SAMPLE 13
It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world
history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is an indisputable fact that history plays an essential role in the educational
system all over the world. However, children nowadays are getting overwhelmed
with a considerable range of historical knowledge; some people, for that reason,
believe that students should only focus on local history. In my opinion, both local
and world history ought to be taught on account of tremendous benefits they bring.
To begin with, local history is completely a great importance, especially for
schoolchildren due to the fact that it is not merely a particular subject at school but
the responsibility of every single student for their own country. To put it another
way, through history, children are able to establish a national identity which is
likely to enhance a sense of patriotism that encourages them to preserve/uphold
traditional values.
From another angle, learning global history is truly necessary as well. As a matter
of fact, the definition of globalization today is becoming more and more popular,
studying world history, therefore, keeps young learners up to date and indeed
gives them more opportunities to get exposed to the outside world, which they
definitely cannot learn through domestic one. Besides, world history also
increases the chances of boosting/improving employment prospects in future
career. Take Japanese firms for a typical example, owing to the appreciation of
Japanese companies to a deep insight of their culture, it is totally advantageous for
employees who acquire a wide knowledge of Japanese history.
In conclusion, both local history and world history are extremely important for
students because of their huge pros. Therefore they should be taught widely in the
school curriculum.
Dostları ilə paylaş: 
