-
Airiau, S., Saha, S., & Sen, S. (2007). Evolutionary tournament-based comparison of learning and non-learning algorithms for iterated games. Journal of Artificial Societies & Social Simulation, 10, 1-12.
-
Alpert, M., & Raiffa, H. (1969/1982). A progress report on the training of probability assessors. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 294-305). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. H. (1993). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma: Experimental evidence. The Economic Journal, 103, 570-585.
-
Aumann, R. J. (1959). Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. In A. W. Tucker, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Contributions to the theory of games, volume IV (pp. 287-324). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Axelrod, R. (1967). Conflict of interest: An axiomatic approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11, 87-99.
-
Axelrod, R. (1980a). Effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 3-25.
-
Axelrod, R. (1980b). More effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict resolution, 24, 379-403.
-
Axelrod, R. (1981). The emergence of cooperation among egoists. American Political Review, 75, 306-318.
-
Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Axelrod, R. (2006). The evolution of cooperation (Revised edition). New York: Basic Books.
-
Axelrod, R., & Dion, D. (1988). The further evolution of cooperation. Science, 242, 1385-1390.
-
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390-1396.
-
Banerjee, D. & Sen, S. (2007). Reaching pareto-optimality in prisoner’s dilemma using conditional joint action learning. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 15, 91 – 108.
-
Bar-Hillel, M. (1982). Studies of representativeness. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 69-83). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
-
Batson, D. C., & Moran, T. (1999). Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner’s dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 909-924.
-
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 295-307.
-
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275,1293–1295.
-
Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2000). Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 123, 2189-2202.
-
Bedell, J., & Sistrunk, F. (1973). Power, opportunity costs, and sex in a mixed-motive game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 219-226.
-
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 301-316). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bendor, J. (1987). In good times and bad: Reciprocity in an uncertain world. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 531–38.
-
Bendor, J. (1993). Uncertainty and the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 709–34.
-
Bendor, J., Kramer, R. M., & Stout, S. (1991). When in doubt… Cooperation in a noisy Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 691-719.
-
Bendor, J., & Swistak, P. (1997). The evolutionary stability of cooperation. American Political Science Review, 91, 290–307.
-
Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Roth, A. E. (2006). The speed of learning in noisy games: Partial reinforcement and the sustainability of cooperation. American Economic Review, 96, 1029-1042.
-
Bernard, V. L. (1993). Stock price reactions to earnings announcements: A summary of recent anomalous evidence and possible explanations. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 303-340). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Turkey, P. (Eds. ) (1998). Human reproductive behavior: A Darwinian perspective. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bicchieri, C. (2002). Covenants without swords: Group identity, norms, and communication in social dilemmas. Rationality and Society, 14, 192-228.
-
Binmore, K. (1999). Why experiment in economics? Economic Journal, 109, 16–24.
-
Black, F. (1986). Noise. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 3-22). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Bó, P. D. (2005). Cooperation under the shadow of the future: Experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games. American Economic Review, 95, 1591-1604.
-
Boyd, R., & Lorberbaum, J. (1987). No pure strategy is evolutionarily stable in the repeated prisoner’s dilemma game. Nature, 327, 58–59.
-
Bradley, J. V. (1958). Complete counterbalancing of immediate sequential effects in a Latin square design. Journal of American Statistical Association, 53, 525-528.
-
Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543-549.
-
Caldwell, M. D. (1976). Communication and sex effects in a five-person Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 273-280.
-
Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. (1971). Test results are what you think they are. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 239-248). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Chase, I. D. (1980). Cooperative and noncooperative behavior in animals. American Naturalist, 115, 827-857.
-
Chater, N., Vlaev, I., & Grinberg, M. (2008). A new consequence of Simpson’s paradox: Stable cooperation in one-shot Prisoner’s Dilemma from populations of individualistic learners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 403–421.
-
Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (1988). The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
-
Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.
-
Chopra, N., Lakonishok, J., & Ritter, J. R. (1992). Measuring abnormal performance: Do stocks overreact? In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 265-302). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Cohen, M. D., & Axelrod, R. (1984). Coping with complexity: The adaptive value of changing utility. American Economic Review, 74, 30-42.
-
Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory (1st paperback edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Colman, A. M. (2003). Depth of strategic reasoning in games. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 2-4.
-
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163-228). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
-
Cutler, D. M., Poterba, J. M., & Summers, L. H. (1989). What moves stock prices? In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 133-151). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences, 351, 1413–1420.
-
Dawkins, R. (1999). The extended phenotype (2nd edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Dawkins, R. (2006a). Foreword to the new edition of The Evolution of Cooperation. In R. Axelrod, The evolution of cooperation (pp. xi-xvi). New York: Basic Books.
-
Dawkins, R. (2006b). The selfish gene (3rd edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
-
De Bondt, W. F. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Does the stock market overreact? In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 249-264). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
de Heus, P., Hoogervorst, N., & van Dijk, E. (2010). Framing prisoners and chickens: Valence effects in the prisoner’s dilemma and the chicken game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 735-742.
-
De Long, B. J., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., & Waldmann, R. J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 23-58). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
-
Denrell, J. (2005). Why most people disapprove of me: Experience sampling in impression formation. Psychological Review, 112, 951–978.
-
Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265-279.
-
Deutsch, D. (1985). Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proceedings of the Royal Society, A400, 97-117.
-
Dudai, Y., & Carruthers, M. (2005). The Janus face of mnemosyne. Nature, 434, 567.
-
Eddy, D. M. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 249-267). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Edney, J. J., & Harper, C. S. (1978). The effects of information in a resource management problem: A social trap analog. Human Ecology, 6, 387-395.
-
Einhorn, H. J. (1980). Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 268-283). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Erickson, M. H. (1959/2009a). Further clinical techniques of hypnosis: Utilization techniques. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52, 341-363.
-
Erickson, M. H. (1959/2009b). Naturalistic techniques of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 2009, 52, 333-341.
-
Erickson, M. H., & Rossi, E. L. (2009). Hypnotické světy: Klinická hypnóza a nepřímé sugesce. Brno: Emitos. [Hypnotic realities: The induction of clinical hypnosis and forms of indirect suggestion. Translated by Kohoutek, T., & Kleinová, K.]
-
Erickson, M. H., & Rossi, E. L. (2010). Hypnotická psychoterapie: Kniha případových studií [Hypnoterapy: An exploratory casebook. Translated by ___]. Brno: Emitos.
-
Fagen, R. M. (1980). When doves conspire: Evolution of nondamaging fighting tactics in a nonrandom-encounter animal conflict model. American Naturalist, 115, 858-869.
-
Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1997). Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 355-373.
-
Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115-141.
-
Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659–676.
-
Fischhoff, B. (1982). Debiasing. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 422-444). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Fisher, R. A. (2000). The genetical theory of natural selection (3d edition). New York: Oxfor University Press.
-
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1998). A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 118-142). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Frank, S. (1995). Mutual policing and repression of competition in the evolution of cooperative groups. Nature, 377, 520-522.
-
Frean, M. (1996). The evolution of degrees of cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 182, 549-559.
-
French, K. R., & Roll, R. (1986). Stock return variances: The arrival of information and the reaction of traders. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 219-245). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Fudenberg, D., & Levine, K. (1998). The theory of learning in games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Gallo, P. S. (1966). Effects of increased incentive upon the use of threat in bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 14-20.
-
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1992). Nature’s mind: The biological roots of thinking, emotion, sexuality, language, and intelligence. New York: Basic Books.
-
Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience (2nd edition). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
-
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.) (2002). Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Gotts, N. M., Polhill, J. G., & Law, A. N. R. (2003). Agent-based simulation in the study of social dilemmas. Artificial Intelligence Review, 19, 3–92.
-
Guetzkow, H. (1957). A use of simulation in the study of inter-national relations. Behavioral Science, 2, 183-191.
-
Gumpert, P., Deutsch, M., & Epstein, Y. (1969). Effect of incentive magnitude on cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 66-69.
-
Haldane, J. B. S. (1955). Population genetics. New Biology, 18, 34-51.
-
Haley, J. (1993). Uncommon therapy: The psychiatric techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D. (new printing). New York, W. W. Norton & Company.
-
Haley, J. (Ed.) (1999a). Conversations with Milton H. Erickson, M.D., volume I: Changing individuals. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
-
Haley, J. (Ed.) (1999b). Conversations with Milton H. Erickson, M.D., volume II: Changing couples. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
-
Haley, J. (Ed.) (1999c). Conversations with Milton H. Erickson, M.D., volume III: Changing children and families. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
-
Hamilton, W. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Joural of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-52.
-
Hamilton, W. (1972). Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systemics, 3, 193-232.
-
Harris, R. J. (1969). Optimal policies for the prisoner’s dilemma. Psychological Review, 76, 363-375.
-
Hauk, E. (2003). Multiple Prisoner’s Dilemma games with(out) an outside option: An experimental study. Theory and Decision, 54, 207-229.
-
Hauk, E., & Nagel, R. (2001). Choice of partners in multiple two-person Prisoner’s Dilemma games: An experimental study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45, 770–93.
-
Helbing, D., Schönhof, M., Stark, H.-U., & Hołyst, J. (2005). How individuals learn to take turns: Emergence of alternating cooperation in a congestion game and the prisoner’s dilemma. Advances in Complex Systems, 8, 87–116.
-
Hertel, G., Neuhof, J., Theuer, T., & Kerr, N. L. (2000). Mood effects on cooperation in small groups: Does positive mood simply lead to more cooperation? Cognition and Emotion, 14, 441-472.
-
Hirsh, J. B., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Extraversion, neuroticism, and the prisoner’s dilemma. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 254-256.
-
Hofstadter, D. (1985). Metamagical themas: Questing for the essence of mind and pattern. New York: Basic Books.
-
Howard, N. (1966). The mathematics of meta-games. General Systems, 11, 187-200.
-
Jackendoff, R. (1995). Patterns in the mind: Language and human nature. New York: Basic Books.
-
Jennings, D. L., Amabile, T. M., & Ross, L. (1982). Informal covariation assessment: Data-based versus theory-based judgments. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 211-230). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., & Kunreuther, H. (1993). Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 224-240). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Jones, B., Steele, M., Gahagan, J., & Tedeschi, J. (1968). Matrix values and cooperative behavior in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 148-153.
-
Jones, G. (2008). Are smarter groups more cooperative? Evidence from prisoner’s dilemma experiments, 1959-2003. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68, 489-497.
-
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 159-170). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 393-413). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (24th printing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972/1982). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 32-47). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 48-68). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 17-43). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979/1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 190-200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246, 167-173.
-
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames (9th printing). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Kelley, H. H., & Grzelak, J. (1972). Conflict between individual and common interest in an N-person relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 190-197.
-
Kerr, N. L., & Kaufman-Gilliland, C. M. (1994). Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 513-529.
-
Kleinfield, S. (1983). The traders. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
-
Kollock, P. (1993). ‘An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind’: Cooperation and accounting systems. American Sociological Review, 58, 768-86.
-
Koukolík, F. (2002). Lidský mozek: Funkční systémy: norma a poruchy (2nd edition). Praha: Portál.
-
Koukolík, F. (2006). Sociální mozek. Praha: Nakladatelství Karolinum.
-
Kreps, D. M., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., & Wilson, R. (1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 245-252.
-
Kreps, D. M., & Wilson, R. (1982). Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 253-79.
