(h)
The outcome of the evaluation for each of the Tenderer's nominees
for appointment as a DAB
member will not form part of the Tender evaluation process, subject to RMS' rights under clause
2.4(b) of this Request for Tender.
2.2.2
C
OMPARATIVE
P
RICE
E
VALUATION
(a)
The process for the selection of the Tender will include an evaluation of the comparative prices of
the Tenders adjusted to recognise the impact of non-priced criteria. The comparative prices will
be determined on the basis of the Project Contract Sum excluding:
(i)
the Project Verifier’s fees for the Project Verifier’s design verification
services;
(ii)
the Project Verifier’s fees for the Project Verifier’s construction verification services;
(iii)
the Environmental Representative’s fees for the Environmental Representative's design
phase services; and
(iv)
the Environmental Representative’s fees for the Environmental Representative's
construction phase services,
adjusted to recognise and reflect:
(i)
conformity of the Tenders with the requirements of this Request for Tender and the
Project Deed;
(ii)
differences in risks associated with the Tenders, including technical risks, commercial
risks, financial risks and any other risk characteristics particular to the Tenders;
(iii)
the net present value (
NPV) of the whole-of-life costs associated with the Tenders,
including user costs and maintenance and operating costs being offered in the Tenders.
The determination will be made in accordance with the Principles
and Guidelines for
Economic Appraisal of Transport Investment and Initiatives; and
(iv)
any other issues that need to be considered to ensure the fairness of comparisons between
the Tenders.
(b)
The NPV evaluation will be based on:
(i)
a nominal discount rate of 7% p.a.; and
(ii)
a term consisting of a period commencing from the Date for Construction Completion
plus a period of 480 months.
2.2.3
N
ON
-
PRICE
E
VALUATION
(a)
Non-price evaluation of tenders will be undertaken on the basis of the information provided in
response to clause 3.2 of this Request for Tender against the evaluation criteria.
(b)
The evaluation criteria are listed (without stipulating any order of precedence) in Table 1 below.
Criteria weightings will remain confidential to the Evaluation Team.
Table 1: Tender Evaluation Criteria
Criterion
No.
Tender Evaluation Criteria
1
Effective methodology for the delivery of the Contractor’s Work and the
Project Verifier’s services to recognise, manage and resolve issues and to
minimise project risks including satisfaction of community expectations
and environmental and safety requirements.
2
Appropriate design proposals (excluding those for the urban and
landscaping design) that comply with the requirements of the Project
IC-DC-C92
D&C
Request for Tender
Edition 1, Revision 21, September 2017
Page 6
Criterion
No.
Tender Evaluation Criteria
Deed including an effective approach to ensuring durability, performance,
reliability and consideration of maintenance and operation issues.
3
Satisfaction of urban design and landscaping design requirements.
4
Appropriate on site and off site financial, human and physical resources,
organisation and experience, including for the Project Verifier’s services.
5
[insert project specific evaluation criterion if required]
(c)
The information submitted in Tenders will be used to determine the non-price performance
against the evaluation criteria. The information contributing to performance in each criterion is
shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2: Application of Tender Information to Evaluation Criteria
Tender Information
Applicable Tender
Evaluation Criteria
Volume
Tender Details Required
I
Commercial Issues
(i) Entity Details
To be provided
(ii) Mandatory Criteria
Mandatory
(iii) Structure, Experience
and Performance of
Tenderer
4
(iv) Subcontractors
4
(v) Proof Engineer
4
II
Urban Design
(i) General
(ii) Bridges
(iii) Retaining wall
structures
(iv) Earthworks, Landform and Slope
Stabilisation
(v) Landscape design
(vi) Road furniture
(vii) Noise Barriers and Headlight Screens
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
IC-DC-C92
D&C Request for Tender
Edition 1, Revision 21, September 2017
Page 7