Preface to the lecture, 1

630

 

Epilogue

 

 

Fig. 30.12:     Derivations of postulates and axioms (part 1).

 

---

Epilogue_____________________________________________________________ 631

 

Be that as it may, the approaches and derivations contained in my collection of material 

are considered to be controversial, and that is good that way! The public takes notice and 

professional circles are occupied with the ideas. With that half the way to success already 

is brought off! It now concerns to knock off all points for their soundness individually, 

because the next step will be to search a way to the goal as unassailable as possible, which 

is able to convince also the biggest sceptic. The final version, which then should appear in 

accredited peer-reviewed journals and in a scientific book concerning the theory of 

objectivity, goes in this direction. From the numerous approaches in the end only one will 

be used, and from the countless, in the collection of material listed aspects only the 

noncontentious ones will remain.

 

The dispute, which in the current stage can't be avoided, yes even is desired, however 

shouldn't deceive about the fact that it here doesn't concern persons, improper vanity or 

some image cultivation, but simply and solely concerns the matter!

 

In fig. 30.12 and 30.13 is represented, what it concerns. Field physics and quantum 

physics don't form, as in common practise, an insurmountable opposite, but even 

complement each other! Below the stripline a little selection of the today in current use 

quantum physical postulates can be found. The number of newly introduced ,,constants of 

nature" and postulates permanently is increasing, a circumstance, which hardly can be 

mediated to the common sense. The bracket is missing, which interlinks all postulates, or 

the common source from which they can be derived causally.

 

In the progress of the three-part edition in this question, essential for physics, already a 

satisfying and in addition real efficient answer has been found in the domain of field 

physics. The coupling marked by individual derivations can be found above the stripline 

and it is entirely new, apart from the dashed indicated derivation (fig. 30.13), as given by 

Prof. Bosse (TU Darmstadt) in his textbook.

 

An approach in principle can be chosen freely. In the case of the superordinated field 

theory two equations of transformation form the approach, which already is laid down in 

textbooks and secured experimentally. That's why the whole field theoretical derivation 

manages without one postulate! It is pointed to the fact that these equations on their part 

can't be derived and should be interpreted rather philosophically than physically. 

From this approach the extended field theory is derived directly, without a need to add or 

discard a term. The extended field theory consists of the well-known law of Ampere 

extended with the dielectric displacement D by Maxwell, and of Faraday's law of 

induction, which experiences an extension with the vector of potential density b by means 

of the derivation. Doing so we assume that the field pointers of the electric and the 

magnetic field strength depend on the spatial coordinate r and through this indirectly also 

on the time t: E(r(t)), H(r(t)).

 

---

632

 

Epilogue

 

 

Fig. 30.13:     Derivations of postulates and axioms (part 2). 

---

Epilogue__________________________     ______________      ___________         633

 

If the somewhat more general case is counted up, in which case apart from the spatial a 

direct temporal dependency is present (E(r,t) and H(r,t)). then further additional terms 

appear in addition to the extended field equations, which need an explanation also for the 

case that they are zero. The physical interpretation would implicate a longer treatise, 

which however can be circumvented, as shown here, by constraining the field pointers, 

which absolutely is allowed according to the slogan: for the case E(r(t)) and H(r(t)) 

chosen from many possibilities the extended field equations come out exactly in the form, 

as they are required and suitable for the further calculations. Who has got to calculate 

other cases, can do that as he likes, but doing so he should not get lost. 

Maxwell's field equations are contained in the solution and with that also continue to be 

valid. Their disadvantage however is that without the extension b not a single quantum 

physical postulate can be derived. If we add this extension and insert the equations into 

each other without addition and without cuts also this time a central solution is the result, 

which is called fundamental field equation.

 

The derivation is known as well from the Maxwell theory, in which case it is common 

practise, to use the general approach (E(r,t) and H(r,t)), what we in accordance with the 

textbooks can do in the same manner. The extension however brings two additional and 

extremely significant terms. Since the fundamental field equation has eigenvalues under 

certain boundary conditions and describes structures, various quantum postulates come out 

from it, from the quantum properties of the elementary particles over the Schrodinger 

equation and the inhomogeneous Laplace equation up to the derivation of the Golden 

Proportion. That justifies the assumption that this possibly is the long sought-for world 

equation! 

Even I, as the initiator, was totally surprised by the found derivation of the most important 

quantum physical postulates and axioms. One just is doing it the right way and already 

everything fits together! I am not aware of any theory, which would be able to achieve 

something roughly comparable. The since long sought-for ,,Theory of Everything", the 

big unification theory really falls into ones lap. The known interactions are the free and 

easy result of analysing the field lines of electric and magnetic field strength (fig. 30.12). 

Physical phenomena, which until now were considered to be incompatible, like e.g. 

waves, noise or the temperature with the utterly insufficient concepts of the mechanisms 

for the conversion of one form of energy into another, can be represented consistently with 

the fundamental field equation as the rolling up of a wavelike field oscillation to a vortex 

oscillation and as conversion of the noise vortices in the case of a vortex contraction down 

to atomic dimensions as thermal oscillation, which we treat as vortex losses. 

There exists no alternative to such unified schemes of things, as makes it possible in 

abundance the theory that I have founded, considering the two conditions, that on the one 

hand in the case of the derivation only known regularities are used, by completely doing 

without postulates and that on the other hand laws are applied and adhered to, also 

physical laws.

 

The new schemes of things, which sound unfamiliar, thus already were contained in the 

laws of physics. After this now having been realized, the tables turn. Now the explanations 

by postulates, as they at the moment still are being taught, should be replaced by the 

newly derived ones, if one doesn't want to become a breaker of the law! There doesn't 

lead a way past the overdue reform of physics anymore.

 

---