Lars Peter Hansen Prize Lecture: Uncertainty Outside and Inside Economic Models



Yüklə 1,76 Mb.
Pdf görüntüsü
səhifə3/21
tarix15.08.2018
ölçüsü1,76 Mb.
#62743
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   21

402 

The Nobel Prizes

nomics by Muth (1961) and Lucas (1972). Following Lucas (1972) in particular, 

rational expectations became an integral part of an equilibrium for a stochastic 

economic model.

The aim of structural econometrics is to provide a framework for policy 

analysis and the study of counterfactuals. This vision is described in Marschak 

(1953) and articulated formally in the work of Hurwicz (1962). While there are 

a multitude of interesting implications of the rational expectations hypothesis, 

perhaps the most important one is its role in policy analysis. It gives a way to 

explore policy experiments or hypothetical changes that are not predicated on 

systematically fooling people. See Sargent and Wallace (1975) and Lucas (1976) 

for a discussion.

5

From an econometric standpoint, rational expectations introduced impor-



tant cross-equation restrictions. These recognize that parameters governing 

the dynamic evolution of exogenous impulses to the model must also be pres-

ent in decision rules and equilibrium relations. These restrictions reflect how 

 decision-makers within the model are forward-looking. For instance, an invest-

ment choice today depends on the beliefs about how profitable such investments 

will be in the future. Investors forecast the future, and the rational expectations 

hypothesis predicts how they do this. The resulting cross-equation restrictions 

add a new dimension to econometric analysis; but these restrictions are built 

on the premise that investors have figured much out about how the future will 

evolve. See Sargent (1973), Wallis (1980) and my first published paper, Hansen 

and Sargent (1980), for characterizations of these restrictions.

6

 To implement 



this approach to rational expectations econometrics, a researcher is compelled 

to specify correctly the information sets of economic actors.

7

 When building 



actual stochastic models, however, it is often not clear what information should 

be presumed on the part of economic agents, how they should use it, and how 

much confidence they have in that use.

The introduction of random shocks as impulses to a dynamic economic 

model in conjunction with the assumption of rational expectations is an exam-

ple of uncertainty inside a model. Under a rational expectations equilibrium, an 

To be clear, rational expectations offers an approach for comparing distinct stochastic 



equilibria but not the transitions from one to another. For an interesting extension that 

allows for clustering of observations near alternative self-confirming equilibria in con-

junction with escapes from such clusters see Sargent (1999).

While this was my first publication of a full length paper, this was not my first publica-



tion. My first was a note published in Economic Letters.

See Sims (2012) for a discussion of the successes and limitations of implementing the 



Haavelmo (1944) agenda to the study of monetary policy under rational expectations.

6490_Book.indb   402

11/4/14   2:30 PM



Uncertainty Outside and Inside Economic Models 403

investor inside the model knows the model-implied stochastic evolution for the 

state variables relevant for decision making and hence the likely consequences 

of the impulses. An econometrician also confronts uncertainty outside a model 

because of his or her lack of knowledge of parameters or maybe even a lack of 

confidence with the full model specification. There is an asymmetry between 

the inside and the outside perspectives found in rational expectations econo-

metrics that I will turn to later. But first, I will discuss an alternative approach to 

imposing rational expectations in econometric analyses.

3  RobuST eCoNoMeTRiCS uNdeR RaTioNal exPeCTaTioNS

My econometrics paper, Hansen (1982b), builds on a long tradition in econo-

metrics of “doing something without having to do everything.” This entails the 

study of partially specified models—that is, models in which only a subset of 

economic relations are formally delineated. I added to this literature by ana-

lyzing such estimation problems in greater generality, giving researchers more 

flexibility in modeling the underlying time series while incorporating some ex-

plicit economic structure. I studied formally a family of Generalized Method of 

Moments (GMM) estimators, and I adapted these methods to applications that 

study linkages between financial markets and the macroeconomy.

8

 By allow-



ing for partial specification, these methods gain a form of robustness. They are 

immune to mistakes in how one might fill out the complete specification of the 

underlying economic model.

The approach is best thought of as providing initial steps in building a time 

series econometric model without specifying the full econometric model. Con-

sider a research program that studies the linkages between the macroeconomy 

and financial markets. One possibility is to construct a fully specified model of 

My exposure to using GMM estimators as a vehicle to represent a broad family of esti-



mators originally came from Christopher Sims’ lectures. As a graduate student I became 

interested in central limit approximations that allow for econometric error terms to pos-

sess general types of temporal dependence by using central limit approximations of the 

type demonstrated by Gordin (1969). I subsequently established formally large sample 

properties for GMM estimators in such circumstances. Interestingly, Econometrica chose 

not to publish many of the formal proofs for results in my paper. Instead they were pub-

lished thirty years later by the Journal of Econometrics, see Hansen (2012). Included in 

my original submission and in the published proofs is a Uniform Law of Large Numbers 

for stationary ergodic processes. See Hansen (2001) and Ghysels and Hall (2002) for 

further elaborations and discussion about the connection between GMM and related 

statistics literatures. See Arellano (2003) for a discussion of applications to panel data.

6490_Book.indb   403

11/4/14   2:30 PM



Yüklə 1,76 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   21




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©www.genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə