Daniel Kahneman Nobel Lecture

Dulany, D. E., & Hilton, D. J. (1991). Conversational implicature, conscious representation,

and the conjunction fallacy. Social Cognition, 9, 85–110.

Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2002). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment

heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases (pp.

139–149). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American

Psychologist, 49, 709–724.

Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., Over, D. E., & Perham, N. (2002). Background beliefs in

Bayesian inference. Memory and Cognition, 30, 179–190.

Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in

judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17.

Fiske, S. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske

(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4

th

ed., Vol. 1, pp. 357–441). New York: McGraw-

Hill.

Frederick, S. W., & Fischhoff, B. (1998). Scope (in)sensitivity in elicited valuations. Risk,

Decision, and Policy, 3, 109–123.

Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations

of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 45–55.

Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond “heuristics and

biases.” In W. Stroebe & M. Hawthorne (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 2,

pp. 83–115). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Gigerenzer, G., Hell, W. & Blank, H. (1988). Presentation and content – the use of base

rates as a continuous variable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and

Performance, 14, 513–525.

Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Krueger, L. (1989). The empire

of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge

University Press.

Gilbert, D. T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social in-

ference process. In J. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 189–211).

Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107–119.

Gilbert, D. T. (2002). Inferential correction. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman

(Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp.167–184). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and Biases. New York:

Cambridge University Press.

Griffin, D. W., & Tversky, A. (1992). The weighing of evidence and the determinants of

confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 411–435.

Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable 

error, unavoidable injustice. New York: Oxford University Press.

Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal casuality. Psychological Review, 51,

358–374.

Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E.

T.  Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles

(pp.133–168). New York: Guilford Press.

Hilton, D. J., & Slugoski, B. R. (2001). Conversational processes in reasoning and explana-

tion. In A. Tesser & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology. (Vol. 1:

Intraindividual processes, pp.181–206). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

Hsee, C. K. (1998). Less is better: When low-value options are valued more highly than

high-value options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 107–121.

Hsee, C. K. (1999). Value seeking and prediction decision inconsistency: Why don’t people

take what they predict they’ll like the most? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 555–561.

Isen, A. M., Nygren, T. E., & Ashby, F. G. (1988). Influence of positive affect on the subjec-

tive utility of gains and losses: It is just not worth the risk. Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 55, 710–717.

485

---

Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from inten-

tional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.

Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Dissociating automatic and consciously controlled effects of study/test

compatibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 32–52.

Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory

and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306–340.

Johnston, W. A., Dark, V. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (1985). Perceptual fluency and recognition

judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 3–11.

Kahneman, D. (1986). Comment. In, R. G. Cummings, D. S. Brookshire & W. D. Schultze

(Eds.), Valuing Environmental Goods (pp.185–193). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld.

Kahneman, D. (1994). New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional

and Theoretical Economics, 150, 18–36. 

Kahneman, D. (2000a). A psychological point of view: Violations of rational rules as a di-

agnostic of mental processes (Commentary on Stanovich and West). Behavioral and Brain

Sciences, 23, 681–683. 

Kahneman, D. (2000b). Experienced utility and objective happiness: A moment-based ap-

proach. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp.673–692).

New York: Cambridge University Press. 

Kahneman, D. (2000c). Evaluation by moments: Past and future. In D. Kahneman and A.

Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp.693–708). New York: Cambridge University

Press. 

Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution

in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and

Biases (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press. 

Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, D. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When

more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4, 401–405.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Thaler, R. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and

status quo bias, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.

Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.

Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.

Kahneman, D., & Ritov, I. (1994). Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public

goods: A study in the headline method. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 5–38.

Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., & Schkade, D. (1999). Economic preferences or attitude expres-

sions? An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19,

220–242.

Kahneman, D., Schkade, D. A., & Sunstein, C. R. (1998). Shared outrage and erratic

awards: The psychology of punitive damages. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 16, 49–86.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics

and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representative-

ness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review,

80, 237–251. 

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk.

Econometrica, 47, 313–327.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982a). On the study of statistical intuitions. In D.

Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases

(pp.493–508). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982b). Variants of uncertainty. Cognition, 11, 143–157.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values, and frames. New York:

Cambridge University Press. 

Kahneman, D., & Varey, C. A. (1990). Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that al-

most won, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1101–1110.

Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of expe-

rienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375–405. 

486

---

Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Koehler, D. J. (1996). A strength model of probability judgments for tournaments.

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes, 66, 16–21.

Kopp, R. (1992). Why existence value should be used in cost-benefit analysis. Journal of

Policy Analysis and Management, 11, 123–130.

