This book is dedicated to the Serpents of Wisdom with thanks

Chapter Eight

Mesopotamia

A large part of our family’s story takes place in the areas between the Black and Caspian Seas and in the Caucasus and Zagros mountain ranges. The area denoted Asshur on the map was the land belonging to the descendants of Shem’s son Ashur or Assur, who as noted previously, may have been the same person known as Aser and Osiris. According to the Mesopotamian records translated by Zecharia Sitchin, Asar or Osiris was the son of Enki’s son Marduk and Sarpanit, the daughter of Enosh. This then would make Marduk, Shem - therefore Enki would be Noah. Enki was in fact Noah’s biological father. In the ancient records, ‘sons’ could mean ‘descendants’. The Mitannian's or Mithans were also referred to as being tied to the Israelites and Moses in the last chapter. The area of Lake Van is where Shem and his family were said to have lived for a period after disembarking from the Ark. I mentioned earlier that the civilization that preceded the Mesopotamian was the Ugaritic. To give the reader some idea of why it’s important to connect this civilization with the later Sumerian one, and still later Israelite one, I refer to information found online from the Quartz Hill School of Theology found at; theology.edu/ugarbib.htm. In the article the author states that the literature of the city of Ugarit, “go a very long way in helping us to understand the meaning of various Biblical passages. Ugarit was at its political, religious and economic high point circa the 12^th century B.C., the time that corresponds to the entry of Israel into Canaan.”

Ugarit was established in the Neolithic period. Ugaritic writings have been found that date back to circa 1800 B.C. This coincides with a time period of Egyptian rule of all of Mesopotamia. The author writes that; “Israel and Ugarit shared a common literary heritage and a common linguistic lineage.” As pointed out in the article, the Old Testament prophets rail against Baal, Asherah and various other gods “on nearly every page.” The author then states; “The reason for this is simple to understand; the people of Israel worshipped these gods along with, and sometimes instead of, Yahweh, the God of Israel. This Biblical denunciation of these Canaanite gods received a fresh face when the Ugaritic texts were discovered, for at Ugarit these were the very gods that were worshipped.” The Ugaritic religion included a pantheon of a high God called El and then lesser gods such as those previously mentioned. Other names of gods of Ugarit include El Shaddai, El Elyon, and El Berith. The author points out that all of these names are applied to Yahweh by the writers of the Old Testament. “What this means is that the Hebrew theologians adopted the titles of the Canaanite gods and attributed them to Yahweh in an effort to eliminate them.” A process known as assimilation.
The article goes on to mention; “One of the most interesting of these lesser deities, Asherah, plays a very important role in the Old Testament. There she is called the wife of Baal; but she is also known as the consort of Yahweh!”
The author of Legend; the Genesis of Civilization p 124 believes that the Neolithic revolution originated in the Zagros mountains and gradually transferred to the Mesopotamian plain. Most scholars agree that the ethnic Sumerians descended from the Ubaid culture of Ugarit in northern Mesopotamia. The author states; “If the so-called Ubaid culture is indeed that of the Sumerians, then we may conclude that the Sumerians entered the lowlands from the mountains to the north-east because that is where their earliest pottery originates.”
Since people have been taught the ‘official’ history of the Earth, they have come to believe that the Bronze Age, which was roughly the same time period of the Ubaid culture, was very primitive. As far as we have been taught, humans were barely out of the Stone-Age then. The truth about the Bronze Age is that the Serpents of Wisdom, who were presiding over these civilizations, brought all aspects of modern culture to them. Thousands of clay tablets from Mesopotamia have been found. Among these are records from lawyers, doctors, merchants, schools, factories, architects and engineers. They have unearthed records that prove that the Sumerians knew advanced math using the square and cube root. Their cities had running water and indoor toilets. They built multi-story buildings. They had paved roads and intricate canal systems. What has happened is that at some point, the Anunnaki left the Earth, and the civilizations declined for several thousand years, until starting to progress again just recently.
The Sumerians called themselves the black-headed people. From the 1998 Grail issue of Temple Doors pp 71-74, 163-164 we learn that the Sumerians didn’t claim to have invented any of the fundamentals of their civilization. In their writings, they claimed that gods came to the Earth and taught them to dredge the swamplands and build their cities. The Sumerian accounts refer to Anunnaki gods named Enlil, Enki, Ninurta, Marduk and Ninhursag and Inanna, among others. The author states; “Modern scholars have relegated these beings to the mythological or religious realm of a Sumerian pantheon. They dispute the Sumerians own descriptions of them as real, flesh and blood people who came to Earth to create and mentor them. And who are we to believe; the Sumerians themselves, who revolutionized the world, left a vast archaeological record of their accomplishments, and sought no credit for these accomplishments, or modern academics whose worldview descends from one that formerly denied the very existence of the Sumerians and now will not permit them such a history?”

The author goes on to say that before the Sumerians, there were no bakers, harpists, carpenters, metal smiths, jewelers, artists, engineers, mathematicians, bureaucrats or scribes. These innovations appeared in their cities between 3700 B.C. and 3000 B.C. They are also credited with inventing the wheel, chariot, bronze, sailboat, mathematics and astrology. The author makes the statement; “So the few ancient, fast growing civilizations, the advanced nature of which we have archaeological proof - do not fit our theoretical modes. Perhaps, then, it is time to change the model. Who or what lit a fire under these cultures? Perhaps now is the time to take as truth the explanations of our ancient ancestors; these cultures were contacted and stimulated by an advanced race; the cultures in the rest of the world were not.” The true history of the Earth has been hidden from humankind. People in the academic world quickly learn that their tenures and reputations rest on toeing the ‘official’ line.

The evidence points to the migration of the Ubaid people from the Zagros Mountain area to the north-east of Ur in the Kurdish highlands of what is now northern Iraq. Saddam Hussein did his best to annihilate the Kurds by poison gas but some still remain. In searching for the origins of the fallen race of the Watchers or Anunnaki, Andrew Collins traveled to the Kurdish lands and spoke with the Kurds and Yezidis. He relates in his book, From the Ashes of Angels that; p 307 “Their most distant ancestors had, they say, migrated to the Mountain of the Madai, i.e. Kurdistan, from a foreign kingdom. That foreign kingdom was Egypt, the land of the Pharaohs.”
The Yezidi are the spiritual and physical descendants of the Persian Magi, the wise men who took gifts to the baby Jesus. They were also a branch of the Serpents of Wisdom. According to Collins, the Yezidis believe in a form of dualism where they give equal respect to both the good and evil principles of their religion. Because they give equal respect to both sides, I believe that they acknowledge that there is a place for both in our dualistic universe. This is known as binary dualism. Alice Linsley listed this as a belief of the Horites, Levites and Essenes. This line of thought believes that rather than opposing forces, they are actually complimentary dualities that balance each other out. Both sides need to be accepted because both sides are enacting the will of God. The Essenes didn’t go so far as to revere the evil side, they completely ignored it, believing that thinking about it would give it power. The Yezidis are referred to as angel worshippers. They say they don’t worship angels, but simply revere them. Some may think the Essenes worshiped angels, but in reality, they just communed with them. They knew angels are here to help people, so they sought their aid in their lives. The Yezidis both revere and fear Satan, or as they know him, Lasifarus. They believe he has already been forgiven by God and given another chance.
There was a period in Egypt known as the Neolithic Sub pluvial or the Holocene Wet Phase. It was an extended period from about 7500-7000 B.C. to about 3500-3000 B.C., of wet and rainy conditions. At least one geologist noted that the sphinx on the Giza plateau shows wear patterns that could only have been caused by water erosion. Most scientists scoff at this because they believe that the sphinx and pyramids were built circa 3500 B.C. Others believe they could have been built as early as 10,500 B.C. Either way, we can see that it could have been subject to water erosion during this wet phase. The Mesopotamian records say quite clearly that it was Enki’s son Ningishzidda also known as Thoth-Hermes, whose face is on the Sphinx. It’s very possible that our ancestors went to the Zagros Mountains during this period to escape the flooding in Egypt, as they lived on the Giza plateau at the time. Collins speaks of an early civilization in Egypt dating to circa 12,000 B.C., and speculates that this could be earlier evidence of the “fallen race’s” migration. He says that the Egyptian elders who settled in Kurdistan circa 9000 B.C. transformed themselves into an “advanced shamanistic culture that had a profound influence on the developing races of the surrounding foothills and plains.”
He goes on to relate the fact that they were unable to preserve much of the scientific and technological capabilities displayed in the cyclopean monuments of Egypt and the great cities beneath the plains of Cappadocia. According to Collins; “The ultimate tragedy of this surviving colony, recognized today as the Watchers of the Book of Enoch, is that they survived fire and flood as well as unknown personal catastrophes merely to have the glories of their race and the wonders of their civilization erased from world history.”

The cities beneath the plains of Cappadocia just referred to are an interesting subject. Cappadocia is located in today’s Turkey. The land there is a soft, carvable, volcanic rock. For whatever reason, whether a re-emergence of an Ice Age as some speculate, or as efforts to try to hide from beings in the skies, as another author speculated, vast underground cities were built approximately eight thousand years ago. One settlement was said to be able to house seventy thousand people. The author of Catal Huyuk; a Neolithic Town in Anatolia wrote about bird-like shamans who appeared to be the precursors to the Zoroastrians and Magi priests of Persia, and stated that even circa 6500 B.C. their tradition was already many thousands of years old. Andrew Collins describes them as; “A tall race of bird-men, with white Caucasian features and long viper-like faces of east Asian appearance.” In my opinion, that describes Pharaoh Akhenaten in the pictures we saw earlier. This was also a description of the Masters of Wisdom from an earlier chapter. What may be hard for some people to come to terms with is that the Essenes were the literal physical and spiritual descendants of these shamanistic, “viper-faced tall race of bird-men with white Caucasian features and long viper-like faces of East Asian appearance.” Our ancestors were the Watchers, Nephilim, Anunnaki, fallen angels. But as we have learned, they were for the most part seen as a blessing to the people they lived among. I imagine though, that if you asked the native Atlantean’s what they thought of us, the answer might not be so favorable.

This area of northern Mesopotamia is the area where Enoch of the Bible lived. In Hebrews 11:15 is written; “It was by faith that Enoch was taken up to heaven without dying - he disappeared, because God took him. For, before he was taken up, he was known as a person who pleased God.” From the earliest days of my research, Enoch kept popping up. Edgar Cayce said that the soul who manifested in Jesus was the same soul as Enoch. The Book of Enoch was one of the main scriptures of the Essenes. Enoch was said to spend all his time with the angels in what is called the mountain of the Madai, or Mount Parwan, located in present day Azerbaijan. This was the same area where Abraham’s wife Hagar fled with her son Ishmael after Sarah’s jealousy caused Abraham to send her away. It was also the area where John the Baptist was raised after he and his mother Elizabeth fled from Herod’s decree to kill all the Hebrews firstborn sons.
The book of Enoch relates that in the days of Jared, who was fifth in descent from Adam through Seth, two hundred Watchers descended from the summit of Mount Hermon, which is located north of Damascus. Their intention was to take human women as wives. The Watchers swore an oath and bound themselves by “mutual imprecations,” apparently knowing full well the consequences their actions would have for themselves and for humanity.
Enoch then relates that “the women became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells; who consumed all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against them and devoured mankind. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish, and to devour one another’s flesh and drink the blood. Then the Earth laid accusation against the lawless ones.” The story goes on to talk about the forbidden secrets that the Watchers taught their wives. Azazel taught metalworking, specifically how to make weapons, shields, knives, breastplates, etc. Not a usual occupation one associates with angels! They also taught the art of jewelry making and how to make and use makeup. Azazel was accused of teaching women the enjoyment of sex and of encouraging promiscuity. Many authors say that Satan and Azazel are the same being, but in the Book of Enoch, Azazel is subject to Satan. The Watchers were also accused of teaching humans about meteorology, or weather forecasting, astronomy, the magical arts, the seasoning of food, the use of plants in medicine, and writing. One Watcher named Kasdeja was said to have “shown the children of men all the wicked smiting’s of spirits and demons, and the smiting’s of the embryo in the womb, that it may pass away.”
According to Muslim legend, Azazel was cast out of Heaven for refusing to bow down before Adam. In the legend, Azazel is told by God to bow down before his younger brother Adam, but he refuses, saying that because he is older, he is superior to Adam. In the Jeshua channelings, Jeshua says that the reason for Satan’s rebellion was because “his brother Satan felt rejected by God.” Some Jews identify Satan with Cain of the Old Testament, who killed his brother Abel because Abel’s offering was accepted by God, while Cain’s was not. This could be a reason why Satan, if he was Cain, felt rejected by God.
From the Sumerian texts, we learn that the Anunnaki lived in a settlement called Kharsag Kurra in the Taurus mountain range of Turkish Kurdistan, west of Lake Van. The texts detail several harsh winters with severe cold and floods that caused the Anunnaki to abandon their mountain settlement and move to the valley below. The texts show very human Anunnaki who suffer from food poisoning, fight flooding with dikes and culverts, and suffer from the bitter cold. If they were possessors of some great supra-natural power it is not evident in the ancient texts. Andrew Collins figures the time of the Anunnaki’s descent onto the Mesopotamian plain to be circa 5500 B.C. He concludes with this regarding the Anunnaki;
Their survival into mythology is a hollow victory. We can only guess at the sense of loss they must have felt coming into the age of Neolithic man. To see the knowledge they had preserved, the achievements they had made and the struggles behind their survival all being reduced to grossly distorted folktales must have been a painful blow.... There is ample evidence to suggest that these Egyptian colonists were responsible for the Neolithic explosion that eventually led to the gradual emergence of civilization in the Near East around 5000 BC. Some of this slow release of information had, I feel, been carefully calculated, but knowledge concerning the fall of the Watchers would imply that some of those involved took matters into their own hands and decided, for their own gain, to reveal further wisdom and knowledge to humanity. From the Ashes of Angels p 359

There are many views as to the knowledge granted to humankind by the fallen angels. One view is that the information was not meant to be kept from humans, but was given too early, when humankind had not progressed enough to use the knowledge wisely. Another view is that there are two sides to the fallen angels, one that is for human progress and the other which is against it. The side against human progress doesn’t want them to have knowledge or even evolve, for that matter. The view expressed by Mr. Collins that some of the fallen angels gave humans knowledge for their (the angels) gain, is probably true in any case. The Mesopotamian texts make it clear that humans initially were given Anunnaki dna in order to make a more advanced human, not for the benefit of humans, but in order to make a more intelligent worker to do the Anunnaki’s bidding. A good reason for the Anunnaki and their Jewish and Israelite descendants need to be repentant and forgiven. I would like to clarify that I believe that the inter-marriage between humans and the Anunnaki that Jeshua said was agreed to in the spiritual realms, took place in Atlantis. The story of the two or three hundred, Watchers who descended from Mount Parwan, relates that they ‘took’ women as wives. The women had no say in the matter. The marriage between Marduk and Sarpanit was a union of love.

It is quite common today to see it stated that Sumerian was the first written language. However, scholars have traced what they believe to be the earlier form of this language to the Transylvanian village of Tartaria in the Balkans. According to Laurence Gardner, this writing precedes the Sumerian by a thousand years. Gardner believed that the Sumerians migrated from ancient Scythia and the Black Sea regions. On an ancient tablet found in Tartaria, the Sumerian god Enki is listed, and the name of the Sumerian city of Ur, where Abraham lived, is derived from the Scythian word Ur, which means ‘Lord’. I have often wondered if the word Scythian stems from Sethian. One of the main movements of our people across Europe was that of the Scythians who were a nomadic horse riding people who were later known as Celt-Iberians. Iberia was an early name for present day France, Spain and Portugal.
Laurence Gardner takes the position that the Adam of the Old Testament was not the first man. He wrote; “He is traditionally recorded as being the first man, and in this regard he was the first of a uniquely advanced strain of Homo sapiens, sapiens.” I believe the paradox of Adam of the Bible being shown to be from roughly ten thousand B.C. and the origins of the first humans being millions of years ago, is clarified in the readings of Edgar Cayce. According to Cayce, what is represented in the book of Genesis is when the latest human, the Adamic human who came equipped with the Tree of Life within it, was created. In his readings, Cayce told how all of Creation celebrated the arrival of the True Human Adam and Eve. Cayce said that there were five Adamic couples transplanted to five different locations on Earth that represent the five present races of humanity.
Thousands of baked clay tablets unearthed from ancient Mesopotamia tell the story of the Anunnaki. Their leaders were Anu and his sons Enlil and Enki, also known as Ea. Their numbers seem to have been few. The tablets tell stories of very human people who have family squabbles, make wine and beer and get drunk, die by accident and illness, and rule over the black-headed people, as the Sumerians were known. The black-haired people were originally from Atlantis. A Hopi medicine man said that the black-haired people of Atlantis scattered all around the Earth and the color of their skin changed, but their hair remained black. According to Laurence Gardner in his book Genesis of the Grail Kings, p 98 “In the ancient Sumerian text from Nippur it is specifically stated that Anu, Enlil, Enki and Nin-khursag had themselves fashioned the ‘black-haired people’, those called the Sumerians - the very race whose mysterious origin, language and culture have never been fathomed.” Enlil was described as “the serpent with the shining eyes.” The Anunnaki were known as “the shining ones.” The Anunnaki with Anu presiding are the assembly of gods mentioned in the 82^nd chapter of Psalms in the Bible.
We saw earlier in the story how biblical characters became embedded in pagan pantheons of gods. Things are equally confusing in our history in Mesopotamia. To begin with, in the ancient Sumerian tablets, and according to Jewish texts, Cain was not fathered by Adam, but by Yaldabaoth or one of Yaldabaoth’s sons. The Talmud says Cain was fathered by Satan. At this point in time, I’m not sure if Satan is Yaldabaoth/Enlil or Sabaoth/Enki/Ea. To give you an idea of what I have been grappling with, I give the following example:
In the gnostic text, the Pistis Sophia, which was dictated by Jesus to the apostle Philip, Jesus says that five of the rulers or archons, were repentant and forgiven. One of these is Ares of the Roman pantheon. I have the following identities for Ares; According to the Jews, Gnostics and Romans, he was Mars. According to Helena Blavatsky, he was Cain. According to the Jews, he was Satan and Samael, which is another name for Yaldabaoth. So here we see that Yaldabaoth was possibly Satan, but if he is the same as Ares he has been forgiven!
Trying to tie-in the Anunnaki/Elohim and Yaldabaoth and his sons, and Satan and the fallen angels together in some recognizable picture at this point seems untenable. If Yaldabaoth is Enlil, which seems to be pretty well agreed upon, and if he is also Jehovah of the Old Testament, then it could be that people have been worshipping Satan and the fallen angels unknowingly, which is the claim that some authors make. Actually, some authors claim that we are worshipping extra-terrestrials! I will clarify that and say that what we in fact did worship until Jesus came, were angels who incarnate as extra-terrestrials or humans. I look at it this way, the Old Testament of the Bible is to me, family history, and an initiatory teaching tool which very few have the key to. There are many voices in it and attributes and titles given by some as all being the same God really speak of different entities, including our Mother the Holy Spirit. When I pray, I end my prayers with, “In Jesus name I pray” as I was taught by the Southern Baptists. I know now, that this is to clear up any confusion as to whom I am actually praying to. I am praying to Jesus’ Father in Heaven, although now, I know to say our Father-Mother who is in Heaven.
The Old Testament itself tells us these were gods, not God. Exodus 15:11 says “Who among the gods is like you, O, Lord.” Exodus 18:11 ‘Now I know that the Lord is greater than all other gods....”
The Mesopotamian texts make it clear that the Anunnaki believed there was only one true God. They debated about whether they were intended to tamper with human dna and came to the conclusion that it had been God’s will. There is an interesting story in the Sumerian texts about an emissary from Niburu named Galzu who told Enlil to expect the Flood and that Ziusudra/Noah and his family were to be saved. Enlil only told Enki what Galzu had said aboaut Noah. The Anunnaki debated what they would do and decided that humanity was too corrupt and they decided to let all humans die in the Flood. They were all made to swear an oath that they would not warn humans of the impending disaster. Since Enki was Noah’s biological father, he could not bear to let Noah and his family perish, so he whispered to the reed walls of Noah’s house, not to Noah himself, thereby not violating his oath, and instructed Noah on how to build the boat to survive the Flood. Later on, Enki is discussing his actions with his father Anu and speaks of the emissary Galzu from Niburu who all the Anunnaki believed to be a messenger from Anu. To their shock, Anu tells them he never sent an emissary named Galzu. They realized then, that they had been sent a messenger from God, and that the human race was meant to be saved.
The Mesopotamian texts describe how the Anunnaki divided up the lands and the family members moved to their areas, established cities, and ruled over the people in their lands. Their cities spread as far east as Mojenjo Daro in present day Pakistan. The Anunnaki vied with each other not only for land and status, but also for the veneration of their subjects. Their inter-necine rivalries can be found in the Old Testament in the wars of the kings in the books with that same name. When Jehovah tells his people not to worship Asherah or Baal, he is referring to family members. Something I am still not convinced of is whether or not Jehovah and Yahweh denote the same deity. The Freemasons say that Yahweh is a higher expression of Jehovah, which makes perfect sense to me. Yahweh is the Logos and the Holy Spirit. Yaldabaoth/Enlil/Jehovah is an emanation from them through whom our world was partially created. Laurence Gardner says this about the Anunnaki;
Every item of written and pictorial attestation confirms that the ancient Sumerians were absolutely sincere about the existence of the Anunnaki, and those such as Enki, Enlil, Nin-khursag and Inanna fulfilled Earthly functions with designated community duties. They were patrons and founders; they were teachers and justices; they were clinical technologists, agriculturalists and kingmakers.

