Decision making using the analytic Hierarchy Process

The corrective actions:
1) improving the quality of the periodic audit of professional knowledge;
2) constant expansion of the information field;
3) individual work with specialists from the laboratory of psychophysiological examination (LPPE).
Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
ВИТИ НИЯУ МИФИ, 2021
Self-control decreasing process
Excessive arrogance
Complacency
Negation
Danger
Improving the quality of the periodic audit of professional knowledge
Constant expansion of the information field
Individual work with specialists from the LPPE
Final state
Contributing factors
Corrective actions
Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
ВИТИ НИЯУ МИФИ, 2021

Self-control decreasing	Excessive arrogance	Complacency	Negation	Danger	The geometric mean	NPV
Excessive arrogance	1	1/3	1/5	1/5	0,3398	0,06384
Complacency	3	1	1/3	1/5	0,6687	0,12564
Negation	5	3	1	1/2	1,6549	0,31092
Опасность	5	5	2	1	2,6591	0,49960
	14,000	9,333	3,533	1,900	5,3226	1,00000

Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
ВИТИ НИЯУ МИФИ, 2021

Excessive arrogance	Improving the quality of the periodic audit of professional knowledge	Constant expansion of the information field	Individual work with specialists from the LPPE	NPV
Improving the quality of the periodic audit of professional knowledge	1	5	7	0,7306
Constant expansion of the information field	1/5	1	3	0,1884
Individual work with specialists from the LPPE	1/7	1/3	1	0,0810

Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
ВИТИ НИЯУ МИФИ, 2021

Complacency	Improving the quality of the periodic audit of professional knowledge	Constant expansion of the information field	Individual work with specialists from the LPPE	NPV
Improving the quality of the periodic audit of professional knowledge	1	5	3	0,6370
Constant expansion of the information field	1/5	1	1/3	0,1047
Individual work with specialists from the LPPE	1/3	3	1	0,2583

Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
ВИТИ НИЯУ МИФИ, 2021

Negation	Improving the quality of the periodic audit of professional knowledge	Constant expansion of the information field	Individual work with specialists from the LPPE	NPV
Improving the quality of the periodic audit of professional knowledge	1	1/7	1/3	0,0810
Constant expansion of the information field	7	1	5	0,7306
Individual work with specialists from the LPPE	3	1/5	1	0,1884

Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
ВИТИ НИЯУ МИФИ, 2021

Danger	Improving the quality of the periodic audit of professional knowledge	Constant expansion of the information field	Individual work with specialists from the LPPE	NPV
Improving the quality of the periodic audit of professional knowledge	1	1/3	1/9	0,0704
Constant expansion of the information field	3	1	1/5	0,1782
Individual work with specialists from the LPPE	9	5	1	0,7514

Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
ВИТИ НИЯУ МИФИ, 2021
Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
ВИТИ НИЯУ МИФИ, 2021

0,7306	0,6370	0,0810	0,0704		0,06384		0,1870
0,1884	0,1047	0,7306	0,1782	×	0,12564	=	0,3414
0,0810	0,2583	0,1884	0,7514		0,31092		0,4716
					0,49960

Criteria priority vector
Local priority matrix of alternatives
Vector of global priorities of alternatives
Self-control decreasing
Excessive arrogance
0,06384
Complacency
0,12564
Negation
0,31092
Danger
0,49960
А1. Improving the quality of the periodic audit of professional knowledge
0,1870
А2. Constant expansion of the information field
0,3414
А3. Individual work with specialists from the LPPE
0,4716
Priorities of factors
Local priorities of alternatives by factors
Global priorities of alternatives relative to goal
А1 – 0,7306
А2 – 0,1884
А3 – 0,0910
А1 – 0,6370
А2 – 0,1047
А3 – 0,2583
А1 – 0,0810
А2 – 0,7306
А3 – 0,1884
А1 – 0,0704
А2 – 0,1782
А3 – 0,7514
Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
ВИТИ НИЯУ МИФИ, 2021
Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
ВИТИ НИЯУ МИФИ, 2021
Thanks for your attention!