Course Goal: Multidisciplinary learning and entrepreneurship Micro/nanotechnology



Yüklə 461 b.
tarix11.06.2018
ölçüsü461 b.
#47888



Course Goal: Multidisciplinary learning and entrepreneurship

  • Micro/nanotechnology

    • Scaling laws
    • Transduction mechanisms
  • Design/manufacturing

    • Processes and tolerances
    • Material selection and limitations
    • Innovation
  • Biomedical device engineering

    • Biocompatibility
    • Safety/Ethics
  • Multidisciplinary language



Course Structure: project based course

  • Two quarter sequence

    • Spring
      • Predesigned masks, device and process
      • Lab teams assigned for diversity of majors and backgrounds
      • Qualify on equipment in Stanford Nanofab
    • Summer
      • Defined projects with partners (design starts early May)
      • Complete design, fabricate, and test cycle
  • Partners

    • Internal research collaboration needs (e.g. Cardiology, Material Science, Cell Physiology)
    • Industry defined challenges (e.g. Intel, Honeywell)


AIM Course Development Funding

  • $10,000 grant to help start this course

    • Winter quarter TA support to debug the process and prepare course materials
    • Prototyping supplies (wafers, masks, etc.)
    • Thank you!
  • I gratefully acknowledged assistance this quarter that also came from:

    • Nu Ions: donation of ion implant service for course
    • Center for Integrated Systems: new user grants to fund team clean room charges
  • Goal is self-sustaining course model



Day 1

  • About 70 students attended the first class

  • 20 students were admitted based on questionnaires of background and interests

  • 4 teams of 5 (max. capacity this year) formed with at least 1 EE, 1 Med/Phys/Chem/MSE, and 2-3 ME students (will cross-list in EE, not advertised this time)

  • 1 team of 5 “overqualified” applicants accepted to audit A and participate fully in B

  • Very tough to turn students away, an exciting amount of interest in microfabricated solutions for new areas of research exists at Stanford



Week 1

  • Safety training sessions for all new students to obtain clean room access

  • Safety tours of SNF (Stanford NanoFab Facility)

  • Written safety test

  • Cleanliness training

  • Instill sense of MEMS/clean room community



Week 2-6: Processing

  • Fabrication in earnest under wing of senior MEMS research students for 4 weeks

  • Incredible SNF staff support to ensure thorough qualification of students as users

  • 2 weeks and 2 masks as independent users (with support net of teaching team)

  • Analysis/simulation in parallel with fabrication

  • Week 7-9: Measurements

  • Package, test, signal condition and calibrate

  • Compare theory and experiment





Background for Project

  • Sensors designed as part of a MEMS based system for force-displacement measurements of electrical microcontacts

  • Sensors originally incorporated gold contact pad at tip to study thin gold films as MEMS/micro-electrical contacts



MicroContact example under study: Formfactor MicroSpringTM Interconnects

  • 1st and 2nd level interconnect

    • pressure connection from the die to the printed circuit board, e.g. 2-sided memory module


Trends and opportunities: Separable Contacts for Packaging, Testing, Switching

  • Shrinking interconnect pitch and size

    • Smaller probes for test
    • Smaller off-chip interconnects
  • Thinner wafers and organic dielectrics

    • Low force probing
    • Thinner metal stackups
  • To support continued miniaturization need low force, small size, and low contact resistance



Design of Contact Characterization Sensors

  • Measurement over 6! orders of magnitude (2 designs)

  • Fabrication of thin film metals in-situ with standard processing (evaporated, sputtered, plated)

  • 4-wire contact resistance measurement

  • Measure force and contact resistance simultaneously



Complete Experimental Setup: Force-Displacement Contact Measurements



Design

  • Cantilever Beam

    • Equivalent spring constant, K (N/m)
  • Goal: maximize range and sensitivity

  • Constraints

    • 100 micron travel in 5nm steps (actuator selection)


Design Space



Design Space



Comparison to AFM cantilever



Cantilever Fabrication (omit gold pads!)



Processing: alignment



Processing: protective oxide



Processing: piezoresistors



Processing: conductors



Processing: oxide/anneal



Processing: contacts



Processing: DRIE



Cantilever Fabrication (shown w/ gold)



Cantilever SEM



ME342 Cantilevers-7 Masks, no Gold

  • Mask Levels 1-3 completed by TA’s

  • Team Processing Mask Levels 4-7

    • Complete in Labs 2-6 plus some time outside of lab for levels 6 and 7
    • Qualify individually on wetbenches, litho, DRIE during labs of ME342
    • Note: team stuck at mask 5 until all team members qualify on required equipment!


ME342 Processing

  • Each team completes processing with same mask set

  • Each team has 5-6 wafers to process

    • 2 SOI wafers fully released by DRIE (300µm)
    • 3 test wafers partially processed (Noise only)
  • Sensor measurements, 2 die per person

    • Packaging and Signal Conditioning
    • Testing and Measurements (Sensitivity & Noise)
  • Analysis



Interconnect Levels: wire bonding to dip package



Cantilever Calibration

  • Piezoresistor Bridge Voltage vs. Displacement

    • Measure at resonant frequency of cantilever
    • Typical sensitivity ~ 1mV/µm
  • Noise spectrum of piezoresistor

    • < 0.1µV/Hz or ~80pN/  Hz at 1Hz


Cantilever Calibration: time & frequency



ME342A Analysis

  • Simulate piezoresistor values (TSUPREM4)

    • Each wafer receives different dose/anneal set, each student assigned a particular wafer to analyze
  • Predict spring constant and gage factor

  • Determine sensitivity and noise of cantilevers

    • compare analysis by beam equations and noise characteristics to measurements
  • Comparisons and Conclusions

    • 15 min. talk 6/3, short report of results


ME342B Design Projects

  • Project and team assignments early May

  • Initial designs due end of May

  • Mask designs must be submitted before start of summer quarter!

  • Processing and testing completed in ME342B

  • Seminars, team meetings and lots of lab time in summer quarter

  • Project results = Conference papers???

    • e.g. MEMS’05, ASME’05, send 1 author per paper


Potential Projects for ME342B 2004

  • Radial 100% strain gage for measuring deformation in animal model blood vessels, e.g. rat aorta (Taylor, ME/cardiology)

  • Integrated touch sensitivity system for neurological examination (Goodman, molecular & cell physiology)

  • Out-of-plane actuated stage (Intel mirror steering)

  • Active thermal isolation package (Honeywell chip scale atomic clock)

  • Implanted piezoresistor design rule formulation (Pruitt)

  • Optimization of miniature blood pressure sensor sensitivity by process and geometry (Feinstein, pediatric cardiology)

  • Coupled beam microresonators for molecular assay (Melosh, MSE)



9 weeks to go and the whole Summer!

  • A class full of enthusiasm

  • The best teaching assistants anyone one could ask for

  • A supportive clean room environment and technical staff

  • A rich tradition of innovation in manufacturing and design

  • Cool projects inspired by local industry and my Bio-X collaborators



Thank you AIM for your help and support!

  • 2004-2005 MEMS projects wanted!

  • Team of 3-4 multidisciplinary students May plus summer

  • Innovative ideas, unique facilities, excellent coaching from faculty and industry

  • Projects on the margin, something a company would like to try or know if it works but doesn’t have manpower, expertise, or resources for it



Yüklə 461 b.

Dostları ilə paylaş:




Verilənlər bazası müəlliflik hüququ ilə müdafiə olunur ©www.genderi.org 2024
rəhbərliyinə müraciət

    Ana səhifə