A szárazföldi növények evolúciója és rendszertana Vezérfonal egy nem is olyan könnyű tárgy tanulásához Podani, János a szárazföldi növények evolúciója és rendszertana: Vezérfonal egy nem is olyan könnyű tárgy tanulásához

F. függelék - F) CD melléklet: Digitális Herbárium

A szövegbeli javításoknál és módosításoknál feltűnőbb változás a második kiadáshoz mellékelt CD lemez, rajta digitális felvételekkel, amelyek 99%-át a szerző készítette. A kb. háromezer kép elsőrendű funkciója, hogy a rendszertani ismertetéshez illusztrációul szolgáljon s egyúttal feloldja a talán túlságosan is „töményre” sikeredett szöveges anyagot. A részletekről a CD-n található PDF dokumentum ad információt.

A képek egyszerű, a szárazföldi növények rendszerének megfelelő, a C függeléket követő hierarchikus mappa-rendszerben vannak elrendezve. Csak azok a rendszertani kategóriák jelennek itt meg, amelyekből legalább egy faj szerepel az összeállításban. Legcélszerűbben olyan programmal nézhetők meg, amely a képeket vagy egyenként, vagy kicsinyített formában csoportosan is tudja ábrázolni, s mellette a mappák fa-struktúráját is bemutatja. A legismertebb ilyen program talán az ACDSee.

A mappa-rendszer felső hierarchiája a következő:

Bryophyta
Hepatophyta
Lycopodiophyta
Monilophyta
	A Psilotopsida
	B Equisetopsida
	C Marattiopsida
	D Ophioglossopsida
	E Polypodiopsida
Nyitvatermők
	Cycadophyta
	Ginkgophyta
	Gnetophyta
	Pinophyta
Zárvatermők
	A Magnolidák és Őslágyszárúak
	B Egyszikűek
	C Valódi Kétszikűek
		AA Alapi és Központi
		AB Rosid Alap
		AC Eurosid I (fabid)
		AD Eurosid II (malvid)
		AE Asterid Alap
		AF Euasterid I (lamiid)
		AG Euasterid II (campanulid)

1. Idézett, felhasznált és/vagy ajánlott irodalom

A kissé szokatlan cím arra utal, hogy az alábbi tételek jelentős részét felhasználtam, és ajánlani is tudom az Olvasónak. Ugyanakkor azt is jelzi, hogy akadnak olyan művek is, amelyeket inkább csak felhasználtam, de ajánlani nem igazán tudom – vagy éppen fordítva.

Abbayes, H. des, M. Chadefaud, J. Feldmann, Y. de Ferré, H, Gaussen, P.-P. Grassé et A. R. Prévot. 1978. Précis de Botanique. I. Masson, Paris.

Adams, E. N. 1972. Consensus techniques and the comparison oftaxonomic trees. Syst. Zool. 21:390-397.

Adegoke, J. A., U. Árnason and B. Widegren. 1993. Sequence organization and evolution, in all extant whalebone whales, of a DNA satellite with terminal chromosome localization. Chromosoma 102:382-38.

Akiyama, H. 1999. Genetic vartation of the asexually reproducing moss, Takakia lepidozioides. J. Bryol. 21: 177-182 Part 3.

Albach, D. C., Meudt, H. M. & Oxelman, B. 2005. Piecing together the „new” Plantaginaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 297-315.

Albach, D.C., P.S. Soltis, D.E. Soltis et al. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of asterids based on sequences of four genes. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 88: 163-212.

Albach, D.C., P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis. 2001. Patterns of embryological and biochemical evolution in the asterids. Syst. Bot. 26: 242-262.

Albert, V.A., A. Backlund, K. Bremer et al. 1994. Functional constraints and rbcl evidence for land plant phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 81 (3): 534-567.

Albert V.A, S. E. Williams, M. W. Chase. 1992. Carnivorous plants - phylogeny and structural evolution. Science 257 (5076): 1491-1495.

The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2003. An update ofthe Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG 11. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 141: 399-436.

Archie, J. W., C. Simon and A. Martin. 1989. Small sample size does decrease the stability of dendrograms calculated from allozyme-frequency data. Evolution 43:678-683.

Arnold, C. A. 1953. Origin and relationships ofthe cycads. Phytomorphology 3, S. 51-65.

Ashlock, P. D. 1984. Monophyly: Its meaning and importance. In: Duncan and Stuessy (1984), pp. 39-46.

Astolfi, P., K. K. Kidd and L. L. Cavalli-Sforza. 1981. A comparison of methods of reconstructing evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 30:156-169.

Baldauf, S.L., A.J. Roger, I. Wenk-Siefert et al. 2000. A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. Science 290: 972-977.

Ballard, J. W. O. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:334.

Ballard, H. E. and K. J. Sytsma. 2000. Evolution and biogeography of the woody Hawaiian violets (Viola, Vio-laceae): Arctic origins, herbaceous ancestry and bird dispersal. Evolution 54 (5): 1521-1532.

Barbacka, M. and K. Bóka. 2000. The stomatal ontogeny and structure of the Liassic pteridosperm Sagenopteris (Caytoniales) from Hungary. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161:149-157.

Barker, N.P., L. G. Clark, J. I. Davis et al. 2001. Phylogeny and subfamilial classification of the grasses (Poaceae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 88 (3): 373-457.

Barthélemy, J. P. and F. R. McMorris. 1986. The median procedure for n-trees. J. Classif. 3:329-334.

Barthélemy, J. P. and B. Monjardet. 1981. The median procedure in cluster analysis and social choice theory. Math. Social Sci. 1:235-268.

Bateman, R. M. 1996. Nonfloral homoplasy and evolutionary scenarios in living and fossil land plants. In: Sanderson and Hufford (1996), pp. 91-130.

Bateman, R. M., P. R. Crane, W. A. DiMichele et al. 1998. Early evolution of land plants: Phylogeny, physiology, and ecology ofthe primary terrestrial radiation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 263-292.

Beardsley, P. M. & Olmstead, R. G. 2002. Redefining Phrymaceae: The placement of Mimulus, tribe Mimuleae and Phryma. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1093-1102.

Beckert, S., H. Muhle, D. Pruchner et al. 2001. The mitochondrial nad2 gene as a novel marker locus for phylogenetic analysis of early land plants: A comparative analysis in mosses. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18 (1): 117-126.

Bell, P. R. and A. R. Hemsley. 2000. Green Plants. Their Origin and Diversity. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

Bennett, J.R. & Mathews, S. 2006. Phylogeny of the parasitic plant family Orobanchaceae inferred from phytochrome A. Amer. J. Bot. 93: 1039-1051.

Birky, C. W. Jr. 1995. Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: Mechanisms and evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92: 11331-11338.

Borhidi A. 1995. A zárvatermők fejlődéstörténeti rendszertana. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.

Bowe, L.M., G. Coat, C. W. dePamphilis. 2000. Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: Extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales’ closest relatives are conifers. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 4092-4097.

Bower, F. O. 1908. The Origin of a Land Tlora. Macmillan, London. Bower, F. O. 1935. Primitive Land Plants. Macmillan, London.

Boyce, C.K., Hotton, C., Fogel, M., Cody, G.D., Hazen, R.M. and Knoll, A.H. 2003. Comparative geochemistry suggests Prototaxites was a gigantic fungus [Abstract]. Geological Society of America Meeting, Abstracts with Programs. 34(7): p. 587.

Bremer, B., K. Bremer, N. Heidari et al. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24: 274-301.

Bremer, K. 1985. Summary of green plant phylogeny and classification. Cladistics 1: 369-385.

Bremer, K. 1990. Combinable component consensus. Cladistics 6:369-372.

Bremer, K. 2000. Early Cretaceous lineages of monocot flowering plants. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97: 4707-4711.

Bremer, K, A. Backlund, B. Sennblad et al. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of 100+ genera and 50+ families of euasterids based on morphological and molecular data with notes on possible higher level. morphological synapomorphies Picim Syst. Evol. 229: 137-169.

Bremer, B., K. Bremer, N. Heidari et al. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Mol.. Phylogenet. Evol. 24 (2) : 274-301.

Bremer, K., M.W. Chase, P.F. Stevens et al. („APG”). 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 85: 531-553.

Bremer, K., C. J. Humphries, B. D. Mishler and S. P. Churchill. 1987. On cladistic relationships in green plants. Taxon 36:339-349.

Briggs, B.G. 2000. What is significant - The Wollemi pine or the southern rushes? Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 87: 72-80. Brooks, D. R. 1981. Hennig’s parasitological method: a proposed solution. Syst. Zool. 30:229-249.

Brown, W. M., E. M. Prager, A. Wang and A. C. Wilson. 1982. Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: Tempo and mode of evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 18:225-239.

Brunsfeld, S.J., P. E. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, P. A. Gadek, C. J. Quinn, D. D. Strenge and T. A. Ranker. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among the genera of Taxodiaceae and Cupressaceae: evidence from rbcL sequences. Syst. Bot. 19: 253-262.

Bryant, H. N. 1994. Comments on the phylogenetic definition of taxon names and conventions regarding the naming of crown clades. Syst. Biol. 43:124-130.

Caddick, L,R„ P. Wilkin, P.J. Rudall et al. 2002. Yams reclassified: a recircumscription of Dioscoreaceae and Dioscoreales. Taxon 51: 103-114.

Camin, J. H. and R. R. Sokal. 1965. A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution 19:311-326.

Cantino, P.D. 1992. Evidence for a polyphyletic origin ofthe Labiatae. Annals Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 361-379.

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and A. W. F. Edwards. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution 32:550-570.

Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., A. Piazza, P. Menozzi and J. L. Mountain. 1988. Reconstruction of human evolution: bringing together genetic, archaeological and linguistic data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:6002-6006.

Chapman, R.L. and D. A. Waters. 2002. Green algae and land plants - An answer at last? J. Phycol. 38: 237-240.

Chase, M.W., M.R. Duval, H.G. Hills, J.G. Conran, A.V. Cox, L.E. Eguiarte, J. Hartwell, M.F. Fay, L.R. Caddick, K.M. Cameron and S. Hoot. 1995. Molecular phylogenetics of Lilianae. In: P.J. Rudall, P.J. Crib, D.F. Cutler & C.J. Humpteries (eds.). Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution. Royal Botanic Garden, Kew. pp. 109137.

Chaw, S.M., C.L. Parkinson, Y.C. Cheng et al. 2000. Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: Monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97: 4086-4091.

Chaw, S.M., A. Zharkikh, H.M. Sung et al. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of extant gymnosperms and seed plant evolution: Analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 56-68.

Cheng, Y.C., R. G. Nicolson, K. Tripp et al. 2000. Phylogeny of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae genera inferred from chloroplast matK gene and nuclear rDNA ITS region. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14: 353-365.

Colless, D. H. 1980. Congruence between morphometric and allozyme data for Menidia species: a reappraisal. Syst. Zool. 29:288-299.

Conran, J.G., C.M. Wood, P.G. Martin et al. 2000. Generic relationships within and between the gymnosperm families Podocarpaceae and Phyllocladaceae based on an analysis of the chloroplast gene rbcL. Aust. J. Bot. 48: 715-724.

Cracraft, J. and K. Helm-Bychowski. 1991. Parsimony and phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: Some methodological strategies. In: Miyamoto and Cracraft (1991), pp. 184-220.

Crane, P.R. 1996. The fossil history ofthe Gnetales. Int. J Plant Sci. 157: 550-557 Suppl. S.

Craven, L.A. 2005. Malesian and Australian Tournefortia transferred to Heliotropium and notes on delimitation of Boraginaceae. Blumea 50: 375-381.

Crepet, W.L. 1998. Botany - The abominable mystery. Science 282 (5394): 1653-1654.

Crepet, W.L. 2000. Progress in understanding angiosperm history, success, and relationships: Darwin’s abominably „perplexing phenomenon”. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 12939-12941.

Crisci, J. V. and T. F. Stuessy. 1980. Determining primitive character states for phylogenetic reconstruction. Syst. Bot. 5:112-135.

Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

Culley, T.M., S. G. Weller and A. K. Sakai. 2002. Evolution of wind pollination in angiosperms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 (10): 491-491.

Dahlgren, R. 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nordic J. Bot. 3: 119-149.

Dahlgren, R. M. T., Clifford, H. T. and Yeo, P. F. 1985. The Families of the Monocotyledons: Structure, Evolution, and Taxonomy. Springer, New York.

Danert, S. és mtsai. 1980. Urania Növényvilág. I-III. Gondolat, Budapest.

Darwin, C. 1955. A fajok eredete a természetes kiválasztás útján vagy a létért való küzdelemben előnyhöz jutott fajtákfennmaradása. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

268 Irodalomjegyzék

Davis, C: C., M. Latvis, D. L. Nickrent, K. J. Wurdack, D. A. Baum. 2007. Floral gigantism in Rafflesiaceae. Science Express, published online January 11, 2007

Day, W. H. E. 1983. Computationally difficult parsimony problems in phylogenetic systematics. J. theor. Biol. 103:429-438.

Day, W. H. E. 1988. Consensus methods as tools for data analysis. In: H. H. Bock (ed.), Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam. pp. 317-324.

Dawkins, R. 1994. A vak órásmester. Akadémiai Kiadó - Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest. Dawkins, R. 2006. Az ős meséje. Zarándoklat az élet hajnalához. Partvonal, Budapest.

De Franceschi, D and C. Vozenin-Serra. 2000. Ginkgo biloba L. origin. Phylogenetical approach. Cr. Acad. Sci. III- Vie. 323: 583-592.

Degens, P. O. 1983. Hierarchical cluster methods as maximum likelihood estimators. In: Felsenstein, J. (1983), pp. 249-253.

dePamphilis, C.W., N. D. Young, A. D. Wolfe. 1997. Evolution of plastid gene rps2 in a lineage of hemiparasitic and holoparasitic plants: Many losses of photosynthesis and complex patterns of rate vartation. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 (14): 7367-7372.

De Queiroz, K. and J. Gauthier. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39:307-322.

Diószegi S. és Fazekas M. 1807. Magyar Füvészkönyv. Nyomtatta Czáky György Debreczenbenn.

Donoghue. M.J. and J. A. Doyle. 2000. Seed plant phylogeny: Demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? Curr. Biol. 10: R106-R109.

Doolittle, W. F. 2000. Uprooting the tree of life. Sci. Am. 282 (2): 90-95.

Doyle, J.A. 1996. Seed plant phylogeny and the relationships of Gnetales. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 157: S3-S39 Suppl. S.

Doyle, J.A. 1998a. Phylogeny ofvascular plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 567-599.

Doyle, J.A. 1998b. Molecules, morphology, fossils, and the relationship of angiosperms and Gnetales. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9: 448-462.

Doyle, J.A. 2000. Paleobotany, relationships, and geographic history of Winteraceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 87: 303-316.

Doyle, J.A. and P.K. Endress. 2000. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: Comparison and combination with molecular data. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 161: S121-S153 Suppl. S.

Doyle, J. A., M. J. Donoghue and E. A. Zimmer. 1994. Integration of morphological and ribosomal-RNA data on the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 81: 419-450.

Duncan, T., R. B. Phillips and W. H. Wagner. 1980. A comparison of branching diagrams derived by various phenetic and cladistic methods. Syst. Bot. 5: 264-293 1980.

Duncan, T. and T. F. Stuessy. 1984. Cladistics: Perspectives on the Reconstruction of Evolutionary History. Columbia University Press, New York.

Duncan, T. and T. F. Stuessy. (eds.) 1985. Cladistic Theory and Methodology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Dunn, G. and B. S. Everitt. 1982. An Introduction to Mathematical Taxonomy. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

Edwards, D. and L. Axe. 2000. Novel conducting tissues in Lower Devonian piants. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 134 (1-2): 383-399.

Edwards, D., J. G. Duckett and J. B. Richardson. 1995. Hepatic characters in the earliest land piants. Nature 374 (6523): 635-636.

Endress, P.K. 1996. Structure and function of female and bisexual organ complexes in Gnetales. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 157: S113-S125 Suppl. S.

Endress, P.K. 2001. Evoiution of floral symmetry. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 86-91. Endress, P. K. 2001a. Origins of flower morphology. J. Exp. Zool. 291: 105-115.

Endress, P. K. 2001b. The flowers in extant basal angiosperms and inferences on ancestral flowers. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162 (5): 1111-1140.

Endress, M. E. and Bruyns, P. V. 2000. A revised classification ofthe Apocynaceae s.l. Bot. Rev. 66: 1-56.

Endress, P.K. and A. Igersheim. 2000. Reproductive structures of the basal angiosperm Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161: 5237-5248 Suppl. S.

Engloner A., Penksza K. és Szerdahelyi T. 2001. A hajtásos növények ismerete. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.

Ereshefsky, M. 2000. The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

Estabrook, G. F. 1972. Cladistic methodology: a discussion of the theoretical basis for the induction of evolutionary history. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3:427-456.

Estabrook, G. F., C. S. Johnson, Jr. and F. R. McMorris. 1976. A mathematical foundation for the analysis of character compatibility. Math. Biosci. 23:181-187.

Faith, D. P. 1985. Distance methods and the approximation of most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 34:312-325. Farris, J. S. 1967. The meaning of relationship and taxonomic procedure. Syst. Zool. 16:44-51.

Farris, J. S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Syst. Zool. 18:374-385. Farris, J. S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees, Syst. Zool. 19:83-92.

Farris, J. S. 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am. Nat. 106:645-668. Farris, J. S. 1973. On comparing the shapes oftaxonomic trees. Syst. Zool. 22:50-54.

Farris, J. S. 1974. Formal definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly. Syst. Zool. 23:548-554. Farris, J. S. 1977. Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo’s Law. Syst. Zool. 26:77-88.

Farris, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5:417-419. Felsenstein, J. 1978. The number of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 27:27-33.

Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.

Felsenstein, J. (ed.)1983. Numerical Taxonomy. Springer, Berlin.

Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791. Felsenstein, J. 1993. PHYLIP. Phylogeny Inference Package. University of Washington, Seattle.

Ferguson, D. M. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis and relationships in Hydrophyllaceae based on ndhF sequence data. Syst. Bot. 23: 253-268.

Fiala, K. L. and R. R. Sokal. 1985. Factors determining the accuracy of cladogram estimation: Evaluation using computer simulation. Evolution 39:609-622.

Finden, C. R. and A. D. Gordon. 1985. Obtaining common pruned trees. J. Classif. 2:255-276.Fisher, D. C. 1992. Stratigraphic parsimony. In: Maddison and Maddison (1992), pp. 124-129.

Fitch, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 29:406-416.

Fitch, W. M. 1982. A non-sequential method for constructing a hierarchical classification. J. Mol. Evol. 18:30-37.

Fitch, W. M. 1984. Cladistics and other methods: problems, pitfalls and potentials. In: Duncan and Stuessy (1984), pp. 221-252.

Fitch, W. M. and E. Margoliash. 1967. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155:279-284.

Floyd, S.K. and W. E. Friedman. 2001. Developmental evolution of endosperm in basal angiosperms: evidence from Amborella (Amborellaceae), Nuphar (Nymphaeaceae), and Illicium (Illiciaceae) . Plant Syst. Evol.