This book is dedicated to the Serpents of Wisdom with thanks
Yüklə 5,84 Mb.
|
Chapter Fifteen The Grail Dynasties According to dianacooper.com the Grail dynasties were started on Atlantis by Melchizedek, who as we learned, was an incarnation of the Logos. This website’s author wrote that the Melchizedekean temples served as birthing grounds for the first twelve Grail lineages founded on Earth. I believe the importance of the Grail lines is that they contain light codes within their dna. I believe there was a reinfusion of light codes at the time of the white Adam in the Caucasus, and then at various stages in the patriarchal line. Ms. Cooper says that the Grail families; “Were men and women who lived their lives in service to God through humanity.” They were - “spiritual magicians who used their powers selflessly to promote the Christic Presence in the world.” She writes that their places of worship included an outer hall where the history of the Melchizedekean generations was recorded. So as you can see, we have been keeping track of our genealogy for a long time! The book that I feel best communicates the spiritual significance of the Grail family lineages is Guardians of the Holy Grail, by Mark Pinkham. I will be referencing information from his book for the majority of this chapter, and will also add my comments within the material.
P 102 The first Fisher king on Lemuria was known as both Murrugan and Sanat, or alternately, Satan Kumara. One of his brothers was Sananda Kumara, who was the same soul as manifested in Jesus. Another name for the Fisher Kings is Priest Kings. They are understood to be incarnations of the good/bad sons of our Mother the Holy Spirit. Another title for the Fisher Kings that is used by descendants of the Celts is the Green Man. Since this is a dualistic universe we live in, just as we have the capacity for great vice and great virtue, so does the Fisher King. His manifestations can be evil, or benign, or beneficent, or a combination thereof. He can be a saint or a demon, a Christ or a Lucifer. Since this applies to the sons of the Goddess, so too can this be said of the Goddess herself. This is reflected in the Holy Spirit’s three modes of creation, preservation and destruction. P 104 Mark writes that if a Fisher King wishes to hold onto his Grail Hallows, the most important lesson he must learn is “whom the Grail serves”. If he forgets that and uses his powers selfishly, he will lose them. Our Priest Kings are not meant to rule countries but to be shepherds of their people. They are intended to benefit their people not profit from them. If a Fisher King falls, the only way he can regain his powers is if someone asks him “whom does the Grail serve?” This is supposed to trigger within him an innate wisdom about the Grail “and how his selfishness and pride has led to his demise.” P 106 Mark writes that the Fisher King is beneficent at the beginning of his reign, but succumbs to pride and self-centeredness midway through his reign. In the Grail legends, when the Fisher King is not doing well he becomes physically disabled in some way. In the European legends, the Fisher King has an injury to his groin, which some attribute to the fact that his wife, the Goddess, has been taken from him. In that state, the Fisher King’s kingdom turns dark and decays. p 109 Mark refers to the book of Revelation which shows Lucifer’s manifestation as the Life-Force where, as the red dragon, a universal symbol of the fiery life force - Lucifer is tossed out of Heaven by St. Michael. Mark explains that Lucifer wasn’t originally considered evil. During the matriarchal era, when humans worshipped God in feminine form, he was considered the embodiment of the Life Force and controller of her two powers of creation and destruction. Mark tells us his “so-called ‘evil’ nature was first exploited during the inception of the categorical and divisive thinking that characterized the rise of patriarchal theology.” He goes on to say that at that time, he was split into two sons of the Goddess. Lucifer became associated with her power of destruction and his twin brother, Christ eventually became known as the guardian of her power of creation. I will add though, that in the Jeshua channelings, Jeshua does refer to “his brother Satan” as a flawed being. According to Mark, when Lucifer became King of the World, he was a righteous monarch. He says that Satan’s fall can be found in the Bible in Ezekiel 28:14-15. In those verses Ezekiel is referring to the king of Tyre, who Mark says was an embodiment of Satan. In that scripture, Lucifer is tainted by his good looks. In India and Sri Lanka, Murrugan/Satan, is known as the androgynous divine son of Shiva and Shakti. In Atlantis he was Neptune. To the Arabs, he is Al Khadir. p 117 In India, one manifestation was King Nahusha, a name which denotes serpent. King Nahusha let his supernatural abilities inflate his ego, as so many other Fisher Kings have done, so he is remembered as one of their most demonic monarchs. His descendants were also fallen and are known as the Asuras, or the fallen angels. What’s important to remember is that the Primal Serpent manifests in humans who are subject to all the temptations and weaknesses all humans are subject to. If I understand correctly, there can be multiple manifestations of the Fisher King at the same time. Anyone whose spiritual level can attain it, are manifestations of the Fisher King. They can reign as a Christ or a Lucifer. We go now to ancient Mesopotamia and Enki or Ea the Lord of the Earth, the House of Water, and Lord of the Two Streams. Enki’s capital city in Sumeria was Eridu. According to the historian Berossus, Enki took form as Oannes who reputedly had a fish’s head atop a human head, a fish’s body with a man’s feet adjoined to a fish’s tail! Some liken this to ceremonial regalia. In fact, they say that the headdress worn by the Catholic pope and cardinals were modeled after the fish’s head of Enki/Oannes which sat atop his human head. The Greek historian Apollodorus evidently believed that Oannes/Enki and his entourage really did look as described. He called them the Annedoti, the “Repulsive Ones.” According to Pinkham, the Annedoti “have since been associated with the Anunnaki.” I don’t understand why there would be an association of a fish-like creature with a serpent-like creature, but in the legends, they are both said to have been teachers and