-
Kuhlman, D. M, Brown, C, & Teta, P. (1992). Judgments of cooperation and defection in social dilemmas: The moderating role of judge’s social orientation. In W. B. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 111-132). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
-
Kuhlman, M. D., & Marshello, A. F. J. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 922-931.
-
Kunreuther, H., Ginsberg, R., Miller, L., Sagi, P., Slovic, P., Borkan, B., & Katz, N. (1978). Disaster insurance protection: Public policy lessons. New York: Wiley Interscience.
-
Lave, L. (1965). Factors affecting cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma. Behavioral Science, 10, 26-38.
-
Le, S., & Boyd, R. (2007). Evolutionary dynamics of the continuous iterated prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 245, 258-267.
-
Lee, C. M. C., Shleifer, A., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Investor sentiment and the closed-end fund puzzle. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 59-104). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Leslie, A. (1992). Pretense, autism and the theory-of-mind module. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 18-21.
-
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D., (1977/1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306-334). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Liebrand, W. B., Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H. A. (Eds.) (1992). Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
-
Luce, D. R., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions. New York: Wiley.
-
Lutzker, D. R. (1960). Internationalism as a predictor of cooperative behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4, 426-430.
-
Macy, M. W. (1991). Learning to cooperate: Stochastic and tacit collusion in social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 808-843.
-
Majolo, B., Ames, K., Brumpton, R., Garratt, R., Hall, K., & Wilson, N. (2006). Human friendship favours cooperation in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma. Behaviour, 143, 1383-1395.
-
Maynard Smith, J. (1964). The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflict. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47, 209-221.
-
McClintock, C. G., Harrison, A. A., Strand, S., & Gallo, P. (1963). Internationalism-isolationism, strategy of the other player, and two-person game behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 631-636.
-
McClintock, C. G., & McNeel, S. P. (1966). Reward and score feedback as determinants of cooperative and competitive game behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 606-613.
-
McGinn, C. (1991). The problem of consciousness. Oxford: Blackwell.
-
McKelvey, R. D., & Palfrey, T. R. (1992). An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica, 60, 803-36.
-
Messick, D. M., & Thomgate, W. B. (1967). Relative gain maximization in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 85-101.
-
Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
-
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1982). Predation, reputation and entry deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 280-312.
-
Miller, G. (2001). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Anchor Books.
-
Miller, G. (2007). A surprising connection between memory and imagination, Science, 315, 312.
-
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
-
Minas, J. S., Scodel, A., Marlowe, D., & Rawson, H. (1960). Some descriptive aspects of two-person, non-zero-sum games. Part II. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 4, 193-197.
-
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Minuchin, S. (1995). The leap to complexity: Supervision in family therapy. In J. K. Zeig (Ed.), The evolution of psychotherapy: The third conference (pp. 271-281). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
-
Mokros, A., Eisenbarth, B. M. H., Alpers, G. W., Lange, K. W., & Osterheider, M. (2008). Diminished cooperativeness of psychopaths in a Prisoner’s Dilemma game yields higher rewards. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 406–413.
-
Molander, P. (1985). The optimal level of generosity in a selfish, uncertain environment. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29, 611–18.
-
Monterosso, J., Ainslie, G., Pamela Toppi Mullen, P. A.-C., & Gault, B. (2002). The fragility of cooperation: A false feedback study of a sequential iterated prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 437-448.
-
Moore, M. J., & Moore, M. C. (1989). Adaptive learning, adaptive utility, and rational behavior in a repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2, 367-383.
-
Morehouse, L. G. (1966). One-play, two-play, five-play, and ten-play runs of prisoner’s dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10, 354-362.
-
Morris, M. W., Sim, D. L. H., & Girotto, V. (1998). Distinguishing sources of cooperation in the one-round Prisoner’s Dilemma: Evidence for cooperative decisions based on the illusion of control. Journal of experimental social psychology, 34, 494-512.