LeBoeuf, R. A., & Shafir, E. (2003). Deep thoughts and shallow frames: On the susceptibil-

ity to framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, in press.

List, J. (2002). Preference reversals of a different kind: The more is less phenomenon.

American Economic Review, 92, 1636–1643.

Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational

Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292.

Loewenstein, G., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological

Bulletin, 127, 267–286.

Luce, R. D., Krantz, D. H., Suppes, P., & Tversky A. (1990). Foundations of measurement (Vol.

3: Representation, axiomatization, and invariance). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

McNeil, B. J., Pauker. S. G., Sox, H. C., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of prefer-

ences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259–1262.

Mellers, B. (2000). Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psychological Bulletin,

126, 910–924.

Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate

conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12,

269–275.

Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality (T. R. Miles & E. Miles, Trans.). New York:

Basic Books.

Myers, D. G. (2002). Intuition: Its powers and perils. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics

in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 339–363.

Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (2002). The use of statistical heuristics

in everyday inductive reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.),

Heuristics and Biases (pp.510–533). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Novemsky, N., & Kronzon, S. (1999). How are base-rates used, when they are used: A com-

parison of Bayesian and additive models of base-rate use. Journal of Behavioral Decision

Making, 12, 55–69.

Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental

Psychology, 77, 353–363.

Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1970). Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental

Psychology, 83, 304–308.

Poulton, E. C. (1975). Range effects in experiments with people. American Journal of

Psychology, 77, 353–363.

Redelmeier, D., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments:

Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 66,

3–8.

Redelmeier, D. A., Katz, J., & Kahneman, D. (in press). Memories of colonoscopy: A ran-

domized trial. Pain.

Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of

categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.

Rottenstreich, Y., & Tversky, A. (1997). Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in

support theory. Psychological Review, 104, 406–415.

Schreiber, C. A., & Kahneman, D. (2000). Determinants of the remembered utility of aver-

sive sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 27–42.

Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being:

Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology, 45, 513–523.

487

---

Schwarz, N., Strack, F., & Mai, H. P. (1991). Assimilation and contrast effects in part-whole

question sequences: A conversational logic analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 3–23.

Schwarz, N., & Vaughn, L. A. (2002). The availability heuristic revisited: Ease of recall and con-

tent of recall as distinct sources of information. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman

(Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 103–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse

than others. Memory & Cognition, 21, 546–556.

Shafir, E., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2002). Rationality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 419–517.

Simon, H. A., & Hayes, J. R. (1976). Understanding process: Problem isomorphs. Cognitive

Psychology, 8, 165–190.

Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin,

119, 3–22.

Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman

(Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp.379–396). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T.

Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp.397–420).

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, S. M., & Levin, I. P. (1996). Need for cognition and choice framing effects. Journal of

Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 283–290.

Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah,

NJ: Erlbaum.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1999). Discrepancies between normative and descriptive

models of decision making and the understanding / acceptance principle. Cognitive

Psychology, 38, 349–385.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for

the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for

the rationality debate. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and 

biases (pp.421–440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Schwarz, N. (1988). Priming and communication: The social de-

terminants of information use in judgments of life-satisfaction. European Journal of Social

Psychology, 18, 429–442.

Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms

of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 437–446.

Swalm, R. O. (1966). Utility theory: Insights into risk taking. Harvard Business Review, 44,

123–136.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological

Bulletin, 76, 105–110.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and

probability, Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. 

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.

Science, 185, 1124–1131. 

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of

choice. Science, 211, 453–458.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Evidential impact of base rates. In D. Kahneman, P.

Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (pp.153–160).

New York: Cambridge University Press. 

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional vs. intuitive reasoning: The conjunction

fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293–3l5. 

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal

of Business, 59, S251–0S278.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-depen-

dent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative represen-

tation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323. 

488

---

Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994). Support theory: A nonextensional representation of

subjective probability. Psychological Review, 101, 547–567.

Wilson, T. D., Centerbar, D. B., & Brekke, N. (2002). Mental contamination and the debi-

asing problem. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases

(pp.185–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Wittreich, W. J. (1961). The Honi phenomenon: A case of selective perceptual distortion.

In F. P. Kilpatrick (Ed.), Explorations in transactional psychology (pp. 188–202). New York:

New York University Press.

Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American

Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

Zajonc, R. B. (1997). Emotions. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of

social psychology (4th Ed., Vol. 1, pp. 591–632). New York: Oxford University Press.

Zukier, H., & Pepitone, A. (1984). Social roles and strategies in prediction: Some determi-

nants in the use of base-rate information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47,

349–360.

489