benefactors of humans. Pinkham says that some researchers believe their original homeland was either Sirius or Venus. He wrote that Enkis founded a lineage of Fisher Kings that included “ten pre-flood monarchs known both as the Ab-Gal, the Masters of Knowledge, as well as the Seven Sages.” Pinkham cites the Biblical Adam, Enoch and Noah as having been Fisher Kings in the lineage of Enki. I believe those ten pre-flood monarchs might have been; Adam, Seth, Enos, Cainan, Mahaleel, Jared, Enoch, Methuselah, Lamech and Noah. Pinkham cites King Nimrod as an example of a fallen Fisher King due to his inflated ego. Nimrod is credited with being the king who oversaw the building of the Tower of Babel as related in the Bible. According to Mark “His inglorious reign came to its conclusion after the megalomaniac king received a prophetic vision of the prophet Abraham re-establishing the religion of the one God in the future. In order to protect his rule, Nimrod slew all the firstborn sons of the Babylonians just in case one of them happened to be the infant Abraham. Because he fell so far from his pride, King Nimrod is rightly regarded as having been a legitimate manifestation of the Fisher King Vulcan-Lucifer.” In the Book of Jasher, said to have been written by Moses’ staff bearer, the story of Nimrod’s edict of killing the firstborn sons is told. In that text, Abraham’s father Terah can’t bear to allow Abraham to be killed, so he substituted a son of one of his servants. Abraham and his mother went into hiding and lived in a cave for some ten years. Afterwards, Abraham went to live with Shem and Noah and was taught the true religion of the One God. Abraham’s father Terah worshipped the Terraphim, who I believe were the Anunnaki. p 125 As mentioned in the Bible, there were still giants on the Earth after the Flood. Those giants included Nimrod, Ham, Japhet and other Biblical characters. It was the time of the Anakim and Rephilim of the Bible. Pinkham says that when Nimrod died, the ruler-ship of the Middle East was placed principally in the hands of King Melchizedek and the Rephilim and Anakim, “the giant descendants of the early Sons of God.” One author wrote that the angels were given charge of the Earth they had almost destroyed. That was the time when the seventy-two sons of God were made to rule over the seventy-two people or languages of the Earth as depicted in the Bible. Cain, who can only be described as the bad son, also founded a lineage, which continued, contrary to the Noah’s Ark story that makes it seem like his line died out. Pinkham says that Cain’s line, called Possessors, embodied the spirit of Vulcan-Lucifer. He says that the Fisher King lineage founded by Cain went to Enoch, then Lamech and to Noah and that Noah passed it to his son Ham. The alternate, Biblical version, shows the descent to Noah, from Adam to Seth to Seth’s son Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, Jared, Enoch, Methuselah, Lamech and then to Noah. It may be that all this confusion goes back to what Ignatius Donnelly termed the disfigured allegories of the race of Cain and Noah and his family that came out of Atlantis. The reason I’m including these points is because it does seem that the Freemasons follow a line that descends from Cain. We also learned earlier from Alice Linsley, that Cain married his cousin, who was a daughter of Enoch, who was a son of Seth. I believe this may account for the similarity in the bloodlines of Seth and Cain listed in the Bible. The lines were joined from the start, although I will say that in the Bible, Seth’s son is given as Enosh, a difference in spelling of just one letter. I believe this is part of the confusion. I have seen authors who say that both sides of the family swore they would never inter-marry because Cain slew Abel, or because Cain’s line was superior, but I believe they inter-married quite early. P 122 Mark notes that the Biblical patriarch Abraham’s original name was Ab-ram, which is Egyptian, and means ‘Possessor of Fire’. According to Mark, Abraham received much of his power from the Fisher King Melchizedek by “drinking from his chalice.” Mark says that King Melchizedek’s name means King of Salem (or Shalem) which denotes King of Venus! Jesus original incarnation in Lemuria was as Sananda Kumara. The Kamara’s were said to have come from Venus - the planet of love. Mark wrote; “The Water of Life Abraham received from King Melchizedek was subsequently transmitted to all the tribes of Israel, especially the tribes of Levi and David out of which emerged the Hebrew priests and Fisher Kings.” The Water of Life referred to is our Mother the Holy Spirit’s power. We are all swimming in a sea of cosmic Life Force. It makes sense that Shem is Melchizedek because Abraham spent a large number of years living with Shem. Abraham was no doubt initiated by Shem and Noah. I am pretty sure an initiate drinks from the ‘cup’ of their initiator. The edict of Nimrod’s to kill the first-born sons had, in hindsight, assured that Abraham had been taught by Melchizedek/Shem the truth about God. Otherwise, Abraham would have most likely worshipped the Anunnaki/Terraphim as his father Terah had. By the way, the clay figurines of the serpent men and women we saw earlier were, I believe, examples of the Terraphim that Terah worshipped. The word Terraphim means earth spirits and the Anunnaki were, I believe, at one time incarnated into the realm of the elementals. Mark wrote that one of Sanat or Murrugan’s Kundalini lineages went to the Middle East where it “culminated in the birth of one of the greatest Kundalini Masters of all time, John the Baptist.” According to esoteric lore, John revived the mystical practices of our ancestors by establishing several schools of initiation. Mark says that the lineages began by John eventually spread throughout the West. Jesus had been a disciple of John as had John and Andrew, who became Jesus’ disciples after John’s death. John ‘the Baptist’s’ line was known as the Johannite Cupholders. His lineage descended to the Knights Templars. The descendants of the Templars were the Freemasons, Rosicrucian’s and the Illuminati, and as I have recently learned, the Shriners and other affiliated groups. p 131 From the Black Sea area, one of our lineages was the Sicambrians who inter-married with the Scythians, a nomadic horse riding people from Asia and the Near East. They made their way westward and are now western Europeans and Americans. Mark wrote that the Scythians were worshippers of the Fisher King Neptune of Atlantis. The Scythians separated into tribes as they crossed the European continent and were known as the Alans, Franks, Visigoths, Goths, Saxons, Alemanni, Bourbons and probably many others. All these examples are just some of the actual lineages. These are lines I have seen in my family, however there were other Grail dynasties apart from ours. If it’s true that only Noah’s family lived after the Flood, then the original twelve dynasties were narrowed down to one, which would have then went on to have many sub-lineages. So now we come to the question; did the Davidic Grail line die out? In the following scripture from the Gospel of the Holy Twelve, Lection 66, Jesus says “Again I say unto you, I and my Bride are one, even as Maria Magdalena, whom I have chosen and sanctified unto myself as a type, is one with me; I and my Church are one. And the Church is the Elect of humanity for the salvation of all.” When Jesus says that to him, Maria Magdalena is his bride and also a type, he is speaking of the archetypal image that she is, just as he is the Royal Bridegroom archetype, she is the Royal Bride. Something important to consider when thinking about the question of whether Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married, is to take into consideration the times and social mores of the era in which they lived. First of all, women were considered second class citizens. They had no rights, and as far as the Jews were concerned, Eve was the cause of all the woe in the world, therefore all women were condemned for that reason. A woman would not talk to a man they didn’t know. Look at some of the Middle Eastern countries today and you will get a good idea of what Palestine was like in those days. A woman would not touch the head and feet of a man she wasn’t married to, as Mary did when she anointed Jesus. She would not have cleaned and anointed the dead body of a man she was not married to, something that Mary Magdalene had gone to Jesus’ tomb to do. As far as proof of Jesus and Mary Magdalene’s marriage and family, the church father Eusebius, quoting Julius Africanus, speaks of the Desposyni and calls them; “The descendants of the Master,” not descendants of the Master’s family. Our family has faithfully recorded their genealogies for several thousand years. I believe the descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdalene kept track of theirs. My Welsh ancestors from Gwynedd brought several large volumes of their detailed family lines with them when they came to America. From the book, The Holy Kingdom the Quest for the Real King Arthur, p 298 we learn about a line that went into Briton and Wales. The author refers to the ‘King List of Owain’ and says that it “turns out to be, as on other occasions, an important document for tracing the Joseph of Arimathea connection.” He says that List 1 traces back to Abatlac, son of Amalech. He then quotes a Latin phrase that he says translates to “Amalech, who was the son of Beli the great and Anna his mother, of whom they say the Virgin Mary, mother of our Lord Jesus Christ, to be a blood-relative.” He next brings forward a List 10 and says that it represents a different line to Owains tree, but still terminates in this same Anna, going back to Eudos, son of Eudelen, son of Aballac, son of Beli and Anna. He next refers to the genealogies of St. Cadoc, a sixth century British saint who, on his father’s side, traces his tree back to Baallad who was a brother of Eudelen mentioned in list 10 of Owen. The author then writes; “St. Cadoc’s mother’s tree is more provocative still. It goes back to Battled, son of Aballach, son of Beli and terminates with the Virgin Mary herself.” Hugh Montgomery, author of The God Kings of Outremer p 25 claims that there were at least “three well-known and authentic lines of legitimate blood descendants from Jesus own family.” One was from Joachim and Anna, Mary’s parents, another from Mary’s cousin Elizabeth through her son John the Baptist, and one from Cleophas and his wife, who was a cousin of Mary. Many people today define Jews as people whose mothers are Jewish. I believe the reason for that is because the Davidic line at one point, only consisted of two sisters. They were the daughters of King Zedekiah who escaped to Egypt and Ireland with the prophet Jeremiah when Zedekiah and his sons were killed. I believe that’s the reason the Davidic lineage is maternal. The author says that this information came from the book by Malachi Martin, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church, which was written by a former priest, an insider who had access to the entire Vatican library. Montgomery makes a good case for Mary Magdalene’s having been the daughter of John the Baptist. He says that Dr. Hugh Sinclair had come to the same conclusion some forty years earlier. They both see in John’s line a connection to the royal Petran Dynasty, the Sabeans/Nabateans. Montgomery does a good job of sleuthing and presenting his case for there being several children of Jesus from both his first marriage and his marriage to Mary Magdalene. Montgomery details at least four brothers and two sisters of Jesus as well. In his book, there is a family tree with the title; “John the Baptist’s line according to Dr. Hugh Sinclair.” He shows John’s wife as a woman named Anya of Petra. The next generation reads; Mary Magdalene and Yeshua (Jesus). They had three children, Jacob, Ruth and John Martinus. The next entry reads; “Jacob’s line turned into the Odonic line. Ruth’s line also went into the Odonic line.” The Odonic line stems from Woden/Odin/Votan/Wotan from Atlantis who went to the Caucasus and then crossed Europe, ending up in the Northern Isles. His descendants later moved into Britain and France. That line continues with John Martinus who, a few generations later, had a “very dark skinned” descendant. P 30 Montgomery points out a relationship between the House of Burgundy and either Mary of Bethany or Mary Magdalene, or both, as related in The Golden Legend. The author believes the lines of the two Mary’s inter-mixed as they descended. The Burgundian connection is important to note, because at one time, when I went on the Family Tree dna website on the Ulvungar Dynasty page, it was reported that Merovingian remains from Ergolding Bavaria that