-
Mulford, M., Jackson, J., & Svedsäter, H. (2008). Encouraging cooperation: Revisiting solidarity and commitment effects in prisoner’s dilemma games. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2964-2989.
-
Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Fong, G. T. (1982). Improving inductive inference. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 445-459). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Nowak, M., & Sigmund, K. (1992). Tit for Tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature, 355, 250-253.
-
Nowak, M., & Sigmund, K. (1993). A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Nature, 364, 56-58.
-
Orbell, J. M., van der Kragt, A. J. C., & Dawes, R. M. (1988). Explaining discussion-induced cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 811-819.
-
Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 287-293). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Oskamp, S. (1971). Effects of programmed strategies on cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma and other mixed-motive games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15, 225-259.
-
Oskamp, S. (1974). Comparison of sequential and simultaneous responding, matrix, and strategy variables in a Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 18, 107-116.
-
Oskamp, S., & Kleinke, C. (1970). Amount of reward as a variable in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 133-140.
-
Palfrey, T. R., & Rosenthal, H. (1988). Private incentives in social dilemmas: The effects of incomplete information and altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 35, 309-32.
-
Pilisuk, M., & Rapoport, A. (1964). Stepwise disarmament and sudden destruction in a two-person game: A research tool. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 8, 36-49.
-
Pilisuk, M., Potter, P., Rapoport, A., & Winter, A. J. (1965). War hawks and peace doves: Alternate resolutions of experimental conflicts. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 9, 491-507.
-
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow and Company.
-
Pinker, S. (2009). How the mind works. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
-
Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 451-472). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Rabin, M. (2000). Diminishing marginal utility of wealth cannot explain risk aversion. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 202-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Raineri, A., & Rachlin. H. (1993). The effects of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 77-94.
-
Rapoport, A. (1964). Strategy and conscience. New York: Harper and Row.
-
Rapoport, A. (1967a). Optimal policies for the prisoner’s dilemma. Psychological review, 74, 136-148.
-
Rapoport, A. (1967b). A note on the “index of cooperation” for prisoner’s dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11, 100-103.
-
Rapoport, A. (1967c). Escape from paradox. Scientific American, 217, 50-56.
-
Rapoport, A. (1968). Prospects for experimental games. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 12, 461-470.
-
Rapoport, A. (1988a). Experiments with social n-person traps I: Prisoner’s dilemma, weak prisoner’s dilemma, volunteer’s dilemma, and largest number. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 457-472.
-
Rapoport, A. (1988b). Experiments with social n-person traps II: Tragedy of the commons. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 473-488.
-
Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965a). A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
-
Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965b). Sex differences in factors contributing to the level of cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 831-838.
-
Rapoport, A., & Dale, P. S. (1966). The “end” and “start” effects in iterated prisoner’s dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 10, 363-366.
-
Rapoport, A., & Guyer, M. (1966). A taxonomy of 2x2 games, General Systems, 11, 203–214.
-
Rapoport, A., Guyer, M. J., & Gordon, D. G. (1976). The 2x2 game. Ann Arbor: University of Michgan Press.
-
Rapoport, A., & Orwant, C. (1962). Experimental games: A review. Behavioral Science, 7, 1-37.
-
Ridley, M. (1993). The red queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature. London: Viking Press.
-
Roberts, G. (1998). Competitive altruism: From reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proceedings of Royal Society of London Biological Sciences, 265: 427-431.
-
Ross, L., Anderson, C. A. (1982). Shortcomings in the attribution process: On the origins and maintenance of erroneous social assessments.
-
Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979/1982). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 179-189). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Rossi, E., Erickson-Klein, R., Rossi, K. (2009). Zaměření na budoucnost v kontextu konstruktivní paměti: Evoluční pohled na terapeutickou hypnózu a krátkodobou psychoterapii. In M. H. Erickson, & E. L. Rossi, Hypnotické světy: Klinická hypnóza a nepřímé sugesce (pp. 351-358). Brno: Emitos.
