Uputstvo za pisanje eseja na predmetu psihologija
Yüklə 74,71 Kb. Pdf görüntüsü
|
| 1
Opšti cilj izrade eseja je sticanje iskustva i veština pisanja akademskih radova, sa specifičnim ciljem da se student upozna sa nekim od čuvenih eksperimenata u oblasti psihologije.
Studenti biraju temu eseja u dogovoru sa predavačem. Esej se radi timski, od po četvoro (četiri osobe pišu i usmeno brane esej).
U eseju, student treba da predstavi jedan od poznatih eksperimenata koji su imali veliki uticaj na razvoj psihološke misli (sa liste predloženih eksperimenata). Pri tome je neophodno da student objasni sve psihološke termine u tekstu. Esej treba da sadrži sledeće elemente: 1.
Osnovne biografske podatke o psihologu koji je sproveo eksperiment 2.
Objašnjenje eksperimenta i psiholoških termina 3.
Priloge (video materijal, testovi, linkovi ka internet stranicama, itd) 4.
Kritički osvrt na eksperiment (mišljenje studenta o eksperimentu) 5.
Literaturu
Svaka preuzeta definicija, podela, ili mišljenje drugog autora treba da bude propraćena: a.
odgovorajućom fusnotom (navođenje pune reference) b.
navođenjem autora u zagradi (prezime, godina) ili c.
endnotom (broj koji označava redni broj reference u literaturi na kraju rada [1].
Slike, tabele, grafici i prilozi treba da budu numerisani i naslovljeni (npr. Slika 1. Opis slike). Za preuzete slike, tabele i grafike drugih autora takođe treba navesti izvor na jedan od prethodno navedenih načina.
Osim za potrebe navođenja podataka odakle je preuzet deo teksta, fusnote mogu da se koriste i za dodatno objašnjenje pojma ili upućivanje na literaturu gde može više da se sazna o problemu. 2
Spisak korišćene literature se navodi na kraju rada. U njemu treba da se navedu svi korišćeni izvori u tekstu. Literaturu treba srediti po azbučnom ili abecednom redu u zavisnosti od od toga da li je rad pisan ćirilicom ili latinicom. Za pisanje seminarskog rada se koriste knjige, naučni članci i izvori sa interneta. 1.
Beograd: Viša železnička škola. 2.
Referenciranje internet stranice: Fakultet organizacionih nauka, Raspored nastave, datum pristupa: 2/10/2015, http://www.fon.rs/osnovnestudije/nastava/
3. Referenciranje naučnog članka: George, J. M. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Origins of Perceived Social Loafing in Organizations. Academy of Management Joumal , 35 (1), 191-202.
Esej treba da sadrži najmanje 3 reference.
Broj strana: 2 strane teksta po studentu bez priloga. Svi prilozi (testovi, slike, itd) treba da budu na dopunskim stranama.
Margine: po 2.54 cm sa svake strane (margins normal) Font:
Arial ( naslovi 13pt , tekst 11pt , fusnote 10pt ) , Times New Roman ( naslovi 14pt
, tekst 12pt, fusnote 10pt ) , Calibri ( naslovi 14pt , tekst 12pt, fusnote 10pt ) ili Cambria ( naslovi 14pt , tekst 12pt, fusnote 10pt ). Sve naslove treba boldovati.
Prored: 6pt nakon pasusa, prored 1 (6pt after paragraph, single line spacing). Umesto proreda može da se koristi enter nakon završetka pasusa.
Poravnanje: obostrano (justified) Predaja i odbrana eseja: Studenti rad šalju na e-mail kivana@fon.bg.ac.rs ili
milinkovic.ivana@fon.bg.ac.rs (zavisno od termina slušanja vežbi). Prijava i pregledanje seminarskog rada
Prijava se vrši upisivanjem u spreadsheet formu, na linku:
3
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10s2lzme6gafRFhpdOLnu9oEhwyDk1OoiCVxTYOkGrU 0/edit?usp=sharing
Potrebno je da odaberete sheet sa vašom grupom, zatim odabrete temu od trenutno raspoloživih i upišete naziv tima, ime, prezime i broj indeksa članova tima kao i e-mail adrese. Nakon toga na e-mail biće vam prosleđeni materijali za rad.
Konsultacije u vezi eseja su moguće u terminu konsultacija (sreda 17:00-18:00 i četvrtak 10:00- 12:00, kancelarija 307) ili putem elektronske pošte.
Završen esej se šalje na e-mail: kivana@fon.bg.ac.rs , ili
milinkovic.ivana@fon.bg.ac.rs (zavisno od termina slušanja vežbi) . Od studenta se može tražiti da unese izvesne izmene u esej. Student može da ostvari 6-10 poena za pisani esej u zavisnosti od kvaliteta rada.
Rok za prijavu eseja je: za grupe A7 i A9 (nastava utorkom) 18.10.2016, za grupu A11 (nastava sredom) 19.10.2016. i za grupe A1, A3 i A5 (nastava četvrtkom) 20.10.2016. Za grupe A8 i A10 (nastava utorkom) 25.10.2016, Za grupu A12 (nastava sredom) 26.10.2016, i Za grupe A2, A4, A6 (nastava četvrtkom) 27.10.2016. Prijava se vrši popunjavanjem forme na linku: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10s2lzme6gafRFhpdOLnu9oEhwyDk1OoiCVxTYOkGrU 0/edit?usp=sharing
za grupe A7 i A9 (nastava utorkom) 1.11.2016, za grupu A11 (nastava sredom) 2.11.2016. i za grupe A1, A3 i A5 (nastava četvrtkom) 3.11.2016. Predaja eseja se vrši putem elektronske pošte na adresu: kivana@fon.bg.ac.rs .
4
Za grupe A8 i A10 (nastava utorkom) 8.11.2016, Za grupu A12 (nastava sredom) 9.11.2016, i Za grupe A2, A4, A6 (nastava četvrtkom) 10.11.2016. Predaja eseja se vrši putem elektronske pošte na adresu: milinkovic.ivana@fon.bg.ac.rs
Odbrana eseja: u terminima vežbi u dogovoru sa asistentom.
1.
J.B., Raynor, R. (1920). Conditioned emotional reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1-14; Harris, B. (1979). What Happened to Little Albert? American Psychologist, 34(2), 151- 160). 2.
Roterov eksperiment kontrole potkrepljenja (Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized Expectancies For INTERNAL Versus EXTERNAL Control of Reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28. 3.
Selidžman i Majer - Naučena bespomoćnost (Seligman, M.E.P., Maier, S.F. (1967). Failure To Escape Traumatic Shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 1-9.; Maier, S.F., Seligman, M.E.P. (1976). Learned Helplessness: Theory and Evidence. Journal ol
4.
Eksperiment sa očevicima saobraćajne nesreće – verodostojnost prisećanja očevidaca (Loftus, Elisabeth; Palmer, John. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An
Example of the Interaction Between Language and Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589; Loftus, E. (1975). Leading questions and eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-572). 5.
Jedan ili dva mozga – eksperiment sa komisurotomijom kod čoveka. (Gayyaniga, M.S. (1967). The split brain in man. Scientific American, 217, 24-29.) 6.
Expectancies: Determinants Of Pupils' IQ Gains. Psychological Reports, 19, 115-118. 5
7. Činiti ono što se propoveda – eksperiment veze stavova i akcija (LaPiere, R.T. (1934). Attitudes vs. Actions. Social Forces, 13, 230-237. 8.
Latane, B., Rodin, J. (1969). A Lady in Distress: Inhibiting Effects of Friends and Strangers on bzstander Intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 189-202; Darley, J.M., Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal
9.
Eksperiment „dobri samarićanin“ o spremnosti da se pritekne u pomoć (John Darley, Daniel Batson: Helping Behavior: The Good Samaritan Experiment): Darley, J., Batson, D. (1973). "From Jerusalem To Jericho": A Study Of Situational And Dispositional Variables In Helping Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 1, 100-108 10.
The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218. 11.
Albert Bandura – Bobo lutke (Bobo doll experiment): Bandura, A., Ross, D., Ross, S.A. (1961). Imitation Of Film-Mediated Aggressive Models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-582. 12.
Red rođenja i intelektualni razvoj (Zajonc, R.B., Markus, G.B. (1975). Birth Order and Intellectual Development. Psychological Review, 82, 74-88. 13.
(1971). Constants Across Cultures In The Face And Emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124-129 14.
Milgramov eksperiment (Stanley Milgram: Obedience to authority) (Milgram, S. (1965). Liberating Effects Of Group Pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 2, 127- 134.; Milgram, S. (1965). Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority,
Study of Obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378. 15.
selective group perception): Hastorf, A., Cantril, H. (1952). They saw a game: Case Study, 6
16. Eksperiment Harloua sa surogat majkom (Harry Harlow: Monkey Love experiments): Harlow, H.F. (1958). The Nature of Love. American Psychologist, 13, 673-685 17.
Skinner, B.F. (1948). 18.
Tolmanove mape u umu (Tolman, E.C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189-208. 19.
Eksperiment kognitivne disonance (Leon Festinger, James Carlsmith: Cognitive Dissonance Experiment): Festinger, L., Carlsmith, J.M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210. 20.