had been dna tested, were Burgundian. P 112 Montgomery traced the Ulvungar Dynasty, another name for the Odinic line, to Ramesses I and Seti I, his son by Queen Sitre who were founders of the 19th Dynasty of Egypt (1342-1197 BC). He wrote that the Hyksos, who were the Habiru of the Nile Delta, took Seth as their main god. He points out that Seth, or Seti I was given as wives or concubines Anat and Astarte also known as Asherah, who were both war goddesses from the Syria-Palestine area. At the time of the Hyksos rule in Egypt, the ruling dynasty of Babylon was the Kassite’s. The first Kassite king was Iddina or Odin. The royal families of Egypt and Babylon inter-married at that time. Shortly thereafter, the Kassite dynasty was overthrown, and it was at that time that Odin and his people migrated in a northwesterly direction and eventually became the Goths of Scandinavia, who would later become known as the Vikings and Ulvungar Dynasty. Montgomery said that another researcher traced the Ulvungar dynasty back to a Seth. He said that it was possible that the Seth referred to was the Biblical Seth, ancestor of Noah. He wrote; “Rashi (Rabbi Shlomo Yitzhaqi) refers to Seth as the father of Noah and the ancestor of all of the generations of the Tzaddikim the righteous ones.” Montgomery said that it occurred to him that the Egyptian Seth and Biblical Seth may be the same man. I think he may be right. He cites a document that shows Mary of Bethany as a priestess of Isis. The Tribe of Benjamin, who were Mary Magdalene’s ancestors, were mercenary soldiers who served as the Egyptian Pharaoh’s personal guard. They lived on Elephantine Island in Egypt, the place where the exiled High Priest Onias built the Temple at Heliopolis. The Essenes in all lands considered this to be their main Temple. Hugh Montgomery wrote that the period from 1100-1133 was the high point of the Ulvungar dynasty. At that time, they ruled Scandinavia, Russia, Normandy, England, southern Italy, Sicily, North Africa and Outremer, a name for the Holy Lands regained during the Crusades. They even had their own man installed as Pope during that period! I read that our family had three or four men as Pope. From what I can tell, some of that was probably done through subterfuge, but there were also alliances and even inter-marriage into the ‘Holy’ Roman Empire. Montgomery found a link between the bloodline and the Herodian dynasty. Considering the history between our family and the Herodian line in Palestine, this wouldn’t seem very likely, but there is a story of a Herodian who, when he was young, was told by an Essene prophet that one day he would become a king. That came true, so that Herodian always favored the Essenes. We also learned that there was a tie-in with John the Baptist’s family and Herod, who had married King Aretas daughter, who was John the Baptist’s sister in law. There is also a story of Mary Magdalene seeking to escape Palestine and appealing to Herod Agrippa’s son, Herod Agrippa the II, for help. The younger Herod Agrippa had been tutored by Saul/Paul. At the time, Paul was not a champion of Jesus because of his reformation of the religion, but did ask his former student to protect Mary. The Herodian’s and the family of John the Baptist were joined in a marriage of political expedience. It seems it was a marriage that may have contributed to the death of John the Baptist and possibly saved the life of Mary Magdalene. We know from the Bible that Saul/Paul was related to the Herodian’s, and Montgomery states that a daughter of Jesus and Mary of Bethany and the apostle Saul/Paul were married. It is quite possible that those Olchon Baptists from Wales were descended from Jesus and Mary Magdalene’s daughter and the apostle Paul. The authors of Rex Deus the True Mystery of Rennes-le-Chateau and the Dynasty of Jesus p 79 wrote that documents exist called the Rex Deus Sagas, which explain that the children of Jesus were separated in an attempt to ensure their security and the continuation of his bloodline. Jesus and Mary’s two and a half year old son James was given to the care of Judas Thomas Didymus, “Jesus twin brother.” They were said to have fled to King Abgar of Edessa who was a supporter of Jesus. There is an interesting letter that can be found on the internet that was written by King Abgar to Jesus requesting he come and heal him (Abgar). Jesus replies that he is unable to come, but he will send one of his disciples. Thomas is the one sent to heal Abgar, so it is quite plausible that Thomas and James lived for a time in Edessa and were protected by King Abgar. The legends relate that eventually James and his uncle went to the Celt-Iberian settlements in the vicinity of present day Compostela in the north-west of Spain, the area where the Basque’s live. The authors of Rex Deus wrote that at the time of the Crucifixion, Mary Magdalene was pregnant and fled to the Therapeutae community in Egypt where she had her baby. Legends record that when Mary Magdalene arrived in France, she had a young Egyptian girl with her. The authors say that they got their information from the Rex Deus Sagas. They go on to say that there were four strands of early transmission of the bloodline in Rome, Provence, Spain and Britain. I don’t know if this is an indication of four children or not. Laurence Gardner attributes a daughter Tamar, a son Jesus II, also called Justus, and another son, Josephes ha Rama Theo to Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Gardner explains that ‘ha Rama Theo’ is a title that has gotten re-identified as a place name, i.e. Arimathea, but means; “Of the Highest of God.” I have also seen the name Michael attributed to one of their sons, but this was most likely a title, as the office holders in the dynasty took the names of the archangels. There are varying stories about how many children Jesus and Mary Magdalene might have had. I have seen anywhere from one to three. I think there’s confusion because there are children from two different Mary’s. One of Jesus and Mary Magdalene’s sons took a vow of abstinence and didn’t marry. I’ve not tried to trace the separate lines through history, but as far as the Merovingian line goes, at one point there was only one male, Dagobert II, who, under an assumed name continued the Merovingian lineage in the Languedoc area of southern France. That narrowed down the gene pool as far as the Merovingian line goes, but