P 89...I can find absolutely no way to explain the phenomenon of the Anunnaki beyond that which was originally recorded - and text after text says precisely the same thing: they were the ‘mighty ones of eternity’, the ‘lofty ones from on high’, the heroes of yore; their Nephilim ambassadors came down and their kingship was lowered from heaven.

Gardner comments that in existing depictions of the Anunnaki they look quite human, tall, with large eyes and usually bearded. He makes reference to “archaic figurines from around 500 B.C. which depict characters with expressly serpentine features.” I am pretty sure he is referring to the serpent figurines we saw earlier that are in the British Museum. Gardner doesn’t feel the figures have anything to do with the Anunnaki, but notes that records do indicate that the word serpent was used in a descriptive manner with Ninkhursag called the ‘Serpent Lady’, and Enlil the ‘Serpent with the shining eyes’. He also noted that the facial characteristics of those statuettes are similar to some found, “on other deiform representations from as far afield as the Carpathian and Transylvanian regions above the Black Sea.” Gardner notes that the Scots Gaels migrated to Ireland from the Black Sea kingdom of Scythia, and an old Irish word which signifies a serpent or dragon is sumaire. He wrote that the Anunnaki tradition was widespread within the Fertile Crescent and even across central Europe to the Balkans.

In the Mesopotamian texts, it’s Enlil who wants humans to perish in the Flood because the people were ‘too noisy’ and his brother Enki who warns Ziusudra/Noah to build a boat. So this is an example of the Old Testament’s revisionist’s combining these two gods into one God. The Old Testament itself is evidence of the wrath of Jehovah against not only his enemies, but also towards the Israelites. The Mesopotamian texts detail how Enlil himself opened the gates of his cities to invaders because the residents had given their loyalty to his nephew Marduk. When one reads the ancient texts, the Book of Jubilees and Jasher, the patriarchs can’t emphasize enough how their descendants are to serve Jehovah with fear and humbleness and strive to avoid his wrath.

It would be easy to think that the entire Old Testament is corrupt because of infernal influence from fallen angels, however, the truth is that Christ and Pistis Sophia never stopped intervening between humanity and the archons. The most perplexing paradox that I have faced in my research is that those very same ancestors, i.e. fallen angels, were and are the same beings perpetuating the patriarchal and matriarchal religions. So if they were corrupt, how could their religions be anything but corrupt? The answer is multifaceted. First of all, not all of them were corrupt. Secondly, their thoughts were not their own, and finally, their religions and texts are admittedly, somewhat corrupt. The archons were in some, not all, ways directed in their actions by a higher source. That is not to say that religions don’t become corrupt with time through human and dark spiritual influence, as they most certainly do. That’s why God periodically send Messiahs or Avatars to correct humankind’s course and seed a greater spirituality on Earth.
The Sumerian texts detail how Enki and his sister Ninhursag created a man named Adapa, who is believed to be the biblical Adam. In another text, Adapa/Adam is described as a high priest and the first human of the royal seed. The first priest-king of the Enki bloodline. So this would make Enki/Ea the parent of Adam and Eve, and ‘God’. Earlier in the story we learned that the Mirothoe created Ea. The Mirothoe is the Holy Spirit. So that would make Ea her son. If Ea/Enki is Yahweh Sabaoth, as I believe, then he is the God of the Israelites and the ‘true’ God.
I have seen many scholars grapple with this issue. I can only say that I don’t believe I will ever know the truth in this lifetime. Regardless, we were made like an archetype from above, the Heavenly Adamas, and were created in Gods image. One author said that Adam was the first man that the Lord of Spirits created. I believe the Lord of Spirits is Sabaoth, Captain of the Heavenly Host, or Lord of Spirits, and as just stated, also Yahweh, or an emanation of Yahweh. Interestingly, Laurence Gardner said that the meaning of the name Enki is ‘archetype’. The Heavenly Adamas and his son Seth were archetypes. That there might be a tie-in between Enki and Seth would be no surprise to me. In fact, I am pretty sure of it. If so, then Enki/Ea is the same as the Logos, Adam, Enoch, Shem, Jesus and all the other incarnations of the Logos. The author Mark Pinkham says that Enki was a manifestation of the Primal Serpent. The Primal Serpent is the Logos and Holy Spirit, a.k.a. Yahweh.

In the Mesopotamian texts, it’s Enki, a Serpent of Wisdom, who encourages Adam and Eve to partake of knowledge and his brother Enlil who doesn’t want them to have knowledge and so throws them out of the Garden. Some believe the rivalry between the two and their different outlooks regarding humans is still being played out to this day. In the ancient texts, Enki had created Adapa/Adam specifically as a leader of mankind from his own seed. I believe he did this so that the Anunnaki themselves would not have to be bothered with governing people. It also could be that because our ancestors, the angels given charge over the Earth, messed up so badly, they were ordered to let humans rule themselves.

In the Mesopotamian texts, Enki created other humans from the blood of an Anunnaki named Kingu. Gardner puts the creation of Adapa/Adam at about 3800 B.C. That particular Adam could well be the Caucasian Adam spoken of by Edgar Cayce, who had come from the Caucasus mountain range, an early home of the Anunnaki. Edgar Cayce dated this ‘white’ Adam to about 10,000 B.C. These dates more than anything else, tell me that not all humans stem from this particular ‘Adam’. DNA haplogroups can be traced for tens of thousands of years, yet we see that this line is less than twelve thousand years old. The Biblical Adam would have been from a black-haired female and Ea/Enki.
I quoted Ignatius Donnelly earlier who made the remark about the disfigured allegories of Cain and Abel and the righteous Noah and his family. I don’t know in what way the allegories are misunderstood, but I can tell you that there are many indications that the line from Cain didn’t die out. The Mesopotamian texts make it clear that after the Flood, the Anunnaki surveyed all of the Earth for life and were delighted to find that some of Cain’s descendants were still living in the America’s. They had survived the Flood on rafts that they already had and used. Laurence Gardner cites “ancient family records” of the royal houses of Europe in tracing his extensive genealogy of the lines of Seth and Cain, and shows their Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Mitannian, Chaldean, Scythian, Trojan, Greek, and Israelite lines and touches on their migrations across Europe.

The Hebrew patriarch Abraham was mentioned by the early twentieth century archeologist Sir Charles Leonard Woolley who stated that there was a need to reassess our view of him, “when we see that his earlier years were spent in such sophisticated surroundings.” According to Laurence Gardner in Genesis of the Grail Kings, p 22 “Indeed, as will be revealed, Abraham was actually descended from a daughter of the great King Ur-nammu who built the ziggurat Temple of Ur.” He went on to say; “Here was positive proof of the world’s oldest and greatest civilization - a highly advanced culture which had already existed for 2000 years before the ancient Egyptian civilization began, and which had emerged 4000 years before the earliest civilization in Greece.”

