12.4 Results
Here, only the statistically significant results of the performed regression analyses will be reviewed:
In general, we found statistically significant positive relation between the willingness to cooperate stated by subjects and their (stated) friendliness:
“45” and “49”, β* = 0,34, p < 0,05 (for more details see Table 12.1 below);
“45” and “50”, β* = 0,36, p < 0,05 (see Table 12.2);
“45” and “51”, β* = 0,60, p < 0,001 (see Table 12.3);
“45” and “56”, β* = 0,49, p < 0,001; variable “56” is also related to “48”: β* = 0,35, p < 0,05 (see Table 12.4);
“45” and “57”, β* = 0,54, p < 0,001 (see Table 12.5);
“45” and “58”, β* = 0,53, p < 0,001 (see Table 12.6).
Table 12.1: The results of regression analysis with dependent Variable “49”
|
Multiple regression results with dependent variable: “49”
R= ,37185231 R2= ,13827414 Adjusted R2= ,04989200
F(4,39)=1,5645 p<,20299 Standard error of estimate: ,89861
|
N=44
|
β*
|
Std. error of β*
|
β
|
Std. error of β
|
t(39)
|
p-value
|
Abs. member
|
|
|
5,348598
|
1,278210
|
4,184442
|
0,000157
|
“45”
|
0,336842
|
0,155809
|
0,214754
|
0,099336
|
2,161893
|
0,036823
|
“46”
|
0,020589
|
0,165636
|
0,009843
|
0,079189
|
0,124302
|
0,901714
|
“47”
|
-0,013544
|
0,169942
|
-0,006909
|
0,086693
|
-0,079700
|
0,936884
|
“48”
|
0,111474
|
0,175760
|
0,055246
|
0,087105
|
0,634242
|
0,529626
|
Table 12.2: The results of regression analysis with dependent Variable “45”
|
Multiple regression results with dependent variable: “50”
R= ,36963868 R2= ,13663275 Adjusted R2= ,04808226
F(4,39)=1,5430 p<,20884 Standard error of estimate: 1,1014
|
N=44
|
β*
|
Std. error of β*
|
β
|
Std. error of β
|
t(39)
|
p-value
|
Abs. member
|
|
|
5,047984
|
1,566647
|
3,222158
|
0,002570
|
“45”
|
0,364988
|
0,155957
|
0,284937
|
0,121752
|
2,340303
|
0,024478
|
“46”
|
-0,031782
|
0,165793
|
-0,018606
|
0,097059
|
-0,191697
|
0,848974
|
“47”
|
0,009710
|
0,170104
|
0,006065
|
0,106256
|
0,057084
|
0,954770
|
“48”
|
-0,009954
|
0,175927
|
-0,006041
|
0,106761
|
-0,056581
|
0,955168
|
Table 12.3: The results of regression analysis with dependent Variable “51”
|
Multiple regression results with dependent variable: “51”
R= ,62588663 R2= ,39173407 Adjusted R2= ,32934782
F(4,39)=6,2792 p<,00053 Standard error of estimate: 1,0222
|
N=44
|
β*
|
Std. error of β*
|
β
|
Std. error of β
|
t(39)
|
p-value
|
Abs. member
|
|
|
2,717231
|
1,454070
|
1,868707
|
0,069188
|
“45”
|
0,604038
|
0,130905
|
0,521434
|
0,113003
|
4,614336
|
0,000042
|
“46”
|
0,191757
|
0,139161
|
0,124132
|
0,090084
|
1,377956
|
0,176072
|
“47”
|
-0,136347
|
0,142778
|
-0,094178
|
0,098621
|
-0,954953
|
0,345483
|
“48”
|
0,011231
|
0,147667
|
0,007536
|
0,099089
|
0,076055
|
0,939764
|
Table 12.4: The results of regression analysis with dependent Variable “56”
|
Multiple regression results with dependent variable: “56”
R= ,58359511 R2= ,34058325 Adjusted R2= ,27295076
F(4,39)=5,0358 p<,00227 Standard error of estimate: ,85425
|
N=44
|
β*
|
Std. error of β*
|
β
|
Std. error of β
|
t(39)
|
p-value
|
Abs. member
|
|
|
3,559891
|
1,215115
|
2,929675
|
0,005644
|
“45”
|
0,494734
|
0,136298
|
0,342773
|
0,094433
|
3,629808
|
0,00081
|
“46”
|
0,070419
|
0,144894
|
0,036586
|
0,075280
|
0,486003
|
0,629685
|
“47”
|
0,150818
|
0,148661
|
0,083610
|
0,082414
|
1,014511
|
0,316592
|
“48”
|
0,345173
|
0,153750
|
0,185899
|
0,082805
|
2,245024
|
0,030511
|
Table 12.5: The results of regression analysis with dependent Variable “57”
|
Multiple regression results with dependent variable: “57”
R= ,59681087 R2= ,35618321 Adjusted R2= ,29015072
F(4,39)=5,3941 p<,00148 Standard error of estimate: ,81145
|
N=44
|
β*
|
Std. error of β*
|
β
|
Std. error of β
|
t(39)
|
p-value
|
Abs. member
|
|
|
4,776218
|
1,154236
|
4,137992
