Republic of south africa republiek van suid-afrika legal notices

This gazette is also available free online at 
www.gpwonline.co.za
22    No. 41559 
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 6 APRIL 2018
Case No: 60874/17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
PRETORIA, 1 February 2018, HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR MABUSE
In the matter between: HENNIE ERWEE BOORKONTRAKTEUR CC, APPLICANT and ZWAMAVU CONSULTANTS 
ENGINEERS AND DEVELOPERS CC, RESPONDENT
After perusing the papers, and after hearing counsel for the applicant, the following order is made:
1. The abovementioned respondent close corporation be and is hereby placed under provisional winding-up order;
2. A rule nisi be and is hereby issued calling upon all persons concerned to appear and show cause, if any, to this court at 
10:00 on 26 APRIL 2018 why the respondent close corporation should not be placed under final winding-up order;
3. This order be served on:
3.1 The respondent close corporation per sheriff; 
3.2 The employees of the respondent close corporation, if any, per sheriff;
3.3 All and any trade unions representing employees of the respondent close corporation, if any, per sheriff; 
3.4 The Master of the High Court, per hand;
3.5 The South African Revenue Service, per hand; 
3.6 This order shall be published in the Government Gazette;
4. Costs shall be costs in the liquidation.  
t
Case No: 79386/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(Gauteng Division, Pretoria)
Pretoria, 16 March 2018, Honourable Mr Justice Maumela
In the matter between: Kobus van der Westhuizen N.O, First Applicant and Simon Matleshe Seima N.O, Second 
Applicant and Roelof Niehaus, Respondent
HAVING HEARD counsel for the applicant(s) and having read the notice of motion and other documents filed of record
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. The estate of the respondent be and is hereby placed under provisional sequestration in the hands of the Master of the 
High Court and that a rule nisi issue calling upon the respondent to appear and show cause, to this court on 19 April 2018 at 
10:00 why a final order of sequestration should not be made against the respondent’s estate.
2. A copy of this order must forthwith be served:
2.1 On the Respondent personally;
2.2 On the employees of the respondent, if any;
2.3 On all trade unions of which the employees of the respondent are members, if any;
2.4 On the Master of the High Court;
2.5 In the South African Revenue Service;
3. The provisional order be published in the Government Gazette and the Citizen newspaper.
4. The costs of this application be costs in the sequestration of the respondent’s estate.
BY THE COURT - REGISTRAR
Attorney: HES ATT.
Address: 2ND FLOOR EASTWOOD LAW CHAMBERS, 876 PRETORIUS STREET, ARCADIA, PRETORIA 
t

---

This gazette is also available free online at 
www.gpwonline.co.za
 STAATSKOERANT, 
6 APRIL 2018 
No. 41559   
23
Saak Nr: 2017/38537
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG)
JOHANNESBURG, 8 Maart 2018, A J STRYDOM
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN PETER ANDREW ROUX, Applicant en MARC JOE SCHATZ, Respondent
BEFORE THE HONOURALE JUDGE STRYDOM A J
Having read and considered the papers and having heard counsel for the applicant the following order is made:
1. The estate of the respondent, Marc Joe Schatz, identity no: 8007135010087, is provisionally sequestrated.
2. The respondent is called upon to advance reasons, if any, why the Court should not order the final sequestration of the 
said estate on 9 April 2018 at 10h00 or soon thereafter as the matter may be heard.
3. The costs of this application shall costs in the sequestration of the respondent. 
t
Case No: 78438/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
PRETORIA, 20 February 2018, MR PRINSLOO
In the application of: NM SEKONYA CIVILS (PTY) LTD, APPLICANT and INKULISO PROJECTS (PTY) LTD; REITY 
TRADING ENTERPRISE CC, RESPONDENTS
In re: PROVISIONAL ORDER
It is ordered that:
1. The first and second respondents be and is hereby placed under provisional winding-up order.
2.  A rule nisi be and is hereby issued calling upon all persons concerned to appear and show cause, if any, at this court at 
10:00 on 31 May 2018 why the respondents should not be placed under final winding-up order.
3.  Service of this rule nisi be effected upon the respondents at its registered office and by publication forthwith once in each 
of the Government Gazette and once in the Citizen Newspaper.
4.  A copy of this order be served upon both the first and second respondents by Sheriff, at their registered address.
5.  A copy of this order be served upon the employees of the first and second respondents, at their registered addresses, 
by sheriff, by way of attachment or affixing.
6. A copy of this order be served upon the Master of the High Court and South African Revenue Services, by way of filing 
notice, by hand.
7.  The costs hereof, be the costs in application. 
t
Case No: 26124/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, Pretoria)
PRETORIA, 6 March 2018, Honourable Madam Justice Mia, AJ
In the matter between: YASER INVESTMENTS CC (REG. NO:  1994/022703/23), APPLICANT and SKABB-AGENCY 
(PTY) LTD (REG. NO:  2014/080473/07), APPLICANT
HAVING HEARD counsel for the applicant and having read the notice of motion and other documents filed of record
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1.  The respondent be placed under provisional liquidation with return date on 23 July 2018.
2.  All interested parties is called upon to show cause on or before the return date hereon, why this order should not be made 
final.
3.  This interim order be served on the respondent’s registered address by way of Sheriff.
4.  This interim order be served upon the Master of the High Court and the South African Revenue Service by way of filing 
notice, by hand.
5.  This interim order be served upon the employees of the respondent at their business address personally by the Sheriff 
and by affixing a copy of this order against the principle door or gate of the premises of the respondent, at the respondent’s 

---