Decision Making In Prisoner’s Dilemma



Yüklə 2,24 Mb.
səhifə23/27
tarix08.12.2017
ölçüsü2,24 Mb.
#14708
1   ...   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27

14. References





  1. Airiau, S., Saha, S., & Sen, S. (2007). Evolutionary tournament-based comparison of learning and non-learning algorithms for iterated games. Journal of Artificial Societies & Social Simulation, 10, 1-12.




  1. Alpert, M., & Raiffa, H. (1969/1982). A progress report on the training of probability assessors. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 294-305). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. H. (1993). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma: Experimental evidence. The Economic Journal, 103, 570-585.




  1. Aumann, R. J. (1959). Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. In A. W. Tucker, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Contributions to the theory of games, volume IV (pp. 287-324). Princeton: Princeton University Press.




  1. Axelrod, R. (1967). Conflict of interest: An axiomatic approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11, 87-99.




  1. Axelrod, R. (1980a). Effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 3-25.




  1. Axelrod, R. (1980b). More effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict resolution, 24, 379-403.




  1. Axelrod, R. (1981). The emergence of cooperation among egoists. American Political Review, 75, 306-318.




  1. Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.




  1. Axelrod, R. (2006). The evolution of cooperation (Revised edition). New York: Basic Books.




  1. Axelrod, R., & Dion, D. (1988). The further evolution of cooperation. Science, 242, 1385-1390.




  1. Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390-1396.




  1. Banerjee, D. & Sen, S. (2007). Reaching pareto-optimality in prisoner’s dilemma using conditional joint action learning. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 15, 91 – 108.




  1. Bar-Hillel, M. (1982). Studies of representativeness. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 69-83). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Toronto: Oxford University Press.




  1. Batson, D. C., & Moran, T. (1999). Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner’s dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 909-924.




  1. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 295-307.




  1. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275,1293–1295.




  1. Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2000). Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 123, 2189-2202.




  1. Bedell, J., & Sistrunk, F. (1973). Power, opportunity costs, and sex in a mixed-motive game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 219-226.




  1. Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 301-316). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Bendor, J. (1987). In good times and bad: Reciprocity in an uncertain world. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 531–38.




  1. Bendor, J. (1993). Uncertainty and the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 709–34.




  1. Bendor, J., Kramer, R. M., & Stout, S. (1991). When in doubt… Cooperation in a noisy Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 691-719.




  1. Bendor, J., & Swistak, P. (1997). The evolutionary stability of cooperation. American Political Science Review, 91, 290–307.




  1. Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Roth, A. E. (2006). The speed of learning in noisy games: Partial reinforcement and the sustainability of cooperation. American Economic Review, 96, 1029-1042.




  1. Bernard, V. L. (1993). Stock price reactions to earnings announcements: A summary of recent anomalous evidence and possible explanations. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 303-340). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Turkey, P. (Eds. ) (1998). Human reproductive behavior: A Darwinian perspective. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Bicchieri, C. (2002). Covenants without swords: Group identity, norms, and communication in social dilemmas. Rationality and Society, 14, 192-228.




  1. Binmore, K. (1999). Why experiment in economics? Economic Journal, 109, 16–24.




  1. Black, F. (1986). Noise. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 3-22). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Bó, P. D. (2005). Cooperation under the shadow of the future: Experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games. American Economic Review, 95, 1591-1604.




  1. Boyd, R., & Lorberbaum, J. (1987). No pure strategy is evolutionarily stable in the repeated prisoner’s dilemma game. Nature, 327, 58–59.




  1. Bradley, J. V. (1958). Complete counterbalancing of immediate sequential effects in a Latin square design. Journal of American Statistical Association, 53, 525-528.




  1. Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.




  1. Caldwell, M. D. (1976). Communication and sex effects in a five-person Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 273-280.




  1. Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. (1971). Test results are what you think they are. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 239-248). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Chase, I. D. (1980). Cooperative and noncooperative behavior in animals. American Naturalist, 115, 827-857.




  1. Chater, N., Vlaev, I., & Grinberg, M. (2008). A new consequence of Simpson’s paradox: Stable cooperation in one-shot Prisoner’s Dilemma from populations of individualistic learners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 403–421.