I still believe there are probably millions of descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdalene today. Pocahontas had just one son circa 1625. Geneticists believe there are tens of thousands of descendants of Pocahontas living today. Given the greater immensity in time, we can see that there could easily be millions of descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdalene today. Laurence Gardner claims that the Merovingian’s were related to Jesus family through Jesus brother James, but Hugh Montgomery cites a document titled; The House of Bethany which shows a descent from Jesus and Mary of Bethany, who I believe to be Jesus’ first wife. He cites a daughter Miriam who married Sigismundus, which I am pretty sure is the Latin name for Saul/Paul. Miriam most likely was a dynastic name and not her actual name. As the men took the names of the archangels as titles, the women had theirs as well. This line descends to a Maria who was the mother of Clodimir, who fathered Merovee - the father of the Merovingian’s. In the Jeshua channelings, where Jeshua is talking to Light workers, he makes the statement that the Light workers were direct descendants of the Apostles. I got the feeling that he may have meant that literally. Hugh Montgomery makes an interesting summary statement in his God Kings of Outremer book p 154 ...“the families of the Odonic God-Kings and the God-Kings of Israel merged into the House of Brocus with the marriage of Maria to Ataulf and we have been able to tentatively identify the missing generation within the Elchasaic line as follows;” He shows a line from Jesus and Miriam of Bethany to their daughter Miriam who married Sigismundus. The author states that this is the same person as the apostle Paul in the Bible. The line continues to a Jacob, who was one of the delegates from our family who went before Pope Sylvester in 318 C.E. asking him for permission to practice the true religion of Jesus. The Pope denied that to them. This line continued to Maria and Ataulf who were the progenitors of the Merovingian’s. According to Montgomery, there is a legend stemming from the first century that tells of Mary Magdalene’s arrival in Southern France in 44 C.E. The legend relates that she was accompanied by Mary Jacob, wife of Cleophas who was a cousin of Jesus; a young girl, and Joseph of Arimathea. The author says that their arrival “is recorded in The Acts of Magdalene and the ancient manuscript History of England which is in the Vatican archives.” He then shares some interesting information; “St. Mary Jacob was a Nazarene priestess, who became better known in Europe as Mary the Gypsy or Mary the Egyptian. In England her cult was widespread in medieval times and her Oath of Wedlock was referred to as the Merrie. She was said to be the origin of Maid Marian in the Robin Hood legends. There is to this day, a yearly festival celebrating this group’s arrival in France.” Do you see what I mean about our family history being woven into fairy tales and folklore? From Celt, Druid and Culdee by Isabel Hill Elder; P 44 The universally held belief that the British are a mixed race has prevailed during many centuries; this belief, however, is now fading out of the scientific mind and giving place to the exact opposite. Britons, Celts, Gaels, Anglo-Saxons, Danes and Normans when warring with each other were kinsmen shedding kindred blood. p 45 The British prince, Caradoc, in maintaining his descent from illustrious ancestors, could bring from the clan records evidence of his pedigree; in those remote times genealogies were guarded with extreme care and recorded with exactitude by the herald-bard of each clan. On the public reception of a child, at the age of fifteen, into the clan, his genealogy was proclaimed and challengers of it commanded to come forward. Pedigree and inheritance were so identified in the ancient British code that an heir even in the ninth descent could redeem at a valuation by jury any portion of an estate with which his forefathers had been compelled to part.
And from the author of Guardians of the Holy Grail; P 309 In Robert de Boron’s poem, Galahad is said to be Joseph of Arimathea’s son - although the identity of the knight’s mother is unclear. And the Queste del Saint Graal calls Galahad, like Jesus, a scion of the house of David and identifies Galahad with Jesus himself. Indeed, the very name Galahad, according to modern scholars, derives from the name Gilead, which was deemed a mystical designation for Jesus. We saw in the Gospel of the Holy Twelve that Jesus’ father Joseph was still alive after Jesus resurrection. Could it be that his father Joseph was Joseph of Arimathea, or ‘ha Rama Theo’? From Hidden Wisdom; Secrets of the Western Esoteric Tradition; P 118 Both King Louis and Count Hugh were members of a mysterious and secretive group of families known as Rex Deus. They claim to be the direct lineal descendants of the twenty-four ma’madot, the high priestly families of biblical Israel, direct descendants of Zadok the priest the true heirs to the Hebraic/Egyptian Gnostic and initiatory tradition. That author goes on to say that the Grail stories tell, by way of allegory, of the search for enlightenment. The stories reveal, in coded form, the pathway of initiation taught by Jesus. The author of Custodians of Truth concurs. He says that the Grail stories are “a coded guide to the true teachings of Jesus.” I will add that the New Testament is as well. The author of The Knights of the Holy Grail p 233 corroborates this. He says that the two main Grail stories carry coded clues to a “heretical belief system” embedded within them that contradict the dogmas of the Church. He wrote that the king of the Grail castle “imperfectly serves his impoverished realm just as the usurpers of the true teachings of Jesus, those who lead the Christian Church, despoil the spiritual lives of the flock they claim to serve.” According to him, when someone pure enough to see the Grail restores the Fisher King to health, “his wasted kingdom will be restored.” That wasted kingdom he refers to is the Earth. He goes on to say; “Likewise, when the true teachings of Jesus triumph over greed, lies, and distortion the dream of heaven on Earth will become a reality.” Merlin was a long-held Druidic title of the Seer to the King, not just one historic character. The familiar historical Merlin however, was Emry’s of Powys in Wales. Before him, the position was held by Taliesin the Bard who was a husband of Viviane I del Acqs. King Arthur’s father was King Aedan mac Gabran of Scots who held the title of Pendragon. Aedan’s mother was Lluan of Brecknock who was descended from Joseph of Arimathea. Arthur was made commander of the British forces on his sixteenth birthday in 575. He was later anointed High King of the Britons. In our family, Kings and Queens did not rule countries, they ruled people. In fact, rule is probably not a good word as their role was to oversee the welfare of their people. Arthur’s mother, Ygerna del Acqs, was made the High Queen of the Celtic Kingdoms, a position granted by the Celtic Church. Ygerna’s mother Viviane I, was the dynastic Queen of Burgundian Avallon. The Burgundian's were a tribe with marital ties to the Merovingian’s, as mentioned previously. Laurence Gardner made the statement that Arthur’s father, King Aedan, was a Celtic Church Christian “of the Sacred Kindred of St. Columba.” He explains that the Sacred Kindred was “distinctly grounded in the Nazarene tradition,” but also incorporated some druidic and pagan ritual. p 166 He goes on to write about the disturbance caused within the Celtic church because, in his words, Arthur; “became obsessed with Roman Christianity.” Evidently this led to a breakdown of his kingdom and shortly thereafter, the kingdom fell to the Anglo Saxons. This signaled the end to over six hundred years of the Celtic kingdom under the Pendragons. The last Pendragon was a direct ancestor of mine, Cadwaladr of Wales, who was twenty-sixth in line from Joseph of Arimathea. The marriage of Ygerna and King Aedan brought together the lineages of Joseph of Arimathea and Jesus once again for the first time in 350 years. That’s the importance of Arthur in the Grail legends, he was dually Desposynic. The two lines were the Arimathean and Christic. Arthur’s half-sister Morgaine married King Urien of Rheged and Gowrie who is known as Urien of Gore in the Arthurian Grail Romances. According to Gardner, Morgaine was a Celtic High Priestess with prophetic and healing powers. Morgaine’s Avallonian Dynasty was perpetuated in the female line. Gardner writes; p 202 “It is apparent from the annals of saintly genealogy and bardic pedigree that the Messianic line of the Sangreal came into Britain from first century Gaul.” (France) He says that the line became the Princely House of Wales and from this root came the “Gwyr-y-Gogledd chiefs of the northern regions.” I am quite sure he is referring to my ancestors from Gwynedd in Northern Wales. He talks about a parallel line conjoined with the kings of Camulod and Siluria. “It was by no chance that Prince Linus, son of Caractacus (a.k.a Caradoc), became the first Bishop of Rome. Neither was it a fluke of circumstance that Helena daughter of Britain’s Coel II married Emperor Constantius. By way of this alliance Rome was attached to the Judean royal succession which it had tried so hard to suppress by other means.” The kingdom of Camulod was later known as Camelot. The author of The Magdalene Legacy p 173 wrote that Archbishop Rabanus Maurus, born circa 780, wrote a manuscript titled The Life of Mary Magdalene. In his manuscript, he tells how Mary, Martha, and their brother Simon-Lazarus and several others, made their way by boat on the Mediterranean Sea until they arrived in the city of Marseilles. He wrote that the libraries of Paris contain a number of manuscripts that witness to Mary Magdalene’s mission in Provence. He mentions that this story is found in a hymn of the A.D. 600’s that was republished in the records of the Acta Sanctorum by the Jesuit, Jean Bolland in the 17th century. There are individual documents containing aspects of the story that date back to the early 4th century. He goes on to cite a “9th century manuscript entitled Vita emeritica beatae Maria Magdalenae that is reckoned to be copied from a Greek original from the second century, possibly written by Hegesippus.” These various records show that Jesus’ sisters, Sarah-Salome and Mary Jacob Cleophas, Helena-Salome, the consort of Simon-Lazarus, and a young girl, accompanied Mary Magdalene and Joseph. Simon-Lazarus is the brother of Mary Magdalene and Martha, and is the Lazarus whom Jesus raised from the dead. A consort is a royal spouse, so it’s quite possible that Simon-Lazarus was also from a royal line and I believe that would have been from the Benjamite King Saul of ancient Israel, or the Petran royal dynasty. Jesus sisters and Helena-Salome are buried in the crypt of Les Saintes Maries de la Mer in the Camargue in France. P 176 Gardner reveals that in AD 44, Mary gave birth to her second son, and “there is a specific reference to this in the New Testament: ‘The word of God grew and multiplied’.” Acts 12:24 He calls this son the “all-important Grail Child” who was named after his grandfather, Josephes. Gardner believes that Jesus continued to live long after his crucifixion. He said that from AD 46, his elder son, nine year old Jesus II, was schooled in Caesarea, and three years later, he underwent the ceremony of his community birth in Provence. I believe that is the same thing as his bar Mitzvah. Gardner states that in AD 53 Jesus junior was “officially proclaimed Crown Prince at the synagogue in Corinth and duly received the Davidic Crown Prince’s title of ‘Justus’ (the Righteous).” At that time, Jesus Justus as he was known, gained the entitlement to the black robe of that office – “as worn by the priests of Isis, the universal Mother Goddess.” I know that to see a tie-in with a son of Jesus and the Egyptian Goddess Isis seems strange. However, Jesus himself was an initiate of the Egyptian Mysteries and underwent initiation in the Great Pyramid of Giza. They would either have considered the Goddess to be Asherah, the Hebrew Goddess, or Isis, or possibly Sophia, the Greek Goddess. They would have known that it doesn’t matter what name she is called by. From Rex Deus the True Mystery of Rennes-le-Chateau and the Dynasty of Jesus p 62 we learn that there is evidence that suggests that the royal bloodline of Jesus and Mary Magdalene “eventually flowed in the veins of the Merovingian monarchs of France.” He explains that the name Merovingian if broken down phonetically into syllables can easily be recognized as ‘mer and vin’, ‘Mary and the vine’. We know that the Davidic line is called the Lord’s vineyard. The author tells us that the royal line was trying to live inconspicuously during that period and no doubt at other times as well. He says that in a ploy to take over the dynastic apostleship from the family, the Catholics intentionally masked the identity of Jesus family in the Bible. Jesus brother James was known for his piety and righteousness and held in great esteem. The Catholics labeled him ‘James the Less’. They adopted the notion that Jesus was celibate so that a direct line of descent from him was not possible. From St. Mary Magdalene the Gnostic Tradition of the Holy Bride p 73 by Tau Malachi, we learn that Mary and Jeshua’s son St. Michael was conceived on the Sabbath eve the week before the Passion and Crucifixion. In Tau Malachi’s words; “The Holy Bride had become the Holy Mother, the mother of a supernal humanity. Jesus blood and flesh given over to the Demiurges and Archons as ransom for those souls he sought to liberate from their dominion and for the sake of binding the serpent in cessation. Thus with Him, she was making a holy sanctuary for the souls of the Elect throughout time who might cleave to the Anointed and also become the Anointed.” I find it intriguing that the author said that Mary and Jesus were making a holy sanctuary for the souls of the Elect through their act of conceiving St. Michael. I believed long before I read that book that the souls of the Elect were in the descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. He calls us a supernal humanity. I’m not sure I am living up to that description. The reference to “also become the Anointed” refers to what is probably our most important reason for incarnating into the Earth at this time. At some point, simultaneously, an anointing of the Holy Spirit power will come upon us. We will be the Christ’s of this era. We will have our own Day of Pentecost. While people still have time to choose whether they want to evolve in God consciousness or perish, we will go out and minister to the sick, starving and injured, just as Jesus and his disciples did. We will tell people that they too will one day be capable of doing everything they see us do, if they turn to God and choose to evolve in God Consciousness. The Rex Deus Sagas are said to relate that the families all laid low and would outwardly practice the religion of the people around them, but practice their real religion in secret. That really bothered me when I first read it. I hadn’t realized how much I cherished the traditions that have been handed down with Christianity. To think that any detail might differ or contain a hidden meaning was very difficult to accept. Now, all I can think is; whoever has the true teachings, will you please bring them out into the open? St. Bernard, “...at the time of the Council of Troyes, required all the members of the new knighthood to make, ‘Obedience to Bethany and the House of Mary and Martha’. In other words, render obedience and loyalty to the dynasty founded by Mary Magdalene and Jesus. - The Knights of the Holy Grail p 224 It would not have been unusual for members of our family to not only revere Mary Magdalene as the archetype of our Mother, but to also revere Isis, her Egyptian representation, or Sophia, her Greek representation, or any of the other Mother archetypes of the pagan pantheons. Some authors called Mary Magdalene a priestess of Isis. That really bothered me until it finally sank in that all they were saying was that she was a priestess of our Mother the Holy Spirit. The area of southern France where Mary Magdalene lived is known as the Languedoc. Mary was known there as La Dompna del Aquae, or the Lady of the Waters. In those first few weeks when I discovered that my ancestry included royalty of Europe, one of the first I was to discover I was related to was Eleanor of Aquitaine. Her royal house was called the House del Acqs, the House of Waters. Eleanor was a descendant of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. It seems there is both a spiritual and profane meaning to almost every aspect of our family story. One writer described our family as both wicked and righteous and I would have to agree. For the profane meaning of the importance of water in our family, if it is true, read Laurence Gardner’s books. The spiritual meaning of our family’s tie-in with water is that water is likened to Spirit. The author of Rule by Secrecy says this about the Rex Deus bloodline; P 296 The author Lawrence Gardner ...was permitted to study the private records of thirty-three European royal families. He confirmed that the Merovingian’s were related to Jesus, but through his brother James, who Gardner claimed was the same person as Joseph of Arimathea. …It was never any secret…for the majority of these people (European Royalty) that Jesus was married and that Jesus had heirs, because it is written as such in very many family archives…The published papers of Mary, Queen of Scots talk about it at length. The papers of James II of England, who wasn’t deposed until 1688, talk of it at length. The author goes on to quote Gardner, who states that he was allowed access to documents that were hundreds of years old, which in 1128 the Knights Templar brought out and confronted the church establishment with. Shortly thereafter, the Templars institutions were raided and the Templars jailed, tortured, and killed. The Templars had been forewarned and most had escaped by boat to Scotland. The Templars were re-formed there into Scottish Rite Freemasonry. When I asked one of my not so distant relatives the difference between the Scottish Rite and ‘regular’ Freemasonry, he said to me “Scottish Rite Freemasonry is for the Jews.” There were various lines in Britain and Wales through the ages that stemmed from the lineage of Joseph of Arimathea. The rulers of Gwynedd in Wales were one of them. The Plantagenet’s and Tudors were others. We also had family lines in the other British Isles such as the Stuarts in Scotland. The Odinic line was in Scandinavia before moving to France and Britain. A later infusion of Eastern Jewish blood was through Makhir who ruled in Septimania, which was an independent Jewish state in southern France. Makhir was originally the Jewish Exilarch in Babylon. The Jews flourished there during their captivity and many didn’t leave when they were given their freedom. It will probably come as a surprise to many readers to learn that the prophet Muhammad was a descendant of Jesus brother Simon, so he too, was Rex Deus. There is a story of how members of Rex Deus went to Pope Sylvester to try and assert their hereditary right to lead and practice the form of the ancient religion transmitted to them by Jesus. The Pope told them that they and their teachings had no place in the new Christian order, and that the teachings of Jesus had been superseded by church doctrine! That, unfortunately, still remains true. It seems one point of contention between our family and the Catholic’s was the doctrine of Jesus divinity, which evidently our family found blasphemous. Early in my research, I saw on the internet that there had been a scientific dna analysis done on some remains of Merovingian’s from the court of Merovech, who lived circa 670 C.E. in what is today, Germany. The Merovingian’s were not just rulers of the people of France and Germany, but also of Ireland and Gaelic Britain. I had already had some testing done on my dad’s dna so I compared it with the results listed in the report and came up with a one hundred percent match. However, there were many more locus tested on the Merovingian remains than I had tested on my dad’s dna, so I sent off another sample of my dad’s dna to be tested so that I would be able to compare every marker tested in the study. It took several weeks for the results to come back. I can honestly say that there was not a scintilla of doubt in my mind that my dad’s dna would show descendancy from the test subjects. I was not disappointed. The testing proved that my dad descended from either of two of the subjects, who were said to be brothers. As of November 2012, the report can still be found online at; www.cmj.hr/2009/50/3/19480023.htm The scans I made of the study results are too light and in too small of print to be practical to add to the even smaller pages of a book. I have found other website’s that have copied and pasted the results, so hopefully they will be available in the future. Just type ‘Merovingian dna Ergolding Bavaria’ into your search engine and you should find one. Following is a link on the FamilyTree dna website’s Ulvungar Dynasty Project page. The news changes on the project’s web page, but in June of 2009 the posting was titled; “Ulvungar connections to tombs tested from the 7th century in Ergolding Bavaria, Germany.” In the article, they were speaking of the dna analysis done on skeletons from the 6th century Merovingian court of Merovech just mentioned. The article was written by a Sinclair who stated; “When Shawn asked Daniel if these three were Merovingian in origin the answer was a resounding yes. He also confirmed that they came from the court of Merovech in and around the period of 670 AD and that this has been confirmed by two doctors, this being based obviously on more than just dna testing.” The address for that page is; www.familytreedna.com/public/ulvungardynasty/default.aspx?section=news The following chart is a comparison of the three closest matches with my dad’s dna; From Daniel Vanek, Lenka Sadkova, Hubert Koch, Forensic DNA Service, Prague, Czech Republic Article titled: Kinship and Y-Chromosome Analysis of 7th Century Human Remains Novel DNA Extraction and Typing Procedure for Ancient Material. Results for 244A, 244B, 244C, 244D - Merovingian Remains
244A and 244B are referred to in the report as brothers. As you can see my dad is only one marker off on either of them. What that means is that in the last fourteen hundred years there has been a slight mutation as the DNA strand came through time to my dad. These were twenty-five marker tests. Where you see a blank cell, it means that the ancient remains did not reveal that marker, so no comparison can be done. However, if you look at the same marker on the results that did turn out, on the brother and cousin, you can see what it most likely would have been. For instance, as you can see, marker 635 on 244A is blank. However the other results make it clear that the number would have been 23. The following from the Family Tree DNA website, explains how to interpret genetic distance, and comes from their glossary of genetic distance: Genetic distance - The number of differences or mutations between two sets of results. A genetic distance of zero means there are no differences in the results being compared against one another (exact match). And in another area of the website; In a twenty-five marker test, a difference of one marker is considered ‘related.’ A difference of two markers is considered ‘probably related.’ On the following page are my dad’s dna test results, so that you can compare them with the Merovingian results. On the page following my dad’s results, is an e-mail between myself and the owner of Family Tree DNA. The result for Gata H4 differed from the previous test I had done at Ancestry.com dna testing. As Mr. Greenspan states in the e-mail, this was because the protocol was changing at the time. 
After these things I will return and will rebuild David’s tent which has fallen down. I will rebuild its ruins and set it up again. So that those who are left of mankind may seek the Lord even all the Gentiles who are called by my name, says the Lord who does these things, which have been known from long ago. Acts 15:16-18 Jesus is rebuilding David’s tent now. This book is a part of that - a living testament to this prophecy from the book of Acts, spoken two thousand years ago. The very important words; “those who are left of mankind” speaks of a day in the not too distant future. These are the End Times. Unless humankind radically changes, we will go through terrible tribulations. The experience of our going through the tribulations will bring about our Christening or enlightenment. We will then minister to, and heal those who are left of mankind. The only thing delaying the End Times is that we must tell humankind they have a choice to love God and all of humankind, or perish. They must choose to evolve or perish. Not spend an eternity in hell, but simply perish as an independent soul. Their matter will dissolve and their essence will revert to pure energy, with which God will create something else. And to my brothers and sisters I ask; how can we rebuild David’s tent, if we deny we are of David’s household? The time for secrets has ended. 
The Symbol of Yahweh’s Presence Yüklə 5,84 Mb. Dostları ilə paylaş:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||