Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative study Rosalind Haddrill

uk/briefing-papers/SN06103.pdf
Luecken LJ, Purdom CL and Howe R. Prenatal care initiation in low-income Hispanic women: risk and protective factors. American Journal of Health Behaviour 2009, 33(3): 264-275.
Lutz KF. Abused pregnant women’s interactions with health care providers during the childbearing year. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecological and Neonatal nursing (JOGNN) 2005, 34(2): 151-162.
Mackey MC and Tiller CM. Adolescents’ description and management of pregnancy and pre-term labour. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecological and Neonatal Nursing (JOGNN) 1998, 27(4): 410-419.
Macfarlane A and Mugford M. Birth counts: statistics of pregnancy and childbirth, volume 1. 2000. The Stationery Office, London.
Malterud K. The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. The Lancet 2001a, 358, Aug 4: 397-400.
Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges and guidelines. The Lancet 2001b, 358, Aug 11: 483-488.

Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TAJ and Taylor S, on behalf of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. The Lancet 2008, 372 (9650): 1661-1669.

Marmot M, Allen J, Goldblatt P, Boyce T, McNeish D, Grady M and Geddes I. Fair Society, Healthy Lives - The Marmot review. Executive Summary. 2010. Institute of Health Equity, University College London. Accessed 26/03/15 from

http://www.instituteofhealthequity.org/projects/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmot-review
Marshall C and Rossman GB. 2011. Designing Qualitative Research 5^th edition, 2011. Sage, Los Angeles, CA.
Martin E. The Woman in the Body: a Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. 1989. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Mayer JP. Unintended childbearing, maternal beliefs and delay of prenatal care. BIRTH 1997, 24(4):247-252.
Mays N and Pope C. Assessing Quality in Qualitative Research. British Medical Journal 2000, 320(7226):50-52.
Mays N, Pope C and Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2005, 10 suppl 1: 6-20.
McComb Hulsey T. Association between early prenatal care and mother’s intention of and desire for the pregnancy. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 2001, 30(3): 275-282.
McGlynn EA,. Asch SM, Adams JL, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro AH, and Kerr EA. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States, RAND Health working paper. 2006. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR174-1.html
McQuide PA, Delvaux T and Buekens P, and the study group on barriers and incentives to prenatal care in Europe. Prenatal care incentives in Europe. Journal of Public Health Policy 1998, 19(3): 331-349.
Mead GH. Mind, Self and Society. 1934. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Medical Research Council (MRC). Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice in Clinical Trials. 1998 (issued 2006). MRC. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/good-clinical-practice-in-clinical-trials/
MRC. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. 2008. MRC. Accessed 26/03/15 from: www.mrc.ac.uk/complexinterventionsguidance
MRC. Good Research Practice: Principles and guidelines. 2012. MRC Ethics Series. MRC, Swindon. Accessed 26/03/15 from: http://www.mrc.ac.uk/news-events/publications/good-research-practice-principles-and-guidelines/

Melnyk KAM. Barriers: a critical review of recent literature. Nursing Research 1988, 37(4): 196-201.