Ašov eksperiment o prvom utisku. (Asch, S.E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290. 21.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., O`Sullivan, M., Scherer, K. (1980). Relative Importance of Face, Body, and Speech in Judgments of Personality and Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, no. 2, 270-277.; Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., Sullivan, M., Chan, A. I dr. (1987). Universals and Cultural Differences in the Judgments of Facial Expressions of Emotion, Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 53, 4, 712-717. 22.
Individualizam/kolektivizam (Triandis, H., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M., Asai, M., Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Self-Ingroup Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338. 23.
Uticaj emocija na kogniciju. (Ashby, F.G., Isen, A.M., Turken, U. (1999). A Neuropsychological Theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 3, 529-550. 24.
Test hipnotičke sugestije (Spanos, N.P., Gorassini, D.R. (1984). Structure of Hypnotic Test Suggestions and Attributions of Responding Involuntarily. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 3, 688-696. 25.
Psihoterapijski ishodi – Smith, M.L., Glass, G.V. (1977). Meta-Analysis of Psychotherapy Outcome Studies. American Psychologist, 32, 752-760. 7
26. Mančmelou test (Walter Michel: Stanford Marshmallow Experiment): Michel, W., Baker, N. (1975). Cognitive Appraisals and Transformations in Delay Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 2, 254-261. 27.
Gilbertov eksperiment primat verovanja nad razumevanjem (Daniel Gilbert: Understanding and Belief): Gilbert, D.T., Tafarodi, R.W., Malone, P.S. (1993). You can’t not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 2, 221-223.; Gilbert, D.T., Hixon, G.J. (1991). The Trouble of Thinking: Activation and Application of Stereotypic Beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, No. 4, 509-517). 28.
Rosenhanov eksperiment sa lažnim pacijentima (pseudopacijenti) (David Rosenhan: The pseudopatient experiment): poglavlje u knjizi i Weiner, B. (1975). On Being Sane in Insane Places": A Process (Attributional) Analysis and Critique. Journal of Abnormal
29.
„Pristrasno opažanje pristrasnosti medija“ (Robert Vallone, Lee Ross, Mark Lepper: Hostile media effect): Vallone, R.P., Ross, L., Lepper, M. (1985). The Hostile Media Phenomenon: Biased Perception and Perceptions of Media Bias in Coverage of the Beirut Massacre. Journal of Personality and Industrial Psychology, 49, 3, 577-585 30.
(1956). Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 9,1-69 31.
Experiment (Zimbardo, Philip G. "On the ethics of intervention in human psychological research: With special reference to the Stanford prison experiment." Cognition 2.2 (1973): 243-256.; Haney, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1998). The past and future of US prison policy: Twenty- five years after the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist, 53(7), 709. 32.
Experiment): Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 35(4), 250. 8
33. Vegnerov eksperiment sa belim medvedom (Daniel M. Wegner: Thought Rebound Experiment): Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of personality and social psychology, 53(1), 5. 34.
Rosov eksperiment lažnog slaganja (Lee Ross: Ross’ False Consensus Effect Experiments): Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of experimental social
35.
Šerifov eksperiment grupne dinamike (Scherif: Sherif’s Robbers Cave Experiment): Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1988). The robbers cave experiment. Intergroup conflict and cooperation.; Sherif, M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American journal of Sociology, 349-356. 36.
Bargaining Theory of Cooperation and Competition): Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R. M. (1960). The effect of threat upon interpersonal bargaining. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61(2), 181. 37.
Eksperiment samoobmane Kvatrona i Tverskog (George Quattrone, Amos Tversky: Quattrone&Tversky’s Self-Deception Experiment): Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1984). Causal versus diagnostic contingencies: On self-deception and on the voter's illusion. Journal
38.
Efekat nagrade na smanjenje intrinzičke motivacije (Mark Lepper, David Greene, Nisbett: Overjustification Effect: The Felt Tip Marker Study): Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the" overjustification" hypothesis. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 28(1), 129.; Greene, D., & Lepper, M. R. (1974). Effects of extrinsic rewards on children's subsequent intrinsic interest. Child development, 1141-1145.) 39.
Experiment and Choice Blindness): Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikström, S., Tärning, B., & Lind, A. (2006). How something can be said about telling more than we can know: On choice blindness and introspection. Consciousness and cognition, 15(4), 673-692.
9
40. Test sa lutkama različite boje (Kenneth Clark, Mamie Clark: Stereotypes and the Clark Doll Test): Keppel, B. (2002). Kenneth B. Clark in the patterns of American culture. American Psychologist, 57(1), 29.; 41.
Leksička greška (David E. Mayer, Roger W. Schvaneveldt: The Lexical Decision Task): Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of experimental psychology,
42.
Kameleon efekat: eksperiment (Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: the perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(6), 893. 43.
Tajfelov eksperiment socijalnog suđenja (Henry Tajfel: Social judgement theory experiment): Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96-102.
Yüklə 74,71 Kb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
|