|
 Projet Bassins VersantsAnnex I
Summary of Works by Quantity
|
| səhifə | 5/6 | | tarix | 18.04.2018 | | ölçüsü | 347,71 Kb. | | #39345 |
| Bu səhifədəki naviqasiya:
- Subtotal 26,360,000 23,999,894
- Subtotal 14,180 9,815
- Subtotal 2,366,356 2,550,162
- Subtotal 5,184 4,917
- Subtotal 4,000 1,500
- Subtotal 4,000 4,525 4,499
- Subtotal 1,948,831 2,206,650
- Subtotal 9,053 11,325
- Annex J SKWRMIP: Indicative Safeguards Policies Applicability (subject to the ongoing ESIA).
Annex I
Summary of Works by Quantity
Contract
|
Main Works
|
Units
|
Original BOQ(1)
|
Revised BOQ(2)
|
Completed BOQ(3)
|
% Completed
|
% Revised vs Original
|
SKMD/1
|
Earthworks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baday Tugay
|
m3
|
1,670,000
|
1,720,742
|
1,720,742
|
100
|
103
|
|
Ayazkala
|
m3
|
190,000
|
70,406
|
70,406
|
100
|
37
|
|
SKMC
|
m3
|
19,500,000
|
15,905,058
|
15,905,058
|
100
|
82
|
|
AMD
|
m3
|
5,000,000
|
6,303,688
|
6,303,688
|
100
|
126
|
|
Subtotal____26,360,000__23,999,894'>Subtotal
|
|
26,360,000
|
23,999,894
|
23,999,894
|
100
|
91
|
SKMD/1
|
Concrete works
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baday Tugay
|
m3
|
1,758
|
1,990
|
1,990
|
100
|
113
|
|
SKMC
|
m3
|
8,695
|
5,319
|
5,319
|
100
|
61
|
|
AMD
|
m3
|
3,727
|
2,506
|
2,506
|
100
|
67
|
|
Subtotal____2,366,356__2,550,162'>Subtotal
|
|
14,180
|
9,815
|
9,815
|
100
|
69
|
MS/1
|
Earthworks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beruni Rayon
|
m3
|
444,324
|
239,629
|
228,343
|
95
|
51
|
|
Ellikkala Rayon
|
m3
|
1,429,429
|
1,307,830
|
1,235,030
|
94
|
86
|
|
Turtkul Rayon
|
m3
|
492,603
|
1,002,703
|
918,054
|
92
|
186
|
|
Subtotal____4,000__4,525__4,499'>Subtotal____4,000__1,500'>Subtotal
|
|
2,366,356
|
2,550,162
|
2,381,427
|
93
|
101
|
MS/1
|
Concrete works
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beruni Rayon
|
m3
|
2,814
|
1,632
|
1,632
|
100
|
58
|
|
Ellikkala Rayon
|
m3
|
909
|
1,550
|
1,451
|
94
|
160
|
|
Turtkul Rayon
|
m3
|
1,461
|
1,735
|
1,698
|
98
|
116
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
5,184
|
4,917
|
4,782
|
97
|
92
|
MS/1
|
Land levelling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beruni Rayon
|
ha
|
2,000
|
750
|
565
|
75
|
28
|
|
Turtkul rayon
|
ha
|
2,000
|
750
|
892
|
119
|
45
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
4,000
|
1,500
|
1,458
|
97
|
36
|
MS/1
|
Deep ripping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beruni Rayon
|
ha
|
2,000
|
2,263
|
1,791
|
79
|
90
|
|
Turtkul rayon
|
ha
|
2,000
|
2,263
|
2,708
|
120
|
135
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
4,000
|
4,525
|
4,499
|
99
|
112
|
CAR/1
|
Earthworks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beruni rayon
|
m3
|
818,419
|
517,717
|
517,717
|
100
|
63
|
|
Turtkul rayon
|
m3
|
1,130,412
|
1,688,933
|
1,688,933
|
100
|
149
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
1,948,831
|
2,206,650
|
2,206,650
|
100
|
113
|
CAR/1/1
|
Concrete works
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beruni rayon
|
m3
|
5,374
|
6,649
|
6,649
|
100
|
124
|
|
Turtkul rayon
|
m3
|
3,679
|
4,676
|
4,676
|
100
|
127
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
9,053
|
11,325
|
11,325
|
100
|
125
|
CAR/1/1
|
Kokdarya
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concrete works
|
m3
|
520
|
520
|
520
|
100
|
100
|
CAR/1/2
|
Earthworks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beruni rayon
|
m3
|
1,779,059
|
1,779,059
|
397,522
|
22
|
22
|
CAR/1/2
|
Concrete works
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beruni rayon
|
m3
|
3,365
|
|
256
|
|
8
|
D1/2
|
Earthworks
|
m3
|
2,534,649
|
2,534,649
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Concrete
|
m3
|
3,945
|
3,945
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
AMDworks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earthworks
|
m3
|
400,000
|
400,000
|
83,450
|
21
|
21
|
(1) As per Contract
(2) As per Working Drawing and Final Measurement
(3) As per Completion to Date
Annex J
SKWRMIP: Indicative Safeguards Policies Applicability (subject to the ongoing ESIA).
WB Safeguard Policy
|
Policy Applicability
|
Reasoning/Comments
|
Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01)
|
Yes
| -
Likely a Category A Project (or a heavy B)
-
Overall positive impacts perceived
-
Minor negative direct impacts perceived
-
Minor external impacts perceived.
|
Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04)
|
Yes
|
Natural Habitats exist in project area
|
Forestry (OP/BP 4.36)
|
No
|
|
Pest Management (OP/BP 4.09)
|
TBD
| -
Incremental vertical and horizontal expansion expected %53.
-
TBD after EIA. Depending on baseline concentration of diffuse pollution (Alpha-BHC, Gamma-BHC, BETA-BHC, Delta-BHC, Heptachlor Aldrine, Heptachlorepoxide, etc), the incremental pesticide load may not lead to exceeding the concentration norms.
-
Baseline case: Biological pesticides replaced chemical ones, albeit with some frequent use of chemical ones if pest is uncommon. Government provides farmers with soft loans on farm inputs including pesticides. MoAWR staff apply the pesticides or train farmers on how to apply them, hence farmers do not have liberty to overuse them.
-
The IPM should ensure: low toxicity, short persistence in ambient environmental elements, low application dose with high efficacy, rapid bio degradable, no effect on non targets.
|
Physical Cultural Property (OP/BO 4.11)
|
TBD
| -
TBD after EIA.
-
Chance finds, based on DIWIP experience/modality.
-
Obstruction of cultural properties as a result of rehabilitation works
|
Indigenous Peoples (4.10)
|
No
|
|
Involuntary Resettlement
(OP/BP 4.12)
|
TBD
|
|
Safety of Dams
(OP/BP 4.37)
|
TBD
| -
Tuyamuyun reservoir (likely plus a new regulator/dam on the river in project area, to be considered by the FS).
-
TBD after EIA (and building on DIWIP outcomes).
|
Projects in International Water Ways (OP 7.50)
|
Yes
| -
Subject to ESIA, notification requirement will be determined and an exemption sought if the ESIA determines that the project has no or a positive impact on downstream water availability
|
Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP 7.60)
|
No
|
|
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
|
|