  1. Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (1988). The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.




  1. Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.




  1. Chopra, N., Lakonishok, J., & Ritter, J. R. (1992). Measuring abnormal performance: Do stocks overreact? In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 265-302). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Cohen, M. D., & Axelrod, R. (1984). Coping with complexity: The adaptive value of changing utility. American Economic Review, 74, 30-42.




  1. Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory (1st paperback edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.




  1. Colman, A. M. (2003). Depth of strategic reasoning in games. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 2-4.




  1. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163-228). Toronto: Oxford University Press.




  1. Cutler, D. M., Poterba, J. M., & Summers, L. H. (1989). What moves stock prices? In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 133-151). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences, 351, 1413–1420.




  1. Dawkins, R. (1999). The extended phenotype (2nd edition). New York: Oxford University Press.




  1. Dawkins, R. (2006a). Foreword to the new edition of The Evolution of Cooperation. In R. Axelrod, The evolution of cooperation (pp. xi-xvi). New York: Basic Books.




  1. Dawkins, R. (2006b). The selfish gene (3rd edition). New York: Oxford University Press.




  1. De Bondt, W. F. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Does the stock market overreact? In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 249-264). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. de Heus, P., Hoogervorst, N., & van Dijk, E. (2010). Framing prisoners and chickens: Valence effects in the prisoner’s dilemma and the chicken game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 735-742.



  2. De Long, B. J., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., & Waldmann, R. J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 23-58). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.




  1. Denrell, J. (2005). Why most people disapprove of me: Experience sampling in impression formation. Psychological Review, 112, 951–978.




  1. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265-279.




  1. Deutsch, D. (1985). Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proceedings of the Royal Society, A400, 97-117.




  1. Dudai, Y., & Carruthers, M. (2005). The Janus face of mnemosyne. Nature, 434, 567.




  1. Eddy, D. M. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 249-267). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Edney, J. J., & Harper, C. S. (1978). The effects of information in a resource management problem: A social trap analog. Human Ecology, 6, 387-395.




  1. Einhorn, H. J. (1980). Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 268-283). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Erickson, M. H. (1959/2009a). Further clinical techniques of hypnosis: Utilization techniques. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52, 341-363.




  1. Erickson, M. H. (1959/2009b). Naturalistic techniques of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 2009, 52, 333-341.




  1. Erickson, M. H., & Rossi, E. L. (2009). Hypnotické světy: Klinická hypnóza a nepřímé sugesce. Brno: Emitos. [Hypnotic realities: The induction of clinical hypnosis and forms of indirect suggestion. Translated by Kohoutek, T., & Kleinová, K.]




  1. Erickson, M. H., & Rossi, E. L. (2010). Hypnotická psychoterapie: Kniha případových studií [Hypnoterapy: An exploratory casebook. Translated by ___]. Brno: Emitos.




  1. Fagen, R. M. (1980). When doves conspire: Evolution of nondamaging fighting tactics in a nonrandom-encounter animal conflict model. American Naturalist, 115, 858-869.




  1. Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1997). Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 355-373.




  1. Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115-141.




  1. Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659–676.




  1. Fischhoff, B. (1982). Debiasing. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 422-444). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Fisher, R. A. (2000). The genetical theory of natural selection (3d edition). New York: Oxfor University Press.




  1. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.




  1. Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1998). A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 118-142). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Frank, S. (1995). Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups. Nature, 377, 520-522.




  1. Frean, M. (1996). The evolution of degrees of cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 182, 549-559.




  1. French, K. R., & Roll, R. (1986). Stock return variances: The arrival of information and the reaction of traders. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 219-245). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Fudenberg, D., & Levine, K. (1998). The theory of learning in games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.




  1. Gallo, P. S. (1966). Effects of increased incentive upon the use of threat in bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 14-20.




  1. Gazzaniga, M. S. (1992). Nature’s mind: The biological roots of thinking, emotion, sexuality, language, and intelligence. New York: Basic Books.




  1. Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience (2nd edition). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.




  1. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.) (2002). Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Gotts, N. M., Polhill, J. G., & Law, A. N. R. (2003). Agent-based simulation in the study of social dilemmas. Artificial Intelligence Review, 19, 3–92.




  1. Guetzkow, H. (1957). A use of simulation in the study of inter-national relations. Behavioral Science, 2, 183-191.




  1. Gumpert, P., Deutsch, M., & Epstein, Y. (1969). Effect of incentive magnitude on cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 66-69.




  1. Haldane, J. B. S. (1955). Population genetics. New Biology, 18, 34-51.




  1. Haley, J. (1993). Uncommon therapy: The psychiatric techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D. (new printing). New York, W. W. Norton & Company.




  1. Haley, J. (Ed.) (1999a). Conversations with Milton H. Erickson, M.D., volume I: Changing individuals. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.




  1. Haley, J. (Ed.) (1999b). Conversations with Milton H. Erickson, M.D., volume II: Changing couples. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.




  1. Haley, J. (Ed.) (1999c). Conversations with Milton H. Erickson, M.D., volume III: Changing children and families. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.




  1. Hamilton, W. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Joural of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-52.




  1. Hamilton, W. (1972). Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systemics, 3, 193-232.




  1. Harris, R. J. (1969). Optimal policies for the prisoner’s dilemma. Psychological Review, 76, 363-375.




  1. Hauk, E. (2003). Multiple Prisoner’s Dilemma games with(out) an outside option: An experimental study. Theory and Decision, 54, 207-229.




  1. Hauk, E., & Nagel, R. (2001). Choice of partners in multiple two-person Prisoner’s Dilemma games: An experimental study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45, 770–93.




  1. Helbing, D., Schönhof, M., Stark, H.-U., & Hołyst, J. (2005). How individuals learn to take turns: Emergence of alternating cooperation in a congestion game and the prisoner’s dilemma. Advances in Complex Systems, 8, 87–116.




  1. Hertel, G., Neuhof, J., Theuer, T., & Kerr, N. L. (2000). Mood effects on cooperation in small groups: Does positive mood simply lead to more cooperation? Cognition and Emotion, 14, 441-472.




  1. Hirsh, J. B., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Extraversion, neuroticism, and the prisoner’s dilemma. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 254-256.




  1. Hofstadter, D. (1985). Metamagical themas: Questing for the essence of mind and pattern. New York: Basic Books.




  1. Howard, N. (1966). The mathematics of meta-games. General Systems, 11, 187-200.




  1. Jackendoff, R. (1995). Patterns in the mind: Language and human nature. New York: Basic Books.




  1. Jennings, D. L., Amabile, T. M., & Ross, L. (1982). Informal covariation assessment: Data-based versus theory-based judgments. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 211-230). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., & Kunreuther, H. (1993). Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 224-240). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Jones, B., Steele, M., Gahagan, J., & Tedeschi, J. (1968). Matrix values and cooperative behavior in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 148-153.




  1. Jones, G. (2008). Are smarter groups more cooperative? Evidence from prisoner’s dilemma experiments, 1959-2003. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68, 489-497.



  2. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 159-170). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 393-413). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (24th printing). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972/1982). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 32-47). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 48-68). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 17-43). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979/1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 190-200). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246, 167-173.




  1. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames (9th printing). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Kelley, H. H., & Grzelak, J. (1972). Conflict between individual and common interest in an N-person relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 190-197.




  1. Kerr, N. L., & Kaufman-Gilliland, C. M. (1994). Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 513-529.




  1. Kleinfield, S. (1983). The traders. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.




  1. Kollock, P. (1993). ‘An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind’: Cooperation and accounting systems. American Sociological Review, 58, 768-86.




  1. Koukolík, F. (2002). Lidský mozek: Funkční systémy: norma a poruchy (2nd edition). Praha: Portál.




  1. Koukolík, F. (2006). Sociální mozek. Praha: Nakladatelství Karolinum.




  1. Kreps, D. M., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., & Wilson, R. (1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 245-252.




