On the problem of categorization in linguistics



Yüklə 337,11 Kb.
səhifə4/6
tarix30.12.2023
ölçüsü337,11 Kb.
#165136
1   2   3   4   5   6
The Problem Of Categorization In Linguistics

Techne grammatike (τέχνη γραμματική)

  • Ascribed to Dionysius Thrax (Διονύσιος ὁ Θρᾷξ) (ca. 170 - 90 BC)

  • Introduction of grammar as a separate study subject for scholars

  • Eight parts of speech

  • Influence on later scholars, including Donatus




γραμματική ἐστιν ἐμπειρία τῶν παρὰ ποιηταῖς τε καὶ συγγραφεῦσιν ὡς ἐπὶ τὸ πολὺ λεγομένων.
μέρη δὲ αὐτῆς ἐστιν ἕξ·
πρῶτον ἀνάγνωσις ἐντριβὴς κατὰ προσωιδίαν,
δεύτερον ἐξήγησις κατὰ τοὺς
ἐνυπάρχοντας ποιητικοὺς τρόπους, τρίτον γλωσσῶν τε καὶ ἱστοριῶν
πρόχειρος ἀπόδοσις,
τέταρτον ἐτυμολογίας εὕρεσις, πέμπτον ἀναλογίας ἐκλογισμός, ἕκτον κρίσις ποιημάτων, ὃ δὲ
κάλλιστόν ἐστι πάντων τῶν ἐν τῆι
τέχνηι.
(Techne grammatike A.α)
Grammar is the practical study of the usage of poets and prose writers.

It has six parts: first, correct pronunciation of the text, paying attention to the diacritics; second, explanation of the poetic tropes encountered; third, elucidation of any difficult words or allusions; fourth, the tracing of etymologies; fifth, the establishment of analogical regularities; sixth, literary appreciation, which is the finest part of all.


(Harris & Taylor 1993: 48)






  • Before 11th century

  • Interpretation of Latin and Greek texts

    • Classical Greek and Latin scholars

    • Christian texts

  • In a scholastic tradition

    • Christian scholars

    • Translation and interpretation of Classical texts in a Christian context

    • Translation and correct interpretation of the Bible and other religious texts

    • Religious orthodoxy

  • Basis for scholarship in the West until today




  • Late antiquity




  • What was the impact of this scholarship on linguistic tradition?

  • Similarities and differences with today’s methods of analysis?

  • Limitations?




nomen quid est? pars orationis cum
casu corpus aut rem proprie communiterue significans.

What is a noun? A part of speech which
with the case a person or a thing specifically or generally.

nomini quot accidunt? sex.

How many accidents (attributes) does it have? Six.

quae? qualitas comparatio genus numerus figura casus.

Which ones? Quality, comparison, gender, number, form and case.




qualitas nominum in quo est? bipertita
est: aut enim unius nomen est et proprium dicitur, aut multorum appellatiuum.

Wherein lies the quality of a noun? It is
twofold: either it is a single name, and it is called a proper noun, or it refers to many [referents].

comparationis gradus quot sunt? tres.

How many grades of comparison are there? Three.

qui? positiuus, ut doctus, comparatiuus, ut doctior, superlatiuus, ut doctissimus.

Which ones? The positive, as in
‘learned’; the comparative, as in ‘more
learned’; and the superlative, as in
‘most learned’.




quae nomina comparantur? appellatiua
dumtaxat qualitatem aut quantitatem significantia.

What kind of nouns are compared?
Only common nouns signifying quality or quantity.

comparatiuus gradus cui casui seruit? ablatiuo sine praepositione: dicimus enim doctior illo.

What case is the comparative degree used with? The ablative without a preposition; for we say ‘more learned than he’.

superlatiuus cui? genetiuo tantum plurali: dicimus enim doctissimus
poetarum.

What case with the superlative? Only
the genitive plural: for we say ‘most
learned of poets’.




  • Nouns according to Donatus

    • A part of speech

    • Referring to persons or things

    • Having the following syntactic properties: quality, comparison, gender, number, form and case

    • Distinction between common and proper nouns

    • Nouns referring to qualities (our adjectives) have grades of comparison




  • Pretty much our modern noun + adjective

  • Adjectives in Latin were noun-like




  • The influence of Aelius Donatus on the language studies and teaching was immense

    • Same parts-of-speech still used today

    • Greek and Latin were considered the basis for analysis

      • Rich morphology

      • Cases for nouns, complex paradigms for verbs

(Bennett 1908, p. 58-59)







  • The influence of Aelius Donatus on the language studies and teaching was immense

    • Same parts-of-speech still used today

    • Greek and Latin were considered the basis for analysis

      • Rich morphology

      • Cases for nouns, complex paradigms for verbs

    • Influence on

      • Definition of word classes ⇒ reliance on morphology

      • Perception of other languages

“We must not forget that there are languages which have remained in that germinal state, and in which there is to the present day no outward distinction between a root and a word. In Chinese, for


instance, …”


Max Mueller, 1864, Lectures on the Science of Language, Second Series (quoted in Harris & Talbot 1997, p. 54-55)

⇒ Languages without morphology are ‘germinal’ or ‘primitive’





  • How do these categories work for non-Western languages?

  • Do major word classes exist in all languages?

  • Focus on nouns and verbs




  • Two possible hypotheses:

  1. Word classes reflect ingrained cognitive categories that are common to all humans

  2. Word classes reflect relative categories determined by the Western tradition and its languages




  • Case studies

    • Bunun

    • Mandarin Chinese

    • (Vietnamese & English)




  • Word classes are determined language-internally

    • Distinctive properties: properties that can tell word classes apart

    • Typical properties: meaningful properties that are typically (but not necessarily always) associated with a word class




  • Nature of the evidence (Evans 2000)

    • (Phonology and prosody)

    • Semantics


    • Yüklə 337,11 Kb.

      Dostları ilə paylaş:
1   2   3   4   5   6




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©www.genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə