MICHAEL T. MURRAY N.D.
Member, Board of Trustees and Faculty
Bastyr University, Kenmore, Washington
JOSEPH E. PIZZORNO JR., N.D.
President
Bastyr University, Kenmore, Washington
JANIS M. RYGWELSKI M.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Family Practice, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
G. RANDOLPH SCHRODT Jr., M.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine; Medical
Director, Behavioral Medicine Program, Norton Psychiatric Clinic, Louisville, Kentucky
ROBERT SHELLENBERGER PHD.
Licensed Psychologist; Chair of Psychology
Aims Community College, Co-Director, Health Psychology Service LLC, Greeley, Colorado
ALLAN TASMAN M.D.
Professor and Chairman
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville,
Kentucky
HARALD WALACH PHD., Dipl. Psych.
Department of Psychology
University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
JAMES C. WHORTON PHD.
Professor
Department of Medical History and Ethics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle,
Washington
IAN WICKRAMASEKERA PHD., A.B.P.P., A.B.P.H.
Consulting Professor of Psychiatry
Stanford Medical School, Stanford, California; Professor of Family Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical
School, Norfolk, Virginia
DEDICATION
THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED TO MY WIFE, SUSAN CUNNINGHAM JONAS, WHOSE LOVE, WISDOM, AND
SERVICE TO OTHERS IS AN EXAMPLE FOR US ALL.
W B J
FOR LEA STEELE LEVIN, MY BELOVED WIFE AND PARTNER.
J S L
FOREWORD
The publication of Essentials of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, the first comprehensive
textbook for physicians about these increasingly popular forms of medical treatment, is very timely. For the
first time, information about the foundations of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), the safety
of CAM products and practices, and overviews of nearly two dozen CAM systems are available in one
place.
The purpose of this textbook is to provide mainstream medical professionals useful and balanced
information about CAM. The development of this type of book is an ambitious and difficult goal for several
reasons. Many CAM systems are claimed to have special patient benefits not met by either conventional
medicine or other CAM approaches. There are few unifying themes across these systems (other than the
belief that there are unmet patient benefits outside of conventional medicine). Faced with these problems,
the editors have sought the best individuals in these diverse areas and worked with them to produce a
balanced and useful book developed specifically for physici ans. In many areas of CAM, there is a history
of long-term and vigorous antagonism with conventional medicine, as well as different educational
standards, training, and practices. Also, the basic conc epts of what constitutes sufficient evidence of
safety and efficacy vary among CAM systems. Ultimately, the usefulness of this book will depend on its
success in addressing these issues in an objective, pragmatic, and convincing way.
Why is it important to publish this textbook? The main reason is the compelling evidence that medicine has
been changing both scientifically and culturally for several decades. Let us start with the changes in
conventional medicine since World War II.
The medicine of my childhood in a small rural town in Virginia was very different from the conventional
medicine of today. For example, my 80-year-old sister who had a heart attack was treated by removal of
the clot and insertion of a stent; both she and her husband viewed the procedure on television, and she
was up and walking the next day. In contrast, when my 59-year-old father suffered a heart attack over 50
years ago, medicine really had little to offer.
Although there are many reasons for these dramatic changes in medicine, the dominant force has been the
emergence of exact sciences underlying medicine (whereas once they were viewed as “soft sciences”).
The rewarding results have been an ever-increasing understanding of basic life processes. This
understanding, in turn, has allowed novel and su ccessful approaches to disease control.
However, the advancement of science-based medicine has a downside: science-based specialty medicine
has become less personal and more costly. And, cost-containment efforts pay for procedures done, rather
than time spent with patients. For these and other reasons, patients seek to augment the benefits of
modern conventional medicine with CAM.
The initial striking evidence of the widespread use of CAM in the United States was reported by David
Eisenberg and colleagues in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1993. According to Eisenberg's
report, one in three Americans saw an alternative health care practitioner in 1990 (constituting more visits
than to conventional primary care physicians), and they paid more than 10 billion dollars in out-of-pocket
expenses for this care. In addition, patients did not tell their physicians of their use of CAM because they
assumed the physicians would not be interested or would not approve. In a follow-up study now completed,
the evidence of even greater use of CAM has been confirmed and is most striking: more than 40% of
Americans currently use CAM (approaching European and Australian rates), and as much out-of-pocket
money is spent for CAM care as is out-of-pocket money spent for all of conventional medicine. These facts