|
Local Area Augmentation System (laas) October 01, 2002
|
tarix | 26.08.2018 | ölçüsü | 8,25 Mb. | | #64529 |
|
Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) October 01, 2002 Steven Hodges Federal Aviation Administration
Overview Program Overview/Schedule/Airport Steve Hodges Selection Criteria Installation Plans Ray Wasilko LAAS Logistics Jim Hanrahan Concept of Operations Dieter Guenter LAAS Operational Implementation Dave Peterson
LAAS History 1992 Limited LAAS R&D Efforts Commenced (DGPS Flights at WJHTC and DCA) 1995 CAT III Feasibility Flight Tests Conducted Jan 98 First Differential GPS (SCAT I) Commissioned for CAT I Service (Part 171) Apr 99 First Two LAAS CAT I Government Industry Partnership (GIP) Agreements Signed (Honeywell, Raytheon) Apr 01 Third CAT I GIP Agreement Signed (Thales) Apr 02 CAT I RFO Released
LAAS Requirements
Architecture Considerations Service Provider Perspective Collocate as Much as Possible All Equipment on Airport Property One LAAS Serves Multiple Runway Ends) Minimize Siting Constraints - Clear Areas
- Antenna Separation
Architecture Considerations User Perspective ILS Lookalike - Accuracy (Performance Characteristics)
- Integrity (Sustain Traditional Responsibility of Service Provider)
- Minimal Change to Flight Directors/Autopilots
No Change to Aircraft Approval Process Reasonable Processing Requirements on Aircraft Minimize Number of LAAS-Dedicated Antennas (e.g., Use Existing VHF Antenna to Receive LAAS Data Broadcast) LAAS CAT I/II/III Complex Procedures
Standard Configuration Plus Options
Monitor satellite measurements Provide real time corrections and integrity information to aircraft - 3-4 reference receivers used to combine measurements for improved accuracy after integrity checks are performed.
- VHF Data broadcast to provide corrections and integrity information to aircraft
- Antenna design allows civil and military Aircraft to utilize signal
- Digital format allows multiple ground stations in close proximity to share frequency
Notify Maintenance and Air Traffic when precision approach capability is not available
To find the ideal site …
LAAS Benefits
LAAS Advocates Air Transport Association (ATA) Airlines - FedEx, UPS, UNITED, Continental, Delta
Airports - Chicago (O’Hare, Midway), Memphis, Seattle, Minneapolis,Houston, Phoenix, Juneau
Department of Defense (DoD), JPALS Boeing FAA
LAAS Development/Acquisition Phase I (April1999-September 2005) - Government Industry Partnership (GIP) to Develop Non-Fed CAT I System Under FAA Type Acceptance (TA) Process (Honeywell, Raytheon, Thales)
Phase II (September 2002-September 2005) - FAA Full-Scale Development (FSD) and Production of Fed CAT I Systems
- Development of Advanced Procedures
Phase III (October 2002-September 2004) - Research & Development (R&D) to Mitigate Technical Design Risk
LAAS GIP Concept Combines Contractor R&D Efforts and FAA’s Type Acceptance (TA) Process to Produce an FAA Certified Part 171 (“Non-Federal”) LAAS CAT I System Industry Team Responsible for Funding Design and Development Costs FAA Responsible for Providing Technical Support, Preparing Program Documentation, Test and Evaluation, Type Acceptance, Etc. FAA Supports Installation and Commissioning of GIP Systems
Current Status of GIP Efforts for CAT I LAAS 3 GIP Teams - Honeywell (Signed GIP 4/99)
- Raytheon (Signed GIP 4/99)
- Airsys ATM/Thales (Signed GIP 6/00)
Honeywell LAAS Prototypes (Beta LAAS) Installation at Partner Airports at Chicago O’Hare, Midway and Memphis, Seattle Planned this Year Raytheon Prototype (SCAT Conversion) at Salt Lake City Airsys ATM/Thales Prototype Scheduled for New Century Airport (Kansas City)
GIP Efforts for CAT I LAAS
LAAS CAT I Acquisition Strategy Leverage FAA Contract Off GIP Efforts Full and Open Competition One Vendor Complete System Design and Documentation Procure 10 Limited Rate of Initial Production System (LRIP) - FAA Support (4)