Pictured below, are depictions of Ur-Nammu unearthed in Mesopotamia;

In his book From the Ashes of Angels, p 258 Andrew Collins talks about Sir Charles Leonard Woolley’s discovery of the mound settlement of Tell al-Ubaid, some four miles to the north of the city of Ur that was the home of Abraham and his family. Collins wrote; “There is every reason to suggest that these people were the distant ancestors of the much troubled Marsh Arabs of modern-day Iraq.” The modern-day marsh Arabs referred to, are none other than the Mandeans, who have been mentioned a few times in this story. I will discuss them in a later chapter, but some may find it interesting to note that John the Baptist was a Mandean.

As far as our family’s Mesopotamian history, I recommend the ancient text The Book of Jasher. In Jasher, one feels like they are reading the original of the Old Testament, which is quite possible. The book of Jasher is mentioned twice in the canonical Bible. In Jasher, there is a much fuller rendering of the familiar Bible stories. When discussing the Old Testament of the Bible, it’s important to know that the Hebrews had no written religious texts before 600 B.C., when the ten northern tribes of Israelites were taken into captivity by Nebuchadnezzar. At that time, scribes wrote down an Israelite history from the original Mesopotamian texts. Also, it is interesting to note that the Ten Commandments were likely written in Egyptian hieroglyphics. The Hebrews didn’t have a written language until a thousand years after the Ten Commandments were given. There are remains of a Hathor temple on top of Mount Sinai.
In support of my understanding of the close ties between Hebrew beliefs and that of Egypt, comes this from Princeton Seminary theologian Bernhard W. Anderson; “Egyptian wisdom made a deep impression on Israel’s thought from at least the time of Solomon, who established diplomatic ties with Egypt. The close parallels between the ‘Instruction of Amen-em-opet’ and Proverbs 22:17-24:22 indicate that the Israelite collection depended heavily on the Egyptian writing (dated during the period 1000-600 B.C.). There are only a few verses of this section of Proverbs that have no counterpart in the Egyptian source. The subject matter, the form of presentation, and even the telescoping of the thirty chapters of the Egyptian work into thirty sayings in the book of Proverbs provide eloquent proof of Israel’s contact with the wisdom of Egypt.”
The ten northern tribes, known as Samaritans, hated the two southern tribes of Judah and Benjamin. I believe that as a result of this strife between the sons of Jacob-Israel, the compilers of the Old Testament, who were from the ten northern tribes, played down the importance of the royal line, their connection to Egypt, and the mystical side of their religion.
The Bible calls Abraham a resident of Ur of the Chaldees. There seems to be some confusion as to where this Ur was located. I believe it was in upper Mesopotamia in the area of modern Edessa in Turkey. I read somewhere that this is the ‘second Ur’. The previous name of Edessa was Urfa and may have earlier been Urim. There was also an Ur in Southern Mesopotamia. Edessa was vitally important to our ancestors who were the Crusaders. In fact, it was ranked in importance right after Jerusalem in their efforts to re-take the Holy Land from the Muslims. The settlement of Haran mentioned in the Bible was named after Abraham’s brother Haran. The settlers of Ur of the Chaldees came from the area surrounding Mt. Ararat in what is modern day Armenia, circa 1500 B.C. The Chaldees were also known as Chaldeans. The Chaldean civilization was established by Nimrod who was the son of Kush, who was the son of Ham, the son of Noah. Another name for Nimrod was Sargon the Great.
According to the research of Alice Linsley, Abraham’s mother was the daughter of a priest associated with the Egyptian shrine of Karnack. She wrote; “This is evident from the name of her father, called ‘Karnevo’ in the Babylonian Talmud. Karnevo would have been a Horite since the shrine of Karnack was dedicated to Horus, called the ‘son of God’.” To be called a Horite is no different than to be called a Christian. One is the follower of Horus, the son of God. The other is a follower of Jesus, the son of God. Alice says that as a Horite ruler, Abraham’s father Terah ruled over the territory of the Euphrates riverlands. She makes the comment that the Horites appear to have been a confederation of numerous clans including the House of Sheba and the House of Joktan. She writes of the importance to our ancestors of preserving a kinship pattern wherein priests marry daughters of priests. She believes that the importance of that was because they believed that God had made a promise that a son would be born of a woman who would crush the serpent’s head and restore Paradise.
I would like to point out that Jesus crushed the serpents head when he became Christed. This means that he overcame his lower nature by purifying himself enough that he was able to be re-joined with God or become enlightened. Alice says that the promised son was to be born in Bethlehem, which was a Horite settlement. She mentions Horite settlements between Mt. Hor near Petra and Mt. Hor near Sela. She says that this is an important piece of information because it links Abraham’s father to the land of Canaan and identifies him as a Horite. Terah was named after his maternal grandfather Terah the Horite. This means that Abraham's mother was from Canaan and our people were still Followers of Horus long after they left Egypt.

We will see a few instances in this book of an Ethiopian tie-in within our family. Alice says that in the Ethiopian chronicle Nazum al-jawahir, Terah’s wives are given as Tohwait, mother of Sarai, and Yawnu mother of Abraham. The plot thickens though, as Alice states; “Tohwait is also recorded in the Syriac Marath Gaze as Naharyath, who is to be identified with Ngry-ta-Thewnen, the former wife of Pharaoh Amenemhet I. Her son by this marriage was the succeeding Pharaoh - Senusret I - the very pharaoh who claimed Sarai for his wife. This is not surprising, since Sarai was Senusret’s maternal half-sister (as well as being Abraham’s paternal half-sister) and it was common practice for Egyptian pharaohs to marry their sisters in order to progress the kingship through the female line. With this in mind, could it perhaps be that Isaac was not the son of Abraham after all, but the son of Sarai and the Pharaoh?”

Alice isn’t the only one who has wondered about that. In Genesis of the Grail Kings, P 206 Laurence Gardner wrote; “If Isaac was the son of Pharaoh Senusret, we could better understand Sarai’s change of name to the Egyptian name Sarah, which means ‘princess’.” He also wrote that the introduction of the Egyptian custom of circumcision would make sense as would the prospect of future dynastic kingship in the Egyptian domain. The Egyptian domain at that time extended into Mesopotamia. Gardner believes it would also explain the relevance of the birthright that was sold by Isaac’s son Esau to his brother Jacob.
Gardner remarks that the story of Isaac and his search for a wife paint a different picture of Abraham than is normally portrayed in the Bible. Abraham appears “not as an everyday nomad, but as a wealthy ruler with gold, silver, camels, herds and a large household of servants.” Gardner notes that this picture of Abraham fits better with his brief portrayal as a military commander who defeated armies of four kings to rescue his nephew Lot. And it is more in keeping with his family’s original high station in the Chaldean city of Ur.
At Family Tree DNA, they have dna haplo-groups categorized in various ways, such as by last name or country of origin. I have looked for matches in all of them. My dad’s dna profile matches those of the Sephardim, the southern Jews. Alice Linsley mentions that Genesis 10:30 tells us that these were the clans whose dwelling place extended from Mesha “all the way to Sephar, the eastern mountain range.” Sephar is quite possibly the origin of the appellation of Sephardim. They are called Horites in Genesis 14:6, 36:20 and in Deuteronomy 2:12.
The following is taken from the Book of Noah, which is appended to the Book of Enoch, which, for several hundred years, was part of the Canonical Bible:
And after some days my son Methuselah took a wife for his son Lamech, and she became pregnant by him and bore a son. And his body was white as snow and red as the blooming of a rose, and the hair of his head and his long locks were white as wool, and his eyes beautiful. And when he opened his eyes, he lighted up the whole house like the sun, and the whole house was very bright. And thereupon he arose in the hands of the midwife, opened his mouth, and conversed with the Lord of Righteousness. And his father Lamech was afraid of him and fled, and came to his father Methuselah. And he said unto him: ‘I have begotten a strange son, diverse from and unlike man, and resembling the sons of the God of Heaven; and his nature is different and he is not like us, and his eyes are as the rays of the sun, and his countenance is glorious. And it seems to me that he is not sprung from me but from the angels, and I fear that in his days a wonder may be wrought on the Earth. And now, my father, I am here to petition thee and implore thee that thou mayest go to Enoch, our father, and learn from him the truth, for his dwelling-place is amongst the angels.’

And when Methuselah heard the words of his son, he came to me to the ends of the Earth; for he had heard that I was there, and he cried aloud, and I heard his voice and I came to him. And I said unto him: 'Behold, here am I, my son, wherefore hast thou come to me?’ And he answered and said: 'Because of a great cause of anxiety have I come to thee, and because of a disturbing vision have I approached. And now, my father, hear me: unto Lamech my son there hath been born a son, the like of whom there is none, and his nature is not like man's nature, and the color of his body is whiter than snow and redder than the bloom of a rose, and the hair of his head is whiter than white wool, and his eyes are like the rays of the sun, and he opened his eyes and thereupon lighted up the whole house. And he arose in the hands of the midwife, and opened his mouth and blessed the Lord of heaven. And his father Lamech became afraid and fled to me, and did not believe that he was sprung from him, but that he was in the likeness of the Angels of Heaven; and behold I have come to thee that thou mayest make known to me the truth.’

And I, Enoch, answered and said unto him: The Lord will do a new thing on the Earth, and this I have already seen in a vision, and make known to thee that in the generation of my father Jared some of the angels of heaven transgressed the word of the Lord. And behold they commit sin and transgress the law, and have united themselves with women and commit sin with them, and have married some of them, and have begot children by them. And they shall produce on the Earth giants not according to the Spirit, but according to the flesh, and there shall be a great punishment on the Earth, and the Earth shall be cleansed from all impurity. Yea, there shall come a great destruction over the whole Earth, and there shall be a deluge and a great destruction for one year. And this son who has been born unto you shall be left on the Earth, and his three children shall be saved with him: when all mankind that are on the Earth shall die [he and his sons shall be saved]. And now make known to thy son Lamech that he who has been born is in truth his son, and call his name Noah; for he shall be left to you, and he and his sons shall be saved from the destruction, which shall come upon the Earth on account of all the sin and all the unrighteousness, which shall be consummated on the Earth in his days. And after that there shall be still more unrighteousness than that which was first consummated on the Earth; for I know the Mysteries of the Holy Ones; for He, the Lord, has showed me and informed me, and I have read (them) in the Heavenly Tablets.

In another ancient text that tells this story, Lamechs wife swears she hasn’t mated with anyone other than Lamech, yet we see that Noah looks like an angel child. Noah was, in fact, the child of Enki. There is debate about whether there ever was a world-wide flood that destroyed all humans. A study done by Stanford University found that the Earth’s population may have shrunk to as few as 2000 before numbers rose again in the early Stone Age. Even Jesus in one of the Nag Hammadi texts says that others of the Undominated Race were saved along with Noah. My point here is that I am not sure if all humans are descendants of Noah and his family or not. The Bible makes it clear that there were still giants on the Earth after the flood, but the Israelites weren’t giants, but were like grasshoppers to the giants.

Andrew Collins gives us more information regarding our fallen angel history. He talks about some Enochian literature that was translated by Mani, the founder of the Gnostic Christian group the Manichaean’s, that document the plight of the Nephilim. In the translation, the original Aramaic names of key characters were replaced by those of specific Iranian figures who feature in the Iranian text the Shahnameh. To the author, the usage of two names from the Shahnameh seemed to imply that Mani saw the Iranian royal dynasty of Sam and Nahriman as direct descendants of Shamyaza, the leader of the Watchers. Collins stated that this kingly line included both Zal and Rustam “who both possessed the physiological features of the fallen race.”
P 118 The plot thickens again, however, as the author points out that in some Manichean texts on Enochian material, the name Sam is rendered S’hm, a name that in Hebrew means name, pillar, or high. He points out that it is the name of one of Noah’s sons (Shem) as well as the root behind the first part of the name Shamyaza. He goes on to say that the suffix yaza is closely linked to the Zend word yazd or yazata, meaning angel or divine being. Then he makes the statement that the biggest mystery seemed to be why giant babies with demon-like characteristics were at first abhorred by their immediate family, but went on to become the greatest heroes or teachers of their age. He cites Noah as one example. Collins says that to the Hebrews, the presence of such qualities would appear to have been viewed differently. In their opinion, “only a true patriarch or teacher of righteousness, descended of the line of Seth, would have possessed a shining countenance; probably the reason why biblical figures such as Abraham, Elijah, Enoch and Noah were all accredited with having both a facial radiance and great stature in post exilic Apocrypha and folklore. … Yet somehow the belief in a shining countenance associated with infants born of the angels would appear to have lingered right down to twentieth century London.”
He goes on to tell a story of an ‘angel baby’ in twentieth century England who was described as having a shining, white complexion with bright red cheeks and eyes that shone. For good luck, people passing by on the street would put money into the child’s buggy. Here we find that even fairly recently, angel-humans were not considered evil by some people. I have read accounts that say that Noah’s sons Ham and Japhet were giants. There is an Armenian legend of a giant named Hayk who was said to have killed Nimrod, the grandson of Ham, who was also a giant. Hayk was a descendant of Noah’s son Japhet. The following comes from Wikipedia:
Movses (Moses) gave Hayk's genealogy as follows: Japhet, Gomer & Tiras, Torgom, Hayk, and his descendants as Armanak, Aramais, Amasya, Gegham, Harma, Aram and Ara Geghetsik. Hayk was also the founder of the Haykazuni Dynasty. Some of the prominent Armenian royal houses such as the Bagratuni, Khorkhoruni, Bznuni, Syuni, Vahevuni, Manavazian, Arran among others, had traced their genealogy to Hayk Nahapet. According to Juansher, Hayk "was prince of the seven brothers and stood in service to the giant Nimrod (Nebrovt') who first ruled the entire world³⁴ as king. Hayk was a handsome, friendly man, with curly hair, sparkling eyes, and strong arms. He was a man of giant stature, a mighty archer and fearless warrior. Hayk and his people, from the time of their forefathers, Noah and Japhet, had migrated south toward the warmer lands near Babylon. In that land there ruled a wicked giant, Bel. Bel tried to impose his tyranny upon Hayk’s people. But proud Hayk refused to submit to Bel. As soon as his son Aramaneak was born, Hayk rose up, and led his people back to the land of his forefathers, the land of Ararat. At the foot of the mountains, he built his home, Haykashen.”
Here we have a descendant of Japheth’s who is described as having giant stature. We are also told that Nimrod was a giant. Nimrod was descended from Noah’s son Ham. I have never seen Shem, the other son of Noah, described as a giant. The Israelites have never been described as giants, but their enemies were. Why Japhet and Ham’s descendants would be gigantic and not Shem’s is mystifying. Most likely Shem was a giant too and I just haven’t found evidence of it yet. The following is an excerpt from the gnostic text the Pistis Sophia which was dictated by Jesus to the apostle Philip. It’s a “for those with ears to hear” document;
Chapter 136/7; These are the regions of the way of the midst. For it came to pass, when the rulers of Adamas mutinied and persistently practiced congress, procreating rulers, archangels, angels, servitors and decans, that Yew, the father of my father,³⁵ came forth from the Right and bound them to a Fate-sphere. For there are twelve æons; over six Sabaoth, the Adamas, ruleth and his brother Yabraōth ruleth over the other six. At that time then Yabraōth with his rulers had faith in the mysteries of the Light and was active in the mysteries of the Light and abandoned the mystery of congress. But Sabaoth, the Adamas, and his rulers have persisted in the practice of congress.

And when Yew, the father of my father, saw that Yabraōth had faith, he carried him and all the rulers who had had faith with him, took him unto himself out of the sphere and led him into a purified air in face of the light of the sun between the regions of those of the midst and between the regions of the invisible God. He posted him there with the rulers who had had faith in him. But he carried Sabaoth, the Adamas, and his rulers who had not been active in the mysteries of the Light, but have been persistently active in the mysteries of congress,³⁶ and inbound them into the sphere.³⁷ He bound eighteen-hundred rulers in every æon, and set three-hundred-and-sixty over them, and he set five other great rulers as lords over the three-hundred-and-sixty and over all the bound rulers, who in the whole world of mankind are called with these names: the first is called Kronos, the second Arēs, the third Hermēs, the fourth Aphroditē, the fifth Zeus.

Jesus continued and said: "Hearken then, that I may tell you their mystery. It came to pass then, when Yew had thus bound them, that he drew forth a power out of the Great Invisible and bound it to him who is called Kronos. And he drew another power out of Ipsantachounchaïnchoucheōch, who is one of the three triple-powered gods, and bound it to Arēs. And he drew a power out of Chaïnchōōōch, who also is one of the three triple-powered gods, and bound it to Hermēs. Again he drew a power out of the Pistis the Sophia daughter of Barbēlō³⁸ and bound it to Aphroditē. And moreover he perceived that they needed a helm to steer the world and the æons of the sphere, so that they might not wreck it [the world] in their wickedness. He went into the Midst, drew forth a power out of the little Sabaoth, the Good, him of the Midst, and bound it to Zeus, because he is a good [regent], so that he may steer them in his goodness. And he set thus established the circling of his order, that he should spend thirteen [? three] months in every æon confirming [it], so that he may set free all the rulers over whom he cometh, from the evil of their wickedness. And he gave him two æons, which are in face of those of Hermēs, for his dwelling.
The previous quote is very puzzling to me. I’m unsure at this point whether the Yabraōth mentioned is Yaldabaoth. I don’t believe so, because Yaldabaoth is also mentioned elsewhere in the text. I also don’t know what to make of the statement that Sabaoth the Adamas was not repentant, but is still practicing congress (intercourse) I don’t know how many Sabaoths there were, but one of the ancient texts shows two repentant Sabaoths, one called Little Sabaoth the Good. Regardless, we see in Jesus words, “that he may set free all the rulers over whom he cometh, from the evil of their wickedness.” What Jesus is saying here, is that all the rulers in the end will be set free of their wickedness. That’s only fair, as the archons were just playing the roles they agreed to play in the great drama of God’s creation. As Jeshua told us earlier, once a soul enters duality, it is meant to experience all of duality, the good and the bad. The point I want to make here, is that in an ancient gnostic Christian text, found in Nag Hammadi Egypt, hidden by Coptic Christians, a church founded by St. Mark of the Bible, we see Jesus speaking of Zeus, Aphrodite, Hermes, Ares and Kronos as real beings, so real they have sex! As far as I know, myths have never had sex and bore children! Margaret Barker called the pantheons of local deities “holy ones, sons of God, in fealty to the transcendent God Most High.” Doesn’t the Bible tell us the sons of God were given charge over the people of the Earth? I have created a table tying identities of various ‘mythological’ persons as they were known in the various countries. These are by no means necessarily accurate. Of the forgiven gods I have the following alternate identities;
Kronos:
El - the Canaanite High God, according to the Phoenicians and Greeks.

Jacob-Israel - according to the historians Berossus (ca 275 B.C.) & Sanchoniathon.

Horus - according to Helena Blavatsky & Albert Pike both 33rd degree Masons.

The Ultimate Cause & Governor of the Universe - according to Pythagoras.

Sydik/Zedek/Melchizedek - according to the Kaballah and Helena Blavatsky.

Enki/Ea - according to the historian Berossus, a priest of Marduk who was a son of Ea

Sabaoth - according to Helena Blavatsky 33^rd degree Freemason.

Shem - according to the Jewish text the Haggada and the Book of Melchizedek.

Dagon - according to the Phoenicians.

Zeus:
Little Sabaoth the Good - according to Jesus!

Judah - son of Jacob-Israel, according to the historians Homer, Hesiod and Sanchoniathon.

Baal/Bel - according to the Greeks.

Michael the archangel - according to Theosophy.

Dionysius - according to the Greeks.

Marduk - according to Theosophy.

Sabazius - ‘little’ Sabaoth - according to the Greeks and Phrygians.

Jehovah - according to the Freemason G.R.S. Mead and Pythagoras & Plato.

Logos - according to Pythagoras

Satan - according to the Apostle John (statue of Satan (Zeus) is in Pergamum)

Darda/Dardanus-according to Homer & Sanchoniathon

Thoth-Hermes:
Seth – according to Mark Pinkham, the Arabs and an Egyptian tile.

Enoch – according to the Greeks, Mark Pinkham and Albert Pike, a Grand Mason

Mercury – according to the Greeks

Ham – Egyptian records, according to Laurence Gardner and the Freemasons

Logos – according to Oxford scholar Andrew Welburn

Osiris – according to the Arabs.

Ningishzidda – (a son of Enki/Ea) according to the Sumerians – (according to Sitchen)

Ares:
Mars - according to the Jews and Gnostics.

Cain - according to Blavatsky.

Satan – according to the Jews.

Samael – according to the Jews. (another name for Yaldabaoth).

Saturn - according to the Jews.

Set - according to the Jews and Gnostics.

Azazel - according to the Jews and Laurence Gardner.

Devil - according to the Archontics.
I didn’t come across, or look for, information on Aphrodite. The Sumerian Inanna was known as Ishtar by the Babylonians, Astarte by the Syrians, Anahita by the Persians, Ashtaroth by the Israelites, Isis by the Egyptians and Queen Esther in the Old Testament. According to Alice Linsley’s thirty years of research, Isis and Hathor are the same person.
As you can see, there are a few overlapping identities in these. Make no mistake about it, our ancestors, even though some of them were very righteous, were Yaldabaoths rulers, the archons. They were both good and bad as everything in this world of physical manifestation is. Jeshua himself tells us that we were dark, as intended, in our past. In the Pistis Sophia text, Jesus said that the patriarch’s souls would be saved by sending them into bodies that would be righteous.
The key to understanding and accepting all of this is to remember this; the highest beings of the Pleroma agreed to go to a lower realm in order to allow God to experience separated consciousness. In these fallen angels, that’s what you’re seeing. The line of the biblical patriarchs was a line of angelic-humans. Abraham, Noah and the rest were not in full control of their actions. They were under the command of Yaldabaoth and they served him with fear and humility. That’s why Jeshua guaranteed their souls would be saved, because they were righteous. We were angels given charge of the Earth. We have made grave mistakes in the past that have negatively affected the Earth and its people. However, we have done much good too. We have to remember too, that all along, the Logos and Holy Spirit have been carefully shepherding this creation, which was an experiment.
The following gives evidence of this strange inter-mixing of biblical people with the gods of the pagan pantheons. It tells about the Aegean royal lines from Zarah who was the son of Judah and Tamar of the Bible that progressed to royalty of Troy and Europe. Zarah was the twin of Pharez. These two were sons of Judah, the father of the Jews or Judeans. In the Bible, Jacob-Israel is talking to his twelve sons about what the future will be for their descendants. He tells Judah that his line was meant to be the royal line with kingship over Israel. From;

http://www.ucg.org/ebooklet/throne-britain-its-biblical-origin-and-future/appendix-3-aegean-royal-lines-zerah/

Appendix 3: Aegean Royal Lines from Zarah. A brief history of the Aegean Royal lines from Zarah:

Yet could the biblical Darda truly be the founder of Troy? What of Dardanus’ descent from the Greek god Zeus? A number of royal genealogies based on Homer describe the descent of Trojan royalty as follows: Cronus (or Kronos) - Zeus - Dardanus - Erichthonius - Tros - Ilus - Laomedon - Priam (the king of Troy at the time of the Trojan War in Homer’s Iliad). While this lineage might appear entirely mythical, it should be realized that some ancient myths about the ‘gods’ were actually rooted in stories about real people. In fact, many pagan religions began, in part, as ancestor and hero worship (see Thomas Bulfinch, Bulfinch’s Mythology, "Stories of God’s and Heroes," chap. 25: "Origin of Mythology," 1855, 1979).

With that in mind, it is rather surprising to discover what the ancient Phoenician historian Sanchoniathon (or Sanchoniatho) - who is believed to have lived around the 1200s B.C. (though some put him a few centuries later) - had to say about the identity of Cronus. But first it should be recognized that all material from Sanchoniathon is derived from the works of Philo of Byblos (flourished AD 100), who claimed to have translated his Phoenicica from the original text. The authenticity of that claim has been questioned, but excavations at Ras Shamra (ancient Ugarit) in Syria in 1929 revealed Phoenician documents supporting much of Sanchuniathon’s information on Phoenician mythology and religious beliefs" (‘Sanchoniathon,’ Encyclopedia Britannica , 1985, Vol. 10, p. 404).

The writings of Sanchoniathon, as we have them, mention the Greek "Kronos, whom the Phoenicians call Israel . . . He circumcised himself, and forced his allies to do the same" (I.P. Cory, Ancient Fragments, 1828). Israel, as earlier stated, was the new name given to the biblical patriarch Jacob. And the Phoenician historian further explained that this Kronos or Israel had a special son named Jehud or Yehud. This is simply a shortened form of the Hebrew Yehudah, that is, Judah: ". . . evidence of the extent of Judah [later in the fifth century B.C.] are the seal impressions on storage jars . . . on which appear the name ‘Yehud’ in various forms" (Yohanan Aharoni and Michael Avi-Yonah, The Macmillan Bible Atlas, 1977, p. 109).

Since the primary son of the Greek Cronus (Roman Saturn) was Zeus (Roman Jupiter), then Jehud would be the same as Zeus. Indeed, the word Zeus (Zhe-ut) may actually derive from Yehud - as the Roman Jupiter or Iupiter appears to derive from the Greek Zeus-pater or Zheut-pater (pater meaning "father"). Of course, a great deal of Babylonian paganism was overlaid onto these historical characters, creating the false gods of Greek and Roman mythology (see Alexander Hislop, The Two Babylon’s, 1916, 1959). Thus, stripped of mythological embellishment, Dardanus son of Zeus son of Kronos is Darda son of Judah son of Israel. Actually, Darda was the grandson, great-grandson or later descendant of Judah - as the word "son" can be interpreted. In any case, Darda was, in fact, a descendant of Judah through the line of Zarah.

Incredibly, an examination of the genealogies of the royal families of Europe shows that nearly all of them trace their lineage back to the house of Troy (see James Anderson, Royal Genealogies or the Genealogical Tables of Emperors, Kings, and Princes, from Adam to These Times , 1736; W.M.H. Milner, The Royal House of Britain: An Enduring Dynasty, 1902). Thus, the scepter did indeed remain with Judah as prophesied. For from the line of Perez came the royal house of David, while from the Zarah line came the royal house of Troy. Yet Troy’s wasn’t the only royal line from Zarah.

The Mycenaean house of Atreus also traced its lineage to Zeus (i.e., Judah). And considering the Mount Zara rising above Mycenae, it would seem that this royal line, like that of Troy, sprang from Zarah. Indeed, remember that the Zarhite Dardanus actually came from this area of Greece. Thus it would appear that the Jewish Cretan royal family, evidently of Zarah, was split with one line going to northwest Turkey and the other going to Mycenaean Greece. Yet they were fused back together when Dardanus married Teucer’s daughter and founded Troy.

The man next depicted, I believe to be Judah, known here as King Gudea. On the right is an urn owned by King Gudea which shows the two serpents winding around the staff, which symbolizes the human spinal column and the Primal Serpent climbing it.

The depiction on the left features, left to right; Dumuzi/Tammuz of the Bible who is a son of Enki, King Gudea, Ningishzidda/Thoth/Hermes - another son of Enki, and Enki. On the right is Enki’s symbol. It depicts a staff representing the human spine, with two snakes, representing the spiritual power rising from the nadi ducts as it climbs up the spine, showing the ascent of the Kundalini or Holy Spirit power.

Myths in which Ea figures prominently have been found in Assurbanipal's library, and in the Hattusas archive in Hittite Anatolia. As Ea, Enki had a wide influence outside of Sumer, being equated with El (at Ugarit) and possibly Yah (at Ebla) in the Canaanite 'ilhm pantheon, he is also found in Hurrian and Hittite mythology, as a god of contracts, and is particularly favourable to humankind. Amongst the Western Semites, it is thought that Ea was equated to the term *hyy (life) ...Generally, however, Enki seems to be a reflection of pre-patriarchal times, in which relations between the sexes were characterized by a situation of greater gender equality. In his character, he prefers persuasion to conflict, which he seeks to avoid if possible. – From Wikipedia – the online encyclopedia

The ‘ilhm pantheon is another spelling of ‘Elohim’. Interestingly, hyy (life) is a name for Eve, who in one ancient text was said to have brought wisdom to Adam. Here we see it equated to Ea, an incarnation of the androgynous Yahweh, who as a Serpent of Wisdom brought knowledge to Adam and Eve.

The following is from the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society Volume XXII by J.F. Hewitt, M.R.A.S., written in the late 1800’s. It reveals the identity of Jacob-Israel from the Bible with Ea, also spelled Ia and Yah;

P 716 We thus see in Ia the god who, as Lenormant shows, descended, unchanged in name but with different functions, from the Akkadians to the Semitic Assyrians, and who also became the supreme god of the Greeks and Hindus. He was first the great snake, then the encircling ocean, afterwards the dark night, and then became the ruler of the stars, first as the goat-fish, and who afterwards, as the bull of heaven, ruled the lunar year. He was the great father, the creator of the year and all that it produces, and was finally the righteous god, the heavenly father and mother. It was on his name, that of Yah, translated in our version as the ‘name of the Lord,’ that men began to call in the days of Enoch, the son of Set, or Seth, the serpent-god of the Egyptians and Jews, and it was he who, in the flood story, as told in Genesis, is the Yah who destroyed the wicked race of serpent-worshippers, and brought in the new year, or era, of a new and holy life.

P 751 I have also from evidence taken from the Hindu Brahmana’s, Rigveda and Mahabharata, shown that the first signs of a spiritual worship, as distinguished from that of the anthropomorphic gods, was shown in the deification of fire as the divine heat, and that fire-god was the supreme god before Ia, the water-god. But the whole series of evidence on which these deductions are founded is still further corroborated by the Babylonian account of the flood, as given in the great Epic of Izdhubar which had come down to the Babylonians from the Akkadians. p 752 This story tells how Anu the god of heaven, Bil the fire-god, Ninib the lord or lady of creation and En or In-nugi the leader of the gods,³⁹ were sitting together and consulting upon the reformation of the Earth.

With them, but apparently apart, was Nin-igi-a-zag the first-born of the lord or lady (nin) of the race of heavenly spirits (igi-u) or of the spirits (i-gi) of water (a). This assembly was clearly that of the sacred pentad formed after the addition of the fire and water gods to the old triad. Thus, the triad here was Anu the heavenly abyss, Ninib the generative power ruling creation, and En-nugi the great serpent or the father; and with them among the older gods was the fire-god (Bil or Bil-gi). They were the gods of Earth, and were the Elohim or gods of the Elohistic account in Genesis. While the fifth god Ia belonged to the spirits of heaven. They determined to destroy the city of Surrippak, which Lenormant has identified with Ur, which thus gives the story a more realistic tinge than it had in its oldest mythic form for the destruction of Ur, the seat of the empire of Ur-Bagas, and that succeeding Telloh as the imperial capital, implied the triumph of a new race bringing in new gods.

I don’t know what to make of the separation of Ia as a spirit of Heaven and the others as gods of the Earth. As far as I know they are all Anunnaki and Enlil and Ia/Ea are half-brothers. It could be that Ia is a God of heaven because as Sabaoth, he was repentant and installed as ruler in the seventh heaven while his unrepentant family were left in charge of the Earth and lower six heavens. In the Mesopotamian texts, the Anunnaki/Elohim decided to send a flood because according to Enlil, the people were “too noisy.” In the ancient records, Ea was made to swear an oath not to warn the people of the coming flood. In order to circumvent their order, Ea whispered to the reed walls of ‘Noah’s’ house, not to Noah himself, thereby not breaking his oath. In the next paragraph you will see that the heavenly spirits were called the Igi-gi. I mentioned them in the beginning of the story in connection with Atlantis and Ireland. Atra-hasis and Khasisatra are other names for Noah. J.F. Hewitt continues;
Ia whispered the news of the deliberations of the gods to the reeds and the walls, who conveyed it to Atra-hasis p 753 or Khasisatra and told him to build a ship. He consulted Ia whether he should tell the men of Surrippak. Ia told him to say to them; “As Bil (the fire-god) hates me, I will not remain any longer in his country, but will go to the ancient waters and live with Ia.” He accordingly built a ship and went away in it when the flood came, having as he said, ‘Left my house and all that was in it to Puzur-Bil, the fire-god.” In other words he forsook the worship of the god of fire and worshipped Ia as the supreme lord. When Atra-hasis was saved, and offered the sacrifice of expiation on Mount Nisir, Bil was with the other gods attracted by the sweet savor of the sacrifice, and when he found that Atrahasis, whom he hated, was saved, he was angry with the gods of Igi-gi (the heavenly spirits), but Ia interceded for Atra-hasis and procured his pardon.

This story fully corroborates the history of religious evolution I have taken from the Hindu sacred books and proves that the story of the flood in one of its later forms, which is that given in Genesis, gives the history of the religious reformation based by the substitution of the worship of the gods of Heaven for those of Earth. While the comparison of this with the Hindu story shows how Ia the supreme god of the waters of heaven, became Manu the thinker. It also clearly connects the Ia of the Babylonian story with the Yah of the Jews, and this is further corroborated by the occurrence of the number seven in the Jehovistic version of the order given for the preservation of the animals according to which Noah was ordered seven of each clean species. This was the number sacred to Ia and became so through the addition of the days sacred to the fire-god and the water-god to the original sacred pentad. The comparison of the various stories also shows how the originally mythic actors have been gradually individualized by the infusion of the Aryan spirits. It is this spirit which, p 764 in the hands of the several secessionists of the Book of Genesis, who are now admitted by all Biblical commentators to have gradually and by successive stages formed the book now found in our Bibles, has turned a compendium of ancient religions and perhaps national history into a didactic story of the supposed destruction of the wicked people of a former age.

I believe the substitution of the worship of the Gods of Heaven for the gods of the Earth, is possibly revealing the time of Ea/Enki/Sabaoth/Yah’s repentance when he was made the Lord of Hosts and placed in the seventh Heaven. Jeshua says that there was a real Flood and that it was meant to cleanse the Earth of wicked humans, and that others of the Undominated Race were saved along with Noah’s family.

....But to prove the working of this innovating spirit, and to show how the Turanian (Semitic) sacred story was altered by Aryan historiographers, I will now turn to the story of Jacob, the father of the Hebrew tribes. Jacob was the supplanter or successor of Esau, and as Dr. Robertson Smith shows, most scholars, from Scaliger downwards, have compared Esau with Uzaus, the god who taught men to clothe themselves with the skins of beasts taken in hunting, that is, with the skins of gazelles or mountain goats, and who was afterwards the Assyrian goat-god Uz, who was represented as clad in a robe of goat’s skin, the sacred dress of the Babylonian priests. This ancient reverence for gazelles has been already referred to in this essay in the account of the historical transformations of Ia, and is also noted in the song of David, taken from the book Jasher and lamenting the death of Saul, where it said, ‘Thy gazelle, O Israel, is slain in the high places.’ Jacob, who supplanted Esau, clothed himself in goats skins and went to Haran, the city of the moon-god, where, as Dr. Sayce shows, the god of the foundation was Laban, the white one or the moon, that is to say, he became the goat-god who was first the god of generation and afterwards became sacred to the moon. He there married the two daughters of Laban, Leah, the wild p 755 cow and Rachel, the lamb or ewe.

That is to say, he became first the moon-bull or Ia and afterwards the solar ram. But he had also two other wives, Bilhah and Zilpah, and these wives may be again compared with the two wives of Azi-Dahaka, the snake-god of the Zend-Avesta, Savanghavach and Erinavach. Bilhah, compared by Delitzsch with old, is probably the Turanian Val, the Sanskrit Vala, and the Akkadian bel, meaning ‘the strong,’ and this interpretation is confirmed by the name of her son Dan, who evidently represents the widely-spread race of the Danava, Danus and Danai. This great Danite race is again reproduced in the name of the son of Dan, who, it must be noted, is the only one of the sons of Jacob who has only one son. This son is named in Gen xlvi 23 Hushim, which, as noted by Dr. Smith, is a plural form. But this name Hushim again appears in Numbers xxvi. 42 in another plural form Shuham so that the two names mean the Hus and the Shus. These names again point to the Hus of the Zend-Avesta and their great king Husrava, the glory (srava) of Hus, who conquered Kangdesh or India, and avenged the murder of Syavarshan by the Turanians. They are also the same people as the Sus of the great province of Susiana, and the Saus or Sauvarna of India, who were the great trading race which united with the warlike tribes of the Sinha-bunsis, the sons of Sinha or Som (the moon) to extend the rule of the merchants of the Euphratean countries over the whole of the Gangetic valley.

This author believes these are all mythological people, but we see here evidence of historical battles and peoples whose descendants are still living today. Myths cannot become “widely-spread races.” We also see the merchants of the Euphrates, the Kushites who controlled the water ways and the tribe of Dan - the sea-fairing Phoenicians who later became the settlers of Danemark, or as we westerners know it, Denmark. The Danes are the Viking descendants of the seagoing Phoenician tribe of Dan. We see that Jacob, Ia and Azi-Dahaka are equated as being the same man. We will get to Azi-Dahaka in a minute. We also see a tie-in with our family and their Asian Indian heritage with the reference to the merchants of the Euphratean countries who ruled over the whole of the Gangetic (Ganges) valley. We see more of our Indian connection in the following, continued from the same author;

Zilpah again, who apparently represents Zillah, the wife of Lamech, and who is, in the Lamech myth, the mother of Tubal-Cain, the father of the metal-workers and worshippers of the fire-god, is identified with those people by her son Ashur. His descendants seem to be the Asuras of the Hindus, and it is the tribe of Ashur who in the book of Joshua are p 756 assigned territory including that of Tyre. The chief god of Tyre was Melgarth, the Tyrian Hercules, or the god first of the phallic club and afterwards of the fire-stick. We see thus in the story of Jacob a reproduction of the transformations of Ia in which he was first the god of the gazelle, afterwards of the goat and phallic god and then of the fire-god. In Leah the wild cow we find Ia again as the moon-god, and her tender eyes mentioned in Genesis 24:17 are explained by the three eyes of the wild bull of Telloh, she being the wild cow.

Rachel again, the ewe who carries off with her the phallic emblems or terraphim, is the mother of Benjamin, from whose tribe Saul was born. Saul again, in his earlier form, and before he was recorded as the first king of Israel, as Dr. Sayce shows, was the sun-god, the Sawul of the Babylonians, and the Saul of Rehoboth, kin of the Edomites; so that throughout the same historical idea has been preserved, and Ia, or Jacob with his four wives, is a complete reproduction of the Akkadian succession of religious beliefs as shown in the story of the flood and the other evidence I have adduced in this essay, with that set forth in Hindu religious history and in the Zend-Avesta.

....That this is the true or nearly the true account of the story of Jacob is shown to be probable by the inscriptions of Thothmes III of Egypt p 757 Quoted by Dr. Sayce, which mention among the cities he took in Palestine, more than two centuries before the time assigned to the Exodus by Egyptologists, Yakub-el, or Jacob the god, and Iseph-el, or Joseph⁴⁰ the god, showing that they were both old gods of Palestine, who could never by old myth-makers have been spoken of as individuals. It was he who learnt the true name of God, the Yah, and put away strange gods. (my emphasis) .....In short, Jacob, or Yakov, seems to be the righteous god Ia, who succeeded the goat-god and the moon-god and who became the father of a holy people, who were appointed to work out the law of righteousness he taught. Of this law Iseph-el, or Joseph, the father of the Ephraimite's the first Semitic race ruling in Palestine, was the Asipu or interpreter.

Joseph, the father of the Ephraimites, is the same Joseph as in the coat of many colors story in the Bible. The Asipu or Ashipu were Serpents of Wisdom and priests. Again, the Semites are a real, not mythological race. We are Israel, that holy people. We are the ones appointed to work out the law of righteousness. I believe it was shortly before the Adamic human was created by Enki/Sabaoth that he was repentant and forgiven. He created Israel, and Judah was his “choice vine.” He is the God of the Israelites. We also see that he is the literal, biological father of the Israelites, Jacob-Israel. I mentioned earlier our family’s propensity to sway from the worship of the One with Abraham’s father Terah who worshipped the Anunnaki or Terraphim. In the Book of Jasher and in the Bible, Terah’s occupation was making the Terraphim images for people to worship. One of the Sumerian texts, written by Enki, states; “After the Anunnaki as gods themselves declared, on mankind’s support they instead are dependent.”

It’s important to understand that the biblical patriarchs, even though Adam had been taught the Mysteries in Eden, were under the control of Enlil/Jehovah/Yaldabaoth and the rest of the Anunnaki, their own family. Their Wisdom and Mystery teachings were something they may have had to do in private. I cannot stress enough that when we incarnate into Earth we come in blind. We start from scratch and learn from our surroundings and according to our upbringing, even if in the spirit world we are advanced spirits. I am sure that is one of the main reasons why we incarnate into the same family groups, so that by parent to child our secrets get passed down. I know these last few pages have been confusing. This is a very confusing subject to try to sort out. The best I can do is point out this information, these correlations, and tell you that there is an association, even if I don’t completely understand it yet.
We learned earlier that the Anunnaki were serpent featured, at least in their earlier images before they incarnated into true human form. It would not be strange then, to see that some people were worshipping images of snakes or snake-like people. I know that Ea/Ia/Enki/Yah started the matriarchal worship with Pistis Sophia. He was all about furthering human evolution and re-connecting humans with the spiritual world, something that the unrepentant side of our family was, and still is, against. From what I have learned about the good serpent worshippers, the serpent always represents the spiral form of the power of the Holy Spirit. What the wicked version of serpent worship entailed, I couldn’t say, but I can say that it was most likely the version practiced by the priests of Belial and the wicked priests of Egypt. The wicked side has continuously countered everything the good side does, so you will find a corrupt version of most all of our family’s beliefs and symbols.
In the previous essay, we learned something very important to our family story. That is, in speaking of Ia/Ea, “He was the great father, the creator of the year and all that it produces, and was finally the righteous god, the heavenly father and mother. It was on his name, that of Yah, translated in our version as the “name of the Lord,” that men began to call in the days of Enoch, the son of Set, or Seth, the serpent-god of the Egyptians and Jews, and it was he who, in the flood story, as told in Genesis, is the Yah who destroyed the wicked race of serpent-worshippers, and brought in the new year, or era, of a new and holy life.” The author states that the name he is referring to is “translated in our version as the name of the Lord.” This is a very important clue, because in the esoteric teachings of the Jews and Israelites, ‘the Lord’ always refers to the Jewish/Israelite God, the God who chose them when the seventy two sons of God were made shepherds over the people of the Earth..
A few paragraphs back, we read the following; “That is to say, he became first the moon-bull or Ia, and afterwards the solar ram. But he had also two other wives, Bilhah and Zilpah, and these wives may be again compared with the two wives of Azi-Dahaka, the snake-god of the Zend-Avesta, Savanghavach and Erinavach.” What this author is saying is that two of Jacob-Israel’s wives can be compared with this character Azi-Dahaka’s two wives in three different religious literatures. We will see Azi-Dahaka in the following, so remember that he is considered by this author to be Jacob-Israel, or Ia/Ea/Yah. I have spoken earlier of some people’s belief that Enki/Ea/Sabaoth/Yah is equated with Satan, who some believe is the lower form of the Logos. In the book From the Ashes of Angels, the author is speaking about the Sumero-Babylonian cult of the snake. He refers to a time when many of Media’s (Iran’s) Magian priests embraced a revitalized form of the Iranian religion, and “it was probably at around this very period that Azhi Dahaka gained his exclusively demonic character among the Persian peoples.”
He goes on to say that as a consequence the final Median king became the personification of the serpent worshipping Magi priesthoods, “as well as a national anti-hero in Persian myth.” He contrasts this to the way that Azhi Dahaka had been viewed by the Kurdish tribes who had been subject to the Median dynasty of kings. To them, the demon king was the hero and Feridun the Median king was the villain. The author states; “So much had they revered the memory of Azhi Dahaka that they came to believe that their entire race was descended of him. ...The Yaresan today seem blind to Sultan Sahaks true origins, and would vehemently deny any connection with his dark half, Azhi Dahaka.”
The author goes on to say that the influence of Sultan Sahak goes far beyond the Yaresan, and is found in various guises throughout the upper Zagros region. And most interesting; “He is also known by the name Sultan Is’haq, or Isaac, the divine priest who features in the story about the Yezidi kochek named Beru, who visits heaven in order to request rain on behalf of the Kurdish peoples.” The author asks; ‘What was the true origin of Azhi Dahaka? Why was this dragon king accredited with being the progenitor of the Kurdish race? And why has his memory lingered so long?” The author believes the answer to these questions seems to lie in the fact that, before his fall, the ‘tyrant’ was seen as one of the mythical kings of Iran who seems to have born distinctive Watcher traits. The author asks the question; “Could it be that Azhi Dahaka represented a faint echo of the presence and blood lineage of the fallen race – remembered in Armenia as the vishaps or dragon descendants – who lived during some distant age of humanity?”
And to that last question, I again say yes! Collins relates that the Armenians claim descent from a race of giants under the leadership of Hayk, “whose name is equated with the Armenian word for gigantic.” He quotes from a book titled; From the Fables of the Persians which was included by Moses of Khorenatsi in his History of the Armenians, that claims that Azhi Dahaka lived at the time of Nimrod and that he was one of the chieftains who seized local territories after the giants or Titans had divided the people following the destruction of the Tower of Babel.
Collins notes that the Kurds trace their ancestry to Azhi Dahaka and that the place of genesis of the Kurdish race, “corresponded very well with the site of Eden, the place of genesis of the human race according to Hebrew tradition.”
To recap and clarify; we have learned that Jacob-Israel of the Bible is Ia/Ea/Enki/Sabaoth/Yah, one of the Watchers, Nephilim, Anunnaki. Then, we learned that Jacob-Israel’s father Isaac is none other than “Sultan Is’haq, or Isaac, the divine priest who features in the story about the Yezidi kochek named Beru, who visits heaven in order to request rain on behalf of the Kurdish peoples.” This is not stated, I just know it to be true. The kocheks were the same men who lived at the Dead Sea, i.e. the Essenes. They were a race of mystics, prophets, healers, rain-makers and Serpents of Wisdom. The description of John the Baptist living in the desert, eating locusts, describes their lifestyle. We also learned that Sultan Is’haq has an alter ego, Azhi Dahaka who is his dark side.
We also see in the preceding, that living tribes of people, not mythological people, who still to this day, live almost exactly as their ancient ancestors did, state that they descend from this Sultan Isaac. We also see that the Armenian people say they descend from a race of giants. Are these indigenous people all ignorant or deluded? Or is the truth simply that they really are descended from a race of Watchers and Nephilim and Anunnaki who include the people of the Old Testament of the Bible? Then again, a quote from the author previous to this last one; “That is to say, he became first the moon-bull or Ia, and afterwards the solar ram. But he had also two other wives, Bilhah and Zilpah, and these wives may be again compared with the two wives of Azi-Dahaka, the snake-god of the Zend-Avesta, Savanghavach and Erinavach.”
We see here that the two previous quoted authors differ. One relates two of the wives of Azi-Dahaka, to Isaac, the other to his son Jacob-Israel. But what is important here is that one of them is said to have an evil alter ego. I say this because Ea is said by some to be Satan. Another interesting thing to note from Andrew Collins research is that two sets of people have two completely different understandings of the same person. One sees Azi-Dahaka as good, the other as evil. To me, this could be representative of two groups of people, under competing rulers, having differing opinions about the same person. In fact, it could be an instance of the bad, still unrepentant side of the family demonizing a member of the good side of the family, making a ‘Satan’ out of him.