|
0,000181
|
“45”
|
0,542418
|
0,134676
|
0,361280
|
0,089701
|
4,027585
|
0,000252
|
“46”
|
-0,091455
|
0,143169
|
-0,045678
|
0,071508
|
-0,638785
|
0,526697
|
“47”
|
0,004962
|
0,146892
|
0,002644
|
0,078285
|
0,033779
|
0,973226
|
“48”
|
0,088880
|
0,151921
|
0,046017
|
0,078656
|
0,585040
|
0,561890
|
Table 12.6: The results of regression analysis with dependent Variable “58”
|
Multiple regression results with dependent variable: “58”
R= ,62598971 R2= ,39186312 Adjusted R2= ,32949011
F(4,39)=6,2826 p<,00053 Standard error of estimate: ,92225
|
N=44
|
β*
|
Std. error of β*
|
β
|
Std. error of β
|
t(39)
|
p-value
|
Abs. member
|
|
|
3,669303
|
1,311841
|
2,79706
|
0,007968
|
“45”
|
0,528896
|
0,130891
|
0,411953
|
0,101950
|
4,04075
|
0,000242
|
“46”
|
0,217359
|
0,139146
|
0,126955
|
0,081272
|
1,56209
|
0,126345
|
“47”
|
-0,225739
|
0,142763
|
-0,140687
|
0,088974
|
-1,58121
|
0,121907
|
“48”
|
0,116587
|
0,147651
|
0,070589
|
0,089397
|
0,78962
|
0,434527
|
We also found statistically significant positive relation between subjects’ expectations about their opponent’s willingness to cooperate and friendliness (higher friendliness was connected with higher expectations about opponents’ cooperation):
“45” and 53“, β* = 0,52, p < 0,001; variable “53” is also related to “47”: β* = 0,44, p < 0,01 (for more details see Table 12.7 below);
“45” and “54”, β* = 0,50, p < 0,01 (see Table 12.8);
“45” and “60”, β* = 0,42, p < 0,01 (see Table 12.9).
Table 12.7: The results of regression analysis with dependent Variable “53”
|
Multiple regression results with dependent variable: “53”
R= ,58709588 R2= ,34468158 Adjusted R2= ,27746943
F(4,39)=5,1283 p<,00203 Standard error of estimate: ,76063
|
N=44
|
β*
|
Std. error of β*
|
β
|
Std. error of β
|
t(39)
|
p-value
|
Abs. member
|
|
|
2,798825
|
1,081950
|
2,586833
|
0,013532
|
“45”
|
0,520255
|
0,135873
|
0,321955
|
0,084084
|
3,828973
|
0,000455
|
“46”
|
0,004548
|
0,144443
|
0,002111
|
0,067030
|
0,031486
|
0,975043
|
“47”
|
0,441221
|
0,148198
|
0,218476
|
0,073382
|
2,977242
|
0,004978
|
“48”
|
0,118603
|
0,153272
|
0,057053
|
0,073730
|
0,773811
|
0,443708
|
Table 12.8: The results of regression analysis with dependent Variable “54”
|
Multiple regression results with dependent variable: “54”
R= ,51473001 R2= ,26494698 Adjusted R2= ,19144168
F(4,40)=3,6045 p<,01335 Standard error of estimate: ,99902
|
N=45
|
β*
|
Std. error of β*
|
β
|
Std. error of β
|
t(40)
|
p-value
|
Abs. member
|
|
|
4,484745
|
1,407176
|
3,18705
|
0,002788
|
“45”
|
0,501869
|
0,142075
|
0,390057
|
0,110422
|
3,53242
|
0,001055
|
“46”
|
-0,018581
|
0,147331
|
-0,010679
|
0,084670
|
-0,12612
|
0,900269
|
“47”
|
-0,004111
|
0,156687
|
-0,002508
|
0,095566
|
-0,02624
|
0,979198
|
“48”
|
-0,224300
|
0,160108
|
-0,131840
|
0,094109
|
-1,40093
|
0,168945
|
Table 12.9: The results of regression analysis with dependent Variable “60”
|
Multiple regression results with dependent variable: “60”
R= ,44949557 R2= ,20204626 Adjusted R2= ,12020486
F(4,39)=2,4688 p<,06057 Standard error of estimate: ,74200
|
N=44
|
β*
|
Std. error of β*
|
β
|
Std. error of β
|
t(39)
|
p-value
|
Abs. member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“45”
|
0,415127
|
0,149933
|
0,227106
|
0,082025
|
2,768749
|
0,008567
|
“46”
|
0,124922
|
0,159389
|
0,051249
|
0,065389
|
0,783755
|
0,437918
|
“47”
|
0,182765
|
0,16353
|
0,080004
|
0,07158
|
1,117606
|
0,270573
|
“48”
|
0,236916
|
0,16913
|
0,10075
|
0,07192
|
1,400783
|
0,169186
|
We found statistically significant positive relation between the rate of cooperation in single-move games and friendliness and tolerance for ambiguity: “45” and “43”, β* = 0,36, p < 0,05; “46” and “43”, β* = 0,34, p < 0,05 (for details see Table 12.10).
Table 12.10: The results of regression analysis with dependent Variable “43”
|
Multiple regression results with dependent variable: “43”
R= ,44186235 R2= ,19524233 Adjusted R2= ,11053100
F(4,38)=2,3048 p<,07597 Standard error of estimate: 9,0697
|
N=43
|
β*
|
Std. error of β*
|
β
|
Std. error of β
|
t(38)
|
p-value
|
Abs. member
|
|
|
-15,1474
|
12,95060
|
-1,16963
|
0,249435
|
“45”
|
0,358595
|
0,153261
|
2,4836
|
1,06146
|
2,33976
|
0,024651
|
“46”
|
0,342578
|
0,159800
|
1,7041
|
0,79489
|
2,14379
|
0,038511
|
“47”
|
-0,019732
|
0,173106
|
-0,1044
|
0,91622
|
-0,11399
|
0,909849
|
“48”
|
0,033338
|
0,181682
|
0,1717
|
0,93546
|
0,18349
|
0,855386
|
We found statistically significant positive relation between the rate of cooperation against Tit for Tat and friendliness: “45” and “37”: β* = 0,46, p < 0,01 (for details see Table 12.11).
Table 12.11: The results of regression analysis with dependent Variable “37”
|
Multiple regression results with dependent variable: “37”
R= ,52347019 R2= ,27402104 Adjusted R2= ,20142314
F(4,40)=3,7745 p<,01072 Standard error of estimate: ,80313
|
N=45
|
β*
|
Std. error of β*
|
β
|
Std. error of β
|
t(40)
|
p-value
|
Abs. member
|
|
|
8,345551
|
1,131251
|
7,37728
|
0,000000
|
“45”
|
0,464997
|
0,141195
|
0,292345
|
0,088770
|
3,29329
|
0,002077
|
“46”
|
-0,098069
|
0,146419
|
-0,045591
|
0,068067
|
-0,66978
|
0,506843
|
“47”
|
-0,135186
|
0,155717
|
-0,066697
|
0,076827
|
-0,86815
|
0,390490
|
“48”
|
-0,248797
|
0,159116
|
-0,118296
|
0,075656
|
-1,56362
|
0,125786
|
Finally, we found statistically significant positive relation between the rate of cooperation against Bully and friendliness, as well as a statistically significant positive relation between tolerance towards ambiguity and the rate of cooperation against Bully: “45” and “41”: β* = 0,35, p < 0,05; “46” and “41”: β* = 0,37, p < 0,05 (for details see Table 12.12).
Table 12.12: The results of regression analysis with dependent Variable “41”
|
Multiple regression results with dependent variable: “41”
R= ,47663562 R2= ,22718151 Adjusted R2= ,14989966
F(4,40)=2,9396 p<,03201 Standard error of estimate: 1,3403
|
N=45
|
β*
|
Std. error of β*
|
β
|
Std. error of β
|
t(40)
|
p-value
|
Abs. member
|
|
|
2,673367
|
1,887866
|
1,416079
|
0,164493
|
“45”
|
0,350128
|
0,145679
|
0,356047
|
0,148142
|
2,403418
|
0,020969
|
“46”
|
0,372915
|
0,151068
|
0,280407
|
0,113593
|
2,468520
|
0,017938
|
“47”
|
0,133018
|
0,160662
|
0,106151
|
0,128211
|
0,827938
|
0,412618
|
“48”
|
-0,027198
|
0,164169
|
-0,020917
|
0,126256
|
-0,165672
|
0,869250
|
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