Mercer RT. Becoming a mother versus maternal role attainment. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2004, 36(3), 226-232.
Merchant V. Maternity service: antenatal care. The needs and experiences of some women living in two deprived areas of Lancaster. Journal of Advances in Health and Nursing Care 1993, 2(4): 79-93.
Mies M. Towards a methodology for feminist research, in Hammersley M (ed) Social research: Philosophy, Politics and Practice. 1993. Sage, London: 64-82.
Mikhail BI and Curry MA. Perceived impediments to prenatal care among low-income women. Western Journal of Nursing Research 1999, 21(3): 335-355.
Milligan R, Wingrove BK, Richards L, Rodan M, Monroe-Lord L, Jackson V, Hatcher B, Harris C, Henderson C and Johnson AA. Perceptions about prenatal care: views of urban vulnerable groups. BMC Public Health 2002, 2:25.
Morse, JM. Strategies for sampling, in Morse JM (ed) Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue. 1991. Sage, Newbury Park, CA: 127-145.
Morse JM and Field PA. Qualitative research methods for health professionals. 1995. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S and Watson P. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment 1998: 2(16).
Napravnik S, Royce R, Walter E and Lim W. HIV-1 infected women and prenatal care utilization: barriers and facilitators. AIDS Patient care and STDs 2000, 14(8): 411-420.
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (NCCWCH). NICE Clinical Guideline CG62: Antenatal Care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. 2008. RCOG Press, London. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg62/evidence/cg62-antenatal-care-full-guideline-corrected-june-20082
NCCWCH. NICE Clinical Guideline CG110: Pregnancy and complex social factors: A model for service provision for pregnant women with complex social factors. 2010. RCOG Press, London. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg110/evidence/cg110-pregnancy-and-complex-social-factors-full-guideline3
National Childbirth Trust (NCT)/Royal College of Midwives (RCM)/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Making sense of commissioning Maternity Services in England – some issues for Clinical Commissioning Groups to consider. 2012.
National Health Service (NHS) Information Centre (NHSIC). Percentage of women in the relevant PCT population who have seen a midwife or a maternity healthcare professional, for health and social care assessment of needs, risks and choices by 12 weeks and 6 days of pregnancy (12 week assessment vital sign). 2008.
NHS Commissioning Board. Commissioning Maternity Services: A Resource Pack to support Clinical Commissioning Groups, July 2012. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/comm-maternity-services.pdf
NHS. Vision and Strategy: an Approach in Midwifery Care. 2012. Accessed 26/03/15 from http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/6c-midwifery.pdf

NHS. The Family Nurse Partnership. 2014. Accessed 26/03/15 from http://www.fnp.nhs.uk/

NHS England. Introduction to the friends and family test. 2014. Accessed 26/03/15 from: http://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/pe/fft/
NHS Sheffield. Access to Maternity Services – Health Equity Audit, October 2010. Maternal and Child Health Planning and Commissioning Group, Sheffield City Council.
NHS Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Screening Programme. Standards for the linked antenatal and newborn screening programme, 2^nd edition. 2011. NHS Screening Programme. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://sct.screening.nhs.uk/standardsandguidelines
NICE. UK Database of Uncertainties about the Effects of Treatments (DUETs): Antenatal care programmes to reduce infant mortality and preterm birth in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women in high-income countries. 2011. Accessed 03/10/2015 from: http://www.library.nhs.uk/duets/ViewResource.aspx?resID=411744
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Quality standard for antenatal care. 2012. Accessed 26/03/15 from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs22
NICE. NICE pathway on pregnancy and complex social factors. 2014. Accessed 26/03/15 from: http://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/pregnancy-and-complex-social-factors/pregnancy-and-complex-social-factors-overview
National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC). Factsheet on Gillick competency and Fraser guidelines. 2014. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.nspcc.org.uk/inform/research/questions/gillick_wda61289.html
Nepal VP, Banerjee D and Perry M. Prenatal care barriers in an inner-city neighborhood of Houston, Texas. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 2011, Volume 2, Issue 1: 33-36.
Nichols MR, Roux GM and Harris NR. Primigravid and multigravid women: prenatal perspectives. The Journal of Perinatal Education 2007, 16(2): 21-32.
Nightingale D and Cromby J. (eds) (1999). Social constructionist psychology. Open University Press, Buckingham.
Noblit and Hare. 1988. Meta-ethnography: Synthesising Qualitative Studies. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Noonan K, Corman H, Schwartz-Soicher O and Reichman NE. Effects of Prenatal Care on Child Health at Age 5. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2013, Volume 17, Issue 2: 189-199.
Nothnagle M, Marchi K, Egerter S and Braveman P. Risk factors for late or no prenatal care following medicaid expansions in California. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2000, 4(4): 251-259.
Novick G. Women’s experience of prenatal care: an integrative review. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health 2009, 54(3): 226-237.
Noyes J and Lewin S. Chapter 6: Supplemental Guidance on Selecting a Method of Qualitative Evidence Synthesis, and Integrating Qualitative Evidence with Cochrane Intervention Reviews. In: Noyes J, Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, Harris J, Lewin S, Lockwood C (editors), Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 1 (updated August 2011). Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group, 2011. Accessed 26/03/15 from: http://cqrmg.cochrane.org/supplemental-handbook-guidance
Oakley A. Chapter 1 – the origins and development of antenatal care, in Enkin M and Chalmers I (eds) Effectiveness and Satisfaction in Antenatal Care. 1982. William Heinemann Medical Books, London: 1-21.
Oakley A, Rajan L and Grant A. Social support and pregnancy outcome. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1990, 97:155–162.
Oakley A. Social support and motherhood. 1992. Blackwell, Oxford.
Oakley A. Chapter 38: Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms, in Seale C (ed) Social Research Methods: a Reader. 2004. Routledge, London: 261-268.
O’ Cathain A, Thomas K, Walters SJ, Nicoll J and Kirkham M. Women’s perceptions of informed choice in maternity care. Midwifery 2002, 18: 136-144.
O’ Cathain A. Chapter 4: Can leaflets deliver informed choice? In Kirkham M (ed) Informed Choice in Maternity Care. 2004. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke: 71-85.
Oberg CN, Lia-Hoagberg B, Hodkinson E, Skovholt C and Vanman R. Prenatal Care Comparisons among privately insured, uninsured, and Medicaid-enrolled women. Public Health Reports 1990, 105(5): 533-535.
Office for National Statistics (ONS). Standard Occupational Classification 2000 (SOC2000). 2000. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/classifications/archived-standard-classifications/standard-occupational-classification-2000/about-soc-2000/index.html
ONS. English Index of Multiple Deprivation Score (2010) for Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs). 2010. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/
Office of the Regulator of Community Interest Companies (ORCIC) and Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. Case study: The Experts Patients Programme. 12 November 2013. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