- Airports (6)
Five Years of Price Production Options (15-40 Systems/Year)
LAAS Program Status Federal Acquisition LAAS CAT I Contract Award System Specification Baselined - Final Request fro Offer (RFO) Released April 26, 2002
- Multiple Proposals Received
LAAS Business Case Developed - First Preliminary Report October 2002
- Final Report December 2003
- Technical Design and Schedule Mitigation Efforts to be Completed Over Next 2-3 Years
- JRC to Proceed to Full-Scale Development 1st Quarter FY05
LRIP Criteria and Planned Sites
LRIP Criteria and Planned Sites LRIP Site Selection Criteria - OEP Airports
- Existing GIP Installations
- AIR 21 Request/Proposal
- Diverse Geographical locations
- Diverse FAA Regions
- Diverse Siting Conditions
- Airport/Region Support
- Airline Support
- Close Proximity to Aircraft Manufacturer
- Close Proximity to Avionics Manufacturer
- Mix of Large and Small Airports, CAT I and CAT II/III Airports
- Minimal Environmental Impact Study Requirements
LAAS Business Case Objective - Update LAAS Benefit Categories (User and Service Provider)
- Address Aviation Equipage Plans for LAAS
- Update List of Airports to Receive
- LAAS Cat I and CAT II/III Systems
Schedule for Business Case - Commence June 2002
- Preliminary/Partial Report October 2002
- Preliminary/Partial Report February 2003
- Draft Final Report May 2003
- Final Report December 2003
LAAS Business Case List of Participants Air Transport Association (ATA) Airline Pilots Association (ALPA) Cargo Airline Association (CAA) Regional Airline Association (RAA) Airports Council International (ACI) American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE) Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) Helicopter Association International (HAI) National Business Aircraft Association (NBAA) General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA) FAA, Organizations Department of Defense (DoD) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Airlines Avionics Manufacturers Airports
Advanced Procedure (Curved/Segmented Approaches) According to FY02 LAAS Appropriation Language includes “LAAS Development of a Data Collection Plan and Initiation of Flight Evaluations for Development of Complex LAAS Approaches (e.g., Curved, Segmented, and Offset)” Work with Aviation Community to: - Determine Exact Industry Requirements
- Validate Industry Requirements (FAA) and Assess Feasibility for LAAS or Other Technology/Systems Providing Those Capabilities
- Develop Cost and Schedule Estimates
ATA User Group Meetings - April 2/Washington DC, April 22-23/ Memphis, July 30-31/Chicago
Coordination with AND-720 (Satellite Operational Integration Team/Dave Peterson)
LAAS CAT I Program Schedule
LAAS CAT I Program Schedule
LAAS CAT II/III R&D Schedule
LAAS Implementation Integration
Summary - Aviation Users Support Continued FAA Development of Satellite Navigation
LAAS Federal Acquisition on Schedule Remaining Issues/Concerns - Part 171 Systems Before Federal Systems
- Siting
- Take-over of part 171 Systems for FAA Maintenance
- Upgrade of Part 171 Systems to FAA Requirements
- AIP Funding
Points of Contact Gary Skillicorn Product Team Lead (202) 493-4747 Steve Hodges Program Manager (202) 267-7849 Richard Lay Technical Manager (202) 267-7768 Ray Wasilko Deployment Manager (202) 267-9432 Carlos Rodriguez GIP Team Lead (202) 493-4559 Susan Houston CAT I Acquisition Lead (202) 493-4623 Ted Urda CAT II/III Team Lead (202) 493-5197 Jim Hanrahan ATS Reqmt Team Lead/APML (202) 493-4746 Hank Cabler Flight Standards (202) 385-4598 John Kennedy NATCA LAAS Rep. (202) 385-7557 Harold Anderson AT Requirements (202) 385-7549 Dale Courtney ANI Implementation (202) 493-5172 Shayne Hallauer PASS LAAS Liaison (202) 267-8045 Dave Peterson NAS Implementation (202) 493-4742 Melvin Brown Business Manager (202) 493-5196
http://gps.faa.gov
Dostları ilə paylaş: |
|
|