  1. Kreps, D. M., & Wilson, R. (1982). Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 253-79.




  1. Kuhlman, D. M, Brown, C, & Teta, P. (1992). Judgments of cooperation and defection in social dilemmas: The moderating role of judge’s social orientation. In W. B. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 111-132). Oxford: Pergamon Press.




  1. Kuhlman, M. D., & Marshello, A. F. J. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 922-931.




  1. Kunreuther, H., Ginsberg, R., Miller, L., Sagi, P., Slovic, P., Borkan, B., & Katz, N. (1978). Disaster insurance protection: Public policy lessons. New York: Wiley Interscience.




  1. Lave, L. (1965). Factors affecting cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma. Behavioral Science, 10, 26-38.




  1. Le, S., & Boyd, R. (2007). Evolutionary dynamics of the continuous iterated prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 245, 258-267.




  1. Lee, C. M. C., Shleifer, A., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Investor sentiment and the closed-end fund puzzle. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 59-104). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Leslie, A. (1992). Pretense, autism and the theory-of-mind module. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 18-21.




  1. Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D., (1977/1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306-334). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Liebrand, W. B., Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H. A. (Eds.) (1992). Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings. Oxford: Pergamon Press.




  1. Luce, D. R., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions. New York: Wiley.




  1. Lutzker, D. R. (1960). Internationalism as a predictor of cooperative behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4, 426-430.




  1. Macy, M. W. (1991). Learning to cooperate: Stochastic and tacit collusion in social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 808-843.




  1. Majolo, B., Ames, K., Brumpton, R., Garratt, R., Hall, K., & Wilson, N. (2006). Human friendship favours cooperation in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma. Behaviour, 143, 1383-1395.




  1. Maynard Smith, J. (1964). The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflict. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47, 209-221.




  1. McClintock, C. G., Harrison, A. A., Strand, S., & Gallo, P. (1963). Internationalism-isolationism, strategy of the other player, and two-person game behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 631-636.




  1. McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. P. (1966). Reward and score feedback as determinants of cooperative and competitive game behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 606-613.




  1. McGinn, C. (1991). The problem of consciousness. Oxford: Blackwell.




  1. McKelvey, R. D., & Palfrey, T. R. (1992). An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica, 60, 803-36.




  1. Messick, D. M., & Thomgate, W. B. (1967). Relative gain maximization in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 85-101.




  1. Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.




  1. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1982). Predation, reputation and entry deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 280-312.




  1. Miller, G. (2001). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Anchor Books.




  1. Miller, G. (2007). A surprising connection between memory and imagination, Science, 315, 312.




  1. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.




  1. Minas, J. S., Scodel, A., Marlowe, D., & Rawson, H. (1960). Some descriptive aspects of two-person, non-zero-sum games. Part II. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4, 193-197.




  1. Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.




  1. Minuchin, S. (1995). The leap to complexity: Supervision in family therapy. In J. K. Zeig (Ed.), The evolution of psychotherapy: The third conference (pp. 271-281). New York: Brunner/Mazel.




  1. Mokros, A., Eisenbarth, B. M. H., Alpers, G. W., Lange, K. W., & Osterheider, M. (2008). Diminished cooperativeness of psychopaths in a Prisoner’s Dilemma game yields higher rewards. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 406–413.




  1. Molander, P. (1985). The optimal level of generosity in a selfish, uncertain environment. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29, 611–18.




  1. Monterosso, J., Ainslie, G., Pamela Toppi Mullen, P. A.-C., & Gault, B. (2002). The fragility of cooperation: A false feedback study of a sequential iterated prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 437-448.




  1. Moore, M. J., & Moore, M. C. (1989). Adaptive learning, adaptive utility, and rational behavior in a repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2, 367-383.




  1. Morehouse, L. G. (1966). One-play, two-play, five-play, and ten-play runs of prisoner’s dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10, 354-362.




  1. Morris, M. W., Sim, D. L. H., & Girotto, V. (1998). Distinguishing sources of cooperation in the one-round Prisoner’s Dilemma: Evidence for cooperative decisions based on the illusion of control. Journal of experimental social psychology, 34, 494-512.




