Conclusion
The
conducted research
has led to the following conclusions. The treatment of
references and quotations as two forms of allusion marker
has enabled us to get a
clearer picture of their functioning in literary discourse,
to see differences and
similarities between them. The analysis of Steinbeck's “The Winter of Our
Discontent” supports the argument that allusion is the
central manifestation of
intertextuality and one of the means contributing to the polyphony of a literary work.
This study has also revealed the main functions of allusions in literary discourse. In
the given novel they are used for characterization, to produce ironic and humorous
effects, to create a
certain atmosphere or setting, to structure the narrative, to
introduce and develop
the theme of a literary work, to generalize the plot. Shared
background knowledge as an inseparable component of the alluding process, makes
allusion an essential instrument in writer-reader interaction.
In all their variety
allusions allow the readers to penetrate deeper into the polyphonous world of the
given novel, the complex inner and outer existence of its characters.
References
Ben-Porat, Ziva. 1976.
The Poetics of Literary Allusion
. PTL. 1:106–128.
Hebel, Udo J. 1969.
Intertextuality. Allusion and Quotation: An International
Bibliography of Critical Studies.
New-York; London: Greenwood Press.
McCarthy, Paul. 1980. John Steinbeck. New-York: Ungar.
Perri, Carmela. 1979.
An International Annotated Bibliography of Allusion
Studies. Style
13(2): 178–225.
Steinbeck, John, 1985.
The Winter of Our Discontent
. Moskwa: Vysshaia
Skola.
Steinbeck,
John and Wallsten, Robert. 1975.
Steinbeck: A Life in Letters.
New-York: The Viking Press.
Watt, Frank William. 1962. Steinbeck. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
UDC 81’373.612.2