https://www.gov.uk/government/case-studies/the-expert-patients-programme
Omar MA, Schiffman RF and Bauer P. Recipient and provider perspectives of barriers to rural prenatal care. Journal of Community Health Nursing 1998, 15(4): 237-249.
Page LA. Chapter 17: Being with Jane in childbirth: putting science and sensitivity into practice, in Page LA and McCandlish R (eds). The New Midwifery: Science and Sensitivity in Practice, 2^nd edition. 2006. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh: 359-376.
Pagnini DL and Reichman NE. Psychosocial factors and the timing of prenatal care among women in New Jersey's HealthStart program. Family Planning Perspectives 2000, 32(2):56-64.
Paley J and Lilford R. Qualitative methods: an alternative view. British Medical Journal 2011, 342, 30 April: 956-958.
Patterson ET, Freese MP, Goldenberg RL. Seeking safe passage: utilizing health care during pregnancy. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship 1990, 22(1): 27-31.
Patton MQ. 2002. Qualitative Research and evaluation methods, 3^rd edition. Sage, California, USA.
Peacock NR, Kelley MA, Carpenter C, Davis M, Burnett G, Chavez N, Aranda V and members of the Chicago Social Networks project. Pregnancy discovery and acceptance among low-income primiparous women: a multicultural exploration. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2001, 5(2): 109-118.
Penchansky R, Thomas JW. The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care 1981, Feb; 19(2): 127-40.
Perez-Woods RC. Barriers to the use of prenatal care: critical analysis of the literature. Journal of Perinatology 1990, 10(4): 420-434.
Petrou S, Kupek E, Vause S and Maresh M. Antenatal visits and adverse perinatal outcomes: results from a British population-based study. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2003, 106: 40-49.
Phillippi JC. Women’s perceptions of access to prenatal care in the United States: a literature review. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health 2009, 54(3): 219-225.

Phillippi JC and Roman MW. The Motivation-Facilitation theory of prenatal care access. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health 2013, 58(5): 509-515.

Poland BD. Chapter 30: transcription quality, in Gubrium JF and Holstein JA (eds) Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. 2002. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA: 629-649.
Poland ML, Ager JW and Olsen JM. Barriers to receiving adequate prenatal care. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1987, 157(2): 297-303.
Polit DF and Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice, 9^th edition. 2012. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia PA.
Ponterotto JG. Brief note on the origins, evolution and meaning of the qualititative research concept ‘thick description’. The Qualitative Report 11(3): 538-49.
Popay J, Rogers A and Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research 1998, 8: 341-351.
Pope C and Mays N. Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal 1995, 311:42.
Pope C and Mays N. Chapter 1: Qualitative methods in health research, in Pope C and Mays N (eds) Qualitative Research in Health care, 3^rd edition. 2006. Blackwell, Oxford: 1-11.
Pope C, Mays N and Popay J. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative health evidence: a guide to methods. 2007. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Open University Press.
Pope C, Ziebland S and Mays N. Chapter 7: Analysing qualitative data, in Pope C and Mays N (eds) Qualitative Research in Health Care, 3^rd edition, 2006. Blackwell, Oxford: 63-81.
Pound P, Britten N, Morgan M, Yardley L, Pope C, Daker-White G and Campbell R. Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking. Social Science and Medicine 2005, 61: 133-155.
Powell Kennedy H. 2011. Foreword in Thomson G, Dykes F and Downe S (eds) Qualitative research in Midwifery and Childbirth – Phenomenological Approaches. 2011. Routledge, Abingdon: xvii-xix.
Quinn GP, Detman LA, and Bell-Ellison BA. Missed appointments in perinatal care: response variations in quantitative versus qualitative instruments. Medical Practice Management 2008, March/April: 307-313.
Raatikainen K, Heiskanen N and Heinonen S. Under-attending free antenatal care is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. BMC Public Health 2007, 7: 268.

Radcliffe P. Substance-misusing women: stigma in the maternity setting. British Journal of Midwifery 2011, 19(8): 497-506.

Radcliffe P. Substance-misusing women: stigma in the maternity setting. British Journal of Midwifery 2011, 19(8): 497-506.
Raine R, Cartwright M, Richens Y, Mahamed Z and Smith D. A qualitative study of women’s experiences of communication in antenatal care: identifying areas for action. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2010, 14: 590-599.
Raleigh VS, Hussey D, Seccombe I and Halt K. Ethnic and social inequalities in women’s experience of maternity care in England: results of a national survey. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2010, 103: 188-198.
Redshaw M, Rowe R, Hockley C and Brocklehurst P. Recorded Delivery: A National Survey of Women’s Experience of Maternity Care 2006. 2007. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Oxford.
Redshaw M and Heikkila K. Delivered with Care: a National Survey of Women’s Experience of Maternity Care 2010. 2010. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford.
Redshaw M and Henderson J. Safely delivered: a National Survey of Women’s Experience of Maternity Care 2014. 2015. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford.
Reis J, Mills-Thomas B, Robinson D and Anderson V. An inner-city community’s perspective on infant mortality and prenatal care. Public Health Nursing 1992, 9(4): 248-256.
Reitmanova S and Gustafson DL. “They can’t understand it”: maternity health and care needs of immigrant muslim women in St John’s Newfoundland. Maternal and Child Health 2008, 12:101-111.
Relton C, Whelan B, Strong M, Thomas K, Whitford H, Scott E and van Cleemput P. Meeting abstract: Are financial incentives for breastfeeding feasible in the UK? A mixed methods field study. The Lancet, November 19, 2014 (Published online). Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736%2814%2962131-0.pdf
Ring N, Jepson R and Ritchie K. Methods of synthesising qualitative research studies for health technology assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Healthcare 2011, 27(4): 384-390.
Ritchie J and Spencer L. Chapter 9: Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research, in Bryman A and Burgess RG (eds) Analyzing Qualitative Data. 1994. Routledge, London: 173-194.
Roberts RO, Yawn BP, Wickes SL, Field CS, Garretson M and Jacobsen SJ. Barriers to prenatal care: factors associated with late initiation of care in a middle-class Midwestern community. The Journal of Family Practice 1998, 47(1): 53-61.
Roberts SCM and Pies C. Complex calculations: how drug use during pregnancy becomes a barrier to prenatal care. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2011, 15: 333-341.

