C H A P T E R 4 : R E Q U I R E D E L E M E N T S
|
69
4
Transit Oriented Development (TOD)
Cities and counties should promote more livable communities by expanding opportunities for
transit-oriented development
(TOD) so that residents minimize traffic and pollution impacts from traveling for work, shopping, school, and recreation.
TOD is defined as moderate to high-density development located within an easy walk of a major transit stop, generally with
a mix of residential, employment, and shopping opportunities. TOD encourages walking and transit use without excluding
the automobile. According to the
California Department of Transportation
, “TOD can be new construction
or redevelopment
of one or more buildings whose design and orientation facilitate transit use.” A well-designed, vibrant TOD community can
provide many benefits for local residents and businesses, as well as for the surrounding region. Compact development near
transit stops can increase transit ridership and decrease rates of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) thereby yielding a good return
on transit system investments. TOD can also provide mobility choices, increase public safety, increase disposable household
income by reducing transportation costs, reduce air pollution
and energy consumption rates, help conserve resources and
open space, assist in economic development, and increase the
housing supply. TOD is a strategy that may help a community
achieve its general plan goals related to circulation,
housing, environmental quality, and economic development.
Additionally, by improving access to jobs and housing and
revitalizing existing neighborhoods, TOD can be a tool for
promoting environmental justice.
A variety of factors need to
be considered during the development and implementation of
TOD. These factors include transit system design; community
partnerships; understanding of local real estate markets;
coordination among local, regional, and state organizations;
and providing the right mix of planning and financial
incentives and resources. A successful TOD will reinforce the
community and the transit system.
Transit operators, property
owners, and residents should be involved in the development
of TOD proposals. Planners should consult data to identify and assess potential locations for TOD during preparation of the
land use, circulation, and housing elements of the general plan. An inventory of potential development (and redevelopment)
sites within a quarter to a half mile of existing and proposed transit stops may reveal potential locations for TOD. Additional
data may be used to verify the optimum location and mix of uses to further refine the viability of TOD at specific transit hubs.
These data may include origin and destination studies, transit ridership protections, and information related to the appropriate
jobs-to-housing ratio and level of retail services. The appropriate density and intensity will support a high level of transit service.
Local governments can promote TOD through general plan policies that encourage supportive densities and designs and a mix
of land uses. TOD-supportive policies provide
for higher land use densities, reduced parking requirements, decreased automobile
traffic levels of service, and increased transit levels of service. TOD policies should facilitate a pedestrian-oriented environment
with features such as traffic calming strategies, traditional street grid patterns with smaller blocks, and architecture that orients
buildings to sidewalks, plazas, and parks rather than to parking.
Land use policies should align with other elements to provide
opportunities for innovation and co-benefits
Image by Urban Advantage, JBG Companies; Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company
C H A P T E R 4 : R E Q U I R E D E L E M E N T S
|
70
4
OPR Recommended Policies
These policies are an example of recommended policies adopted by varying jurisdictions, to be modified and used as appropriate.
A full list of recommended policies and examples can be found
here
Sample Policy
Example of Application
Relationship to Other Elements
Provide for and encourage the development of a broad range of uses in
the [city/county]’s commercial centers and
corridors that reduce the
need to travel to adjoining communities and capture a greater share of
local spending.
La Habra
Circulation, economic development, climate
change
[City, county shall] require that new neighborhoods be designed
to locate all housing within ½ mile of a central gathering place that
incorporates public spaces, shopping areas, access to transit, and/or
community-supportive facilities and services.
Sacramento
Circulation, open space,
equitable and resilient
communities, healthy communities, economic
development
[City, county shall] prioritize the provision of necessary major street
infrastructure and utility capacities for properly zoned land, consistent
with the general plan so that such land can be developed in a timely
manner to supports economic development.
Fresno
Circulation, economic development
[City, county shall] review the general plan’s residential and commer-
cial capacities every five years and modify, as necessary,
to reflect
development that has occurred, its impacts, evolving market and
economic conditions, and consistency with community values.
Pasadena
Open space, conservation, healthy communi-
ties, climate change