I
SLAMIST
R
ADICALISATION
T
HE
C
HALLENGE FOR
E
URO
-M
EDITERRANEAN
R
ELATIONS
E
DITED BY
M
ICHAEL
E
MERSON
,
K
RISTINA
K
AUSCH AND
R
ICHARD
Y
OUNGS
A
UTHORS
O
MAYMA
A
BDEL
-L
ATIF
M
URIEL
A
SSEBURG
R
UŞEN
Ç
AKIR
S
ENEM
A
YDIN
D
ÜZGIT
A
NA
E
CHAGÜE
M
ICHAEL
E
MERSON
K
HALED
A
L
-H
ASHIMI
I
BRAHIM
E
L
H
OUDAIBY
K
RISTINA
K
AUSCH
N
ONA
M
IKHELIDZE
R
OBERT
S
PRINGBORG
N
ATHALIE
T
OCCI
R
ICHARD
Y
OUNGS
C
ENTRE FOR
E
UROPEAN
P
OLICY
S
TUDIES
B
RUSSELS
FRIDE
M
ADRID
The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) is an independent policy
research institute based in Brussels. Its mission is to produce sound
analytical research leading to constructive solutions to the challenges facing
Europe today.
FRIDE is an independent European think tank based in Madrid that
provides innovative thinking on Europe’s role on the international stage; its
core research interests include democracy, human rights, peace and
security.
The views expressed in this report are those of the authors writing in
a personal capacity and do not necessarily reflect those of CEPS, FRIDE or
any other institution with which they are associated.
This study was carried out with the kind support of the Fundacion
Tres Culturas, Sevilla, and the Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid. CEPS’
programme in this area is supported by the Compagnia di San Paolo and
the Open Society Institute, which are also gratefully acknowledged.
Cover photo: Protest by the Islamic jihad in Bethlehem against the Danish
newspaper cartoons, February 2006.
ISBN 978-92-9079-865-1
© Copyright 2009, CEPS and FRIDE.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system
or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording
or otherwise – without the prior permission of the Centre for European Policy Studies and
FRIDE.
Centre for European Policy Studies
FRIDE
Place du Congrès 1, B-1000 Brussels
Calle Goya 5-7, Pasaje 2, E-28001 Madrid
Tel: 32 (0) 2 229.39.11 Fax: 32 (0) 2 219.41.51 Tel: 34 91 244 4740 Fax 34 91 244 47 41
C
ONTENTS
Preface
Richard Youngs and Michael Emerson ........................................................... i
Part I. The question
1.
Is the EU contributing to re-radicalisation?
Robert Springborg .......................................................................................... 1
Part II. Case studies in Islamist radicalisation
2.
Trends in political Islam in Egypt
Ibrahim El Houdaiby .................................................................................... 25
3.
Understanding Hamas’s radicalisation
Khaled Al-Hashimi ....................................................................................... 52
4.
Trends in Salafism
Omayma Abdel-Latif .................................................................................... 69
5.
Turkey: A sustainable case of de-radicalisation?
Senem Aydın Düzgit and Ruşen Çakır........................................................ 87
6.
The radicalisation of moderate Islamist parties: Reality or chimera?
Ana Echagüe............................................................................................... 108
Part III. European engagement?
7.
Europe’s engagement with moderate Islamists
Kristina Kausch .......................................................................................... 129
8.
How can Europe engage with Islamist movements?
Nona Mikhelidze and Nathalie Tocci ......................................................... 151
9.
Conclusions: Dynamics in political Islam and challenges for European
policies
Muriel Asseburg......................................................................................... 170
About the Authors............................................................................................ 181
| i
P
REFACE
R
ICHARD
Y
OUNGS AND
M
ICHAEL
E
MERSON
ssues relating to political Islam continue to present challenges to
European foreign policies in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).
As EU policy has sought to come to terms with such challenges during
the last decade or so political Islam itself has evolved. Experts point to the
growing complexity and variety of trends within political Islam. Some
Islamist organisations have strengthened their commitment to democratic
norms and engaged fully in peaceable, mainstream national politics. Others
remain wedded to violent means. And still others have drifted towards a
more quietist form of Islam, disengaged from political activity. Political
Islam in the MENA region presents no uniform trend to European policy-
makers.
Analytical debate has grown around the concept of ‘radicalisation’.
This in turn has spawned research on the factors driving ‘de-radicalisation’,
and conversely, ‘re-radicalisation’. Much of the complexity derives from
the widely held view that all three of these phenomena are occurring at the
same time. Even the terms themselves are contested. It has often been
pointed out that the moderate–radical dichotomy fails fully to capture the
nuances of trends within political Islam. Some analysts also complain that
talk of ‘radicalism’ is ideologically loaded. At the level of terminology, we
understand radicalisation to be associated with extremism, but views differ
over the centrality of its religious–fundamentalist versus political content,
and over whether the willingness to resort to violence is implied or not.
Such differences are reflected in the views held by the Islamists themselves,
as well as in the perceptions of outsiders.
Whatever one’s stance on such questions of terminology, it is clear
that political Islam presents dimensions that are disconcerting from the
point of view of European interests. In November 2007, we published a
I
Dostları ilə paylaş: |