of a senile 86-year-old woman with a vora-
cious appetite, kleptomaniac habits, and disgustingly un-
kempt appearance” (from the jacket commentary, Shinchô
bunko edition).
Niwa apparently did not consciously set out to write
about the problem of age, but had simply recorded in fic-
tional form, following his preferred realistic style, some-
thing he had witnessed after evacuating to Tochigi
prefecture during the bombing of Tokyo. This thoroughly
realistic portrayal of the ugliness of aging is so vivid as to
be at times repulsive. Even though it appeared soon after
the war when everyone was still suffering from the
shortage of food and getting enough to eat was something
of a national obsession,
Iyagarase no nenrei drew consid-
erable attention.
Niwa Fumio, born in 1904, is now 93 years old. He
stood at the head of Japanese literary world for many
years as one of its most eminent writers and was a
member of the Japan Art Academy. He continues to live
in the city of Musashino, a western suburb of Tokyo, but
ceased writing some time ago, and is now widely rumored
to have entered his dotage.
The city of Musashino is known for having established
the Musashino Municipal Welfare Corporation as Japan’s
first experiment in welfare services for pay. This en-
deavor has provided a third alternative to bedridden
Writing and the Aging Society
Hayase Keiichi