21
BSQI 2000-2003: End of project report
20
BSQI 2000-2003: End of project report
Recall events (2002)
In response to feedback received from delegates, a series of nine recall events was
held in the period from January to March 2002, one in each government region.
The events were attended by 326 delegates from 285 providers. They provided an
update on the national context for the development of literacy, numeracy and ESOL
provision, an opportunity for providers to share experience of their involvement in
the BSQI to date, to review their progress and plan for further improvements in
this provision.
The programme also included presentations on the interim findings from Pathfinder
Projects, the new arrangements for inspecting literacy, numeracy and ESOL, and the
LSC approaches to quality improvement. The events were restricted to those
providers who had attended a previous BSQI residential training and development
event, and attendance was prioritised within providers’ own regions. The Adult Basic
Skills Strategy Unit provided an update on the national strategy, and received and
commented on the feedback from the group sessions.
Developing good practice events (2003)
As part of the BSQI project, the AoC was invited by the national LSC to organise a
series of one-day events in March and April 2003. These were the last events
organised under the BSQI framework, pending its re-launch as the Skills for Life
Quality Initiative. There were five events, three for work-based learning (WBL)
providers and two for adult and community learning (ACL) providers. In the
previous series of nine residentials, feedback from tutors and participants indicated
that these two groups of providers had generally a greater need than colleagues in FE
colleges for further help with quality improvement strategies.
Each event provided information about the current guidance about good practice in
literacy, numeracy and ESOL, and updates on current practice from case study
material. Each provider was asked to send one delegate, preferably from management
level, to attend. The events were planned to build on the work done during the
two-day residentials, and focused on the key theme of 'embedded' provision.
This was explored within the contexts of guidance from the inspectorate and
exemplar case studies drawn from the BSQI experience. The programme consisted of
three presentations and two group sessions.
The aims of the events were to:
■
Provide guidance on the ALI approach to inspections of literacy, numeracy
and ESOL provision in the contexts of WBL and ACL
■
Enable participants to learn from current practice through case study
presentations
■
Consider relevant published exemplar material from the BSQI
■
Share experience of effective strategies for the development of literacy, numeracy
and ESOL
One-day events
WBL providers
■
Framework requirements which often stipulated achievement of key skills at level
2 meant that providers were turning away the neediest learners because they
would not achieve or they would not be able to get funding for them
Other comments
■
Too much time spent on trying to sort out data systems and not on quality
improvement or capacity building; clarity urgently needed on funding and
coding that is easily understood by MIS managers and that is recognised by
the software used
■
Continuing concern about the tests; they are not a measure of literacy, simply a
reading test
■
Need for training in differentiation and teaching strategies
Overall
■
The BSQI had been one catalyst for change but here had also been strong
influences from the
Common Inspection Framework (CIF),
the requirement to meet
the targets, and curriculum and diagnostic assessment training
■
There was a need for a pause in the rate of change to allow providers to
consolidate what had been happening over the past 2 years
■
In later events there were also increasing comments on the following features
which could hinder the organisation’s own development work:
–
Frustration over the lack of allocation of a facilitator
–
Frustration over the delays in the delivery of assessments and materials that
backed up the learning infrastructure
–
Frustration over the delays and lack of clarity surrounding the new teacher
qualifications, in particular frustration over the withdrawal of funding for the
City & Guilds 9281 series before anything else was put in its place
at a time when the providers were planning widespread training of
vocational tutors
–
Frustration over the lack of recognition in the targets of the gains made by
learners moving through the entry level stages
–
Concern that the push for the targets will mean that learners who are not
likely to achieve one of the certificates which count towards the target will be
excluded from provision
–
Frustration that difficulties in recruiting appropriately qualified and
experienced tutors and co-ordinators were preventing the implementation of
their action plans
–
Frustration over the lack of clarity on coding and funding, particularly the
use of a single code for the whole of entry level
–
Concern about the alignment of basic and key skills