6
This
segregation policy, which also means protection and care for the
Native in the land of the Afrikaner, but decisively rejects any attempts at
equality, gives the Native an opportunity to develop what is his own, so that he
can have pride and self-respect as a Native, instead of being continually
humiliated as a failed and imitation white.
11
The oppression of blacks under apartheid was “politically, economically, and
ideologically” brutal. Anti-apartheid groups mounted vigorous political resistance, and
over time, armed struggle. After decades of oppression and unrest and growing
international sanctions, South Africa finally emerged from apartheid in 1990 when
Afrikaner President F.W. de Klerk repealed the major laws that legislated almost every
aspect of the lives of black people and released Nelson Mandela, the literal and symbolic
leader of the resistance movement, from prison after 27 years of incarceration. President
de Klerk’s actions set the stage for a new and radical transition of power in South Africa.
Mandela was elected President in 1994 with 63% of the vote in the country’s first
free elections on a campaign slogan of “A Better Life for All.” Under Mandela’s
leadership, South Africa achieved what many viewed as a political miracle: averting civil
war and uniting a divided nation of people and cultures. South Africa adopted a
constitutional democracy in which equal access and treatment for all South Africans were
guaranteed and human and property rights were protected. After decades of white-only
rule in which a minority (11%) of the population controlled virtually all of the country’s
wealth came the promise of economic opportunity for all (see Exhibit 1 for key South
Africa demographics).
President Mandela and the ANC were elected as part of a fragile coalition
government in a post-Cold War environment. Although a violent revolution was averted,
the new ANC government recognized that the liberation movement, which succeeded
with aid from COSATU and SACP, the trade unions and the communist party, would not
remain patient in the face of one of the most inequitable distributions of income in the
world. The ANC promised free education for all, a million new homes over five years to
help combat the country’s acute homeless problem, and the extension of electric and
water service to millions of homes. Once in power, however, the ANC found itself in a
quandary. Many hoped the ANC, with its socialist roots, would favor nationalization and
the radical redistribution of wealth. After consulting with their traditional constituencies
and international financiers, however, Mandela’s government adopted a tight fiscal policy
intended to stimulate long-term growth through debt reduction and decreased inflation.
Their macroeconomic strategy was characterized by privatization, deregulation, fiscal
austerity and trade liberalization to encourage domestic and foreign investment.
12
This
decision was not without controversy; some accused the government of abandoning its
social agenda. Even more, these measures left the government with limited funds for
social programs.
13
11
See
www.cchr.org/racism/pasa1.htm
(Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights).
12
R. Vietor, “South Africa: Getting in GEAR.” Harvard Business School No. 9-798-012.
13
A. Sampson, Mandela. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1999, p. 471.
7
Black Economic Empowerment
The South African economy was once again opened to the outside world, but with
the end of apartheid and the associated trade embargos and sanctions
14
, many companies
were ill-prepared to compete in a global economy with its demand for efficiency and
innovation. The economy had suffered years of serious decline towards the end of
apartheid (real GDP per capita was negative between 1984 and 1996).
The government understood that the damage done to the non-white communities
under apartheid would not be easily repaired. The majority of the population was
uneducated (60% of adults had not attended school), owned no property, and held
extremely low-wage jobs. The new government adopted policies to broaden the
economic participation of blacks within the constraints of a free market economy. An
analogous transformation occurred fifty years earlier in 1948 when the Afrikaner-
speaking National Party took control of the government from the English-speaking
15
United Party. As in that previous transformation, the new ruling party quickly perceived
that a transfer of political power did not result in a transfer of economic wealth. As one
Afrikaner executive remarked, “The process the country is going through now – other
than the fact that different people are involved – is not much different from what
happened here in 1948. There was a change in the controlling elite, but very little else
had changed. My father lived in a house that looked like a squatter shack – no different
from the house that Irene grew up in.” To improve the economic conditions of
Afrikaners and integrate them into the mainstream business community, the Afrikaner
government instituted, in the early 1950s, what in contemporary times would be
considered an affirmative action program for Afrikaners. By the time apartheid
collapsed, the South African government controlled a larger share of national economic
activity than any other country outside the Communist bloc. They used this control of the
country’s assets to advantage whites.
16
In 1994, whites owned virtually all businesses and held all but a handful of
management positions in South Africa. To avoid government intervention,
English-
owned
17
and Afrikaner-owned corporations responded to the new political climate by
participating proactively in what was termed Black Economic Empowerment (BEE).
BEE consisted of a number of initiatives to increase the participation of previously
disadvantaged individuals (including blacks, women, and the disabled) in the formal
economy through company ownership and management. The national government
believed historical inequalities in the economic arena needed to be addressed for South
Africa to achieve sustainable development and prosperity. Incentives were introduced to
14
For example, in 1986, the U.S. extended its trade sanctions to ban the import of coal, steel, uranium, aluminum, iron,
agricultural products, and textiles. The U.S. also
banned the export of oil, arms, and munitions with a prohibition on
“new investments in and credits for South Africa.”
15
South African whites were commonly categorized into two groups – English-speaking and Afrikaner-speaking.
Afrikaner-speaking whites were descended from the original Dutch settlers of the Cape. English-speaking whites, who
on average were wealthier and better educated, were descended from the English businessmen and bureaucrats that came
to South Africa.
16
R. Abdelal, D. Spar, and K. E. Cousins, “Remaking the Rainbow Nation: South Africa 2002,” Harvard Business School Case No.
9-702-035.
17
In apartheid South Africa, businesses tended to be owned by either Afrikaner-speakers or English-speakers, but not
both.