Ministry of higher and secondary special education of the republic uzbekistan state world languages university

1.
 
Non-linguistic typology 
2.
 
Linguistic typology 
Non-linguistic typology
is the subject matter of the sciences except 
linguistics. It can be political typology, medical, historical, botanic, psychological, 
mathematical or economic typology as well. General and solitary differences and 
similarities are typical to all sciences. Some branches isolate systemic comparison 
into an independent sub-branch within the frames of a more general science: e.g. 
comparative psychology
first mentioned in the works of Aristotle who described 
psychological similarities between animals and human beings. One the most well-
known representatives 
of 
Comparative Psychology
was Charles Darwin. 
Comparative Pedagogy 
deals with general and distinctive features, 
development trends and prospective of theory, applied instruction and upbringing 
methods, reveals their economic, social political and philosophic backgrounds. 
Historical typology 
analyses historic facts and produces comparative 
inventory based on the history of each nation/ethnicity to reveal general trends, 
differences, and similarities. E.g. based on French revolution of 1848 the major 
signs of revolutionary situation were revealed. 
Literary criticism
ot rapid development in the second half of XIX century 
simultaneously with thedevelopment of comparative linguistics. In Russia, the 
representatives of comparative linguistics were P.M. Samarin, V.M. Jirmunskiy, 
M.P. Alekseev, N.I. Conrad, I.G. Neupokoeva, etc. 
The two sciences — ComparativeTypology and Literary criticism have a 
number of similarities: 

linguistic comparison deals with identifying universal principles of 
thecomparative description of the systems of national languages. 
Literary criticism establishes general principles of typological 
description of national literature;

both sciences deal with identifying systemic features and discover 
typological isomorphism which can be conditioned structurally, 
genetically and geographically, etc. 

---

7 
Comparative typology is one of the branches of General Linguistics, which 
studies the systems of languages comparatively, also finds common laws of 
languages and establishes differences and 
similarities between them.Moreover, due to 
David Crystal’s book “Dictionary of Linguistics 
and Phonetics”, Comparative Typology is 
explained in this way: “A branch of linguistics 
which studies thestructural similarities between 
languages, regardlessof their history, as part of 
an 
attempt 
to 
establisha 
satisfactory 
classification 
or 
typology 
oflanguages. 
Typological 
comparison 
is 
thus 
distinguishedfrom the historical comparison 
oflanguages […] and its groupings may not 
coincidewith those set up by the historical 
method”.
The most popular definition of the subject matter seems to be 
“ComparativeTypology” is a branch of General Linguistics, field of astudy aiming 
at identifying such similarities and distinctive features of languages that do not 
depend on genetic origin or influence of languages to one another. Typology 
strives to identify and look at the most significant features that affect other spheres 
of language systems, e.g. the way of thejunction of meaningful parts of the word or 
the so-called structure of the sentence in the language". Typological studies base 
on materials of representative sampling from many world languages so that the 
findings and conclusions made on the results of such analysis can be applied to the 
entire majority of languages (in cases of language universals). 
Comparative typology shows special interest in the so-called exotic or non-
studied languages, e.g. languages of ethnicities of South-East Asia, Africa, Ocean 
side or American Indian tribes. Still, the data of well-known, expanded and well-
studied languages the similar extent become the subject matter of a typological 
study. 
Comparative typology not only systemizes, generalizes and classifies the 
facts of language isomorphism and allomorphism but also explains them. 
The majority of prestigious linguistic theories have their own typological 
agenda aimed at theoretical analysis of structurally different languages, their 
location, and genetic origin. 

---

8 
Nowadays many terms are used for defining this very type of science, such 
as 
Linguistic Typology
, 
Comparative Typology
, 
and Contrastive Linguistucs, 
Charaxterology 
and so on. However, with the help of analyzing historical 
background, we will be able to realize the main notion of this branch of 
Linguistics.