  1. Mulford, M., Jackson, J., & Svedsäter, H. (2008). Encouraging cooperation: Revisiting solidarity and commitment effects in prisoner’s dilemma games. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2964-2989.




  1. Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Fong, G. T. (1982). Improving inductive inference. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 445-459). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Nowak, M., & Sigmund, K. (1992). Tit for Tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature, 355, 250-253.




  1. Nowak, M., & Sigmund, K. (1993). A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Nature, 364, 56-58.




  1. Orbell, J. M., van der Kragt, A. J. C., & Dawes, R. M. (1988). Explaining discussion-induced cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 811-819.




  1. Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 287-293). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Oskamp, S. (1971). Effects of programmed strategies on cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma and other mixed-motive games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15, 225-259.




  1. Oskamp, S. (1974). Comparison of sequential and simultaneous responding, matrix, and strategy variables in a Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 18, 107-116.




  1. Oskamp, S., & Kleinke, C. (1970). Amount of reward as a variable in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 133-140.




  1. Palfrey, T. R., & Rosenthal, H. (1988). Private incentives in social dilemmas: The effects of incomplete information and altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 35, 309-32.




  1. Pilisuk, M., & Rapoport, A. (1964). Stepwise disarmament and sudden destruction in a two-person game: A research tool. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 8, 36-49.




  1. Pilisuk, M., Potter, P., Rapoport, A., & Winter, A. J. (1965). War hawks and peace doves: Alternate resolutions of experimental conflicts. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 9, 491-507.




  1. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow and Company.




  1. Pinker, S. (2009). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.




  1. Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 451-472). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Rabin, M. (2000). Diminishing marginal utility of wealth cannot explain risk aversion. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 202-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Raineri, A., & Rachlin. H. (1993). The effects of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 77-94.




  1. Rapoport, A. (1964). Strategy and conscience. New York: Harper and Row.




  1. Rapoport, A. (1967a). Optimal policies for the prisoner’s dilemma. Psychological review, 74, 136-148.




  1. Rapoport, A. (1967b). A note on the “index of cooperation” for prisoner’s dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11, 100-103.




  1. Rapoport, A. (1967c). Escape from paradox. Scientific American, 217, 50-56.




  1. Rapoport, A. (1968). Prospects for experimental games. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 12, 461-470.




  1. Rapoport, A. (1988a). Experiments with social n-person traps I: Prisoner’s dilemma, weak prisoner’s dilemma, volunteer’s dilemma, and largest number. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 457-472.




  1. Rapoport, A. (1988b). Experiments with social n-person traps II: Tragedy of the commons. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 473-488.




  1. Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965a). A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.




  1. Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965b). Sex differences in factors contributing to the level of cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 831-838.




  1. Rapoport, A., & Dale, P. S. (1966). The “end” and “start” effects in iterated prisoner’s dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10, 363-366.




  1. Rapoport, A., & Guyer, M. (1966). A taxonomy of 2x2 games, General Systems, 11, 203–214.




  1. Rapoport, A., Guyer, M. J., & Gordon, D. G. (1976). The 2x2 game. Ann Arbor: University of Michgan Press.




  1. Rapoport, A., & Orwant, C. (1962). Experimental games: A review. Behavioral Science, 7, 1-37.




  1. Ridley, M. (1993). The red queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature. London: Viking Press.




  1. Roberts, G. (1998). Competitive altruism: From reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proceedings of Royal Society of London Biological Sciences, 265: 427-431.




  1. Ross, L., Anderson, C. A. (1982). Shortcomings in the attribution process: On the origins and maintenance of erroneous social assessments.




  1. Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979/1982). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 179-189). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Rossi, E., Erickson-Klein, R., Rossi, K. (2009). Zaměření na budoucnost v kontextu konstruktivní paměti: Evoluční pohled na terapeutickou hypnózu a krátkodobou psychoterapii. In M. H. Erickson, & E. L. Rossi, Hypnotické světy: Klinická hypnóza a nepřímé sugesce (pp. 351-358). Brno: Emitos.




  1. Roth, A. E., & Murnighan, K. J. (1978). Equilibrium behavior and repeated play of the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 17, 189–98.




  1. Runciman, W. G., Maynard Smith, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996). Evolution of social behaviour patterns in primates and man. Oxford: Oxford University Press.




  1. Sally, D. (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7, 58-92.




  1. Samuelson, L. (1987). A note on uncertainty and cooperation in a finitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma. International Journal of Game Theory, 16, 187-95.




  1. Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (1991). Ekonomie. Praha: Nakladatelství Svoboda. [Economics. Translated by Mejstřík, M., Sojka, M., & Kotulán, A.]




  1. Schelling, T. C. (1960a). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.




  1. Schelling, T. C. (1960b/2005). Reciprocal measures for arms stabilization. Daedalus, 134, 101-117.




  1. Schelling, T. C. (1962). The role of deterrence in total disarmament. Foreign Affairs, 40, 392-406.




  1. Schelling, T. C. (1968). Game theory and the study of ethical systems. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 12, 34-44.




  1. Schelling, T. C. (2009). A world without nuclear weapons? Daedalus, 138, 124-129.




  1. Scinto, D. L., Sistrunk, F., & Clement, D. E. (1972). Effect of the magnitude of reward upon cooperative game behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 86, 155-156.




  1. Scodel, A., Minas, J. S., Ratoosh, P., & Lipetz, M. (1959). Some descriptive aspects of two-person, non-zero-sum games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3, 114-119.




  1. Selten, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1984). Gaps in Harley’s argument on evolutionary stable learning rules and in the logic of ‘Tit For Tat’. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 115-16.




  1. Selten, R. (1975). Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 25-55.




  1. Sermat, V. (1967). The effect of an initial cooperative or competitive treatment upon a subject’s response to conditional cooperation. Behavioral Science, 12, 301-313.




  1. Shafir, E., & Tversky, A. (1992). Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 449–474.




  1. Shaw, J. I. (1976). Response-contingent payoffs and cooperative behavior in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1024-1033.




  1. Shefrin, H. M., & Statman, M. (1984). Explaining investor preference for cash dividends. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 393-425). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Shefrin, H. M., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 507-525). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Sheldon, K. M. (1999). Learning the lessons of tit-for-tat: Even competitors can get the message. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1245-1253.




  1. Shiller, R. J. (1979). The volatility of long-term interest rates and expectations models of team structure. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 1190-1219.




  1. Shiller, R. J. (1981). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 107-132). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Shiller, R. J. (1984). Stock prices and social dynamic. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 167-217). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Shubik, M. (1963). Some reflections on the design of game theoretic models for the study of negotiation and threats. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 7, 1-12.




  1. Sidowski, J. B., Wycoff, L. B., & Tabory, L. (1956). The influence of reinforcement and punishment in a minimal social situation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 115-119.




  1. Silverstein, A., Cross, D., Brown, J., & Rachlin, H. (1998). Prior experience and patterning in a Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 123-138.




  1. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.




  1. Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review, 49, 253-283.




  1. Simon, H. A. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74, 29-39.




  1. Simon, H. A. (1978a). Rationality as process and as product of thought. American Economic Association, 68, 1-16.




  1. Simon, H. A. (1978b). On how to decide what to do. Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 494-507.




  1. Simon, H. A. (1979). The sciences of the artificial (2nd edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.




  1. Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1-19.




  1. Simon, H. A. (1991). Cognitive architectures and rational analysis: Comment. In K. VanLehn (Ed.), Architectures for intelligence: The 22nd Carnegie Mellon Symposium on Cognition (pp. 25-40). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.




  1. Simon, H. A. (2001). Pro- and anti-list of the most significant contributions to economic literature of the twentieth century. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 8, 309-310.




  1. Singer, M. (1971/1982). The vitality of mythical numbers. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 408-413). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980/1982). Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky, A. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 463-489). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Sluzki, C. E. (2007). Interfaces: Toward a new generation of systemic models in family research and practice. Family Process, 46, 173-185.




  1. Stein, J. (1989). Overreaction in the options market. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 341-356). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Taylor, S. E. (1982). The availability bias in social perception and interaction. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 190-200). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Terhune, K. W. (1968). Motives, situation, and interpersonal conflict within prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 1-24.




  1. Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.




  1. Thaler, R. H. (Ed.) (1993). Advances in behavioral finance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.




  1. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. In D. Kahneman, A. & Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 241-268). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Thompson, L., Kray, L. J., & Lind, E. A. (1998). Cohesion and respect: An examination of group decision making in social and escalation dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 289-311.




  1. Tideman, N. T., & Tullock, G. (1976). A new and superior process for making social choices. Journal of Political Economy, 84, 1145-1159.




  1. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19-136). Toronto: Oxford University Press.




  1. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker’s paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. In W. G. Runciman, J. Maynard Smith, & R. I. M. Dunbar (Eds.), Evolution of social behaviour patterns in primates and man (pp. 119-143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.




  1. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. In R. Trivers, Natural selection and social theory (pp. 18-51). New York: Oxford University Press.




  1. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In R. Trivers, Natural selection and social theory (pp. 65-109). New York: Oxford University Press.




  1. Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. In R. Trivers, Natural selection and social theory (pp. 129-151). New York: Oxford University Press.




  1. Trivers, R. L. (1976). Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects: The unusual traits of the social insects are uniquely explained by Hamilton’s kinship theory. In R. Trivers, Natural selection and social theory (pp. 129-151). New York: Oxford University Press.




  1. Trivers, R. L. (2002). Natural selection and social theory. New York: Oxford University Press.




  1. Tucker, A. W., & Luce, R., D. (Eds.) (1959). Contributions to the theory of games, volume IV. Princeton: Princeton University Press.




  1. Turner, P., & Chao, L. (1999). Prisoner’s dilemma in an RNA virus. Nature, 398, 441-443.




  1. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 23-31). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973/1982). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 163-178). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 3-20). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1982). Evidential impact of base rates. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 153-160). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 143-158). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 44-65). New York: Cambridge University Press.




  1. Urbánek, T. (2003). Psychosémantika: Psychosémantický přístup ve výzkumu a diagnostice. Brno: Psychologický ústav AV ČR a Nakladatelství Pavel Křepela.




  1. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2004). Theory of games and economic behavior (60th anniversary edition). Princeton: Princeton University Press.




  1. Wade, M. J., & Breden, F. (1980). The evolution of cheating and selfish behavior. Behavioral Ecology and Socobiology, 7, 167-172.




  1. Wang, X. T. (1996a). Domain-specific rationality in human choices: Violations of utility axioms and social contexts. Cognition, 60, 31-63.




  1. Wang, X. T. (1996b). Framing effects: Dynamics and task domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 145-157.




  1. Wang, X. T., Simons, F., & Brédart, S. (2001). Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 1-15.




  1. Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.




  1. Williams, C. D., Steele, M. W., Tedeschi, J. T. (1969). Motivational correlates of strategy choices in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Social Psychology, 79, 211-217.




  1. Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.




  1. Wilson, E. O. (2000). Sociobiology: The new synthesis (25th anniversary edition). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.




  1. Wilson, J. G. (1986). Subjective probability and the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Management Science, 32, 45-55.




  1. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205-214.




  1. Zeig, J. K. (2008). An ericksonian approach to hypnosis: The phenomenological model of hypnosis; the nature of hypnotic “states”; multilevel communication and indirection; and why all hypnosis is not self-hypnosis. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36, 99-115.




  1. Zeig, J. K. (Ed.) (1995). The Evolution of psychotherapy: The third conference. New York: Brunner/Mazel.




  1. Zeig, J. (Ed.) (2010). Výukový seminář s Miltonem H. Ericksonem: Netradiční hypnoterapie. Brno: Emitos. [A teaching seminar with Milton H. Erickson. Translated by Černohousová, T. & Barbarič, J.]




  1. Zeig, J. K., & Geary, B. B. (Eds.) (2000). The letters of Milton H. Erickson. Phoenix: Zeig, Tucker & Theisen.



Yüklə 2,24 Mb.

Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   ...   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©www.genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə