Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative study Rosalind Haddrill

References

Akkerman D, Cleland L, Croft G, Eskuchen K, Heim C, Levine A, Setterlund L, Stark C, Vickers J and Westby E. Routine Prenatal Care. 2012. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Bloomington, MN. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

https://www.icsi.org/_asset/13n9y4/Prenatal.pdf
Alderliesten ME, Vrijkotte TGM, van der Wal MF and Bonsel GJ. Late start of antenatal care among ethnic minorities in a large cohort of pregnant women. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2007, 114: 1232-1239.
Allen J, Gamble J, Stapleton H and Kildea S. Does the way maternity care is provided affect maternal and neonatal outcomes for young women? A review of the research literature. Women and Birth 2012, 25: 54-63.
Anderson T. Chapter 12: The misleading myth of choice: the continuing oppression of women in childbirth. In Kirkham M (ed) Informed Choice in Maternity Care. 2004. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke: 257-264.
Annandale E, Harvey J, Cavers D and Dixon-Wood M. Gender and access to healthcare in the UK: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature. Evidence and Policy 2007, 3(4): 463-486.
Appleby J and Deeming C. Inverse Care Law. Health Service Journal 2001, 111 (5760): 37.
Australian Department of Health. Clinical Practice Guidelines – Antenatal care - Module I. 2012. Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/015FBFDD266795DBCA257BF0001A0547/$File/ANC_Guidelines_Mod1_v32.pdf
Aved BM, Irwin MM, Cummings LS and Findeisen N. Barriers to prenatal care for low-income women. Western Journal of Medicine 1993, 158: 493-498.
Bailey L. Refracted selves? A study of self-identity in the transition to motherhood. Sociology 1999 33(2): 335-352.
Baker EC and Rajasingam D. Using Trust databases to identify predictors of late booking for antenatal care within the UK. Public Health 2012, 126(2): 112-6.
Barrett G and Wellings K. What is a ‘planned’ pregnancy? Empirical data from a British study. Social Science and Medicine 2002, 55: 545-557.
Barnett-Page E and Thomas J. 2009. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. NCRM Working Paper Series Number 01/09. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, Southampton.
Beauchamp TL and Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6^th edition. 2008. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Beckmann CA, Burford T and Witt J. Perceived barriers to prenatal care services. MCN, the American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing 2000, 25(1): 43-46.
Beeckman K, Louckx F, Downe S and Putman K. The relationship between antenatal care and preterm birth: the importance of content of care. The European Journal of Public Health, September 12 2012: 1-6.
Bharj KK and Henshaw AM. Chapter 32 – confirming pregnancy and care of the pregnant woman, in Macdonald S and Magill-Cuerden J (eds) Mayes’ Midwifery 14^th edition. 2011. Bailliere Tindall, Edinburgh: 411-442.
Bloom KC, Bednarzyk MS, Devitt DL, Renault RA, Teaman V and van Loock DM. Barriers to prenatal care for homeless pregnant women. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 2004, 33(4): 428-435.
Boerleider AW, Wiegers TA, Mannien J, Francke Al and Deville WLJM. Factors affecting the use of prenatal care by non-western women in industrialised western countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2013, 13: 81.
Bollini P and Quack-Lötscher K. Guidelines-based indicators to measure quality of antenatal care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2013, 5 February.
Bondas T. Chapter 1: Husserlian phenomenology reflected in caring science childbearing research, in Thomson G, Dykes F and Downe S (eds) Qualitative research in Midwifery and Childbirth – Phenomenological Approaches. 2011. Routledge, Abingdon: 1-18.
Bowling A. Research Methods in Health, 3^rd edition, 2009. McGraw Hill, Maidenhead.
Boyatzis RE. Transforming Qualitative Information: thematic analysis and code development. 1998. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Boynton P and Greenhalgh T. Selecting and designing your questionnaire. British Medical Journal 2004, 328:1312–15.
Bradford Teaching Hospitals. NHS Bradford and Airedale’s 'direct access to a midwife' campaign. 2014. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.airedale-trust.nhs.uk/services/maternity-services/about/
Braun V and Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006, 3(2): 77-101.
Braveman P, Bennet T, Lewis C, Egerter S and Showstack J. Access to prenatal care following major Medicaid eligibility expansions. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 1993, 269(10): 1285-1289.
Braveman P, Marchi K, Egerter S, Pearl M and Neuhaus J. Barriers to timely prenatal care among women with insurance: the importance of pre-pregnancy factors. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000, 95(6) pt 1: 874-880.
Britten N. Qualitative Research: Qualitative interviews in medical research. British Medical Journal 1995, 311: 251.
Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M and Pill R. Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2002, 7(4):209-215.

Britten N. Chapter 2: qualitative interviews, in Pope C and Mays N (eds) Qualitative Research In Health Care, 2006. Blackwell, Oxford: 12-20.

Browner CH and Press N. The production of authoritative knowledge in American prenatal care. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 1996, 10(2): 141-156.
Brubaker SJ. Denied, Embracing and Resisting Medicalization: African American teen mothers’ perceptions of formal pregnancy and childbirth care. Gender and Society 2007, 21: 528-552.
Burke, B. The Transition to Motherhood. Nursing Mirror 1985, 161: 22–24.
Burns J. Sex education 'not taught properly by schools'. BBC News online 16^th June 2014. Accessed 26/03/15 from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-27733256
Butler J. Research in the place where you work – some ethical issues. Bulletin of Medical Ethics 2003, 185: 21-22.
Bryman A. Social Research Methods, 3^rd edition, 2008. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Callaghan M, Buller AM and Murray SF. Understanding ‘late bookers’ and their social circumstances. British Journal of Midwifery 2011, 19(1): 7-13.
Campbell JD, Mitchell P, Stanford JB and Ewigman BG. Validating a model developed to predict prenatal care utilization. The Journal of Family Practice 1995, 41(5): 457-464.
Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, Britten N, Pill R, Morgan M and Donovan J. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science and Medicine 2003, 56: 671-684.
Campbell R, Pound P, Morgan M, Daker-White G, Britten N, Pill R, Yardley L, Pope C and Donovan J. Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technology Assessment 2011, 15(43) 1-164.
Carolan M and Cassar L. Antenatal care perceptions of pregnant African women attending maternity services in Melbourne, Australia. Midwifery 2010 26: 189-201.
Cartwright PS, McLaughlin FJ, Martinez AM, Caul DE, Hogan IG, Reed GW and Swafford MS. Teenager’s perceptions of barriers to prenatal care. Southern Medical Journal 1993, 86(7): 737-741.
Carver N and Ward B. Perspectives on women’s need in pregnancy. Birth Issues 2007: 15(3/4): 98-104.
Carver NA, Ward BM and Talbot LA. Using Bradshaw’s Taxonomy of Needs: listening to women in planning pregnancy care. Contemporary Nurse 2008, 30: 76-82.
Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE): Saving Mothers’ Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–08. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011, 118(Suppl. 1): 1–203. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x/pdf
Chandler D. Late entry into prenatal care in a rural setting. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health 2002, 47(1): 28-34.
Charmaz K. Good Days Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness and Time. 1991. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
Charmaz K. Qualitative Interviewing and Grounded Theory Analysis, in Gubrium JF and Holstein JA (eds) Handbook of Interview research: Context and Method. 2002. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA: 675-694.
Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. 2006. Sage, London.
Charmaz K. Chapter 7: Grounded theory in the 21^st century – applications for advancing social justice studies, in Denzin NK and Lincoln YS (eds) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry 3^rd edition, 2008. Sage, London: 203-241.
Charmaz K. The Power and Potential of Grounded Theory. Medical Sociology Online 2012, 6(30): 2-15. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.medicalsociologyonline.org/resources/Vol6Iss3/MSo-600x_The-Power-and-Potential-Grounded-Theory_Charmaz.pdf

Chisholm DK. Factors associated with late booking for antenatal care in central Manchester. Public Health 1989, 103: 459-466.
Choté AA, Koopmans GT, Redekop WK, de Groot CJM, Hoefman RJ, Jaddoe VWV, Hofman A, Steegers EAP, Mackenbach JP, Trappenburg M and Foets M. Explaining ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry by predisposing, enabling and need factors in the Netherlands. The Generation R Study. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2011, 15: 689-699.
Clement S, Sikorski J, Wilson J, Das S and Smeeton N. Women’s satisfaction with traditional and reduced antenatal visit schedules. Midwifery 1996, 12: 120-128.
Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths (CEMD). Why Mothers Die 1997–1999. The 5^th Report of the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths. 2001. RCOG, London.
Cook CAL, Selig KL, Wedhe BJ and Gohn-Baube EA. Access barriers and the use of prenatal care by low-income, inner-city women. Social Work 1999, 44(2):129-139.
Corbett S, Chelimo C and Okesene-Gafa K, Barriers to early initiation of antenatal care in a multi-ethnic sample in South Auckland, New Zealand. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 2014, Vol. 127 (1404): 53-61.
Corbin J and Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research, 3^rd edition. 2008. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Corbin J. Chapter 3: taking an analytic journey, in Morse JM, Stern PN, Corbin J, Bowers B, Charmaz K and Clarke AE (eds) Developing Grounded Theory – the Second Generation. 2009. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA: 35-53.
Crawford P, Brown B and Majomi P. Education as an Exit Strategy for Community Mental Health Nurses: A Thematic Analysis of Narratives. Mental Health Review Journal 2008, 13(3): 8-15.
Cresswell JA, Yu G, Hatherall B, Morris J, Jamal F, Harden A and Renton A. Predictors of the timing of initiation of antenatal care in an ethnically diverse urban cohort in the UK. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2013, 13:103.
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Qualitative Research and Systematic Review Checklists (versions 31.05.13). 2013. Accessed 26/03.15 from: http://www.casp-uk.net/
Daniels P, GN Noe and Mayberry R. Barriers to prenatal care among black women of low socioeconomic status. American Journal of Health Behaviour 2006, 30 (2): 188-198.
Dartnall L, Ganguly N and Batterham J. for EdComs. Access to Maternity Services Research Report. 2005. Department of Health.
Delvaux T, Buekens P, Godin I, Boutsen M and the study group on barriers and incentives to prenatal care in Europe. Barriers to prenatal care in Europe. American Journal of Preventative Medicine 2001, 21(1): 52-59.
Denzin NK. The logic of naturalistic inquiry. Social Forces 1971, 50: 166-182.
Denzin NK. Interpretive Interactionism. 1989. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Denzin NK and Lincoln YS (eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research 3^rd edition. 2005. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). English indices of deprivation 2010: guidance. 2011. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/english-indices-of-deprivation-2010-guidance
Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). Guidance – Curriculum and Standards: Sex and Relationship Education Guidance. 2000. DfEE, London.
Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS). Inequalities in Health – Report of a research working group (the Black Report). 1980. DHSS, London.
Department of Health. Changing Childbirth: report of the expert maternity group (the Cumberlege Report). 1993. HMSO, London.
Department of Health. Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health – Report (The Acheson Report). 1998. HMSO, London.
Department of Health. National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services: Maternity Services. 2004a. DoH Publications, London.
Department of Health. Every Child Matters: Change for Children in Health Services. 2004b. DoH Publications, London.
Department of Health. Choosing Health: Making Healthy Choices Easier. 2004c. HMSO, London. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/dh.gov.uk/en/publicationsandstatistics/publications/publicationspolicyandguidance/dh_4094550
Department of Health. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care, Second edition, 2005. Department of Health. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/139565/dh_4122427.pdf
Department of Health. White Paper: Our health, our care, our say: a new direction for community services. 2006. HMSO, Norwich.
Department of Health. Review of the Health Inequalities Infant Mortality PSA Target. 2007a. DoH Publications, London. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.bipsolutions.com/docstore/pdf/15829.pdf
Department of Health. Implementation Plan for Reducing Health Inequalities in Infant Mortality: A Good Practice Guide - Review of the health inequalities infant mortality PSA target. 2007b. DoH Publications, London. Accessed 26/03/15 from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_081337
Department of Health. White Paper: Maternity matters: choice, access and continuity of care in a safe service. 2007c. DoH Publications, London.

Department of Health. The Operating Framework for the NHS in England 2010/11. 2009. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://systems.hscic.gov.uk/infogov/links/operatingframework2010-2011.pdf

Depart ment of Health. Maternity published data: number of women seen and assessed by a healthcare professional within 12 weeks and 6 days of their maternity. 2013. Accessed 26-03-15 from:

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130402145952/http://transparency.dh.gov.uk/2012/07/19/maternity-published-data/
DeSantis L and Ugarriza D.N. The concept of theme as used in qualitative nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research 2000, 22(3): 351-372.
Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R. Qualitative research in systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 2001; 323: 765-766.
Dixon-Woods M, Kirk D, Agarwal S Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, Hsu R, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L, Riley R and Sutton AJ. 2005. Vulnerable groups and access to health care: a critical interpretive view. National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO). Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.netscc.ac.uk/hsdr/files/project/SDO_FR_08-1210-025_V01.pdf
Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, Hsu R, Katbamna S, Olsen R, Smith L, Riley R and Sutton AJ. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2006a, 6:35.
Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S and Booth A. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Health Research 2006b, 6: 27-44.
Dixon-Woods M, Sutton A, Shaw R, Miller T, Smith J, Young B, Bonas S, Booth A and Jones D. Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2007, 12(1): 42-47.
Docherty A, Bugge C and Watterson A. Engagement: an indicator of difference in the perceptions of antenatal care for pregnant women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. Health Expectations 2012, 15(2): 126-38.
Donovan J and Sanders C. Chapter 22: Key issues in the analysis of qualitative data in health services research, in Bowling A and Ebrahim S (eds) Handbook of Health Research Methods: Investigation, Measurement and Analysis. 2005. McGraw Hill, New York: 515-532.
Dowler C. McKinsey partner: ‘women could do most antenatal care themselves’. Health Services Journal 21^st June 2012.

Downe S.  Finlayson K.  Walsh D and Lavender T. 'Weighing up and balancing out': a meta-synthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high-income countries. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009, 116(4): 518-29.

Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Metin Gülmezoglu AM, Khan-Neelofur D and Piaggio GGP. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 10. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD000934.pub2/full
Dugan E. Teenage pregnancies in England and Wales are at the lowest point since records began. The Independent, 25^th February 2014.
Durrance CP and Hankins S. Is direct access to obstetricians/gynecologists effective at improving maternal health behaviors? Health Services Research 2011, Aug; 46(4): 1243-58.
Eakin J and Mykhalovskiy E. Reframing the evaluation of qualitative research: Reflections on a review of assessment guidelines in the health sciences. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2003, 9(2): 187-194.
Economic and Social Research Council. ESRC Framework for Research Ethics (FRE) 2010 (updated September 2012). 2012. ESRC. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/framework-for-research-ethics-09-12_tcm8-4586.pdf
Edwards NP. Chapter 1: Why can’t women just say no? And does it really matter? In Kirkham M (ed) Informed Choice In Maternity Care. 2004. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke: 1-30.
Edwards NP. Safety in birth: the contextual conundrums faced by women in a ‘risk society’, driven by neoliberal policies. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 2008a, 18(4): 463-470.
Edwards NP. Safe Births: Everybody’s business. AIMS Journal 2008b, 20(3): 18-19.
Enkin M, Keirse M, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E and Hofmeyr J. Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, 3^rd Edition. 2000. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Entwistle V, Firnigl D, Ryan M, Francis J and Kinghorn P. Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2012, 17(2): 70–78.
EURO-PERISTAT project. European Perinatal Health Report: the health and care of women and babies in Europe in 2010. 2013. Accessed 26/03/15 from: www.europeristat.com
Ezzy D. Qualitative Interviewing as an Embodied Emotional Performance. Qualitative Inquiry 2010, Jan 5 2010.
Feijen-de Jong EI, Jansen DEMC, Baarveld F, van der Schans CP, Schellevis FG and Reijeneveld SA. Determinants of late and/or inadequate use of prenatal healthcare in high-income countries: a systematic review. European Journal of Public Health 2011, 22(6): 904-913.
Finer LB and Zolna MR. Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception 2011, 84:478–485.
Flemming K. Synthesis of quantitative and qualitative research: an example using Critical Interpretive Synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2010, 66(1): 201-217.
Fontana A and Frey JH. Chapter 2: interviewing, in Denzin NK and Lincoln (eds) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, 1998. Sage, California, USA: 47-78.

Firdous R and Bhopal RS. Reproductive health of Asian women: a comparative study with hospital and community perspectives. Public Health 1989, 103:307-315.

Fox N, Hunn A and Mathers N. New Horizons: GMH 6010 Research Methods – a distance learning package. 2001. The University of Sheffield.
Fuller CA and Gallagher R. perceived benefits and barriers of prenatal care in low income women. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 1999, 11(12): 527-532.
Furber CM, Garrod D, Maloney E, Lovell K and McGowan L. A qualitative study of mild to moderate distress during pregnancy. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2009, 46: 669-677.
Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S and Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2013, 13: 117.
Garcia J. Chapter 5 – women’s views of antenatal care, in Enkin M and Chalmers I (eds) Effectiveness and Satisfaction in Antenatal Care. 1982. William Heinemann Medical Books, London: 81-91.
Gaudion A. Maternity Matters Early Adopter Site - Health Equity Audit of Access to Maternity Services in SE London, project report. 2008. The Pollyanna Project, London. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.thepolyannaproject.org.uk/documents/Healthequityaudit.pdf
Gaudion A, Godfrey C and Homeyard C. The Women’s Wheel: discovering the art of access. Practising Midwife 2009, 12(1): 13-16.
Gaudion A and Homeyard C. Chapter 8: the midwife-mother relationship where there is poverty and disadvantage, in Kirkham M (ed) The Midwife-Mother Relationship, 2^nd edition. 2010. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke: 144-159.
Gazmararian JA, Schwartz KS, Amacker LB and Powell CL. Barriers to prenatal care mong Medicaid managed care enrolees: patient and provider perceptions. HMO Practice 1997, 11(1): 18-24.

Geertz C. The Interpretation of Cultures. 1973. Basic Books, New York, NY.

General Medical Council (GMC). 0-18 years: Guidance for all Doctors. 2007. GMC, London.
GMC. Good Practice in Research and Consent to Research – supplementary guidance. 2010. GMC, London.
Gerrish K and Lacey A. The Research Process in Nursing, 5^th edition. 2006. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
Giles EL, Robalino S, McColl E, Sniehotta FF and Adams J. The Effectiveness of Financial Incentives for Health Behaviour Change: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS One, 2014. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0090347
Giorgi A (ed). Phenomenology and Psychological Research. 1985. Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
Glaser, B and Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. 1967. Weidenfield & Nicolson, London.
Glenton C, Colvin CJ, Carlsen B, Swartz A, Lewin S, Noyes J and Rashidian A. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD010414. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.

CD010414.pub2.

Goldenberg RL, Patterson ET, Freese MP. Maternal demographic, situational and psychosocial factors and their relationship to enrolment in prenatal care: a review of the literature. Women and Health 1992, 19(2/3): 133-151.
Goodwin D. Chapter 6: Ethical issues, in Pope C and Mays N (eds) Qualitative Research in Health Care, 3^rd edition. 2006. Blackwell, Oxford: 5353-62.
Green J and Britten N. Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. British Medical Journal 1998, 316: 1230-1234.
Green J and Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research 3^rd edition, 2014. Sage, London.
Green JM. Integrating women’s views into maternity care research and practice. BIRTH 2012, 39(4): 291-295.
Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, and Peacock R. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Social Science and Medicine 2005a, 61(2): 417-430.
Greenhalgh T and Peacock R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. British Medical Journal 2005b, 331(7524): 1064–1065.
Greig S and Burrows C. 0-19+ Partnership Paper: Reducing Infant Mortality in Sheffield. Sheffield 0-19+ Partnership. 29th March 2012. Accessed 26/03/15 from: https://www.sheffield0to19.org.uk/
Grindlay K and Grossman D. Unintended pregnancy among active-duty women in the United States military, 2008. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2013, 121(no 2, part 1): 241-246.
Guba EG and Lincoln YS. Chapter 6: Competing paradigms in qualitative research, in Denzin N and Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. 1994. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA: 105-117.
Guest G, Bunce A and Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006, 18(1): 59-82.
Haddrill R, Jones GL, Mitchell CA and Anumba DOC. Understanding delayed access to

antenatal care: a qualitative interview study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14: 207.

Hall HG, McKenna LG and Griffiths Dl. Applying Grounded Theory to Midwifery Research Problems. International Journal of Childbirth 2012, 2(2): 136-141.
Hammersley M. What’s wrong with ethnography? 1992. Routledge, London.
Harding S (ed). Feminism and Methodology. 1987. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Harvey SM and Faber KS. Obstacles to prenatal care following implementation of a community-based program to reduce financial barriers. Family Planning Perspectives 1993, 25(1): 32-26.
Hatherall B. ‘Barriers to the early initiation of antenatal care: a qualitative study of women and service providers in East London’, UEL Research and Knowledge Exchange Conference 2013. University of East London, London, 26 June 2013. University of East London.
Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC). HES Online - Maternity data, 2011-12. Accessed 26-03-15 from:

http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130402145952/http://hesonline.nhs.uk/ease/servlet/contentserver?siteid=1937&categoryid=1941
Heaman MI, Moffatt M, Elliott L, Sword W, Helewa ME, Morris H, Gregory P, Tjaden L and Cook C. Barriers, motivators and facilitators related to prenatal care utilization among inner-city women in Winnipeg, Canada: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014, 14: 227.
Heaton J, Corden A and Parker G. Continuity of care: a critical interpretive synthesis of how the concept was elaborated by a national research programme. International Journal of Integrated Care 2012, 12: e12. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429143/pdf/ijic2012-201212.pdf
Hennings J, Williams J and Haque BN. Exploring the health needs of Bangladeshi women: a case study in using qualitative research methods. Health Education Journal 1996, 55: 11-23.
HM Government. Government Response to House of Commons Health Committee Reports Fourth Report Session 2002–03: Provision of Maternity Services, Eighth Report Session 2002–03: Inequalities in Access to Maternity Services and Ninth Report Session 2002–03: Choice in Maternity Services. 2004. The Stationary Office, Norwich. Accessed 26-03-2015 from:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/272097/6140.pdf
HM Government. PSA Delivery Agreement 19: Ensure better care for all. 2007. HM Treasury.
HM Government. White Paper: Equity and excellence- Liberating the NHS. 2010. The Stationary Office. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/213823/dh_117794.pdf
Hildingsson I, Waldenstrom U and Radestad I. Women’s expectations on antenatal care as assessed in early pregnancy: number of visits, continuity of caregiver and general content. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2002, 81:118–25.
Hirst J, Hewison J, Dowswell T, Baslington H and Warrilow J. Chapter 2: Antenatal care: what do women want?, in Clement S (ed) Psychological Perspectives on Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2003, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh: 27-44.
Holloway I and Wheeler S. Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare, 3^rd edition. 2010. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
Holloway I and Freshwater D. Narrative Research in Nursing. 2007. Blackwell, Oxford.
Hollowell J, Oakley L, Kurinczuk JL, Brocklehurst P and Gray R. The effectiveness of antenatal care programmes to reduce infant mortality and preterm birth in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women in high-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2011, 11:13. Accessed 26/03/15 from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/11/13#
Hollowell J, Oakley L, Vigurs C, Barnett-Page E, Kavanagh J and Oliver S. Increasing early initiation of antenatal care by Black and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and mixed methods synthesis of women’s views and the literature on intervention effectiveness: Final Report. 2012. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford.

Homan R. The Ethics of Social Research. 1991. Longman, London.

Houston Department of Health and Human Services. Women of Worth: factors relating to prenatal care among women of Greater Fifth Ward: a qualitative and quantitative project. HDHHS, 2009, Houston, Texas.
Hulsey TM. Association between early prenatal care and mother’s intention of and desire for the pregnancy. Journal of Obstetric, Gynaecology and Neonatal Nursing 2001, 30(3): 275-282.
Hunter LP. A hermeneutic phenomenological analysis of midwives’ ways of knowing during childbirth, Midwifery 2008, 24(4): 405-415.
Jenkinson C. Chapter 1: Assessment and evaluation of health and medical care: an introduction and overview, in Jenkinson C (ed) Assessment and Evaluation of Health and Medical Care – a methods text. 1997. Open University Press, Maidenhead: 1-5.
Jewell D, Sanders J and Sharp D. The views and anticipated needs of women in early pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2000, 107: 1237-1240.
Johnson AA, Nabil El-Khorazaty MN, Hatcher BJ, Wingrove BK, Milligan R, Harris C and Richards L. Determinants of late prenatal care initiation by African American women in Washington DC. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2003, 7(2): 103-114.
Johnson AA, Hatcher BJ, Nabil El-Khorazaty MN, Milligan R, Bhaskar B, Rodan MF, Richards L, Wingrove BK and Laryea HA. Determinants of inadequate prenatal care utilization by African American women. Journal for Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 2007, 18: 620-636.
Johnson JI, Primas PJ and Coe MK. Factors that prevent women of low socioeconomic status from seeking prenatal care. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 1994, 6(3): 105-111.
Jomeen J. The importance of assessing psychological status during pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period as a multi-dimensional construct: a literature review. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing 2004, 8: 143-155.
Jomeen J. Choices for maternity care are they still ‘an illusion’?: a qualitative exploration of women’s experiences in early pregnancy. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing 2006, 9S2: e191-e200.
Jomeen J. The paradox of choice in maternity care. Journal of Neonatal Nursing 2012, 18: 60–62.
Kalmuss D and Fennelly K. Barriers to prenatal care among low-income women in New York City. Family Planning Perspectives 1990, 22(5): 215-232.
Kazimierczak KA, Skea ZC, Dixon-Woods M, Entwistle VA, Feldman-Stewart D, N'Dow JMO and MacLennan SJ. Provision of cancer information as a “support for navigating the knowledge landscape”: findings from a critical interpretive literature synthesis. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 2013, 17(3): 360-369.
Keeton K and Hayward RA. Pregnancy intention and birth outcomes: does the relationship differ by age or race? Journal of Women’s Health 2007, 16(4): 510-516.
Kelly L, Burton S and Regan L. Chapter 2: Researching women’s lives or studying women’s oppression? Reflections on what constitutes feminist research, in Maynard M and Purvis J (eds) Researching Women’s Lives from a Feminist Perspective. 1994. Taylor and Francis, London: 27-48.
Kendall C, Afable-Munsuz A, Speizer I, Avery A, Schmidt N and Santelli J. Understanding pregnancy in a population of inner city women in New Orleans – results of qualitative research. Social Science and Medicine 2005, 60: 297-311.
Kent J. Social Perspectives on Pregnancy and Childbirth for Midwives, Nurses and the Caring Professions. 2000. Open University Press, Buckingham.
Kinsman SB and Slap GB. Barriers to adolescent prenatal care. Journal of Adolescent Health 1992, 13: 146-154.
Kirkham M. Chapter 13: Choice and Bureaucracy, in Kirkham (ed) Informed Choice in Maternity Care. 2004. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke: 265-290.
Kirkham M and Stapleton H. The culture of the maternity services in Wales and England as a barrier to informed choice, in Kirkham M (ed) Informed Choice in Maternity Care. 2004. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke: 117-146.
Kirkham M. Chapter 1: the Maternity Services Context, in Kirkham (ed) The Midwife-Mother Relationship 2^nd edition. 2010a. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke: 1-16.
Kirkham M. Chapter 14: We Need to Relate, in Kirkham (ed) The Midwife-Mother Relationship 2^nd edition. 2010b. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke: 250-272.
Kisely S and Kendall E. Critically appraising qualitative research: a guide for clinicians more familiar with quantitative techniques. Australasian Psychiatry 2011, 19(4): 364-367.
Knight M, Kenyon S, Brocklehurst P, Neilson J, Shakespeare J and Kurinczuk JJ (eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care - Lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009–12. 2014. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford.
Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions, 2^nd edition. 1970. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Kupek E, Petrou S, Vause S, Maresh M. Clinical, provider and sociodemographic predictors of late initiation of antenatal care in England and Wales. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2002, 109(3): 265-273.
Kvale S. InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. 1996. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Lacey A. and Luff D. 2007. Qualitative Research Analysis. The NIHR RDS for the East Midlands / Yorkshire & the Humber.
Laken MP and Ager J. Using incentives to increase participation in prenatal care. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995, 85(3):326-9.
Lambert C, Jomeen J and McSherry W. Reflexivity: a review of the literature in the context of midwifery research. British Journal of Midwifery 2010, 18(5): 321-326.
Lavender T, Downe S, Finnlayson K and Walsh D. Access to antenatal care: a systematic review – Report. 2007. University of Central Lancashire (UCLAN).
Leatherman J, Blackburn D and Davidhizar R. How postpartum women explain their lack of obtaining adequate prenatal care. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1990, 15: 256-267.
Leamon J and Viccars A. West Howe midwifery evaluation: the ‘with me’ study. 2007. Bournemouth University, Bournemouth.
Lee H. Why Finnish babies sleep in cardboard boxes. BBC News Magazine 4 June 2013. Accessed 26/03/15 from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22751415
Leininger MM (ed). Qualitative Research Methods in Nursing. 1985. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.
Levy V. Maintaining equilibrium: a grounded theory study of the processes involved when women make informed choices during pregnancy. Midwifery 1999, 15: 109-119.
Levy V. Chapter 3: How midwives used protective steering to facilitate informed choice in pregnancy. In Kirkham M (ed) Informed Choice in Maternity Care. 2004. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke: 57-70.
Lewis G (ed). The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Why Mothers Die 2000-2002. The Sixth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. 2004. CEMACH, London.
Lewis G (ed). The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving Mothers’ Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer - 2003-2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. 2007. CEMACH, London. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.publichealth.hscni.net/sites/default/files/Saving%20Mothers%27%20Lives%202003-05%20.pdf

Lia-Hoagberg B, Rode P, Skovholt CJ, Oberg CN, berg C, Mullett S and Choi T. Barriers and Motivators to prenatal care among low-income women. Social Science and Medicine 1990, 30(4): 487-495.

Liamputtong P and Ezzy D. Qualitative Research Methods 2^nd edition. 2005. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lincoln YS and Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. 1985. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Lindquist A, Kurinczuk JJ, Redshaw M and Knight M. Experiences, utilisation and outcomes of maternity care in England among women from different socio-economic groups: findings from the 2010 National Maternity Survey. BJOG 2014. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13059.
Lofland J and Lofland LH Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 3^rd edition. 1995. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
Lofland J, Snow D, Anderson L and Lofland LH. Analyzing social settings – a guide to qualitative observation and analysis 4^th Edition, 2006. Thomson Wadsworth, USA.
Long R. Standard Note: SN/SP/6103 - Sex and Relationship Education in Schools. 2014. House of Commons Library. Accessed 26/03/15 from: www.parliament.