-
Roth, A. E., & Murnighan, K. J. (1978). Equilibrium behavior and repeated play of the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 17, 189–98.
-
Runciman, W. G., Maynard Smith, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996). Evolution of social behaviour patterns in primates and man. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Sally, D. (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7, 58-92.
-
Samuelson, L. (1987). A note on uncertainty and cooperation in a finitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma. International Journal of Game Theory, 16, 187-95.
-
Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (1991). Ekonomie. Praha: Nakladatelství Svoboda. [Economics. Translated by Mejstřík, M., Sojka, M., & Kotulán, A.]
-
Schelling, T. C. (1960a). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
-
Schelling, T. C. (1960b/2005). Reciprocal measures for arms stabilization. Daedalus, 134, 101-117.
-
Schelling, T. C. (1962). The role of deterrence in total disarmament. Foreign Affairs, 40, 392-406.
-
Schelling, T. C. (1968). Game theory and the study of ethical systems. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 12, 34-44.
-
Schelling, T. C. (2009). A world without nuclear weapons? Daedalus, 138, 124-129.
-
Scinto, D. L., Sistrunk, F., & Clement, D. E. (1972). Effect of the magnitude of reward upon cooperative game behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 86, 155-156.
-
Scodel, A., Minas, J. S., Ratoosh, P., & Lipetz, M. (1959). Some descriptive aspects of two-person, non-zero-sum games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3, 114-119.
-
Selten, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1984). Gaps in Harley’s argument on evolutionary stable learning rules and in the logic of ‘Tit For Tat’. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 115-16.
-
Selten, R. (1975). Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 25-55.
-
Sermat, V. (1967). The effect of an initial cooperative or competitive treatment upon a subject’s response to conditional cooperation. Behavioral Science, 12, 301-313.
-
Shafir, E., & Tversky, A. (1992). Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 449–474.
-
Shaw, J. I. (1976). Response-contingent payoffs and cooperative behavior in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1024-1033.
-
Shefrin, H. M., & Statman, M. (1984). Explaining investor preference for cash dividends. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 393-425). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Shefrin, H. M., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 507-525). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Sheldon, K. M. (1999). Learning the lessons of tit-for-tat: Even competitors can get the message. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1245-1253.
-
Shiller, R. J. (1979). The volatility of long-term interest rates and expectations models of team structure. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 1190-1219.
-
Shiller, R. J. (1981). Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 107-132). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Shiller, R. J. (1984). Stock prices and social dynamic. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 167-217). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Shubik, M. (1963). Some reflections on the design of game theoretic models for the study of negotiation and threats. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 7, 1-12.
-
Sidowski, J. B., Wycoff, L. B., & Tabory, L. (1956). The influence of reinforcement and punishment in a minimal social situation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 115-119.
-
Silverstein, A., Cross, D., Brown, J., & Rachlin, H. (1998). Prior experience and patterning in a Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 123-138.
-
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.
-
Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review, 49, 253-283.
-
Simon, H. A. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74, 29-39.
-
Simon, H. A. (1978a). Rationality as process and as product of thought. American Economic Association, 68, 1-16.
-
Simon, H. A. (1978b). On how to decide what to do. Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 494-507.
-
Simon, H. A. (1979). The sciences of the artificial (2nd edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1-19.
-
Simon, H. A. (1991). Cognitive architectures and rational analysis: Comment. In K. VanLehn (Ed.), Architectures for intelligence: The 22nd Carnegie Mellon Symposium on Cognition (pp. 25-40). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
-
Simon, H. A. (2001). Pro- and anti-list of the most significant contributions to economic literature of the twentieth century. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 8, 309-310.
-
Singer, M. (1971/1982). The vitality of mythical numbers. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 408-413). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980/1982). Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky, A. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 463-489). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Sluzki, C. E. (2007). Interfaces: Toward a new generation of systemic models in family research and practice. Family Process, 46, 173-185.
-
Stein, J. (1989). Overreaction in the options market. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Advances in behavioral finance (pp. 341-356). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Taylor, S. E. (1982). The availability bias in social perception and interaction. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 190-200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Terhune, K. W. (1968). Motives, situation, and interpersonal conflict within prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 1-24.
-
Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.
-
Thaler, R. H. (Ed.) (1993). Advances in behavioral finance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
-
Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. In D. Kahneman, A. & Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 241-268). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Thompson, L., Kray, L. J., & Lind, E. A. (1998). Cohesion and respect: An examination of group decision making in social and escalation dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 289-311.
-
Tideman, N. T., & Tullock, G. (1976). A new and superior process for making social choices. Journal of Political Economy, 84, 1145-1159.
-
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19-136). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
-
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker’s paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. In W. G. Runciman, J. Maynard Smith, & R. I. M. Dunbar (Eds.), Evolution of social behaviour patterns in primates and man (pp. 119-143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. In R. Trivers, Natural selection and social theory (pp. 18-51). New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In R. Trivers, Natural selection and social theory (pp. 65-109). New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Trivers, R. L. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. In R. Trivers, Natural selection and social theory (pp. 129-151). New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Trivers, R. L. (1976). Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects: The unusual traits of the social insects are uniquely explained by Hamilton’s kinship theory. In R. Trivers, Natural selection and social theory (pp. 129-151). New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Trivers, R. L. (2002). Natural selection and social theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Tucker, A. W., & Luce, R., D. (Eds.) (1959). Contributions to the theory of games, volume IV. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Turner, P., & Chao, L. (1999). Prisoner’s dilemma in an RNA virus. Nature, 398, 441-443.
-
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 23-31). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973/1982). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 163-178). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 3-20). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1982). Evidential impact of base rates. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 153-160). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 143-158). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. In D. Kahneman, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 44-65). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Urbánek, T. (2003). Psychosémantika: Psychosémantický přístup ve výzkumu a diagnostice. Brno: Psychologický ústav AV ČR a Nakladatelství Pavel Křepela.
-
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2004). Theory of games and economic behavior (60th anniversary edition). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Wade, M. J., & Breden, F. (1980). The evolution of cheating and selfish behavior. Behavioral Ecology and Socobiology, 7, 167-172.
-
Wang, X. T. (1996a). Domain-specific rationality in human choices: Violations of utility axioms and social contexts. Cognition, 60, 31-63.
-
Wang, X. T. (1996b). Framing effects: Dynamics and task domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 145-157.
-
Wang, X. T., Simons, F., & Brédart, S. (2001). Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 1-15.
-
Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
-
Williams, C. D., Steele, M. W., Tedeschi, J. T. (1969). Motivational correlates of strategy choices in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Social Psychology, 79, 211-217.
-
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Wilson, E. O. (2000). Sociobiology: The new synthesis (25th anniversary edition). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
-
Wilson, J. G. (1986). Subjective probability and the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Management Science, 32, 45-55.
-
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205-214.
-
Zeig, J. K. (2008). An ericksonian approach to hypnosis: The phenomenological model of hypnosis; the nature of hypnotic “states”; multilevel communication and indirection; and why all hypnosis is not self-hypnosis. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 36, 99-115.
-
Zeig, J. K. (Ed.) (1995). The Evolution of psychotherapy: The third conference. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
-
Zeig, J. (Ed.) (2010). Výukový seminář s Miltonem H. Ericksonem: Netradiční hypnoterapie. Brno: Emitos. [A teaching seminar with Milton H. Erickson. Translated by Černohousová, T. & Barbarič, J.]
-
Zeig, J. K., & Geary, B. B. (Eds.) (2000). The letters of Milton H. Erickson. Phoenix: Zeig, Tucker & Theisen.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |