ix
7- T
HE
T
URN OF
E
VENTS
...............................................................................................160
8- T
HE
W
ORLD
W
AR
II
AND THE
N
ORTH
C
AUCASIAN
E
MIGRES
...................................166
CHAPTER IV: THE COLLAPSE OF THE SOVIET UNION AND REEMERGENCE
OF UNITY..................................................................................................................175
1- P
ERESTROIKA AND
G
LASNOST
’.................................................................................178
2- T
HE
R
ISING
G
EORGIAN
N
ATIONALISM
, A
BKHAZIA AND THE
F
ORMATION OF THE
A
SSEMBLY OF THE
M
OUNTAIN
P
EOPLES OF THE
C
AUCASUS
.....................................182
3- T
HE
A
CTIVITIES OF THE
A
SSEMBLY
..........................................................................187
4- F
ROM
A
SSEMBLY TO THE
C
ONFEDERATION
..............................................................191
5- A
CTIVITIES OF THE
C
ONFEDERATION
........................................................................197
6- T
HE
S
PLIT
: F
ROM
C
ONFEDERATION OF THE
M
OUNTAIN
P
EOPLES OF THE
C
AUCASUS TO
THE
C
ONFEDERATION OF
C
AUCASIAN
P
EOPLES
.........................................................200
7- T
HE
C
OSSACK
F
ACTOR AND THE
CPC ......................................................................211
8- I
NCREASING
R
USSIAN
A
CTIVITY
...............................................................................216
CHAPTER V: REGIONAL DISPUTES AND THE CONFEDERATION................221
1- T
HE
G
EORGIAN
-S
OUTH
O
SETIAN
C
ONFLICT
.............................................................224
2- T
HE
I
NGUSH
-O
SETIAN
P
ROBLEM
..............................................................................233
3- T
HE
C
ONFLICT AND THE
C
ONFEDERATION
...............................................................237
4- T
HE
A
BKHAZ
-G
EORGIAN CONFLICT
.........................................................................250
5- C
ONFEDERATION AND THE
A
BKHAZ
C
ONFLICT
........................................................254
6- T
HE
C
HECHEN
S
TRUGGLE FOR
I
NDEPENDENCE AND
S
EEKING FOR A
U
NITED
F
RONT
268
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................280
BIBLIOGRAPHY ...........................................................................................................301
APPENDICES .................................................................................................................322
LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE .......................................................................................323
POPULATION OF THE NORTH CAUCASUS (1897 R
USSIAN
C
ENSUS
) ................325
POPULATION OF NORTH CAUCASIAN PEOPLES (1926, 1959, 1970, 1989).....326
SLAVIC POPULATION IN THE NORTH CAUCASUS...........................................327
1
INTRODUCTION
In this thesis, an attempt has been made to look into the common identity
building process of the native peoples of the North Caucasus. The identity building
process normally requires various factors, such as common religion, language,
geography, common history and sometimes a working economic network. In the
case of the North Caucasus, however, these factors sometimes play a role, while
some other times they do not.
The point here to be borne in mind is that the history of the region, as well
as the social structure, is quite sui generis. Throughout history, the region has
hosted a number of peoples, whose numbers are occasionally limited to some
hundreds, and whose mother tongues are quite different from each other. The
example of Dagestan, the eastern part of the North Caucasus, with more than 30
ethno-linguistic groups can give a clue to a reader on the structure of the region.
It is interesting to note that although the region changed hands several
times, the outsiders (such as Sassanian, Golden Horde, Crimean and etc.) hardly
interfered with the traditional law and order. And the Ottoman rule over the region
was no exception: it scarcely made any attempt to alter the traditional rule.
Despite the existence of great ethno-linguistic diversity, all the inhabitants
of the North Caucasus shared the same way of life, traditions, customs and even the
costume determined by harsh mountain conditions and thus they unified by broad
cultural similarities.
It is also believed that all these commonalities created a mode of life, or a
common identity encompassing the peoples of the North Caucasus called Gortsy or
2
the Mountaineer identity. In line with that all these peoples of the North Caucasus
defined with the general name of Mountaineer by the Russians and then it was
accepted even by themselves.
The peoples of the North Caucasus, however, had continued a life in an
atomized state. This atomized peoples and structures never felt it necessary to form
a common, comprehensive organization or the State. Until the 16
th
century tribe
was the main source of identification among the peoples of the North Caucasus and
in this period the most widespread form of settlement was a village that comprised
mainly of one tribe. This diffused structure was only strengthened the
particularistic nature of the North Caucasus.
Beyond the establishment of some loose alliances, there was no
comprehensive body or the state in the North Caucasus. Peoples continued their
lives withinin their own domains, mainly the small villages, without a need of
establishing a common organization, state, or like. Later, in time, because of the
economic and legal relationships, and of security concerns, more comprehensive
settlements, or rural communes comprised of several tribes began to form. These
bodies, however, not permanent political formations and thus did not caused the
emergence of the feeling of belonging to the same organization or the body.
The feeling of freedom, culture and the common way of life were turned
into a conscious bond by the emergence of an alien power: the Russians. By the
late 16
th
century, the North Caucasus emerged as the main target for the Russian
expansion. The Russians endeavoured to establish firm and centralised
administration, which soon caused havoc in terms of the survival of the traditional
system.
Dostları ilə paylaş: |