52
pati semiotika, atrodo, nelabai jaudinasi dėl savo „moksliškumo“.
Ji tiesiog yra.
iš rusų kalbos vertė dalia kaladinskienĖ
Versta iš rankraščio
literatūra
anderson, myrdene, deely, John, krampen, martin, ransdell, Joseph, sebeok,
Thomas a., uexküll, Thure von 1984, „a semiotic perspective on the sciences:
steps toward a new paradigm“, Semiotica 52(1/2): 7–47.
Barthes, roland 1967, Elements of Semiology, new York: hill and Wang.
Bouissac, Paul 2010, Saussure. A Guide for the Perplexed, london: continuum.
chernov, igor 1988, „historical survey of tartu–moscow semiotic school“, in:
Broms, henri, kaufmann, rebecca (eds.), Semiotics of Culture. Proceedings of
the 25th Symposium of the Tartu–Moscow School of Semiotics, Imatra, Finland,
27th–29th July, 1987, helsinki: arator inc, 7–16.
cP = see Peirce, charles s. 1931–58.
deely, John 2001, Four Ages of Understanding. The first postmodern survey of
philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century, toronto:
univer sity of toronto Press.
deely, John 2005, Basics of Semiotics / Semiootika alused, tartu: tartu Ülikooli kir jastus.
deleuze, Gilles 2006[1986], Foucault, minneapolis: university of minnesota Press.
deleuze, Gilles, Guattari, Felix 1994[1991], What is Philosophy? new York: colum-
bia university Press.
eco, umberto 1997, „history and historiography of semiotics“, in: Semiotik: ein
Hand buch zu den zeichentheoretischen Grundlagen von Natur und Kultur =
Semiotics: a handbook on the sign-theoretic foundations of nature and culture.
Halbband 1, Berlin, new York: de Gruyter, 730–746.
Foucault, michel 2002[1966], The Order of Things, london and new York: rout ledge.
Greimas, algirdas J. 2005, Struktūrinė semantika: metodo ieškojimas, Vilnius: Baltos
lankos.
Greimas, algirdas J., courtés, Joseph 1979, Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du
langage, Paris: hachette, 1979.
hjelmslev, louis 1961[1943], Prolegomena to a Theory of Language, madison: uni-
versity of Wisconsin Press.
hubig, christoph 1990, „semiotik als objekt- und metawissenschaft: Zum wissen-
schaftstheoretishen status der semiotik“, in: koch, Walter a. (ed.), Semiotik und
Wissenschaftstheorie, Bochum: Brockmeyer, 1–12.
53
koch, Walter a. 1990, „semiotik, kultursemiotik und evolutionäre kultursemiotik als
Prototypen für die aufteilung von Wissenshaft und Wirklichkeit“, in: koch, Wal-
ter a. (ed.), Semiotik und Wissenschaftstheorie, Bochum: Brockmeyer, 118– 156.
kristeva, Julia 1969, Sèméiotikè. Recherches pour une sémanalyse, Paris: Éditions
du seuil.
lakatos, imre 1980, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (Philosophical
Papers, vol. i, Worrall, John; currie, Gregory, eds.), cambridge university Press.
locke, John 1979, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, oxford: clarendon
Press.
lotman, Jurij 2000 = Лотман, Юрий, „Люди и знаки“, in: Лотман, Юрий, Семио
сфера, С.-Петербург: Искусство–СПБ, 5–11.
lotman, mikhail 2001 = Лотман, Михаил, „Страх: семиотика культуры и фено-
менология (к постановке проблемы)“, Sign Systems Studies 29(2): 417–439.
– 2002, „atomistic versus holistic semiotics“, Sign Systems Studies 30(2): 513–527.
mamardashvili, merab 1996 = Мамардашвили, М. К., „Введение в философию“,
Не обходимость себя, Москва: Лабиринт, 7–155.
mcevoy, Paul 2001, Niels Bohr: Reflections on Subject and Object, san Francisco:
microanalytix.
Pattee, howard h. 2005, „Physics and metaphysics of biosemiotics“, Journal of
Biose miotics 1(1): 223–238.
Peirce, charles s. 1931–58, Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols. cambridge:
harvard university Press. [hartshorne, charles, Weiss, Paul (eds.), 1931–1935;
vols. 7–8. Burks, a. W. (ed.) 1958, in-text references are to cP, followed by
volume and paragraph numbers]
Peirce, charles s. 2001 = Пирс, Чарльз Сандерс 2001 [1931], Принципы филосо
фии, т. 1. Санкт-Петербург, Санкт-Петербургское философское общество.
Pietarinen, ahti-Veikko 2006, „interdisciplinarity and Peirce’s classification of the
sciences: a centennial reassessment“, Perspectives on Science 14(2): 127–152.
Ponzio, augusto, Petrilli, susan 2001, „Bioethics, semiotics of life, and global com-
munication“, Sign Systems Studies 29(1): 263–276.
Posner, roland, robering, klaus, sebeok, Thomas a. (eds.) 1997–2004, Semiotics:
A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture, 4 vols.
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
saussure, Ferdinand 1977 = Соссюр, Фердинанд де 1977 [1916], „Курс общей
лингвистики“, in: Соссюр, Фердинанд де, Труды по языкознанию, Москва,
Прогресс, 31–273.
sebeok, Thomas 1997, „What is semiotics, really?“ interview with Thomas sebeok,
Trames 1(51/46), 4: 291–305.
Tel Quel 1998[1968], „division of the assembly“, in: French, Patrick, lack, roland-
Francois (eds.), The Tel Quel Reader, london: routledge, 21–24.
54
todorov, tzvetan 1984[1977], Theories of the Symbol, ithaca: cornell university Press.
todorov, tzvetan 1999 = Тодоров, Цветан 1999 [1977], Теория символа, Москва:
Дом интеллектуальной книги.
Vehkavaara, tommi 2002, „Why and how to naturalize semiotic concepts for biose-
miotics“, Sign Systems Studies 30(1): 293–313.
Weber, andreas 2002, „Feeling the signs: The origins of meaning in the biological
philosophy of susanne k. langer and hans Jonas“, Sign Systems Studies 30(1):
183–200.
iš rusų kalbos vertė dalia kaladinskienĖ
Versta iš rankraščio