M@n@gement, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2001, 83-99
Special Issue: Deconstructing Las Vegas
87
Paradigmatic New Means of Consumption
in mind and they may have a sense of the means they intend to
employ as well. However, once they enter a means of consumption
they encounter an array of means and ends that serve the interests
of those who control the means of consumption more than their own
interests. While the consumer may be searching for a particular loca-
tion, the setting may be designed to force the consumer to pass other
locations deemed more desirable (or profitable) by those who control
the means of consumption. The blue jeans are usually located along
the back wall of the Gap, so customers need to navigate the entire
store to reach them. While the consumer may have as an end the
purchase of a particular commodity, those in control of the means of
consumption encourage the purchase of as many things as possible.
Formally rational systems can also be defined as McDonaldized sys-
tems. Such systems are characterized by their efficiency, predictabil-
ity, calculability and replacement of human with non-human technolo-
gy. These characteristics serve to make McDonaldized means of con-
sumption highly effective “selling machines”. To put it another way,
they are highly effective at controlling large numbers of consumers.
All rationalized systems suffer from a range of irrationalities of ratio-
nality, but the most notable for our purposes is disenchantment. Prior
to becoming formally rationalized, the means of consumption were
more likely to have had magical elements that provided a great deal
of meaning. Magical elements might include the simple fact that a
consumer formed a meaningful, but not necessarily rational, attach-
ment to a particular means of consumption like a local bakery with a
“perfect” chocolate éclair reminiscent of a youthful trip to Paris. While
it is in the interests of cathedrals of consumption to McDonaldize, this
inevitably leads to the disenchantment of those settings. That local
bakery may be able to increase profits if it produces twice as many
éclairs and opens a chain of shops, but the special quality that attract-
ed our hypothetical consumer is likely to be diminished in the process
because of a decline in the quality of the product or the disenchant-
ment of the setting as it is copied again and again. Consumers are not
drawn, at least for very long, to rationalized settings that lack enchant-
ment, especially for non-routine consumption. A warehouse-like out-
let store, for example, may incorporate all the elements of
McDonaldization but none of it will make consumers want to shop in
a dimly-lit, cavernous space. Although price competition and
economies of scale help warehouse stores succeed, other rational-
ized means of consumption look for ways to become more attractive
to consumers.
Weber’s work offers little guidance to our effort to understand the
methods used to enhance the attraction and enchantment of ratio-
nalized means of consumption because he focused on the ways in
which enchantment was being extracted progressively (without
hope for reversal) from modern societies. The more recent contri-
bution of Campbell (1987), however, provides a basis for under-
standing how consumer settings might become reenchanted. In his
research on the Protestant Ethic, Weber focused on the fact that the
early Calvinists sought to root out emotion and enchantment from
M@n@gement, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2001, 83-99
Special Issue: Deconstructing Las Vegas
88
George Ritzer and Todd Stillman
their lives. Campbell found that later Calvinists reversed course to
some degree and began allowing space for emotions and enchant-
ment in their lives. While the early Calvinists looked for “signs of
economic success,” the later Calvinists shifted their attention to “evi-
dence of good taste.” Good taste, in turn, was tied to beauty and
goodness. People who sought beauty and goodness, who sought
pleasure, came to be thought of as possessing good character.
Pleasure-seeking was tied to being in fashion and the consumption
of luxury goods. In this way, the ethic and the lifestyle of the later
Calvinists gave birth to the “spirit of modern consumerism.” The
defining characteristic of this spirit, self-illusory hedonism, contrasts
sharply with the asceticism of the early Calvinists. Under the spell of
self-illusory hedonism, actors constantly seek pleasure. Yet the
object of their desire—the luxury object at the top of their list—
always fails to gratify. Rather than abandon their faith in pleasure,
people became involved in an insatiable cycle of desire with the
belief that the next object could and would be more gratifying than
the previous one. In short, Campbell described an enchanted indi-
vidual world characterized by illusions, daydreams and fantasies
about consumer objects
1
.
Campbell (1987) succeeded in re-injecting a notion of enchantment
into Weberian theory. However, the enchantment of concern to
Campbell exists at the level of the individual, while our concern is
the enchantment of rationalized structures. Williams’s (1982) work
on French expositions and department stores is of great help here.
Williams views French department stores as highly enchanted
“dream worlds.” As she sees it, these dream worlds employ
enchantment, glamour and romance to seduce consumers into
spending their money. However, these settings were also highly
rationalized. This point is made by Miller (1981) in his study of the
Paris department store, Bon Marché. Miller describes a number of
Bon Marché’s rationalized elements including the division into sep-
arate departments, and the use of files, statistics, sliding chutes,
conveyor belts and escalators. Thus, the early French department
store, like today’s new means of consumption, was both rationalized
and enchanted.
Even when the two co-exist, rationalization is the more powerful force
and it tends to marginalize, routinize, or drive out enchantment. For
this reason, the cathedrals of consumption are in constant need of re-
enchantment. This brings us to postmodern social theory where the
idea of re-enchantment is of great importance. For example, accord-
ing to Bauman (1993: 33), «postmodernity brings ‘re-enchantment’ of
the world after the protracted (...) modern struggle to disenchant it.»
To take a specific example, Baudrillard (1983/1990: 51) privileges
seduction as a type of enchantment and its «play and power of illu-
sion» over the complete clarity and visibility (disenchantment) of the
modern world. Thus, re-enchantment occurs throughout the post-
modern world, including the cathedrals of consumption where re-
enchantment lures and controls consumers. However, it is important
to bear in mind that rationalization continually poses a threat to efforts
1. Campbell's self-illusory hedonism sug-
gests that consumers who fantasize are ful-
filling a social psychological need to esca-
pe from the constraints of work, family,
and society into the more perfect world of
the imagination. It is worth noting that
such an account is only one of several
plausible social psychological models of
consumer behavior. Because this essay
examines the settings in which consump-
tion takes place rather than the motivations
of consumers themselves, we have skirted
the complicating factors of social psycho-
logy. We hope it will be sufficient to sim-
ply suggest the type of effect that the fan-
tastic settings may have on consumers
while taking greater care to describe the
techniques of enchantment employed in
the cathedrals of consumption. A more
definitive analysis of the social psychology
of gamblers and casino patrons is beyond
the scope of this essay.