18
I N T R O D U C T I O N
PT
•
I
in the world external to the organism under study.
In many ways thus, cognitive
neuroscience studies behavior, and decision-making in particular, in ways that are
relevant for the attempts of economists to understand the material basis of decision-
making. This led to the formation of the new fi eld of neuroeconomics, which refers to
the use of empirical evidence relating to brain activity in order to come to conclusions
relating to economic behavior.
Cognitive neuroscience has seen signifi cant empirical advances made possible by a
number of recent technological developments, particularly in terms of brain scanning
and imaging techniques like PET (positron emission tomography), fMRI (functional
magnetic resonance imaging), EEG (electroencephalography), rCBF (regional cerebral
blood fl ow) and TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation). These methods detect (or in
the case of TMS, block) brain activity in particular areas in terms of electrical activity or
increased blood fl ow, and this has been used to shed light on various topics of interest
in behavioral economics. Relevant results have been infl uential in the area of decision-
making heuristics, learning processes and the role of the emotions.
Perhaps the most fundamental discovery in neuroscience has been the concept of
brain modularity. This means that different types of thinking
or mental process are
performed in different parts of the brain, indicating the importance of brain structure or
anatomy, and it is attributed to evolutionary processes, whereby new parts of the brain
have been successively added to older more primitive parts, and have become more
developed over time. One of the most profound consequences of modularity, certainly
as far as behavioral economics is concerned, is that humans have different decision-
making systems that operate in different circumstances. The most obvious illustration
of this is that we have a ‘cold’ rational system for reasoning through some problems,
like doing a crossword puzzle, and a ‘hot’ system involving emotions, that tends to
operate, for example, when somebody cuts in front of us in a traffi c jam. We also fi nd
that we tend to perform some processes automatically, like a skilled musician playing
the piano, without conscious thought about what keys to play, whereas other actions
require conscious decisions, for example, where a beginner is attempting to play the
same piece. The reason why this aspect of brain modularity is signifi cant for behavioral
economics is that there are often confl icts between different systems, and these can
cause phenomena such as preference reversals and time-inconsistent preferences, that
are frequently observed anomalies in the standard model. There are executive control
systems that mediate these different systems, and these are necessary in order to bring
into effect some action when there are internal confl icts. However, it is important
that we do not think of these control systems as being the ‘self’, or the ‘I’, that decides.
This would amount to Cartesian Dualism, or a belief in what the philosopher Gilbert
Ryle has termed ‘the ghost in the machine’ (Ryle, 1949). Executive control systems
may indeed operate subconsciously, for example, when we run from a wasp fl ying
toward us.
Another important discovery in neuroeconomics is that different chemicals and
hormones have a signifi cant infl uence on behavior. Given these developments, various
examples of neuroeconomic studies will be given throughout the book. It is important
to realize, though, that relevance and application of neuroeconomics has remained a
controversial issue in the discipline.
19
N AT U R E O F B E H A V I O R A L E C O N O M I C S
CH
•
1
1.4 Objectives, scope and structure
Objectives
In view of the foregoing discussion, this book has the following major objectives:
1 Present the principles and methods of behavioral economics in a logical and
amenable manner, comparing and contrasting them with those of the standard
model.
2 Illustrate how behavioral models represent an improved modifi cation and
refi nement of the standard model in terms of power of explanation and
prediction, using a wide variety of empirical examples from both observational
and experimental studies.
3 Provide a critical examination of the existing literature relating to behavioral
economics.
4 Explain the policy implications of behavioral economics, particularly when these
differ from those of the standard model.
5 Provide a coherent psychological framework underpinning the fi ndings of
behavioral economics.
6 Indicate the
way forward for the subject, in terms of future challenges and areas
meriting further research.
Structure
In order to achieve the objectives described at the beginning of the section, the book
is divided into fi ve parts. Following the two introductory chapters in Part I, Part II is
concerned with the foundations of behavioral economics, in which the fundamental
concepts of preferences, beliefs, decision-making under risk and uncertainty and
mental accounting are discussed. This relates to the fi rst, third and fourth components
of the model in (1.1). Part III of the book examines intertemporal decision-making,
where costs and benefi ts of decisions are incurred in different time periods. This relates
to the second component of the model in (1.1). Part IV examines strategic interaction
and the applications of game theory, which relates to aspects of the third and fourth
components not discussed earlier. Part V represents a conclusion. We are concerned
here with summarizing the various aspects of behavioral economics and presenting an
integrated view of rationality; this part also relates to the sixth objective stated above:
looking at the future of the discipline.
Within each chapter there is also frequently a typical structure. The principles
and assumptions of the relevant aspects of the standard model are examined fi rst,
with a description of shortcomings or anomalies. Various behavioral models are then
introduced, and these are evaluated in the light of the empirical evidence available, with
comparisons being made between different models. Normative or policy implications
are also discussed. Finally, some important applications of behavioral economics are
examined in more detail in case studies at the end of each chapter.