Rogers C and Schiff M. Early versus late prenatal care in New Mexico: Barriers and Motivators. BIRTH 1996, 23(1): 26-30.

Rosenthal MB, Li Z, Robertson AD and Milstein A. Impact of financial incentives for prenatal care on birth outcomes and spending. Health Services Research 2009, 44(5 pt 1): 1465–1479.
Rowe RE and Garcia J. Social class, ethnicity and attendance for antenatal care in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. Journal of Public Health Medicine 2003, 25(2):113-9.
Rowe RE, Garcia J and Davidson LL. Social and ethnic inequalities in the offer and uptake of prenatal screening and diagnosis in the UK: a systematic review. Public Health 2004, 118: 177-189.
Rowe RE,  Magee H, Quigley MA,  Heron P,  Askham J and Brocklehurst, P. Social and ethnic differences in attendance for antenatal care in England. Public Health 2008, 122(12): 1363-72.
The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Standards of Maternity Care in Australia and New Zealand. 2014. RANZCOG, East Melbourne, Australia. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://www.ranzcog.edu.au/doc/standards-of-maternity-care-in-australia-and-new-zealand.html.
Royal College of Midwives (RCM). Making sense of commissioning Maternity Services in England – some issues for Clinical Commissioning Groups to consider. 2012. Accessed 26/03/15 from https://www.rcm.org.uk/news-views-and-analysis/briefings-and-reports/commissioning-maternity-services
RCM. Headlines: Central booking line – women linked with maternity services. Midwives 2014, 4: 8.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Maternal Morbidity and Mortality - study group statement. November 2002. RCOG, London.
RCOG. Standards for Maternity Care: Report of a Working Party. 2008. RCOG, London. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/wprmaternitystandards2008.pdf
RCOG. Why Should we Consider a Life Course Approach to Women’s Health Care? (Scientific Impact Paper 27). 2011. RCOG, London. Accessed 26/03/15 from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/sip_no_27.1.pdf
Rubin R. Attainment of the maternal role: Part I. Processes. Nursing Research 1967a, 16(3): 237-245.
Rubin R. Attainment of the maternal role: Part II. Models and Referrants. Nursing Research 1967b, 16(3): 342-346,351.
Rubin R. Maternal Identity and the Maternal Experience. 1984. Springer, New York.
Ryan GW and Bernard HR. Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods 2003, 15: 85-109.
Sable MR, Stockbauer JW, Schramm WF and Land GH. 1990. Differentiating the barriers to adequate prenatal care in Missouri, 1987-88. Public Health Reports 1990, 105(6) L: 549-555.
Sable MR and Wilkinson DS. Pregnancy intentions, pregnancy attitudes and the use of prenatal care in Missouri. Maternal and Child Health Journal 1998, 2(3): 155-165.
Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A and Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 8. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub3/pdf
Sandall J. The contribution of continuity of midwifery care to high quality maternity care. 2014. RCM. Accessed 26/03/15 from:

https://www.rcm.org.uk/sites/default/files/Continuity%20of%20Care%20A5%20Web.pdf
Sandelowski, M. Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing and Health 1995a, 18, 179-183.
Sandelowski M. Qualitative Analysis: what it is and how to begin. Research in Nursing and Health 1995b, 18: 371-375.
Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S. and Emden, C. Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative meta-synthesis: issues and techniques. Research in Nursing and Health 1997, 20: 365-371.