60
BARIUM AND BARIUM COMPOUNDS
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
Table 3-2. Genotoxicity of Barium and Barium Compounds In Vitro
Species (test system) End point
Results Reference
Compound
Prokaryotic organisms:
Salmonella typhimurium
Gene mutation
–
Monaco et al. 1990,
Barium chloride
frequency
1991; NTP 1994
(with or without S9
activation)
Escherichia coli
Gene mutation
–
Rossman et al. 1991
Barium chloride
WP2s(
λ
)
frequency
Bacillus subtilis
DNA damage
–
Kanematsu et al. 1980;
Barium
chloride,
(rec assay)
Nishioka 1975
barium nitrate
Eukaryotic organisms:
Fungi
Saccharomyces
Meiosis
–
Sora et al. 1986
Barium chloride
cerevesiae
Avian myeloblastosis
DNA synthesis
–
Sirover and Loeb 1976a, Barium chloride,
virus DNA polymerase
1976b
barium acetate
Mammalian cells:
CHO cells
Sister chromatid
–
NTP 1994
Barium chloride
exchange
(with or without S9
activation)
CHO cells
Chromosome
–
NTP 1994
Barium chloride
aberration
(with or without S9
activation)
Mouse lymphoma cells
Gene mutation at TK
NTP 1994
Barium chloride
locus
With S9 activation
+
Without S9 activation –
– = negative result; + = positive result; CHO = Chinese hamster ovary
61
BARIUM AND BARIUM COMPOUNDS
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
3.4
TOXICOKINETICS
3.4.1
Absorption
3.4.1.1 Inhalation Exposure
No studies were located regarding absorption of barium in humans following inhalation exposure.
Several animal studies have investigated the absorption of barium chloride or barium sulfate following
inhalation, intratracheal injection, or nasal deposition. The results of these studies suggest that the rate
and extent of absorption of barium from the respiratory tract depend on the exposure level, how much
barium reaches the alveolar spaces, the clearance rate from the upper respiratory tract, and the solubility
of the particular form of barium that was administered. Approximately 50–75% of inhaled barium
chloride or barium sulfate is absorbed from the respiratory tract (Cuddihy and Griffith 1972; Morrow et
al. 1968); approximately 65% of the barium chloride deposited in the nose is absorbed (Cuddihy and
Ozog 1973b). Most of the barium absorption occurs within the first 24 hours (Cuddihy and Griffith 1972;
Cuddihy et al. 1974). Barium chloride appears to be more rapidly absorbed than barium sulfate (Cuddihy
et al. 1974), although the differences in particle size (AMADs of 2.3 and 1.0 µm for barium chloride and
barium sulfate, respectively) may have influenced the absorption rate. In contrast to the rapid absorption
of barium following inhalation or nasal deposition, most of the barium sulfate that is injected directly into
the trachea of rats can be taken up into the epithelium membranes and remains in these membranes for at
least a few weeks (Gore and Patrick 1982; Takahashi and Patrick 1987), suggesting that clearance in the
upper respiratory tract is more efficient than in the trachea. Following intratracheal injection, the
clearance of barium sulfate from the lungs was independent of lung burden over the range of 23.3–
2,330 µg (Cember et al. 1961); this is consistent with the lack of evidence of lung overload following
intermediate-duration inhalation exposure to 37.5 or 75 mg/m
3
barium sulfate (MMAD 4.3 µm, σg 1.7)
(Cullen et al. 2000). Species differences in the retention of intratracheally administered radiolabelled
(
133
Ba) barium sulfate have been found. The percentages of
133
Ba retained in the trachea 1
week after
administration were 0.41, 0.145, 0.044, and 0.043% in rats, rabbits, dogs, and monkeys, respectively
(Takahashi and Patrick 1987; Takahashi et al. 1993).
3.4.1.2 Oral Exposure
The absorption of barium from the gastrointestinal tract is compound dependent. Barium sulfate is
extremely insoluble and very little, if any, ingested barium sulfate is absorbed. Acid-soluble barium
compounds, such as barium chloride and barium carbonate, are absorbed through the gastrointestinal
62
BARIUM AND BARIUM COMPOUNDS
3. HEALTH EFFECTS
tract, although the amount of barium absorbed is highly variable. Older human studies estimated that
barium was poorly absorbed; approximately 1–15% of the ingested dose was estimated to be absorbed
(Harrision et al. 1956; LeRoy et al. 1966; Schroeder et al. 1972; Tipton et al. 1969). A re-examination of
the methods used in these studies found a number of flaws; Leggett (1992) estimated that barium
absorption in these studies was approximately 3–60%. Studies in adult rats and dogs estimated fractional
absorption at 7% (Cuddihy and Griffith 1972; Taylor et al. 1962). Several unpublished animal studies
discussed by Leggett (1992) found absorption rates of 1–50%. Experiments in rats have shown that
younger animals (22 days old or less) absorb about 10 times more barium chloride from the
gastrointestinal tract (63–84%) than do older animals (about 7%) (Taylor et al. 1962). Absorption was
higher in fasted adult rats (20%) as compared to fed rats (7%). The International Commission for
Radiation Protection (ICRP) estimates that the gastrointestinal absorption of barium is 20% in adults,
30% for children aged 1–15 years, and 60% in infants (ICRP 1993).
3.4.1.3 Dermal Exposure
No studies were located regarding absorption of barium in humans after dermal exposure. One animal
study showed that barium applied to the skin of piglets was found in the various layers of the skin
(Shvydko et al. 1971). Barium is not expected to cross the intact skin because of the high polarity of the
forms in which it is most commonly encountered.
3.4.2
Distribution
3.4.2.1 Inhalation Exposure
Shortly after dogs were exposed to radiolabelled (
140
Ba) barium chloride, elevated activity was found in
the upper respiratory tract, stomach, and small intestine (30% of initial burden), lungs and
tracheobronchial tissue (6%), and various internal organs (64%) (Cuddihy and Griffith 1972). One day
post-exposure, 44% of the label was detected in the skeleton, 1% in blood, and 4% in muscle; 26% of the
dose was excreted.
3.4.2.2 Oral Exposure
In humans, barium is predominantly found in bone; approximately 90% of the barium in the body was
detected in the bone (Schroeder et al. 1972). Approximately 1–2% of the total body burden was found in
muscle, adipose, skin, and connective tissue. This information is supported by a number of studies